pith. sign in

arxiv: 2602.05156 · v2 · pith:JGOUU3HTnew · submitted 2026-02-05 · 💻 cs.RO · cs.SY· eess.SY

PLATO Hand: Shaping Contact Behavior with Fingernails for Precise Manipulation

Dong Ho Kang , Aaron Kim , Mingyo Seo , Kazuto Yokoyama , Tetsuya Narita , Luis Sentis This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 14:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO cs.SYeess.SY
keywords robotic handhybrid fingertipfingernailcontact behaviorprecise manipulationstrain-energy modeldexterous grasping
0
0 comments X

The pith

A hybrid fingertip with rigid fingernail and compliant pulp creates stable contact for precise robotic manipulation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a robotic hand design that mechanically structures the fingertip to control contact initiation, support, and transmission across varied objects and grasp orientations. This hybrid structure pairs a rigid fingernail with a compliant pulp and embedded phalanx to produce task-relevant contact conditions without relying solely on control algorithms. A strain-energy model of bending and indentation is used to relate material stiffness and geometry to how deformation is partitioned inside the fingertip. Experiments confirm gains in pinch stability, dorsal force transmission, and proprioceptive feedback, plus successful performance on edge-sensitive tasks such as paper singulation, card picking, and orange peeling.

Core claim

By mechanically organizing how contact is initiated, supported, and transmitted at the fingertip through a hybrid structure of rigid fingernail, embedded distal phalanx, and compliant pulp, the design creates stable and task-relevant contact conditions across diverse object geometries and grasp orientations, providing a principled mechanical route to precise manipulation.

What carries the argument

Hybrid fingertip that combines a rigid fingernail, embedded distal phalanx, and compliant pulp, whose deformation partitioning is guided by a strain-energy-based bending-indentation model.

If this is right

  • Pinch grasp stability increases because the fingernail provides a hard stop that prevents pulp over-compression.
  • Dorsal contact forces become reliably transmissible and observable through the rigid nail path.
  • Edge-sensitive tasks such as paper singulation and orange peeling become executable without additional sensing or control layers.
  • The same mechanical structuring principle can be scaled to other fingers or hand designs while preserving force-motion transparency.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach suggests that hardware-level contact shaping can reduce the computational burden on controllers for fine manipulation.
  • Designers could extend the model to predict long-term wear or fatigue at the nail-pulp interface under repeated use.
  • Similar hybrid interfaces might improve robustness in unstructured environments where object geometry is unknown in advance.

Load-bearing premise

The strain-energy bending-indentation model correctly predicts how stiffness and contact geometry divide deformation inside the fingertip so that the design choices produce the desired contact behavior.

What would settle it

A test in which the measured contact forces, stability margins, or task success rates remain unchanged or degrade when the fingernail stiffness and pulp compliance are varied according to the model's predictions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.05156 by Aaron Kim, Dong Ho Kang, Kazuto Yokoyama, Luis Sentis, Mingyo Seo, Tetsuya Narita.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Overview of the PLATO Hand. This system combines a hybrid fingertip with a rigid fingernail and a compliant fingerpulp to structure local contact mechanics, together with proprioceptive actuation for high-bandwidth force-regulated interactions. This integration enables robust and responsive contact behaviors across a range of precise, dexterous manipulation tasks fine manipulation tasks become more demandi… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Design overview of the PLATO Hand. (a) Robot kinematic diagram of the hand with eight fully actuated joints across three fingers: two-DoF index and middle fingers, and a four-DoF thumb. (b) Cross-sectional view of the hybrid fingertip showing a rigid fingernail integrated with a compliant pulp surrounding the distal phalanx and a distal force–torque sensor. (c) Five-bar linkage mechanism coupling the QDD a… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Strain Energy Fingertip Model. (a) Composite cantilever model of the PLATO Hand fingertip, consisting of a thin, rigid fingernail, soft pulp, and an embedded distal phalanx. The model captures bending deformation through a piecewise flexural rigidity determined by the layered geometry. (b) Hertzian contact model describing local indentation of the pulp against an external surface with radius 𝑅env. The inde… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Energy-based design characterization of the fingertip and finger [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Experimental evaluation of the PLATO Hand. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Teleoperated manipulation tasks demonstrating the PLATO Hand’s dexterity. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present the PLATO Hand, a dexterous robotic hand with a hybrid fingertip that combines a rigid fingernail, embedded distal phalanx, and compliant pulp to shape contact behavior during manipulation. \rrev{By mechanically organizing how contact is initiated, supported, and transmitted at the fingertip, this structure creates stable and task-relevant contact conditions across diverse object geometries and grasp orientations.} We develop a strain-energy-based bending--indentation model to guide the fingertip design and to explain how material stiffness and contact geometry govern deformation partitioning within the fingertip. \rrev{Experiments show improved pinch stability, improved fingernail-mediated dorsal-contact force transmission and proprioceptive observability}, and successful execution of edge-sensitive manipulation tasks, including paper singulation, card picking, and orange peeling. These results show that coupling a mechanically structured contact interface with a force-motion-transparent finger mechanism provides a principled approach to precise manipulation. Our project page is at: https://platohand.github.io

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents the PLATO Hand, a dexterous robotic hand with a hybrid fingertip combining a rigid fingernail, embedded distal phalanx, and compliant pulp. A strain-energy-based bending-indentation model is developed to guide fingertip design and explain how material stiffness and contact geometry govern deformation partitioning. Experiments report improved pinch stability, fingernail-mediated dorsal-contact force transmission, proprioceptive observability, and successful performance on edge-sensitive tasks including paper singulation, card picking, and orange peeling. The central claim is that coupling a mechanically structured contact interface with a force-motion-transparent finger mechanism provides a principled approach to precise manipulation.

Significance. If the hybrid fingertip structure and strain-energy model can be shown to predictably produce the reported contact conditions and task improvements, the work would offer a concrete mechanical design principle for enhancing precision manipulation in robotic hands. This could complement control-based approaches by making contact behavior more robust across object geometries and orientations, with potential relevance to applications requiring fine force transmission and proprioception.

major comments (2)
  1. [Model description and design section] The strain-energy bending-indentation model is presented as guiding the design and explaining deformation partitioning, yet the manuscript provides no direct empirical validation (e.g., measured vs. predicted deformation fields or force partitioning under controlled loads). Without such comparison, the attribution of task improvements to the 'principled' mechanical organization rather than empirical tuning remains under-supported.
  2. [Experiments and results] Experiments claim improved pinch stability, force transmission, and task success, but the abstract and results lack quantitative metrics, error bars, statistical analysis, or full experimental protocols (e.g., number of trials, object variations, baseline comparisons). This weakens the evidential basis for the central claim that the hybrid structure delivers predictable advantages.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Mechanism design] Clarify the exact definition of 'force-motion-transparent' finger mechanism and how it interacts with the hybrid fingertip in the mechanism description.
  2. [Related work] Add references to prior strain-energy models in contact mechanics to better situate the bending-indentation formulation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thoughtful and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each of the major comments in detail below and outline the revisions we plan to make to strengthen the evidential support for our claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Model description and design section] The strain-energy bending-indentation model is presented as guiding the design and explaining deformation partitioning, yet the manuscript provides no direct empirical validation (e.g., measured vs. predicted deformation fields or force partitioning under controlled loads). Without such comparison, the attribution of task improvements to the 'principled' mechanical organization rather than empirical tuning remains under-supported.

    Authors: We agree that direct empirical validation of the strain-energy model would strengthen the manuscript. The model was developed to provide a principled basis for selecting the relative stiffness and geometry of the fingernail and pulp components. While the current experiments focus on demonstrating the resulting manipulation capabilities, we will add a dedicated validation subsection. This will include comparisons between model predictions and experimental measurements of deformation under controlled indentation and bending loads, using both optical tracking and force sensing. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Experiments and results] Experiments claim improved pinch stability, force transmission, and task success, but the abstract and results lack quantitative metrics, error bars, statistical analysis, or full experimental protocols (e.g., number of trials, object variations, baseline comparisons). This weakens the evidential basis for the central claim that the hybrid structure delivers predictable advantages.

    Authors: The referee correctly identifies that the presentation of experimental results can be improved with more quantitative detail. We will revise the results section to include specific metrics for pinch stability (e.g., success rates with standard deviations), force transmission measurements with error bars, and statistical comparisons to baseline configurations. We will also provide full details on the number of trials, object variations, and experimental protocols in the supplementary material or expanded methods section. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper develops a strain-energy-based bending-indentation model from established mechanical principles to prospectively guide fingertip design and explain how stiffness and geometry partition deformation. This model is not fitted to match reported experimental outcomes but used to inform the hybrid structure a priori. Subsequent experiments on pinch stability, dorsal-contact force transmission, and tasks like card picking provide independent empirical support for the central claim that mechanically structured contact coupled with a transparent finger mechanism enables precise manipulation. No load-bearing steps reduce by construction to self-definitions, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or self-citation chains; the derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard continuum mechanics assumptions for deformation and on the novel hybrid fingertip geometry introduced to organize contact; no explicit numerical free parameters are stated in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Strain energy governs the partitioning of bending and indentation deformations in the fingertip materials under contact loads.
    This principle is invoked to develop the model that guides fingertip design and explains observed behavior.
invented entities (1)
  • Hybrid fingertip with rigid fingernail, embedded distal phalanx, and compliant pulp no independent evidence
    purpose: To mechanically shape contact initiation, support, and force transmission for stable manipulation across object geometries.
    This specific multi-material fingertip configuration is introduced by the paper as the key hardware innovation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5721 in / 1336 out tokens · 71559 ms · 2026-05-21T14:47:50.286678+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Design of the utah/M.I.T. dextrous hand,

    S. C. Jacobsen, E. K. Iversen, D. F. Knutti, R. T. Johnson, and K. B. Biggers, “Design of the utah/M.I.T. dextrous hand,” inProceedings of the 1986 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), vol. 3, 1986, pp. 1520–1532

    work page 1986

  2. [2]

    Robonaut hand: A dexterous robot hand for space,

    C. S. Lovchik and M. A. Diftler, “Robonaut hand: A dexterous robot hand for space,” inProceedings of the 1999 IEEE International ConferenceonRoboticsandAutomation(ICRA),vol.2,1999,pp.907– 912

    work page 1999

  3. [3]

    Dexterous anthropo- morphic robot hand with distributed tactile sensor: Gifu hand II,

    H. Kawasaki, T. Komatsu, and K. Uchiyama, “Dexterous anthropo- morphic robot hand with distributed tactile sensor: Gifu hand II,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 296–303, 2002

    work page 2002

  4. [4]

    Multisensory five-finger dexterous hand: The DLR/HIT hand II,

    H. Liu et al., “Multisensory five-finger dexterous hand: The DLR/HIT hand II,” in2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2008, pp. 3692–3697

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    Mechanisms of the anatomically correct testbed hand,

    A. D. Deshpande et al., “Mechanisms of the anatomically correct testbed hand,”IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 238–250, 2013

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    Fluid lubricated dexterous finger mechanism for human-like impact absorbing capability,

    Y.-J. Kim, J. Yoon, and Y.-W. Sim, “Fluid lubricated dexterous finger mechanism for human-like impact absorbing capability,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 3971–3978, 2019

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Getting the ball rolling: Learning a dexterous policy for a biomimetic tendon-driven hand with rolling contact joints,

    Y. Toshimitsu et al., “Getting the ball rolling: Learning a dexterous policy for a biomimetic tendon-driven hand with rolling contact joints,” in2023 IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids), 2023, pp. 1–7

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    C. C. Christoph et al.,ORCA: An open-source, reliable, cost-effective, anthropomorphic robotic hand for uninterrupted dexterous task learn- ing, 2025. arXiv: 2504.04259[cs.RO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    TRX-Hand5: An anthropomorphic hand with inte- grated tactile feedback for grasping and manipulation in human envi- ronments,

    S. Yang et al., “TRX-Hand5: An anthropomorphic hand with inte- grated tactile feedback for grasping and manipulation in human envi- ronments,” in2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2024, pp. 5289–5296

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    Toward dexterous manipulation with augmented adaptive synergies: The pisa/IIT softhand 2,

    C. D. Santina, C. Piazza, G. Grioli, M. G. Catalano, and A. Bicchi, “Toward dexterous manipulation with augmented adaptive synergies: The pisa/IIT softhand 2,”IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 1141–1156, 2018. [11]Shadow dexterous hand series – research and development tool, https: //shadowrobot.com/dexterous-hand-series/

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    Integrated linkage-driven dexterous anthropomorphic robotic hand,

    U. Kim et al., “Integrated linkage-driven dexterous anthropomorphic robotic hand,”Nature Communications, vol. 12, no. 1, 2021

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    A linkage- driven underactuated robotic hand for adaptive grasping and in- hand manipulation,

    G. Li, X. Liang, Y. Gao, T. Su, Z. Liu, and Z.-G. Hou, “A linkage- driven underactuated robotic hand for adaptive grasping and in- hand manipulation,”IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 3039–3051, 2024

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    All the feels: A dexterous hand with large-area tactile sensing,

    R. Bhirangi et al., “All the feels: A dexterous hand with large-area tactile sensing,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 8311–8318, 2023

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    [16]DG-5F | humanoid robotic hand for dexterous manipulation, https: //en.tesollo.com/dg-5f/

    Wonik Robotics,Allegro hand, https://www.allegrohand.com/. [16]DG-5F | humanoid robotic hand for dexterous manipulation, https: //en.tesollo.com/dg-5f/

    work page

  15. [15]

    Proprioceptive actuator design in the MIT cheetah: Impact mitigation and high-bandwidth physical interaction for dynamic legged robots,

    P. M. Wensing, A. Wang, S. Seok, D. Otten, J. Lang, and S. Kim, “Proprioceptive actuator design in the MIT cheetah: Impact mitigation and high-bandwidth physical interaction for dynamic legged robots,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 509–522, 2017

    work page 2017

  16. [16]

    The dynamic effect of mechanical losses of transmissions on the equation of motion of legged robots,

    Y. Sim and J. Ramos, “The dynamic effect of mechanical losses of transmissions on the equation of motion of legged robots,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2021, pp. 1191–1197

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    BaRiFlex: A robotic gripper with versatility and collision robustness for robot learning,

    G.-C. Jeong, A. Bahety, G. Pedraza, A. D. Deshpande, and R. Martín- Martín, “BaRiFlex: A robotic gripper with versatility and collision robustness for robot learning,” in2024 IEEE/RSJ International Confer- ence on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2024, pp. 4106–4113

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    An overview of dexterous manipulation,

    A. M. Okamura, N. Smaby, and M. R. Cutkosky, “An overview of dexterous manipulation,” inProceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Con- ference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings, vol. 1, 2000, pp. 255–262

    work page 2000

  19. [19]

    A hand-centric classifica- tion of human and robot dexterous manipulation,

    I. M. Bullock, R. R. Ma, and A. M. Dollar, “A hand-centric classifica- tion of human and robot dexterous manipulation,”IEEE Transactions on Haptics, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 129–144, 2013

    work page 2013

  20. [20]

    Nail anatomy and physiology for the clinician,

    B. M. Piraccini, “Nail anatomy and physiology for the clinician,” in Nail Disorders, Springer, 2014, pp. 1–6

    work page 2014

  21. [21]

    Effect of fingernail length on the hand dexterity,

    R. Shirato, A. Abe, H. Tsuchiya, and M. Honda, “Effect of fingernail length on the hand dexterity,”Journal of Physical Therapy Science, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 1914–1919, 2017

    work page 1914

  22. [22]

    Fang et al.,DEXOP: A device for robotic transfer of dexterous human manipulation, 2025

    H.-S. Fang et al.,DEXOP: A device for robotic transfer of dexterous human manipulation, 2025. arXiv: 2509.04441[cs.RO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    DenseTact- Mini: An optical tactile sensor for grasping multi-scale objects from flat surfaces,

    W. K. Do, A. K. Dhawan, M. Kitzmann, and M. Kennedy, “DenseTact- Mini: An optical tactile sensor for grasping multi-scale objects from flat surfaces,” inProceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2024, pp. 6928–6934

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    A soft gripper with retractable nails for advanced grasping and manipulation,

    S. Jain, T. Stalin, V. Subramaniam, J. Agarwal, and P. V. Y. Alvarado, “A soft gripper with retractable nails for advanced grasping and manipulation,” in2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2020, pp. 6928–6934

    work page 2020

  25. [25]

    A compliant, underactuated hand for robust ma- nipulation,

    L. Odhner et al., “A compliant, underactuated hand for robust ma- nipulation,”The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 33, pp. 736–752, 2013

    work page 2013

  26. [26]

    Novel fingertip equipped with soft skin and hard nail for dexterous multi-fingered robotic manipulation,

    K. Murakami and T. Hasegawa, “Novel fingertip equipped with soft skin and hard nail for dexterous multi-fingered robotic manipulation,” inProceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), vol. 1, 2003, pp. 708–713

    work page 2003

  27. [27]

    A century of robotic hands,

    C. Piazza, G. Grioli, M. G. Catalano, and A. Bicchi, “A century of robotic hands,”Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems, vol. 22, pp. 1–32, 2019

    work page 2019

  28. [28]

    LEAP hand: Low-cost, efficient, and anthropomorphic hand for robot learning,

    K. Shaw, A. Agarwal, and D. Pathak, “LEAP hand: Low-cost, efficient, and anthropomorphic hand for robot learning,” inRobotics: Science and Systems (RSS), 2023

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    Robotic hand: A review on linkage-driven finger mechanisms of prosthetic hands and evaluation of the performance criteria,

    S. R. Kashef, S. Amini, and A. Akbarzadeh, “Robotic hand: A review on linkage-driven finger mechanisms of prosthetic hands and evaluation of the performance criteria,”Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 145, p. 103677, 2020

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    Fin Ray®effect inspired soft robotic gripper: From the RoboSoft grand challenge toward optimization,

    W. Crooks, G. Vukasin, M. O’Sullivan, W. Messner, and C. Rogers, “Fin Ray®effect inspired soft robotic gripper: From the RoboSoft grand challenge toward optimization,”Frontiers in Robotics and AI, vol. 3, p. 220991, 2016

    work page 2016

  31. [31]

    Universal manipulation interface: In-the-wild robot teaching without in-the-wild robots,

    C. Chi et al., “Universal manipulation interface: In-the-wild robot teaching without in-the-wild robots,” inProceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS), 2024

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    LEGATO: Cross-embodiment imitation using a grasping tool,

    M. Seo, H. A. Park, S. Yuan, Y. Zhu, and L. Sentis, “LEGATO: Cross-embodiment imitation using a grasping tool,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, pp. 1–8, 2025

    work page 2025

  33. [33]

    Shang, M

    S. Shang, M. Seo, Y. Zhu, and L. Chin,FORTE: Tactile force and slip sensing on compliant fingers for delicate manipulation, 2025. arXiv: 2506.18960[cs.RO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Comparison of precision grasping performance between artificial fingers with and without nails,

    A. Kumagai, Y. Obata, Y. Yabuki, Y. Jiang, H. Yokoi, and S. Togo, “Comparison of precision grasping performance between artificial fingers with and without nails,” in2022 IEEE 4th Global Conference on Life Sciences and Technologies (LifeTech), 2022, pp. 380–381

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    Improving soft pneumatic actuator fingers through integration of soft sensors, position and force control, and rigid fingernails,

    J. S. Torrey, J. F. Morrow, R. D. Larkins, and S. T. Dang, “Improving soft pneumatic actuator fingers through integration of soft sensors, position and force control, and rigid fingernails,” Tech. Rep., 2015

    work page 2015

  36. [36]

    Dynamic simulation of hybrid-driven pla- nar five-bar parallel mechanism based on SimMechanics and tracking control,

    B. Zi, J. Cao, and Z. Zhu, “Dynamic simulation of hybrid-driven pla- nar five-bar parallel mechanism based on SimMechanics and tracking control,”International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 28–33, 2011

    work page 2011

  37. [37]

    Hansen,The CMA evolution strategy: A tutorial, 2023

    N. Hansen,The CMA evolution strategy: A tutorial, 2023. arXiv: 1604. 00772[cs.LG]. [40]SteadyWin GIM3505-8, https://steadywin.cn/en/pd.jsp?id=130. [41]ROBOTIS XM430-W350-T/R, https://emanual.robotis.com/docs/en/ dxl/x/xm430-w350/

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    On grasp choice, grasp models, and the design of hands for manufacturing tasks,

    M. R. Cutkosky, “On grasp choice, grasp models, and the design of hands for manufacturing tasks,”IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 269–279, 1989. [43]Roboligent | intelligent manufacturing automation, Roboligent, 2025. Appendix A. PLATO Hand Specifications TABLE II:Optimized linkage dimensions and PLATO Hand specifications. ...

    work page 1989