Pith. sign in

REVIEW

High Quality Rather than High Model Probability: Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding with Neural Metrics

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2111.09388 v3 pith:JBLAESY4 submitted 2021-11-17 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

High Quality Rather than High Model Probability: Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding with Neural Metrics

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG
keywords modelqualitytranslationhighestneuraldecodingmetricsprobability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

In Neural Machine Translation, it is typically assumed that the sentence with the highest estimated probability should also be the translation with the highest quality as measured by humans. In this work, we question this assumption and show that model estimates and translation quality only vaguely correlate. We apply Minimum Bayes Risk (MBR) decoding on unbiased samples to optimize diverse automated metrics of translation quality as an alternative inference strategy to beam search. Instead of targeting the hypotheses with the highest model probability, MBR decoding extracts the hypotheses with the highest estimated quality. Our experiments show that the combination of a neural translation model with a neural reference-based metric, BLEURT, results in significant improvement in human evaluations. This improvement is obtained with translations different from classical beam-search output: these translations have much lower model likelihood and are less favored by surface metrics like BLEU.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.