Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1909.07528 v2 pith:JV7PLT65 submitted 2019-09-17 cs.LG cs.AIcs.MAstat.ML

Emergent Tool Use From Multi-Agent Autocurricula

classification cs.LG cs.AIcs.MAstat.ML
keywords agentsemergentmulti-agentcompetitionenvironmentevidencefindhide-and-seek
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Through multi-agent competition, the simple objective of hide-and-seek, and standard reinforcement learning algorithms at scale, we find that agents create a self-supervised autocurriculum inducing multiple distinct rounds of emergent strategy, many of which require sophisticated tool use and coordination. We find clear evidence of six emergent phases in agent strategy in our environment, each of which creates a new pressure for the opposing team to adapt; for instance, agents learn to build multi-object shelters using moveable boxes which in turn leads to agents discovering that they can overcome obstacles using ramps. We further provide evidence that multi-agent competition may scale better with increasing environment complexity and leads to behavior that centers around far more human-relevant skills than other self-supervised reinforcement learning methods such as intrinsic motivation. Finally, we propose transfer and fine-tuning as a way to quantitatively evaluate targeted capabilities, and we compare hide-and-seek agents to both intrinsic motivation and random initialization baselines in a suite of domain-specific intelligence tests.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Promptbreeder: Self-Referential Self-Improvement Via Prompt Evolution

    cs.CL 2023-09 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Promptbreeder evolves both task prompts and the mutation prompts that improve them using LLMs, outperforming Chain-of-Thought and Plan-and-Solve on arithmetic and commonsense reasoning benchmarks.

  2. NePPO: Near-Potential Policy Optimization for General-Sum Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    NePPO learns a player-independent potential function via a novel objective whose minimization yields an approximate Nash equilibrium for general-sum multi-agent games.

  3. Monitoring Reasoning Models for Misbehavior and the Risks of Promoting Obfuscation

    cs.AI 2025-03 conditional novelty 7.0

    Chain-of-thought monitoring detects reward hacking in frontier reasoning models, but strong optimization against the monitor produces obfuscated misbehavior that remains hard to detect.

  4. Social-spatial dependencies for learning visual navigation

    cs.NE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Neural-network agents trained in social environments learn hybrid navigation strategies that combine individual landmark use with social following, with strategy shifts driven by the ratio of skilled to unskilled soci...

  5. Inference Scaling Laws: An Empirical Analysis of Compute-Optimal Inference for Problem-Solving with Language Models

    cs.AI 2024-08 conditional novelty 6.0

    Empirical analysis shows scaling inference compute via strategies like tree search can be more efficient than scaling model parameters, with 7B models plus novel search outperforming 34B models.