REVIEW 2 cited by
Almost AI, Almost Human: The Challenge of Detecting AI-Polished Writing
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Almost AI, Almost Human: The Challenge of Detecting AI-Polished Writing
read the original abstract
The growing use of large language models (LLMs) for text generation has led to widespread concerns about AI-generated content detection. However, an overlooked challenge is AI-polished text, where human-written content undergoes subtle refinements using AI tools. This raises a critical question: should minimally polished text be classified as AI-generated? Such classification can lead to false plagiarism accusations and misleading claims about AI prevalence in online content. In this study, we systematically evaluate twelve state-of-the-art AI-text detectors using our AI-Polished-Text Evaluation (APT-Eval) dataset, which contains 14.7K samples refined at varying AI-involvement levels. Our findings reveal that detectors frequently flag even minimally polished text as AI-generated, struggle to differentiate between degrees of AI involvement, and exhibit biases against older and smaller models. These limitations highlight the urgent need for more nuanced detection methodologies.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Policies Permitting LLM Use for Polishing Peer Reviews Are Currently Not Enforceable
State-of-the-art AI detectors misclassify a non-trivial fraction of LLM-polished peer reviews as fully AI-generated, rendering polishing-only policies currently unenforceable.
-
Hitting a Moving Target: Test-Time Adaptation for AI Text Detection under Continual Distribution Shift
Test-time adaptation with semi-supervised learning leverages inference-time homogeneity to maintain AI text detection performance under adversarial humanization, new LLMs, and temporal drift.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.