Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

ROSE: A Reward-Oriented Data Selection Framework for LLM Task-Specific Instruction Tuning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.00631 v2 pith:IX7NAH52 submitted 2024-12-01 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL
keywords datainstructiontuningselectiontask-specifictraininglossrose
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Instruction tuning has underscored the significant potential of large language models (LLMs) in producing more human controllable and effective outputs in various domains. In this work, we focus on the data selection problem for task-specific instruction tuning of LLMs. Prevailing methods primarily rely on the crafted similarity metrics to select training data that aligns with the test data distribution. The goal is to minimize instruction tuning loss on the test data, ultimately improving performance on the target task. However, it has been widely observed that instruction tuning loss (i.e., cross-entropy loss for next token prediction) in LLMs often fails to exhibit a monotonic relationship with actual task performance. This misalignment undermines the effectiveness of current data selection methods for task-specific instruction tuning. To address this issue, we introduce ROSE, a novel Reward-Oriented inStruction data sElection method which leverages pairwise preference loss as a reward signal to optimize data selection for task-specific instruction tuning. Specifically, ROSE adapts an influence formulation to approximate the influence of training data points relative to a few-shot preference validation set to select the most task-related training data points. Experimental results show that by selecting just 5\% of the training data using ROSE, our approach can achieve competitive results compared to fine-tuning with the full training dataset, and it surpasses other state-of-the-art data selection methods for task-specific instruction tuning. Our qualitative analysis further confirms the robust generalizability of our method across multiple benchmark datasets and diverse model architectures.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CLID-MU: Cross-Layer Information Divergence Based Meta Update Strategy for Learning with Noisy Labels

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CLID-MU replaces the clean meta-dataset in meta-learning with an unsupervised cross-layer divergence metric, improving noisy-label and semi-supervised results on several benchmarks.

  2. CLaDMoP: Learning Transferrable Models from Successful Clinical Trials via LLMs

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CLaDMoP pre-trains a two-branch model on successful clinical trials with a pair-matching objective, then fine-tunes it to predict trial success, outperforming prior models on the TOP benchmark.

  3. Active Domain Knowledge Acquisition with 100-Dollar Budget: Enhancing LLMs via Cost-Efficient, Expert-Involved Interaction in Sensitive Domains

    cs.CL 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    A budget-aware framework (PU-ADKA) selects which domain expert an LLM should query under a fixed $100 budget, improving specialized-domain answers at low cost.

Pith tools