Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 4 cited by

Quantum noise spectroscopy of superconducting dynamics in thin film Bi$_2$Sr$_2$CaCu$_2$O$_{8+\delta}$

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that nitrogen-vacancy (NV) spin sensors placed nanometres from a thin film of the high-temperature superconductor BSCCO can read the GHz magnetic noise of its quasiparticles, critical fluctuations, and vortices.

desk verdict First NV noise spectroscopy on a thin-film cuprate with solid qualitative results, but the claimed determination of critical exponents is circular — revise before publication. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.04439 v2 pith:IITQJH3H submitted 2025-02-06 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.mes-hallquant-ph

Zhongyuan Liu , Ruotian Gong , Jaewon Kim , Oriana K. Diessel , Qiaozhi Xu , Zackary Rehfuss , Xinyi Du , Guanghui He
show 9 more authors
Abhishek Singh Yun Suk Eo Erik A. Henriksen G. D. Gu Norman Y. Yao Francisco Machado Sheng Ran Shubhayu Chatterjee Chong Zu
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-concond-mat.mes-hallquant-ph
keywords nitrogen-vacancycentersquantumnoisespectroscopyhigh-temperaturesuperconductivityBSCCOthinfilmscriticalfluctuationsGinzburg-Landautheoryvortexdynamicsspinrelaxometry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centers in diamond, embedded tens of nanometres beneath the surface, can act as a non-invasive noise spectrometer for a thin exfoliated film of the high-temperature superconductor BSCCO. At zero applied field the sensor resolves two dynamical regimes: a $\Gamma_1 \propto T^2$ growth of GHz magnetic noise at low temperature, attributed to nodal d-wave quasiparticles in agreement with BCS mean-field theory, and a sharp divergence $\Gamma_1(T) \propto |T-T_c|^{-x}$ near $T_c \approx 90$ K with $x \approx 1$, stronger than the BCS mean-field value $x = 1/2$. The paper argues that a time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau (TDGL) Langevin model of order-parameter fluctuations, with critical exponents $\nu = 1/2$ and $z = 2$, reproduces the divergence on both sides of the transition and gives fitted relaxation times $\tau_{\rm M}/\tau_{\rm GL} \approx 1.2$ and $\tau_{\rm SC}/\tau_{\rm GL} \approx 0.2$, close to weak-coupling predictions. Under a small magnetic field the same $T_1$ measurement sees a broadened peak attributed to a vortex liquid whose noise scales linearly with field, and $T_2$ decoherence spectroscopy reaches MHz-scale vortex-solid fluctuations. If the paper is right, NV noise spectroscopy becomes a table-top complement to scattering and transport for probing superconducting dynamics in two-dimensional materials.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the ensemble of nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centers as local GHz magnetic-noise detectors, coupled to a time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau (TDGL) Langevin description of the superconducting order parameter $\psi(\mathbf{r},t)$. The NV spin relaxation rate is set by magnetic noise at the $\approx 2.87$ GHz zero-field splitting, computed from the transverse current-current correlator of the BSCCO layers; the current operator is $J(\mathbf{r}) = (\hbar e^* / 2 i m^*)(\psi^* \nabla \psi - \psi \nabla \psi^*)$. The order parameter obeys $\partial_t \psi = -\gamma\, \delta F/\delta \psi^* + \eta$ with Gaussian white noise $\eta$ and free energy $F = \int [K|\nabla\psi|^2 + r(T)|\psi|^2 + (u/2)|\psi|^4]$, where $r(T) \propto T-T_c$. Near criticality the relaxation time diverges as $\tau \propto \xi^z \propto |T-T_c|^{-z\nu}$ with $\nu = 1/2$, $z = 2$, and this critical slowing down is what produces the $|T-T_c|^{-1}$ divergence of $\Gamma_1$. To connect the model to data, BSCCO is treated as 240 independent CuO$_2$ layers at an assumed average NV distance of 25 nm.

What would settle it

Measure $\Gamma_1(T)$ near $T_c$ with a single NV whose distance from the BSCCO surface is known by construction, rather than an ensemble with an assumed 25 nm average standoff; if the extracted divergence exponent moves from $x \approx 1$ toward the BCS value $1/2$, or if the fitted ratios $\tau_{\rm M}/\tau_{\rm GL}$ and $\tau_{\rm SC}/\tau_{\rm GL}$ shift substantially when $z_0$ is varied within the model, the central quantitative claim would be overturned. A complementary check is to measure the same critical current fluctuations via paraconductivity or THz conductivity on the same film and compare exponents.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the temperature dependence of the BSCCO-induced NV relaxation rate $\Gamma_1(T)$ at zero field is a direct readout of three distinct low-energy dynamical regimes in a thin-film cuprate. At $T \ll T_c$, $\Gamma_1 \propto T^2$, consistent with nodal d-wave quasiparticles at BCS mean-field level. Near $T_c \approx 90$ K, $\Gamma_1$ rises in a sharp symmetric peak that scales as $|T-T_c|^{-x}$ with $x \approx 1$, clearly distinct from the BCS prediction $x = 1/2$; the paper attributes this extra singularity to amplitude and phase fluctuations of the superconducting order parameter. A TDGL Langevin equation with Gaussian white noise, treated with mean-field exponents $\nu = 1/2$, $z = 2$, reproduces the divergence on both the metallic and superconducting sides and yields fitted relaxation-time ratios $\tau^{\rm fit}_{\rm M}/\tau_{\rm GL} \approx 1.2$ and $\tau^{\rm fit}_{\rm SC}/\tau_{\rm GL} \approx 0.2$, bracketing the analytical weak-coupling values $1$ and $0.5$. In an applied field the transition peak broadens and becomes asymmetric as vortices enter, with $\Gamma_1 \propto H$ as expected for a diffusive vortex liquid; $T_2$ noise spectroscopy additionally resolves MHz-frequency fluctuations assigned to vortex motion in the vortex solid deep below $T_c$.

Load-bearing premise

The quantitative claims assume the superconductor's order parameter relaxes exactly as a Gaussian-noise Langevin equation with mean-field exponents predicts, and that the NV sensors sit at an assumed average distance of 25 nm from 240 independent copper-oxide layers; if the real distance or interlayer coupling differs, the fitted relaxation times and the apparent critical exponent change substantially.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • NV $T_1$ relaxometry can extract the characteristic order-parameter relaxation time $\tau$ near $T_c$ and the static and dynamic critical exponents ($\nu = 1/2$, $z = 2$) from a thin-film superconductor without electrical contact.
  • The observed $\Gamma_1 \propto T^2$ low-temperature noise is a fingerprint of nodal d-wave quasiparticles, so the same measurement on other thin-film superconductors should distinguish nodal from fully gapped pairing.
  • The near-$T_c$ scaling $\Gamma_1 \propto |T-T_c|^{-1}$ shows that order-parameter fluctuations, not just BCS quasiparticles, dominate the magnetic noise of thin cuprate films at criticality.
  • In a magnetic field, the linear $\Gamma_1(H) \propto H$ scaling and the broadened asymmetric peak locate a diffusive vortex liquid phase, while $T_2$ spectroscopy at MHz frequencies extends the platform to vortex-solid flux motion.
  • The technique extends to other superconductors, including hydrides and nickelates under high pressure inside diamond anvil cells, where the same NV sensors can probe pressure-driven transitions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: Because the momentum range of the detected noise is set by the NV–sample distance, a scanning single NV could map not only static vortices but the spatial texture of fluctuating supercurrents; the paper demonstrates static imaging but not dynamic sub-micron noise imaging.
  • Editorial inference: The asymmetry between $\tau_{\rm M}/\tau_{\rm GL} \approx 1.2$ and $\tau_{\rm SC}/\tau_{\rm GL} \approx 0.2$ suggests that phase and amplitude fluctuations of the order parameter relax at different rates; if reproduced in other cuprates, this asymmetry would constrain microscopic theories of pair relaxation beyond the weak-coupling limit.
  • Editorial inference: The zero-field critical exponent $x \approx 1$ could be cross-checked on the same films by paraconductivity or THz conductivity measurements, which probe the same fluctuating supercurrents through different observables; agreement would strengthen the TDGL description.
  • Editorial inference: Because the fitted ratios assume a 25 nm average NV distance, a single-NV measurement with a known standoff would either confirm or revise the close-to-weak-coupling conclusion; varying $z_0$ by tens of nanometres in the model would show how strongly the extracted $\tau$ ratios depend on this assumption.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports NV-center noise spectroscopy measurements on a thin film of the high-Tc superconductor Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ (BSCCO) exfoliated onto a diamond substrate. Using ODMR, T1 relaxometry, and T2 (XY-8) decoherence measurements, the authors observe the Meissner effect and trapped vortices, a low-temperature BSCCO-induced NV relaxation rate scaling as T^2 (attributed to nodal d-wave quasiparticles), a sharp peak in the relaxation rate near Tc, and low-frequency vortex-solid fluctuations below Tc. The critical peak is modeled with a time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau (TDGL) Langevin equation, and the authors extract order-parameter relaxation times on both sides of the transition, reporting ratios to the weak-coupling Ginzburg-Landau timescale of approximately 1.2 (metallic) and 0.2 (superconducting). The paper claims that these results enable the determination of both static and dynamical critical exponents.

Significance. If the claims hold, this work introduces a genuinely new non-invasive probe of low-energy superconducting dynamics, with nanoscale spatial resolution and access to MHz-GHz frequencies that are complementary to scattering, transport, and local-probe techniques. The qualitative observations—Meissner expulsion, vortex imaging, and the distinct temperature dependences in T1 and T2—are convincing and should be of broad interest. The low-temperature T^2 power law is a useful consistency check for d-wave pairing. However, the quantitative headline claim that the experiment determines the static and dynamical critical exponents is not supported by the analysis as presented, because the TDGL model assumes mean-field exponents and the fit only constrains the product zν. The paper also does not provide error bars for the extracted exponent or a sensitivity analysis for the assumed sensor-sample geometry. The experimental core is sound, but the central quantitative claims require reworking before publication.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract, Introduction, and Methods Eqs. (M10)-(M13)] The central claim that the measurement enables 'the determination of both static and dynamical critical exponents' (abstract; also Introduction) is not supported by the analysis. In the TDGL Langevin model, Eqs. (M10)-(M13) set r(T) ∝ T − Tc and ξ² = K/r, which fixes the static exponent ν = 1/2, and the relaxation rate of the uniform mode τ_M⁻¹ = γr ∝ T − Tc fixes the dynamical exponent z = 2 through the scaling τ ∝ ξ^z. These values are inputs to the model, not outputs of the fit; the fit only determines the overall timescale τ_fit. The measured log-log slope x ≈ 1 in Fig. 3(e) constrains only the combination zν = 1, not ν and z separately. The main-text sentence stating that 'the resulting value of the associated critical exponents, ν = 1/2 and z = 2, directly reproduce the aforementioned divergence' is therefore circular. Please revise the abstract, introduction, and main text to characterize the results as consistency tests with the assumed mean-field exponents, and remove the claim that ν and z are determined.
  2. [Fig. 3(e)] The exponent x ≈ 1 is a load-bearing quantitative result, because it is the basis for the claimed deviation from the BCS mean-field value x = 1/2. The data points in Fig. 3(e) are shown without error bars, and the fitting procedure (temperature range, weighting, treatment of Tc uncertainty, number of points, and whether the fit is to the raw Γ1 or to a binned/log-averaged quantity) is not described. Please include error bars on Γ1(T), state explicitly how x is extracted, and provide a confidence interval. Without this, the reader cannot assess whether x is significantly different from 1/2.
  3. [Methods, Eqs. (M5), (M13)-(M15)] The quantitative ratios τ_fit^M/τ_GL ≈ 1.2 and τ_fit^SC/τ_GL ≈ 0.2 are obtained from absolute noise magnitudes that depend directly on the assumed geometry: an average NV-to-sample distance z0 = 25 nm and a total of 240 independent active CuO2 layers (60 unit cells × 4 layers). The Methods state that these values are assumed, but no systematic uncertainty is propagated into the fitted timescales. Because the NV ensemble has a depth distribution (SRIM profile, approximately 50 nm) and the flake thickness is estimated by optical contrast (similar flakes measured as 188–300 nm), the extracted τ ratios could shift by order-one factors. Please provide a sensitivity analysis over z0 and the number of layers, or quote the timescales with a systematic uncertainty. The assumption of negligible interlayer correlations is also worth justifying, since interlayer Josephson coupling could change the effective dimensionality of the fluctuations.
minor comments (5)
  1. [References, Ref. [19]] Reference [19], cited for electrical transport, points to a paper on AC electrical conduction in p-CuIn3Se5; please replace it with a standard transport reference for superconductors or for the specific BSCCO transport data you rely upon.
  2. [Fig. 1(a) caption] The acronym 'APRES' should be 'ARPES' (angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy).
  3. [Methods, Characterization of BSCCO] The phrase 'four-point-prob method' should be 'four-point-probe method'.
  4. [Supplementary Information, Sections II.1 and II.2] There are several typographical errors: 'temparature' in Section II.1, 'vaccum' in Section II.2, and 'BSSCO' in the caption of Fig. S2 should be 'BSCCO'.
  5. [Methods, Eq. (M15)] Equation (M15) is derived in the Ω → 0 limit, but the T1 measurement probes noise at 2.87 GHz. Please clarify why this frequency can be treated as much smaller than the relevant electronic relaxation scales in BSCCO, or briefly discuss the validity of the low-frequency approximation.

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged · score 7.0 of 10

Critical-exponent 'determination' is circular: ν=1/2 and z=2 are model inputs and the data only constrain zν; τ ratios are fitted, not predicted.

  1. self definitional [Main text, section 'Zero-field superconducting fluctuations', final paragraph before 'In-field criticality and vortex dynamics'.]
    "Indeed, the resulting value of the associated critical exponents, ν = 1/2 and z = 2 [37], directly reproduce the aforementioned divergence of the scattering timescale τ via the scaling behavior of the correlation length ξ: τ ∝ ξz ∝ |T − Tc|−zν."

    The values ν=1/2 and z=2 were put into the model before any fit: Methods Eq. (M13) defines (τM)^-1 = γr with r ∝ T−Tc and ξ² = K/r, i.e. ξ ∝ |T−Tc|^{-1/2}, and Eq. (M10) is the non-conserved (Model A) Langevin equation, i.e. z=2. The measured Γ1(T) exponent x≈1 constrains only the product zν; the two individual exponents are inputs, not outputs. Asserting that they are 'determined' and 'directly reproduce' the divergence equates the model's conclusion with its own assumptions.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Methods, 'Metallic Side', immediately after Eq. (M13).]
    "Since BSCCO is not necessarily in the weak-coupling regime, we will treat τM as a phenomenological parameter, and extract the ratio τM/τGL by fitting with the experimental data. ... Fitting against the data, we find that the decay time scales as τ fit M ≈ 1.2 τ wc M = 1.2 τGL, which is close to the weak coupling limit."

    The headline agreement τ_fit/τGL ≈ 1.2 is the value of the single free normalization parameter used to scale the model to the data, not a prediction of the divergence exponent or of the timescale. Because the functional form of Γ1(T) is fixed by the assumed TDGL inputs, any data collapsing onto a |T−Tc|^-1 slope yields a fitted ratio by construction; comparing that fitted amplitude to the weak-coupling value is a consistency check, not independent confirmation.

1 more flagged steps
  1. self definitional [Methods, 'Superconducting Side', paragraph deriving Eq. (M15).]
    "We further express uM0 in terms of the relaxation time τSC of the amplitude mode near the critical point, which can be derived analytically in terms of the parameters of the Ginzburg-Landau theory [5, 11, 12] as τSC = 1/(2γ|r|) = 1/(2γuM0). Combining these expressions, we arrive at the final form of the transverse magnetic noise (see Eq. (M5)) which reads NT (Ω) = µ2 0(kBT )2τSC log(2) (4π)2z2 0 ( e∗ ℏ )2."

    The model defines τSC = 1/(2γ|r|) ∝ |T−Tc|^{-1} and then makes the final noise formula proportional to τSC. The superconducting-side divergence Γ1 ∝ |T−Tc|^{-1} is therefore present in the model by definition. The subsequent fit ('we obtain a ratio of τ fit SC/τ wc SC = 0.38') merely rescales this predetermined divergence; the data slope cannot separately determine the static exponent ν or the dynamical exponent z.

full rationale

Most of the experimental content is self-contained and not circular: the Meissner and vortex imaging, the low-temperature Γ1(T) ∝ T^2 nodal-quasiparticle behavior, the in-field Γ1(H) ∝ H vortex-liquid scaling, and the T2 vortex-solid noise are compared with external predictions (BCS nodal quasiparticles, diffusive vortex motion) or with controlled off-sample references. The circularity is concentrated in the central critical-exponent claim. In Methods, r(T) ∝ T−Tc, ξ² = K/r, the non-conserved Langevin equation (M10), and τ_M^{-1}=γr fix ν=1/2 and z=2 as inputs; Eq. (M15) makes the superconducting-side noise proportional to τ_SC=1/(2γ|r|), so the |T−Tc|^{-1} divergence is built in rather than measured. The observed log-log slope x≈1 thus tests only the product zν, and the abstract statement that the work enables 'determination of both static and dynamical critical exponents' reduces the output to the assumed input. The ratios τ_fit/τGL ≈ 1.2 and ≈ 0.2 are fitted normalization constants, so presenting them as agreement with weak-coupling theory is a consistency check rather than a parameter-free prediction. We note that the weak-coupling reference [59] is a 'to appear' paper by two present coauthors, but identical numbers are available in Larkin-Varlamov [7] and Schmid [8], so this self-citation is redundant rather than load-bearing and does not by itself raise the score. The stated assumptions of z0=25 nm and 240 independent CuO2 layers affect the fitted τ amplitudes but are acknowledged modeling assumptions, not circularity. Overall, the paper's strongest quantitative claim is partially circular; a softened statement of consistency with assumed mean-field GL/Model-A exponents would be supported.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The quantitative conclusions (τ_fit/τGL ratios, exponent consistency) depend on four fitted or assumed inputs: two phenomenological relaxation times extracted from the data, an assumed NV-sample distance z0=25 nm, and an assumed 240-layer model with independent CuO2 layers. The critical exponents ν=1/2, z=2 are imported from Ginzburg-Landau theory, not determined by the data. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • τ_M (metallic-side order-parameter relaxation time) = τ_fit_M ≈ 1.2 τ_GL
    Fitted to the metallic-side Γ1(T) data (Methods, 'Fitting against the data...'); treated as phenomenological, not predicted for BSCCO.
  • τ_SC (superconducting-side amplitude-mode relaxation time) = τ_fit_SC ≈ 0.38 τ_wc_SC ≈ 0.2 τ_GL
    Fitted to the superconducting-side Γ1(T) data via Eq. (M15); main text quotes τ_fit_SC/τGL≈0.2 while Methods gives τ_fit_SC/τ_wc_SC=0.38.
  • z0 (average NV-to-BSCCO distance) = 25 nm (assumed)
    Used in noise integrals and Eq. (M15); extracted τ scales roughly as z0^2, so the assumed distance directly changes the τ_fit/τGL comparison.
  • number of active superconducting layers = 240 (assumed from 200 nm flake thickness)
    Based on optical-contrast thickness estimate of a separate flake, not a direct measurement of the target flake; layer count sets the total noise added.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Order-parameter dynamics follow a time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau Langevin equation with Gaussian white noise and U(1)-symmetric GL free energy.
    Methods Eqs. (M10)-(M12); the entire extraction of τ and the predicted Γ1 scaling rely on this phenomenological dynamics.
  • domain assumption Critical exponents take mean-field GL values ν=1/2 and z=2, with τ ∝ ξ^z.
    Main text after Fig. 3(e); these values are taken from Ref 37, not measured independently.
  • domain assumption BSCCO is modeled as 240 independent CuO2 layers with negligible interlayer correlations, at distances z0=25+1.55n nm.
    Methods: the average NV distance is assumed to be 25 nm and correlations between BSCCO layers are assumed negligible.
  • domain assumption The intrinsic NV relaxation measured away from BSCCO is a valid baseline for subtraction.
    SI Eq. (S6); any difference in local charge, strain, or NV density between under-flake and away regions would bias Γ1.
  • domain assumption Vortex-density response is diffusive, with Drude conductivity independent of vortex density.
    Methods Eqs. (M19)-(M21); used for the Γ1(H)∝H result, and the renormalization by bound vortex pairs is neglected.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum noise spectroscopy of superconducting dynamics in thin film Bi$_2$Sr$_2$CaCu$_2$O$_{8+\delta}$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IITQJH3H

@misc{pith2026250204439,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum noise spectroscopy of superconducting dynamics in thin film Bi$_2$Sr$_2$CaCu$_2$O$_8+\delta$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IITQJH3H}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.04439}
}
abstract

Characterizing the low-energy dynamics of quantum materials is crucial to our understanding of strongly correlated electronic states. Yet, it remains experimentally challenging to investigate such dynamics with high spectroscopic resolution in both frequency and momentum space, particularly in two-dimensional correlated systems. Here, we leverage Nitrogen-Vacancy (NV) centers in diamond as a powerful and non-invasive tool to study thin-film Bi$_2$Sr$_2$CaCu$_2$O$_{8+\delta}$ (BSCCO), revealing several distinct dynamical phenomena across the superconducting phase diagram. At zero magnetic field and low temperatures, NV depolarization ($T_1$) noise spectroscopy captures the low-frequency (GHz-scale) magnetic noise generated by nodal superconducting quasiparticle excitations, in agreement with Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) mean-field theory. Near the critical temperature $T_c \approx 90$ K, supercurrent-fluctuation-induced noise leads to a sharp reduction of the NV $T_1$. By carefully analyzing the temperature-scaling of $T_1$, we observe clear deviations from the BCS prediction, reflecting the importance of order parameter fluctuations and enabling the determination of both static and dynamical critical exponents. When a small field is applied, we detect a broad and asymmetric reduction of NV $T_1$ near $T_c$; the field-induced smearing of the transition unveils the presence of a vortex liquid phase. Finally, NV decoherence ($T_2$) noise spectroscopy allows us to characterize magnetic noise at even lower MHz-scale frequencies and obtain evidence for complex vortex-solid fluctuations well below $T_c$. Our results establish quantum noise spectroscopy as a versatile platform for probing dynamical phenomena in superconductors, with frequency and length scales complementary to existing techniques.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.04439 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Effect of superconducting fluctuations on nonreciprocal dichroism and gyrotropy

    cond-mat.supr-con 2026-07 accept novelty 6.5 of 10

    Fluctuating Cooper pairs above Tc produce closed-form nonreciprocal dichroism and gyrotropic birefringence that diverge as 1/(T−Tc) and require particle-hole asymmetry plus a cubic Lifshitz invariant.

  2. Probing nonlocal superconducting fluctuations with covariance noise magnetometry

    cond-mat.supr-con 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    TDGL nonlocal paraconductivity predicts NV 1/T1 cutoffs, covariance range equal to ξ(T), and universal FDT-violation ratios in biased fluctuation noise measurable by covariance magnetometry.

  3. Simultaneous Determination of Local Magnetic Fields and Sensor Orientation with Nitrogen-Vacancy Centers in Nanodiamond

    quant-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Four non-coplanar bias fields suffice to reconstruct both the NV crystallographic axis orientation and the local vector magnetic field from ODMR spectra.

  4. Spin Relaxometry with Solid-State Defects: Theory, Platforms, and Applications

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    A defect spin's T1 rate samples the transverse magnetic-noise power spectral density at its transition frequency, and this review consolidates the theory, platforms, and applications of that mapping.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [2]

    A., Norman, M

    Keimer, B., Kivelson, S. A., Norman, M. R., Uchida, S. & Zaanen, J. From quantum matter to high-temperature superconductivity in copper oxides. Nature 518, 179–186 (2015)

    2015

  2. [3]

    Zhou, X. et al. High-temperature superconductivity. Na- ture Reviews Physics 3, 462–465 (2021)

    2021

  3. [4]

    Bardeen, J., Cooper, L. N. & Schrieffer, J. R. Microscopic theory of superconductivity. Physical Review 106, 162 (1957)

    1957

  4. [5]

    Bardeen, J., Cooper, L. N. & Schrieffer, J. R. Theory of superconductivity. Physical review 108, 1175 (1957)

    1957

  5. [6]

    N., Tolmachov, V

    Bogoljubov, N. N., Tolmachov, V. V. & Sirkov, D. V. A new method in the theory of superconductivity. Fortschritte der physik 6, 605–682 (1958)

    1958

  6. [9]

    The critical fluctuation of the order param- eter in type-ii superconductors

    Maki, K. The critical fluctuation of the order param- eter in type-ii superconductors. Progress of Theoretical Physics 39, 897–906 (1968)

    1968

  7. [12]

    V., Geshkenbein, V

    Blatter, G., Feigel’man, M. V., Geshkenbein, V. B., Larkin, A. I. & Vinokur, V. M. Vortices in high- temperature superconductors. Reviews of modern physics 66, 1125 (1994)

    work page 1994

  8. [13]

    & Nelson, D

    Halperin, B. & Nelson, D. R. Resistive transition in su- perconducting films. Journal of low temperature physics 36, 599–616 (1979)

    work page 1979

Show all 88 references
  1. [14]

    R., Mooij, J

    Beasley, M. R., Mooij, J. E. & Orlando, T. P. Pos- sibility of vortex-antivortex pair dissociation in two- dimensional superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1165–1168 (1979). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.42.1165

    1979 doi

  2. [15]

    Nelson, D. R. Vortex entanglement in high- Tc superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1973–1976 (1988). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.60.1973

    1988

  3. [16]

    R., Efetov, D

    Balents, L., Dean, C. R., Efetov, D. K. & Young, A. F. Superconductivity and strong correlations in moir´ e flat bands. Nature Physics 16, 725–733 (2020)

    2020

  4. [17]

    Ko, E. K. et al. Signatures of ambient pressure super- conductivity in thin film la3ni2o7. Nature 1–2 (2024)

    2024

  5. [18]

    Barry, J. F. et al. Sensitivity optimization for NV- diamond magnetometry. Reviews of Modern Physics 92, 015004 (2020)

    2020

  6. [19]

    Essaleh, L. et al. Theoretical and experimental study of AC electrical conduction mechanism in the low temper- ature range of p-CuIn3Se5. Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures 99, 37–42 (2018)

    2018

  7. [20]

    Kirtley, J. R. & Jr, J. P. W. SCANNING SQUID MI- CROSCOPY. Annual Review of Materials Research 29, 117–148 (1999)

    1999

  8. [21]

    Dusad, R. et al. Magnetic Monopole Noise. Nature 571, 234–239 (2019). 1901.10044

    2019 arXiv

  9. [22]

    Harada, K. et al. Real-time observation of vortex lattices in a superconductor by electron microscopy. Nature 360, 51–53 (1992)

    1992

  10. [23]

    V., Bending, S

    Silhanek, A. V., Bending, S. & Lee, S. Local Probes of Magnetic Field Distribution. In Handbook of Supercon- ductivity (CRC Press, 2021), 2 edn

    2021

  11. [24]

    & Damascelli, A

    Comin, R. & Damascelli, A. Resonant x-ray scattering studies of charge order in cuprates. Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 7, 369–405 (2016)

    2016

  12. [25]

    Magnetic small-angle neutron scat- tering

    M¨ uhlbauer, S.et al. Magnetic small-angle neutron scat- tering. Reviews of Modern Physics 91, 015004 (2019)

    2019

  13. [26]

    Nuclear Magnetic Resonance

    Hore, P. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. Oxford Chemistry Primers (Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, 2015), second edition, second edition edn

    2015

  14. [27]

    Hillier, A. D. et al. Muon spin spectroscopy. Nature Reviews Methods Primers 2, 1–24 (2022)

    2022

  15. [28]

    Liu, G. et al. Development of a vacuum ultraviolet laser- based angle-resolved photoemission system with a super- high energy resolution better than 1mev. Review of Sci- entific Instruments 79 (2008)

    2008

  16. [29]

    Kitamura, M. et al. Development of a versatile micro- focused angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy sys- tem with kirkpatrick–baez mirror optics. Review of Sci- entific Instruments 93 (2022)

    2022

  17. [30]

    Altman, M. S. Trends in low energy electron mi- croscopy. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 22, 084017 (2010)

    2010

  18. [31]

    Moradifar, P. et al. Accelerating Quantum Materials De- velopment with Advances in Transmission Electron Mi- croscopy. Chemical Reviews 123, 12757–12794 (2023)

    2023

  19. [32]

    Parker, C. V. et al. Nanoscale proximity effect in the high-temperature superconductor Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ Us- ing a Scanning Tunneling Microscope. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 117001 (2010). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.117001

    2010 doi

  20. [33]

    Kaindl, R. et al. Ultrafast mid-infrared response of YBa2Cu3O7−δ. Science 287, 470–473 (2000)

    2000

  21. [34]

    De La Torre, A. et al. Colloquium: Nonthermal pathways to ultrafast control in quantum materials. Reviews of Modern Physics 93, 041002 (2021)

    2021

  22. [35]

    Landau, L. D. & Lifshitz, E. M. Statistical Physics: Vol- ume 5 , vol. 5 (Elsevier, 2013)

    2013

  23. [38]

    A., Yao, N

    Machado, F., Demler, E. A., Yao, N. Y. & Chatterjee, S. Quantum noise spectroscopy of dynamical critical phe- nomena. Physical Review Letters 131, 070801 (2023)

    2023

  24. [39]

    Fisher, M. P. A. Vortex-glass superconductivity: A pos- sible new phase in bulk high-t c oxides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1415–1418 (1989). URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.1415

    1989 doi

  25. [40]

    S., Fisher, M

    Fisher, D. S., Fisher, M. P. A. & Huse, D. A. Thermal fluctuations, quenched disorder, phase transitions, and transport in type-ii superconductors. Phys. Rev. B 43, 130–159 (1991). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.43.130. 9

    1991

  26. [42]

    Wen, J. et al. Large bi-2212 single crystal growth by the floating-zone technique. Journal of Crystal Growth 310, 1401–1404 (2008)

    2008

  27. [43]

    Rovny, J. et al. Nanoscale diamond quantum sensors for many-body physics. Nature Reviews Physics 1–16 (2024)

    2024

  28. [44]

    Schlussel, Y. et al. Wide-field imaging of superconductor vortices with electron spins in diamond. Physical Review Applied 10, 034032 (2018)

    2018

  29. [45]

    Yip, K. Y. et al. Measuring magnetic field texture in cor- related electron systems under extreme conditions. Sci- ence 366, 1355–1359 (2019)

    2019

  30. [46]

    Lesik, M. et al. Magnetic measurements on micrometer- sized samples under high pressure using designed nv cen- ters. Science 366, 1359–1362 (2019)

    2019

  31. [47]

    Bhattacharyya, P. et al. Imaging the meissner effect in hydride superconductors using quantum sensors. Nature 627, 73 (2024)

    2024

  32. [48]

    Nusran, N. et al. Spatially-resolved study of the meissner effect in superconductors using nv-centers-in-diamond optical magnetometry. New Journal of Physics 20, 043010 (2018)

    2018

  33. [49]

    Ho, K. O. et al. Studying critical parameters of super- conductor via diamond quantum sensors. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.16848 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  34. [50]

    & Maan, J

    Geim, A., Dubonos, S., Lok, J., Henini, M. & Maan, J. Paramagnetic meissner effect in small superconductors. Nature 396, 144–146 (1998)

    1998

  35. [51]

    Kolkowitz, S. et al. Probing johnson noise and ballis- tic transport in normal metals with a single-spin qubit. Science 347, 1129–1132 (2015)

    2015

  36. [56]

    Kelly, S. P. & Tserkovnyak, Y. Superconductivity- enhanced magnetic field noise. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.05465 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  37. [57]

    Li, S. et al. Observation of on-and off-resonant interac- tion between a solid-state spin qubit and a superconduct- ing resonator. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.18896 (2024)

    2024

  38. [58]

    & Kivelson, S

    Emery, V. & Kivelson, S. Importance of phase fluctu- ations in superconductors with small superfluid density. Nature 374, 434–437 (1995)

    1995

  39. [60]

    A., Nagaosa, N

    Lee, P. A., Nagaosa, N. & Wen, X.-G. Doping a mott in- sulator: Physics of high-temperature superconductivity. Reviews of modern physics 78, 17–85 (2006)

    2006

  40. [61]

    Curtis, J. B. et al. Probing the berezinskii-kosterlitz- thouless vortex unbinding transition in two-dimensional superconductors using local noise magnetometry. Physi- cal Review B 110, 144518 (2024)

    2024

  41. [62]

    Xue, R. et al. Signatures of magnon hydrodynam- ics in an atomically-thin ferromagnet. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.01057 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  42. [64]

    Li, Y. et al. Critical fluctuation and noise spectra in two- dimensional fe {3} gete {2} magnets. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.00647 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  43. [65]

    Maletinsky, P. et al. A robust scanning diamond sen- sor for nanoscale imaging with single nitrogen-vacancy centres. Nature nanotechnology 7, 320–324 (2012)

    2012

  44. [66]

    Scanning magnetic field microscope with a diamond single-spin sensor

    Degen, C. Scanning magnetic field microscope with a diamond single-spin sensor. Applied Physics Letters 92 (2008)

    2008

  45. [67]

    Pelliccione, M. et al. Scanned probe imaging of nanoscale magnetism at cryogenic temperatures with a single-spin quantum sensor. Nature nanotechnology 11, 700–705 (2016)

    2016

  46. [68]

    Gottscholl, A. et al. Initialization and read-out of in- trinsic spin defects in a van der waals crystal at room temperature. Nature materials 19, 540–545 (2020)

    2020

  47. [69]

    Gong, R. et al. Coherent dynamics of strongly interacting electronic spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride. Nature Communications 14, 3299 (2023)

    2023

  48. [70]

    Stern, H. L. et al. Room-temperature optically detected magnetic resonance of single defects in hexagonal boron nitride. Nature Communications 13, 618 (2022)

    2022

  49. [71]

    Gong, R. et al. Isotope engineering for spin defects in van der waals materials. Nature Communications 15, 104 (2024)

    2024

  50. [72]

    Dailledouze, C. et al. Imaging the Meissner Effect and Flux Trapping of Superconductors under High Pressure using N-V Centers. arXiv e-prints arXiv:2501.14504 (2025). 2501.14504

    2025 arXiv

  51. [73]

    J., Errea, I

    Pickard, C. J., Errea, I. & Eremets, M. I. Supercon- ducting hydrides under pressure. Annual Review of Con- densed Matter Physics 11, 57–76 (2020)

    2020

  52. [74]

    & Shylin, S

    Drozdov, A., Eremets, M., Troyan, I., Ksenofontov, V. & Shylin, S. Conventional superconductivity at 203 kelvin at high pressures in the sulfur hydride system. Nature 525, 73 (2015)

    2015

  53. [75]

    Sun, H. et al. Signatures of superconductivity near 80 k in a nickelate under high pressure. Nature 621, 493–498 (2023)

    2023

  54. [76]

    Wen, J. et al. Probing the meissner effect in pressurized bilayer nickelate superconductors using diamond quan- tum sensors. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.10275 (2024). 10 METHODS Characterization of BSCCO Resistance Electrical transport measurements are performed on a bulk BSCCO ...

    2024 arXiv

  55. [77]

    L., Reinhard, F

    Degen, C. L., Reinhard, F. & Cappellaro, P. Quantum sensing. Reviews of modern physics 89, 035002 (2017)

    2017

  56. [78]

    Agarwal, K. et al. Magnetic noise spectroscopy as a probe of local electronic correlations in two-dimensional sys- tems. Physical Review B 95, 155107 (2017)

    2017

  57. [79]

    Dolgirev, P. E. et al. Characterizing two-dimensional su- perconductivity via nanoscale noise magnetometry with single-spin qubits. Physical Review B 105, 024507 (2022)

    2022

  58. [80]

    Chatterjee, S. et al. Single-spin qubit magnetic spec- troscopy of two-dimensional superconductivity. Physical Review Research 4, L012001 (2022)

    2022

  59. [81]

    Introduction to Superconductivity (Dover Publications, 2004), 2 edn

    Tinkham, M. Introduction to Superconductivity (Dover Publications, 2004), 2 edn. URL http://www.worldcat. org/isbn/0486435032

    2004

  60. [82]

    Ginzburg-landau theory for superconductors

    Cyrot, M. Ginzburg-landau theory for superconductors. Reports on Progress in Physics 36, 103 (1973)

    1973

  61. [83]

    D., Lifshitz, E

    Landau, L. D., Lifshitz, E. M. & Pitaevskii, L. Sta- tistical physics: theory of the condensed state , vol. 9 (Butterworth-Heinemann, 1980)

    1980

  62. [84]

    Schuller, I. K. & Gray, K. Time-dependent ginzburg– landau: from single particle to collective behavior. Jour- nal of superconductivity and novel magnetism 19, 401– 407 (2006)

    2006

  63. [85]

    Hohenberg, P. C. & Halperin, B. I. Theory of dynamic critical phenomena. Reviews of Modern Physics 49, 435 (1977)

    1977

  64. [86]

    & Varlamov, A

    Larkin, A. & Varlamov, A. Theory of fluctuations in superconductors, vol. 127 (OUP Oxford, 2005)

    2005

  65. [87]

    A time dependent ginzburg-landau equation and its application to the problem of resistivity in the mixed state

    Schmid, A. A time dependent ginzburg-landau equation and its application to the problem of resistivity in the mixed state. Physik der kondensierten Materie 5, 302– 317 (1966)

    1966

  66. [88]

    & Diessel, O

    Kim, J. & Diessel, O. to appear. arXiv (2025)

    2025

  67. [89]

    Curtis, J. B. et al. Probing the berezinskii-kosterlitz- thouless vortex unbinding transition in two-dimensional superconductors using local noise magnetometry. Physi- cal Review B 110, 144518 (2024). 14 Extended Data Figure 1. Characterization of BSCCO. (a) Electrical resista...

    2024

  68. [91]

    Doherty, M. W. et al. The nitrogen-vacancy colour centre in diamond. Physics Reports 528, 1–45 (2013)

    2013

  69. [92]

    Mittiga, T. et al. Imaging the local charge environment of nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond. Physical review letters 121, 246402 (2018)

    2018

  70. [93]

    & Glasbeek, M

    Van Oort, E. & Glasbeek, M. Electric-field-induced modulation of spin echoes of nv centers in diamond. Chemical Physics Letters 168, 529–532 (1990)

    1990

  71. [94]

    Choi, J. et al. Depolarization dynamics in a strongly interacting solid-state spin ensemble. Physical review letters 118, 093601 (2017)

    2017

  72. [95]

    Ziffer, M. E. et al. Quantum noise spectroscopy of critical slowing down in an atomically thin magnet. Under review at Science, preprint arXiv:2407.05614 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  73. [96]

    Gullion, T., Baker, D. B. & Conradi, M. S. New, compensated carr-purcell sequences. Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969) 89, 479–484 (1990)

    1969

  74. [97]

    Bauch, E. et al. Decoherence of ensembles of nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond. Physical Review B 102, 134210 (2020)

    2020

  75. [98]

    A., Yao, N

    Machado, F., Demler, E. A., Yao, N. Y. & Chatterjee, S. Quantum noise spectroscopy of dynamical critical phenomena. Physical Review Letters 131, 070801 (2023)

    2023

  76. [99]

    Zuo, Y. et al. Synthetic diamond for nitrogen vacancy sensor and its applicability. Industries, Sumitomo Electric,(92) 6 (2021)

    2021

  77. [100]

    F., Ziegler, M

    Ziegler, J. F., Ziegler, M. D. & Biersack, J. P. Srim–the stopping and range of ions in matter (2010). Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 268, 1818–1823 (2010)

    2010

  78. [101]

    Hsieh, S. et al. Imaging stress and magnetism at high pressures using a nanoscale quantum sensor. Science 366, 1349–1354 (2019)

    2019

  79. [102]

    Wen, J. et al. Large bi-2212 single crystal growth by the floating-zone technique.Journal of Crystal Growth 310, 1401–1404 (2008)

    2008

  80. [111]

    In the absence of magnetic field, all four NV groups are degenerate, making the sensor equally responsive to signals in all directions

    group serves as a sensor for in-plane magnetic field fluctuations, whereas the non-[111] groups can also detect the out-of-plane signals. In the absence of magnetic field, all four NV groups are degenerate, making the sensor equally responsive to signals in all directions. Whe...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.