REVIEW 6 cited by
WSI-Agents: A Collaborative Multi-Agent System for Multi-Modal Whole Slide Image Analysis
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
WSI-Agents: A Collaborative Multi-Agent System for Multi-Modal Whole Slide Image Analysis
read the original abstract
Whole slide images (WSIs) are vital in digital pathology, enabling gigapixel tissue analysis across various pathological tasks. While recent advancements in multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) allow multi-task WSI analysis through natural language, they often underperform compared to task-specific models. Collaborative multi-agent systems have emerged as a promising solution to balance versatility and accuracy in healthcare, yet their potential remains underexplored in pathology-specific domains. To address these issues, we propose WSI-Agents, a novel collaborative multi-agent system for multi-modal WSI analysis. WSI-Agents integrates specialized functional agents with robust task allocation and verification mechanisms to enhance both task-specific accuracy and multi-task versatility through three components: (1) a task allocation module assigning tasks to expert agents using a model zoo of patch and WSI level MLLMs, (2) a verification mechanism ensuring accuracy through internal consistency checks and external validation using pathology knowledge bases and domain-specific models, and (3) a summary module synthesizing the final summary with visual interpretation maps. Extensive experiments on multi-modal WSI benchmarks show WSI-Agents's superiority to current WSI MLLMs and medical agent frameworks across diverse tasks.
Forward citations
Cited by 6 Pith papers
-
Hierarchical Attacks for Multi-Modal Multi-Agent Reasoning
HAM³ achieves up to 78.3% attack success rate on the GQA benchmark by hierarchically attacking perception, communication, and reasoning layers in multi-modal multi-agent systems.
-
PathView-Bench: Can Multimodal Large Language Models Achieve Fine-grained Multiscale Understanding of Pathology Images?
A 308k-sample dual-FOV pathology benchmark finds that current MLLMs remain weak at fine-grained multiscale visual grounding even when high-level slide QA looks correct.
-
Evaluating Agentic Bioinformatics through Function, Evidence, and Validation
Agentic bioinformatics systems mostly demonstrate planning and tool execution but rarely prospective empirical validation, so the paper argues evaluation should center on inspectable workflow trajectories (FEV) rather...
-
PathoSage: Towards Multi-Source Evidence Adjudication in Pathology via Experience-Aware Agentic Workflow
PathoSage is a three-stage framework using Structured Evidence Deliberation and a Beta-Bernoulli experience system to improve patch-level pathology reasoning by mitigating hallucinations and tool conflicts.
-
Thinking Like a Clinician: A Cognitive AI Agent for Clinical Diagnosis via Panoramic Profiling and Adversarial Debate
DxChain uses panoramic patient profiling, Med-ToT planning, and adversarial angel-devil debates to reduce LLM hallucinations in clinical diagnosis, achieving SOTA accuracy and consistency on two MIMIC-IV benchmarks.
-
The Path to Self-Evolving Clinical Systems: Scaling Medical Agents from Assistance to Autonomy
Medical agents should be scaled mainly by richer clinical environments and self-evolution loops, not parameter growth alone, under a three-level autonomy taxonomy.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.