REVIEW 4 cited by
Explainable Automated Fact-Checking for Public Health Claims
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Explainable Automated Fact-Checking for Public Health Claims
read the original abstract
Fact-checking is the task of verifying the veracity of claims by assessing their assertions against credible evidence. The vast majority of fact-checking studies focus exclusively on political claims. Very little research explores fact-checking for other topics, specifically subject matters for which expertise is required. We present the first study of explainable fact-checking for claims which require specific expertise. For our case study we choose the setting of public health. To support this case study we construct a new dataset PUBHEALTH of 11.8K claims accompanied by journalist crafted, gold standard explanations (i.e., judgments) to support the fact-check labels for claims. We explore two tasks: veracity prediction and explanation generation. We also define and evaluate, with humans and computationally, three coherence properties of explanation quality. Our results indicate that, by training on in-domain data, gains can be made in explainable, automated fact-checking for claims which require specific expertise.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Small LLMs for Biomedical Claim Verification: Cost-Effective Fine-Tuning, Structural Dataset Shortcuts, and Cross-Domain Generalization
Fine-tuned Mistral-7B via QLoRA achieves up to 12% higher F1 than GPT-4o on biomedical claim verification with 1008 examples, identifies a structural shortcut in SciFact, and shows robust cross-domain transfer from so...
-
REFLEX: Self-Refining Explainable Fact-Checking via Verdict-Anchored Style Control
REFLEX improves explainable fact-checking by using verdict-anchored style control and self-disagreement signals to disentangle fact from style in LLM outputs, achieving SOTA results with minimal self-refined samples.
-
REFLEX: Self-Refining Explainable Fact-Checking via Verdict-Anchored Style Control
By steering activations along directions learned from base-vs-fine-tuned disagreements, REFLEX reports 64.99 macro-F1 on RAW-FC fact-checking with only ~465 self-refined contrastive samples and no retrieval.
-
Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey
A survey of RAG paradigms, components, benchmarks, and challenges for improving LLMs on knowledge-intensive tasks.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.