Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

NoisyEQA: Benchmarking Embodied Question Answering Against Noisy Queries

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.10726 v1 pith:IBROWF3S submitted 2024-12-14 cs.CV cs.AIcs.LGcs.RO

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.LGcs.RO
keywords noiseagentquestionsagentsansweringbenchmarkcontainembodied
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The rapid advancement of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) has significantly advanced the development of Embodied Question Answering (EQA), enhancing agents' abilities in language understanding and reasoning within complex and realistic scenarios. However, EQA in real-world scenarios remains challenging, as human-posed questions often contain noise that can interfere with an agent's exploration and response, bringing challenges especially for language beginners and non-expert users. To address this, we introduce a NoisyEQA benchmark designed to evaluate an agent's ability to recognize and correct noisy questions. This benchmark introduces four common types of noise found in real-world applications: Latent Hallucination Noise, Memory Noise, Perception Noise, and Semantic Noise generated through an automated dataset creation framework. Additionally, we also propose a 'Self-Correction' prompting mechanism and a new evaluation metric to enhance and measure both noise detection capability and answer quality. Our comprehensive evaluation reveals that current EQA agents often struggle to detect noise in questions, leading to responses that frequently contain erroneous information. Through our Self-Correct Prompting mechanism, we can effectively improve the accuracy of agent answers.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ActiveFly-Bench: Aligning Embodied Question Answering with Vision-Language-Action for Aerial Embodied Perception

    cs.RO 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    ActiveFly-Bench defines Air-EQA, Observation Behavior Planning, and 7-DoF FLUC tasks on 10k real/sim trajectories so UAV agents must plan, fly, and answer questions they cannot solve from the start view.

  2. DarkQA: Benchmarking Vision-Language Models on Visual-Primitive Question Answering in Low-Light Indoor Scenes

    cs.CV 2025-12 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    DarkQA is a new benchmark that measures vision-language model performance on basic visual questions under controlled low-light degradations modeled from real camera physics.

  3. Extending Embodied Question Answering from Perception to Decision

    cs.RO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Introduces EQA-Decision dataset with 4M+ QA pairs across four embodied reasoning dimensions and RoboDecision baseline for joint perception-reasoning-decision evaluation.

  4. ERQA-Plus: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Reasoning in Embodied AI

    cs.RO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    ERQA-Plus is a new benchmark dataset with a structured taxonomy for evaluating fine-grained embodied reasoning in AI agents across perceptual, action-centric, social, navigation, and commonsense categories.

Pith tools