pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.27969 · v1 · pith:HXBTVX3Enew · submitted 2026-06-26 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA · astro-ph.EP· astro-ph.SR

Formation of Isotopically Heterogeneous Molecular Cloud Cores in Filamentary Molecular Clouds

Yoshiaki Misugi , Shu-ichiro Inutsuka , Taishi Nakamoto , Tetsuya Yokoyama This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 03:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.EPastro-ph.SR
keywords isotopic inhomogeneitymolecular cloud filamentscore formationsmoothed particle hydrodynamicsstar formationmeteoritescircumstellar disksturbulence
0
0 comments X

The pith

Isotopic inhomogeneities from molecular cloud filaments persist through core formation and may survive into circumstellar disks.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that isotopic variations along filamentary molecular clouds evolve during fragmentation into dense cores but are not fully erased by mixing. Simulations demonstrate that filament geometry makes longitudinal isotopic differences more influential than minor-axis ones, leaving cores with residual inhomogeneities at 1-10 percent of the maximum possible level after a hundredfold reduction from the initial one-parsec scale. This connects directly to meteorite evidence of isotopic differences in early solar system solids, offering a cloud-origin explanation rather than requiring all variation to arise later. If the residuals reach the disk stage, the parental cloud structure sets part of the isotopic inventory available for planet formation.

Core claim

Simulations of filament fragmentation with initial isotopic ratio variations show that the effect along the filament's longitudinal axis exceeds that along the minor axis due to geometry. Inhomogeneities remain in the resulting cores at levels reduced by a factor of 100 from the initial filament scale, amounting to 1-10 percent of the maximum ratio acquirable by each core. Shell inhomogeneities arise from initial center-of-mass differences driven by the turbulent velocity field, and the model indicates that such inhomogeneity can survive even in the circumstellar disk.

What carries the argument

Smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulations of filament fragmentation with imposed initial isotopic ratio variations along the filament length and a turbulent velocity field.

If this is right

  • Filament geometry causes longitudinal isotopic variations to dominate over minor-axis variations in the formed cores.
  • Initial inhomogeneities are reduced by a factor of 100 yet persist at 1-10 percent of the maximum ratio the core can acquire from the filament.
  • Isotopic differences in shells trace to initial center-of-mass offsets induced by the turbulent velocity field.
  • Isotopic inhomogeneity inherited from the parental filament can remain present in the circumstellar disk.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Meteoritic isotopic anomalies in CAIs could trace directly to filament-scale structures in the parent cloud rather than being generated entirely during disk evolution.
  • Observations of isotopic ratios in Class 0/I disks could reveal inherited variations whose amplitude matches the simulated residual levels.
  • Different turbulent environments across molecular clouds would be expected to produce a range of isotopic heterogeneity in the resulting planetary systems.

Load-bearing premise

The simulations assume that the chosen initial isotopic ratio variations along the filament and the turbulent velocity field accurately represent real molecular clouds and that the SPH method captures physical mixing without dominant numerical artifacts.

What would settle it

High-resolution isotopic mapping of a sample of young circumstellar disks that shows either complete erasure of variations or levels far below the simulated 1-10 percent retention would falsify the survival claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.27969 by Shu-ichiro Inutsuka, Taishi Nakamoto, Tetsuya Yokoyama, Yoshiaki Misugi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Distribution of the density ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Internal profile of the isotopic ratio in the case of the model M z. The vertical axis is the difference between the average isotopic ratio of the shell and that of the core center (see Equation 4). The horizontal axis is the distance from the density peak. The red and black solid lines are the profile in the case of the hydrodynamics and B = 10 µG, respectively. The profiles are averaged over 40 cores ide… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Comparison of the internal profile of the isotopic ratio. The blue, green, and brown lines are the results of the models of M z, M x, and M y, respectively (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: SPH particles of each shell at the final state (a) and at the initial state (b). The sizes of the shells are 0.1, 0.05, and 0.03 pc from the outer to the inner regions. where rfin,ref = 10−4 pc. We confirmed that |∆C(r)| does not change even if we choose a smaller rfin,ref. The profile is averaged over all 40 cores [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Difference of the center-of-mass of each shell at the initial state. The blue, green, and brown lines represent the difference of the center-of-mass along the z, x, and y-axes, respectively. The solid and dashed lines are the results of the B0 = 10µG and hydrodynamic cases, respectively. 3.3. Effect of the Isotopic Ratio Variation along the Minor Axis of the Filament In Section 3.2, we focused on the resul… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) Isotopic ratio at the final state normalized by the maximum isotopic ratio that the shell can acquire at the initial state. The blue, green, and brown lines are the results of the models M z, M x, and M y, respectively. |∆Cini,max| is estimated using the shell size shown in panel (b). The blue, green, and brown lines in panel (b) represent the shell size along the z-, x-, and y-axes, respectively. For … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: p Comparison of the semi-analytical estimate and simulation results. The blue solid line represents to ∆zfin ≡ ⟨|δzfin| 2⟩ (a), ∆zini ≡ p ⟨|δzini| 2⟩ (b), and ∆C ≡ ∆zini/1.6 (c). The blue-shaded regions correspond to the regions within a factor of 2 of the semi-analytical model. 4. DISCUSSION 4.1. Semi-Analytical Estimate of the Isotopic Inhomogeneity of Cores In Section 3, we discussed the isotopic ratio … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Distribution of the SPH particles with rcf = 180-210 AU (a) and rcf = 360-400 AU (b) (Equation 13). The color represents the isotopic ratio of the SPH particle. The black arrow represents the rotation direction of the core at a radius of 0.1 pc. 102 103 rcf [AU] 10−3 10−2 10−1 |∆ C| 10 µG Hydro z x y [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Profile of the isotopic ratio in the protoplanetary disks. The horizontal axis is the centrifugal radius estimated from Equation 13. The profile is derived using the results at the final state of our simulations. solenoidal mode dominates the turbulent velocity field in the molecular cloud and the resultant forcing parameter b = 0.39. We also measure σd in our simulations and the resultant forcing paramete… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Ratio of the dispersion of the isotopic ratio (Equation 14) to the average difference of isotopic ratio between shells. In section 3, we discussed the isotopic heterogeneity of the molecular cloud cores by assuming the initial isotopic profile in the filament. However, since the planets are thought to form in the circumstellar disk, the isotopic hetero￾geneity of the circumstellar disk should be investiga… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Profile of the isotopic ratio in the protoplanetary disks. The horizontal axis is the centrifugal radius estimated from Equation C9 . The profile is derived using the results at the final state of our simulations in (a) hydrodynamic and (b) B0 = 10µG cases Using Equations B1, B4 and the mass conservation, we can derive the following equation: ξ ′3 ini 1 + ξ ′2 ini = 4.8 far r ′0.74 fin . (B5) The solution… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Meteorite analysis shows that the older solids of the solar system, such as the calcium-aluminum-rich inclusions (CAIs), have isotopic inhomogeneity. This indicates that the isotopic inhomogeneity could originate from parental molecular clouds. We investigate the evolution of the isotopically heterogeneous molecular cloud cores formed from filament fragmentation using the smoothed particle hydrodynamics method. We show that the effect of the variation of isotopic ratio along the minor axes of the filament is smaller than that along the longitudinal axis of the filament due to the filament geometry. Our results also suggest that isotopic inhomogeneities remain in the resulting cores, although the amounts of initial inhomogeneities are reduced by a factor of 100 from those over the initial filament length of 1 pc. This fraction corresponds to 1-10% of the maximum isotopic ratio that the core can acquire from the filament in each model. The origin of the isotopic inhomogeneity of the shells could be attributed to the initial difference in the center-of-mass of shells caused by the turbulent velocity field. Our model indicates that the isotopic inhomogeneity could survive even in the circumstellar disk.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper presents SPH simulations of the fragmentation of a 1-pc filamentary molecular cloud initialized with longitudinal isotopic ratio variations and turbulence. It reports that the initial inhomogeneities are reduced by a factor of ~100 in the resulting cores while persisting at 1-10% of the maximum possible core value, attributes shell inhomogeneity to center-of-mass offsets from the turbulent velocity field, and concludes that the isotopic inhomogeneity could survive into circumstellar disks.

Significance. If the quantitative persistence levels prove robust, the work supplies a concrete hydrodynamical pathway linking observed meteoritic isotopic heterogeneity (e.g., in CAIs) to primordial molecular-cloud structure, using forward simulations that avoid circular fitting and generate falsifiable predictions for core-scale isotopic maps.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that 'the isotopic inhomogeneity could survive even in the circumstellar disk' is an extrapolation; the reported SPH runs evolve only the filament-to-core fragmentation stage and contain no protostellar collapse, accretion, or disk-formation calculations that would be required to test survival through later mixing or shocks.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the specific reduction factor of ~100 and the 1-10% persistence range are presented without any accompanying resolution study, convergence test, or parameter sweep on initial amplitude, turbulent driving, or SPH artificial viscosity; these omissions leave the central quantitative claim dependent on unverified numerical fidelity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. We respond to each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that 'the isotopic inhomogeneity could survive even in the circumstellar disk' is an extrapolation; the reported SPH runs evolve only the filament-to-core fragmentation stage and contain no protostellar collapse, accretion, or disk-formation calculations that would be required to test survival through later mixing or shocks.

    Authors: We agree that the simulations are limited to the filament-to-core stage and do not model protostellar collapse or disk formation. The abstract uses the cautious phrasing 'could survive' to indicate a possible implication from the core-stage persistence rather than a tested result. We will revise the abstract and conclusion to explicitly note this as an extrapolation and state that dedicated simulations of later evolutionary stages are required to assess survival through mixing or shocks. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the specific reduction factor of ~100 and the 1-10% persistence range are presented without any accompanying resolution study, convergence test, or parameter sweep on initial amplitude, turbulent driving, or SPH artificial viscosity; these omissions leave the central quantitative claim dependent on unverified numerical fidelity.

    Authors: The referee correctly notes the absence of an explicit resolution study or parameter sweep. The quoted reduction factor and persistence range are measured directly from the suite of SPH runs performed at the resolution and with the turbulent driving and viscosity settings described in the methods. We will add a dedicated paragraph in the revised manuscript discussing the adopted numerical parameters, the rationale for the chosen resolution, and the potential sensitivity to artificial viscosity, while acknowledging the lack of a full convergence test as a limitation of the present work. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; results are direct outputs of forward SPH simulations with stated initial conditions

full rationale

The paper initializes filaments with explicit isotopic ratio variations along longitudinal and minor axes plus a turbulent velocity field, then evolves them via SPH to core formation. Reported outcomes (inhomogeneity reduced by factor ~100 yet persisting at 1-10% levels, shell offsets from center-of-mass differences) are numerical results of that evolution, not quantities fitted to data and relabeled as predictions, nor self-defined via the target result. No equations reduce the final inhomogeneity to the inputs by algebraic construction. The disk-survival remark is an untested extrapolation, but that is a scope limitation rather than circularity. No self-citation chains, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes imported from prior author work appear as load-bearing steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides insufficient detail to enumerate specific free parameters or ad-hoc assumptions; the claim rests on standard hydrodynamical methods and unspecified initial isotopic and velocity fields.

free parameters (1)
  • initial isotopic ratio variation amplitude and distribution
    The reported reduction factor and persistence percentages depend on the chosen initial inhomogeneities along the filament, whose specific values are not stated in the abstract.
axioms (1)
  • standard math Smoothed particle hydrodynamics accurately models compressible, self-gravitating astrophysical flows with mixing
    The entire set of results is obtained via SPH; this is an established but unverified assumption for the specific mixing and fragmentation regime in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5747 in / 1294 out tokens · 58457 ms · 2026-06-29T03:36:42.669355+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2021, ApJ, 916, 83, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac07a1

    Abe, D., Inoue, T., Inutsuka, S.-i., & Matsumoto, T. 2021, ApJ, 916, 83, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac07a1

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac07a1 2021

  2. [2]

    Abramowitz, M., & Stegun, I. A. 1965, Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables 17 Andr´ e, P., Di Francesco, J., Ward-Thompson, D., et al. 2014, in Protostars and Planets VI, ed. H. Beuther, R. S

    1965

  3. [3]

    Klessen, C. P. Dullemond, & T. Henning, 27–51, doi: 10.2458/azu uapress 9780816531240-ch002

    work page doi:10.2458/azu

  4. [4]

    2013, A&A, 553, A119, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220822

    Arzoumanian, D., Andr´ e, P., Peretto, N., & K¨ onyves, V. 2013, A&A, 553, A119, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220822

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220822 2013

  5. [5]

    2011, A&A, 529, L6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201116596

    Arzoumanian, D., Andr´ e, P., Didelon, P., et al. 2011, A&A, 529, L6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201116596

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201116596 2011

  6. [6]

    2019, A&A, 621, A42, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201832725

    Arzoumanian, D., Andr´ e, P., K¨ onyves, V., et al. 2019, A&A, 621, A42, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201832725

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201832725 2019

  7. [7]

    2022, A&A, 660, A56, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141699

    Arzoumanian, D., Russeil, D., Zavagno, A., et al. 2022, A&A, 660, A56, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141699

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141699 2022

  8. [8]

    L., Sacarabany, A., et al

    Dauphas, N., Cook, D. L., Sacarabany, A., et al. 2008, ApJ, 686, 560, doi: 10.1086/589959

    work page doi:10.1086/589959 2008

  9. [9]

    2002, ApJ, 565, 640, doi: 10.1086/324597

    Dauphas, N., Marty, B., & Reisberg, L. 2002, ApJ, 565, 640, doi: 10.1086/324597

    work page doi:10.1086/324597 2002

  10. [10]

    2016, Annual Review of Earth and Plaentary Sciences, 44, 709, doi: 10.1146/annurev-earth-060115-012157

    Dauphas, N., & Schauble, Edwin, A. 2016, Annual Review of Earth and Plaentary Sciences, 44, 709, doi: 10.1146/annurev-earth-060115-012157

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-earth-060115-012157 2016

  11. [11]

    C., Lugaro, M., & Sch¨ onb¨ achler, M

    Ek, M., Hunt, T. C., Lugaro, M., & Sch¨ onb¨ achler, M. 2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 273, doi: 10.1038/s41550-019-0948-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0948-z 2020

  12. [12]

    S., Schmidt, W., & Mac Low, M

    Federrath, C., Roman-Duval, J., Klessen, R. S., Schmidt, W., & Mac Low, M. M. 2010, A&A, 512, A81, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912437

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912437 2010

  13. [13]

    2009, ApJL, 694, L1, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/694/1/L1

    Gounelle, M., Meibom, A., Hennebelle, P., & Inutsuka, S.-i. 2009, ApJL, 694, L1, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/694/1/L1

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/694/1/l1 2009

  14. [14]

    2016, A&A, 587, A97, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526015

    Alves, J. 2016, A&A, 587, A97, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526015

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526015 2016

  15. [15]

    2011, A&A, 533, A34, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117039

    Hacar, A., & Tafalla, M. 2011, A&A, 533, A34, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117039

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117039 2011

  16. [16]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 2020

  17. [17]

    M., & Hartmann, L

    Heitsch, F., Stone, J. M., & Hartmann, L. W. 2009, ApJ, 695, 248, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/695/1/248

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/695/1/248 2009

  18. [18]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    work page doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 2007

  19. [19]

    2008, ApJ, 687, 303, doi: 10.1086/590528 —

    Inoue, T., & Inutsuka, S.-i. 2008, ApJ, 687, 303, doi: 10.1086/590528 —. 2009, ApJ, 704, 161, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/704/1/161 —. 2012, ApJ, 759, 35, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/759/1/35

    work page doi:10.1086/590528 2008

  20. [20]

    2001, ApJL, 559, L149, doi: 10.1086/323786

    Inutsuka, S. 2001, ApJL, 559, L149, doi: 10.1086/323786

    work page doi:10.1086/323786 2001

  21. [21]

    Inutsuka, S., & Miyama, S. M. 1992, ApJ, 388, 392, doi: 10.1086/171162

    work page doi:10.1086/171162 1992

  22. [22]

    2015, A&A, 580, A49, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201425584

    Inutsuka, S.-i., Inoue, T., Iwasaki, K., & Hosokawa, T. 2015, A&A, 580, A49, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201425584

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425584 2015

  23. [23]

    M., Langer, N., & Kramer, M

    Iwasaki, K., & Inutsuka, S. 2011, MNRAS, 418, 1668, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19588.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19588.x 2011

  24. [24]

    2013, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Iwasaki, K., & Inutsuka, S. 2013, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 474, Numerical Modeling of Space Plasma Flows (ASTRONUM2012), ed. N. V. Pogorelov, E. Audit, & G. P. Zank, 239

    2013

  25. [25]

    2019, ApJ, 873, 6, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab02ff

    Iwasaki, K., Tomida, K., Inoue, T., & Inutsuka, S.-i. 2019, ApJ, 873, 6, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab02ff

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab02ff 2019

  26. [26]

    2016, PASJ, 68, 54, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psw053

    Iwasawa, M., Tanikawa, A., Hosono, N., et al. 2016, PASJ, 68, 54, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psw053

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psw053 2016

  27. [27]

    C., Chaussidon, M., & Charnoz, S

    Jacquet, E., Pignatale, F. C., Chaussidon, M., & Charnoz, S. 2019, ApJ, 884, 11, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab38c1

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab38c1 2019

  28. [28]

    2005, ApJL, 630, L45, doi: 10.1086/491600

    Kim, J., & Ryu, D. 2005, ApJL, 630, L45, doi: 10.1086/491600

    work page doi:10.1086/491600 2005

  29. [29]

    2022, ApJ, 930, 76, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5a54 K¨ onyves, V., Andr´ e, P., Men’shchikov, A., et al

    Nakatsugawa, H. 2022, ApJ, 930, 76, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5a54 K¨ onyves, V., Andr´ e, P., Men’shchikov, A., et al. 2015, A&A, 584, A91, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201525861 K¨ ortgen, B., & Banerjee, R. 2015, MNRAS, 451, 3340, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1200

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac5a54 2022

  30. [30]

    Kuffmeier, M., Calcutt, H., & Kristensen, L. E. 2019, A&A, 628, A112, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935504

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935504 2019

  31. [31]

    Larson, R. B. 1969, MNRAS, 145, 271, doi: 10.1093/mnras/145.3.271

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/145.3.271 1969

  32. [32]

    2024, ApJ, 963, 106, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1990

    Misugi, Y., Inutsuka, S., Arzoumanian, D., & Tsukamoto, Y. 2024, ApJ, 963, 106, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1990

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad1990 2024

  33. [33]

    2019, ApJ, 881, 11, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2382

    Misugi, Y., Inutsuka, S.-i., & Arzoumanian, D. 2019, ApJ, 881, 11, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2382

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab2382 2019

  34. [34]

    2022, MNRAS, 514, 105, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1012

    Pan, L., Ju, W., & Chen, J.-H. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 105, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1012

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1012 2022

  35. [35]

    2016, ApJ, 825, 30, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/825/1/30

    Pan, L., Padoan, P., Haugbølle, T., & Nordlund, ˚A. 2016, ApJ, 825, 30, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/825/1/30

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/825/1/30 2016

  36. [36]

    Penston, M. V. 1969, MNRAS, 144, 425, doi: 10.1093/mnras/144.4.425

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/144.4.425 1969

  37. [37]

    E., Segura-Cox, D., Caselli, P., et al

    Pineda, J. E., Segura-Cox, D., Caselli, P., et al. 2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 1158, doi: 10.1038/s41550-020-1150-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-020-1150-z 2020

  38. [38]

    E., Arzoumanian, D., Andre, P., et al

    Pineda, J. E., Arzoumanian, D., Andre, P., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka, Y. Aikawa, T. Muto, K. Tomida, & M. Tamura, 233, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2205.03935

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.03935 2023

  39. [39]

    2015, A&A, 584, A111, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526431

    Roy, A., Andr´ e, P., Arzoumanian, D., et al. 2015, A&A, 584, A111, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526431

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526431 2015

  40. [40]

    2024, ApJ, 963, 20, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad187a

    Takaishi, D., Tsukamoto, Y., Kido, M., et al. 2024, ApJ, 963, 20, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad187a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad187a 2024

  41. [41]

    2009, Science, 324, 374, doi: 10.1126/science.1168221

    Trinquier, A., Elliot, T., Ulfbeck, D., et al. 2009, Science, 324, 374, doi: 10.1126/science.1168221

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1168221 2009

  42. [42]

    2016, A&A, 587, A76, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527325 18 van Loo, S., Falle, S

    Valdivia, V., Hennebelle, P., G´ erin, M., & Lesaffre, P. 2016, A&A, 587, A76, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527325 18 van Loo, S., Falle, S. A. E. G., Hartquist, T. W., & Moore, T. J. T. 2007, A&A, 471, 213, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20077430

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527325 2016