REVIEW 2 cited by
Trialogue on the number of fundamental constants
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Trialogue on the number of fundamental constants
read the original abstract
This paper consists of three separate articles on the number of fundamental dimensionful constants in physics. We started our debate in summer 1992 on the terrace of the famous CERN cafeteria. In the summer of 2001 we returned to the subject to find that our views still diverged and decided to explain our current positions. LBO develops the traditional approach with three constants, GV argues in favor of at most two (within superstring theory), while MJD advocates zero.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Certified Private Relational Time from Entanglement
Quantum coincidence-tick rates for a singlet state exceed Peres' linear classical model by ~13.6% at θ≈140.5°, a comparison used to propose device-independent certified private time.
-
Gravity, Fine-Structure Constant and Natural Units -- some Thoughts based on Dimensional Analysis --
Dimensional analysis with L, T, M, G, c, ħ, e implies the form of the fine-structure constant and highlights gravity's distinct unquantized status.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.