Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 93 references

This paper derives a parton shower from QCD effective kinetic theory and claims it exactly reproduces the full linearized Boltzmann equation, so that jet quenching, thermalization, and medium response are described by one Monte Carlo framew

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 00:39 UTC pith:JZFDI6QT

load-bearing objection A solid extension of inelastic jet thermalization to elastic 2<->2 and 3D inhomogeneous settings; analytic equivalence is clean, but the full-EKT claim awaits validation with the complete signed kernel. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.26143 v1 pith:JZFDI6QT submitted 2026-07-28 hep-ph hep-thnucl-th

An Equilibrating Parton Shower for Jet Quenching and Medium Response

Ismail Soudi , Adam Takacs This is my paper
classification hep-ph hep-thnucl-th
keywords jet quenchingeffective kinetic theoryparton showerthermalizationmedium responseMach conelinearized Boltzmann equationquark-gluon plasma
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper seeks to show that a single parton-shower Monte Carlo, derived from QCD effective kinetic theory, exactly reproduces the linearized Boltzmann equation for a perturbation on a thermal quark-gluon plasma, including the full set of 1↔2 and 2↔2 collisions with quantum-statistical factors. The motivation is that the same framework then describes both jet quenching — the energy loss and transverse broadening of hard partons — and the thermalization of soft fragments near the thermal scale, which traditional jet-quenching generators cannot do because they omit secondary scatterings and 2→1 merging. The authors further show how the shower extends to space-time inhomogeneous perturbations, producing Mach-cone-like density patterns and a negative diffusion wake even while the system is far from equilibrium. A sympathetic reader would care because this offers a single, first-principles-based path from a hard jet to the hydrodynamic response of the quark-gluon plasma, without an ad-hoc switching scale near 1 GeV.

Core claim

The central claim is that the parton shower constructed from the effective kinetic theory is exactly equivalent to the linearized Boltzmann equation. By separating collisions into real (momentum-changing) and virtual (no-collision) parts and iterating the integral equation, the shower generates a Markovian sequence of free propagation and collisions; the inhomogeneous version, in which particles free-stream between collisions and collision products are evaluated along comoving trajectories, is claimed to retain detailed balance, quantum statistics, and energy-momentum conservation. In the high-energy limit the inelastic kernel becomes the standard medium-induced splitting rate and the elasti

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Sudakov (no-collision) factor built from the virtual collision rates, combined with the real collision terms. Iterating the integral equation generates arbitrarily many collisions: each elastic 2↔2 scattering emits three lines — two recoils and one negative-weight hole — and each inelastic splitting emits two partons or a merging; the negative weights are what make detailed balance possible. For inhomogeneous perturbations, the streaming term is absorbed by moving to comoving coordinates and then transforming back, yielding the simple picture of free streaming between collisions with collision products evaluated along backward trajectories. The kernel set inclu

Load-bearing premise

All numerical checks use a simplified setup — gluons only, no quantum statistics, and the high-energy splitting rate applied down to 0.5 GeV — and assume this exercises the same negative-weight, merging, and cancellation features as the complete kernel in the p∼T region where the completion matters.

What would settle it

Implement the shower with the complete collision kernels of the effective kinetic theory — including fermions, Bose-Einstein and Fermi-Dirac statistical factors, and the full 1↔2 and 2↔2 matrix elements — and compare the single-particle distribution with a direct numerical solution of the linearized Boltzmann equation for momenta between 0.5 and 5 GeV; disagreement, or failure of the distribution to approach the perturbed equilibrium for a generic initial condition, would falsify the central equivalence claim.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The same shower describes both the high-energy jet-quenching regime and the near-thermal equilibration regime, so jet energy loss and medium thermalization no longer need separate models.
  • Inhomogeneous perturbations in three dimensions become computationally tractable, providing benchmark results for future kinetic-theory solvers and for comparisons with hydrodynamic wake signals.
  • Because energy and momentum are conserved at every vertex, medium response (wakes, Mach cones) is generated self-consistently rather than by assuming instantaneous thermalization below a switching scale.
  • Earlier Monte Carlo generators that omit secondary collisions or 2→1 merging cannot reach equilibrium; the derived shower restores the missing processes while reproducing the same single-particle evolution.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the equivalence survives with the full collision kernels, the shower gives a direct way to compute the energy-momentum deposition tensor from kinetic theory, which could be matched to hydrodynamics and would test whether the usual ~1 GeV switching scale biases jet-wake predictions.
  • The derivation is generic to any linearized Boltzmann equation, so the same algorithm could be adapted to neutrino transport in core-collapse supernovae or early-universe reheating, where inhomogeneous kinetic equations are a bottleneck.
  • The two-particle correlations shown rely on molecular chaos, which the paper states is unproven for the EKT; a natural extension is to interpret the shower correlations as the molecular-chaos null hypothesis and compare them with any future genuine multi-particle EKT evolution.
  • Since the numerics use only the high-energy splitting kernel down to 0.5 GeV, including the full low-energy kernels and quantum statistics could change the Mach-cone speed and the diffusion-wake pattern; testing this would show whether the present wake structures are robust.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper presents a parton-shower reformulation of the linearized AMY effective kinetic theory (EKT) for a small perturbation on a thermal background. The authors separate the collision terms into real and virtual parts, derive a Volterra-like equation with Sudakov no-collision factors, and extend it to spatially inhomogeneous perturbations using comoving coordinates. They then argue that the high-energy limit of the EKT reduces to BDMPS-Z type evolution, and implement a Monte Carlo that generates positive- and negative-weight particles to represent 1<->2 and 2<->2 processes. The shower is compared against a deterministic solver for a simplified gluon-only kernel, and the same framework is used to study inhomogeneous evolution and two-particle correlations.

Significance. If the full-kernel implementation is validated, this is a significant methodological advance: the construction is parameter-free in the sense that no data are fitted, and it unifies jet energy loss, thermalization, and medium response within one kinetic-theory framework. The analytic derivation of Eq. (5) as an exact rearrangement of the linearized Boltzmann equation is standard and appears correct, and the reduction to BDMPS-Z in the high-energy limit is plausible. The internal consistency check between the shower and a differential solver using the same simplified kernel is also a useful validation. However, the numerical verification does not exercise the full quantum-statistical, sign-changing kernel claimed in the abstract, so the strongest claim is not yet supported.

major comments (3)
  1. [The EKT parton shower / Appendix A] All numerical comparisons (Figs. 1, 2, 6) use a reduced kernel: gluons only, quantum statistics set to zero, and the high-energy BDMPS-Z-like splitting rate quoted in App. A applied down to E_min = 0.5 GeV. With n=0, Gamma_2 in Eq. (15) vanishes (no 2->1 merging) and the stimulated-emission corrections in Eqs. (11) and (14) are absent. Thus the p~T regime, where the full AMY kernel differs most from the high-energy limit and where the statistical factors can change sign, is not exercised. Eq. (5) is an exact rearrangement, but the Monte Carlo algorithm's practical correctness is kernel-dependent. The claim that the shower 'reproduces the full linearized Boltzmann equation, including ... quantum-statistical factors' is therefore not supported by the numerics. Please add a full-kernel benchmark or explicitly restrict the claim to the reduced kernel and defer full-kernel validation.
  2. [Figs. 1, 2, 6] No error bars or convergence diagnostics are given for the MC curves. Because Eq. (11) generates positive- and negative-weight particles, the histogrammed single-particle distributions rely on cancellations; without event counts, weight distributions, or a variance study, the agreement in Fig. 1 could mask poor convergence, especially at late times where the equilibrium distribution changes sign. Please report statistical uncertainties or an equivalent measure of weight cancellation (e.g., total positive/negative weight, effective number of events).
  3. [Two-particle correlations] In the two-particle section the paper explicitly states that the molecular-chaos/factorization assumption is unproven and that the multi-particle distributions of the EKT are unknown. Eq. (18) and Fig. 4 are therefore model-dependent predictions of the Markovian shower, not consequences of Eq. (1). The abstract and conclusion do not carry this caveat when presenting 'multi-particle correlations' and the 'full, real-time dynamics'. Please qualify these statements and label Fig. 4 as a shower-model prediction under molecular chaos.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (5)] The statement that Eq. (5) is 'equivalent to Eq. (3)' holds only in the homogeneous limit; as written, Eq. (5) is the inhomogeneous generalization. Please rephrase.
  2. [Implementation paragraph after Eq. (16)] The phrase 'limits of AMY collisions' is ambiguous; presumably 'high-energy limits'. Clarify that the numeric solver used for comparison solves the same reduced equation, not the full AMY kernel.
  3. [Eq. (10) and App. A] Notation: m_D^2 is given as g^2 T^2 (1+n_f/6) in Eq. (10) and as 4 pi alpha_s T^2 in App. A; define g^2 = 4 pi alpha_s once.
  4. [Two-particle correlations] The sentence 'we have proved that we reproduce Eq. (1)' should read 'the single-particle distribution reproduces Eq. (1)', since the multi-particle statement is not proved.
  5. [Fig. 1 and Fig. 6 labels] The labels 'lin. EKT' should specify the reduced gluon kernel, to avoid implying that the full AMY equation was solved.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the parton shower is derived from the linearized Boltzmann/EKT equation it is designed to solve, with validation against an independent differential-equation solver and external BDMPS-Z benchmarks; the only self-citation is not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central derivation is a Monte Carlo reformulation of the linearized Boltzmann equation: Eq. (5) is obtained by a comoving-coordinate rearrangement of Eq. (1) in App. B, and Eq. (3) is the standard integrated form of Eq. (1). The shower therefore reproduces the equation by construction, which is the intended function of a solver, not a circular physical claim. Numerical equivalence with the traditional EKT solver is an internal consistency check using the same matrix elements and phase-space cuts, and the high-energy limit is benchmarked against the independent BDMPS-Z formalism. No parameter is fitted to the MC output, and no predicted quantity is defined in terms of the input. The only self-citation, Ref. [69] by the same authors, is invoked for the inelastic-shower construction, but the real/virtual decomposition is re-derived here and the elastic extension is validated numerically, so the citation is not load-bearing. The paper also explicitly disclaims deriving multi-particle correlations from EKT, stating the molecular-chaos assumption is unproven, which removes any hidden circularity there. The use of a reduced gluon-only, quantum-statistics-neglecting kernel in the numerical tests limits how strongly the full AMY claim is validated, but that is a correctness/coverage concern, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 5 axioms · 1 invented entities

The analytic derivation introduces no fitted parameters; all numbers in the ledger are simulation inputs/regulators. The key assumptions are the static-equilibrium background, the AMY collision structure, the sufficiency of the simplified numerical kernels, and the molecular-chaos ansatz for correlations.

free parameters (5)
  • alpha_s (strong coupling) = 0.3
    Chosen benchmark strong coupling in all simulations; not fitted to data, but sets all collision rates.
  • T (background temperature) = 0.3 GeV
    Thermal background temperature chosen typical for QGP phenomenology; the linearized background n(p) depends on it.
  • p0 (initial parton energy) = 100 GeV
    Initial single-gluon perturbation momentum; scale of the high-energy limit.
  • E_min (IR cutoff for 1<->2) = 0.5 GeV (Figs. 1-3), 1 GeV (Fig. 4)
    Regulates IR poles of splitting rates; produces the sharp low-p cutoff in Fig. 1 and affects the approach to equilibrium.
  • m_min / t_min (screening cutoff for 2<->2) = 1 GeV
    Regulates collinear/IR region of elastic matrix element (Debye-like screening); affects broadening and equilibration rate. The figure labels inconsistently call it tmin and mmin.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The QGP and jet perturbations are described by AMY effective kinetic theory linearized around a static, spatially homogeneous equilibrium background n(p).
    Eq. (1) and the Sudakov/no-collision factor (eq. 4) rely on a fixed background; an expanding, out-of-equilibrium fireball is not treated.
  • domain assumption The collision terms have the form deltaC^{1<->2} + deltaC^{2<->2} and obey the standard AMY kernels with detailed balance.
    The derivation is structural (App. A says it depends only on the general form), but the claim to reproduce 'the full linearized Boltzmann equation' inherits the AMY approximation.
  • ad hoc to paper Numerics with gluons only, classical statistics, and high-energy BDMPS-Z-like Gamma are a sufficient test of the algorithm for the full kernel.
    Appendix A explicitly replaces AMY rates by the high-energy limit Gamma(z,p), so the equivalence checks do not exercise the full kernel near p~T; the burden is on the authors to show the algorithm is stable for the full AMY kernel.
  • domain assumption Multi-particle correlations factorize (molecular chaos).
    The paper states it is unknown how multi-particle distributions evolve in EKT and assumes Markovian factorization for the two-particle correlation results.
  • standard math The Dyson-series/Volterra iteration converges and the negative-weight Monte Carlo has finite variance.
    Eq. (5) is obtained by iterating the integral form of eq. (1); convergence is not proved but is empirically consistent with Figs. 1 and 6.
invented entities (1)
  • Negative-weight particles ('holes') no independent evidence
    purpose: Represent the loss/recoil terms of linearized 2<->2 and 1<->2 real collision kernels as MC particles, enabling detailed balance and equilibration in the shower.
    These are algorithmic bookkeeping devices that mirror the sign structure of deltaC_r; their validity is tested only against the linearized equation itself, so they carry no independent physical evidence.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 15356 in / 18707 out tokens · 186139 ms · 2026-08-01T00:39:18.896452+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

In the weak-coupling approach, thermalization of the quark-gluon plasma and the evolution of jet-like perturbations in the medium can be described by the same underlying QCD effective kinetic theory (EKT). In this work, we show how the EKT reduces to the standard energy-loss and angular-broadening evolution of jet-quenching in the high-energy regime, while providing a consistent description near the thermal scales. Building on this, we derive a parton shower directly from EKT that reproduces the full linearized Boltzmann equation, combining elastic and inelastic collisions to capture both hard-parton energy loss and thermal equilibration on an equal footing. This shower lets us extend EKT to inhomogeneous perturbations, connecting jet evolution to the medium's hydrodynamic response, including wakes, Mach cones, and multi-particle correlations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.26143 by Adam Takacs, Ismail Soudi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The gluon distribution as a function of the energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The gluon density in momentum space for different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The evolution of the number density parallel and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Two-particle distribution from the parton shower [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The spatial dependence of a collision using [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Energy distribution with only [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 84 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Busza, K

    W. Busza, K. Rajagopal, and W. van der Schee, Heavy Ion Collisions: The Big Picture, and the Big Questions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.68, 339 (2018), arXiv:1802.04801 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  2. [2]

    QGP Signatures

    J. W. Harris and B. Müller, “QGP Signatures” Revisited, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 247 (2024), arXiv:2308.05743 [hep- ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    N.ArmestoandE.Scomparin,Heavy-ioncollisionsatthe Large Hadron Collider: a review of the results from Run 1, Eur. Phys. J. Plus131, 52 (2016), arXiv:1511.02151 [nucl-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  4. [4]

    Connors, C

    M. Connors, C. Nattrass, R. Reed, and S. Salur, Jet mea- surements in heavy ion physics, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 025005 (2018), arXiv:1705.01974 [nucl-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  5. [5]

    Cunqueiro and A

    L. Cunqueiro and A. M. Sickles, Studying the QGP with Jets at the LHC and RHIC, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.124, 103940 (2022), arXiv:2110.14490 [nucl-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  6. [6]

    K.M.Burkeet al.(JET),Extractingthejettransportco- efficient from jet quenching in high-energy heavy-ion col- lisions, Phys. Rev. C90, 014909 (2014), arXiv:1312.5003 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  7. [7]

    Caoet al.(JETSCAPE), Determining the jet trans- port coefficientˆqfrom inclusive hadron suppression mea- surements using Bayesian parameter estimation, Phys

    S. Caoet al.(JETSCAPE), Determining the jet trans- port coefficientˆqfrom inclusive hadron suppression mea- surements using Bayesian parameter estimation, Phys. Rev. C104, 024905 (2021), arXiv:2102.11337 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    Ehlerset al.(JETSCAPE), Bayesian inference anal- ysis of jet quenching using inclusive jet and hadron suppression measurements, Phys

    R. Ehlerset al.(JETSCAPE), Bayesian inference anal- ysis of jet quenching using inclusive jet and hadron suppression measurements, Phys. Rev. C111, 054913 (2025), arXiv:2408.08247 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    Casalderrey-Solana and C

    J. Casalderrey-Solana and C. A. Salgado, Introductory lectures on jet quenching in heavy ion collisions, Acta Phys. Polon. B38, 3731 (2007), arXiv:0712.3443 [hep- ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  10. [10]

    Majumder and M

    A. Majumder and M. Van Leeuwen, The Theory and Phenomenology of Perturbative QCD Based Jet Quenching, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.66, 41 (2011), arXiv:1002.2206 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  11. [11]

    Mehtar-Tani, J

    Y. Mehtar-Tani, J. G. Milhano, and K. Tywoniuk, Jet physics in heavy-ion collisions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A28, 1340013 (2013), arXiv:1302.2579 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  12. [12]

    Qin and X.-N

    G.-Y. Qin and X.-N. Wang, Jet quenching in high-energy heavy-ion collisions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E24, 1530014 (2015), arXiv:1511.00790 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  13. [13]

    Mehtar-Tani, The Physics of Jet Quenching in Per- turbative QCD, (2025), arXiv:2509.26394 [hep-ph]

    Y. Mehtar-Tani, The Physics of Jet Quenching in Per- turbative QCD, (2025), arXiv:2509.26394 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Majumder, Incorporating Space-Time Within Medium-Modified Jet Event Generators, Phys

    A. Majumder, Incorporating Space-Time Within Medium-Modified Jet Event Generators, Phys. Rev. C 88, 014909 (2013), arXiv:1301.5323 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  15. [15]

    K. C. Zapp, JEWEL 2.0.0: directions for use, Eur. Phys. J. C74, 2762 (2014), arXiv:1311.0048 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  16. [16]

    Caucal, E

    P. Caucal, E. Iancu, A. H. Mueller, and G. Soyez, Vacuum-like jet fragmentation in a dense QCD medium, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 232001 (2018), arXiv:1801.09703 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  17. [17]

    A. M. Sirunyanet al.(CMS), First measurement of large area jet transverse momentum spectra in heavy-ion col- lisions, JHEP05, 284, arXiv:2102.13080 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [18]

    Aadet al.(ATLAS), Measurement of substructure- dependent jet suppression in Pb+Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys

    G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Measurement of substructure- dependent jet suppression in Pb+Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. C107, 054909 (2023), arXiv:2211.11470 [nucl-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  19. [19]

    Aadet al.(ATLAS), Comparison of inclusive and 8 10−1 100 101 102 p [GeV] −103 −102 −101 −100 −10−1 −10−2 0 10−2 10−1 100 101 102 103 dN/dp lin

    G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Comparison of inclusive and 8 10−1 100 101 102 p [GeV] −103 −102 −101 −100 −10−1 −10−2 0 10−2 10−1 100 101 102 103 dN/dp lin. EKT, gluon 2 ↔ 2 αs = 0.3, T = 0.3 GeV p0 = 100 GeV, mmin = 1 GeV t = 0.2 fm t = 2 fm t = 20 fm t = 200 fm MC equilibrium 10−1 100 101 102 p [GeV] −103 −102 −101 −100 −10−1 −10−2 0 10−2 10−1 100 101 102 103 dN/...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  20. [20]

    Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Measurement of the radius dependence of charged-particle jet suppression in Pb–Pb collisions at sNN=5.02TeV, Phys

    S. Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Measurement of the radius dependence of charged-particle jet suppression in Pb–Pb collisions at sNN=5.02TeV, Phys. Lett. B849, 138412 (2024), arXiv:2303.00592 [nucl-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Search for quasi-particle scat- tering in the quark-gluon plasma with jet splittings in pp and Pb−Pb collisions at√sNN = 5.02 TeV, Phys

    S. Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Search for quasi-particle scat- tering in the quark-gluon plasma with jet splittings in pp and Pb−Pb collisions at√sNN = 5.02 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 031901 (2025), arXiv:2409.12837 [nucl-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Belyaevet al.(CMS), Probing early parton emissions in heavy ion collisions using the Lund jet plane, (2026), arXiv:2602.09271 [nucl-ex]

    A. Belyaevet al.(CMS), Probing early parton emissions in heavy ion collisions using the Lund jet plane, (2026), arXiv:2602.09271 [nucl-ex]

    arXiv 2026

  23. [23]

    Schenke, S

    B. Schenke, S. Jeon, and C. Gale, Elliptic and triangu- lar flow in event-by-event (3+1)D viscous hydrodynam- ics,Phys.Rev.Lett.106,042301(2011),arXiv:1009.3244 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  24. [24]

    G. Nijs, W. van der Schee, U. Gürsoy, and R. Snellings, Transverse Momentum Differential Global Analysis of Heavy-Ion Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 202301 (2021), arXiv:2010.15130 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  25. [25]

    Wu, G.-Y

    X.-Y. Wu, G.-Y. Qin, L.-G. Pang, and X.-N. Wang, (3+1)-D viscous hydrodynamics at finite net baryon den- sity: Identified particle spectra, anisotropic flows, and flow fluctuations across energies relevant to the beam- energy scan at RHIC, Phys. Rev. C105, 034909 (2022), arXiv:2107.04949 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  26. [26]

    Cao and X.-N

    S. Cao and X.-N. Wang, Jet quenching and medium response in high-energy heavy-ion collisions: a review, Rept. Prog. Phys.84, 024301 (2021), arXiv:2002.04028 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  27. [27]

    Y. He, W. Chen, T. Luo, S. Cao, L.-G. Pang, and X.-N. Wang, Event-by-event jet anisotropy and hard-soft to- mography of the quark-gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. C106, 044904 (2022), arXiv:2201.08408 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  28. [28]

    Barreto, F

    L. Barreto, F. M. Canedo, M. G. Munhoz, J. Noronha, and J. Noronha-Hostler, Jet cone radius depen- dence of RAA and v2 at PbPb 5.02 TeV from JEWEL+TRENTo+v-USPhydro, Phys. Lett. B860, 139217 (2025), arXiv:2208.02061 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    S. Cao, A. Majumder, R. Modarresi-Yazdi, I. Soudi, and Y. Tachibana, Jet Quenching: From Theory to Simulation, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E33, 2430002 (2024), arXiv:2401.10026 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Iqbal, Three models for charged hadron nu- clear modification from light to heavy ions, (2025), arXiv:2509.04299 [nucl-th]

    W.vanderSchee, I.Kolbé, G.Nijs, K.Ruhani, I.Ahmed, and S. Iqbal, Three models for charged hadron nu- clear modification from light to heavy ions, (2025), arXiv:2509.04299 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    S. S. Gubser, S. S. Pufu, and A. Yarom, Sonic booms and diffusion wakes generated by a heavy quark in ther- mal AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 012301 (2008), arXiv:0706.4307 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  32. [32]

    P. M. Chesler and L. G. Yaffe, The Stress-energy tensor of a quark moving through a strongly-coupled N=4 su- persymmetric Yang-Mills plasma: Comparing hydrody- namics and AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. D78, 045013 (2008), arXiv:0712.0050 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  33. [33]

    Casalderrey-Solana, J

    J. Casalderrey-Solana, J. G. Milhano, D. Pablos, K. Ra- jagopal, and X. Yao, Jet Wake from Linearized Hydro- dynamics, JHEP05, 230, arXiv:2010.01140 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  34. [34]

    Pablos, M

    D. Pablos, M. Singh, S. Jeon, and C. Gale, Minijet quenching in a concurrent jet+hydro evolution and the nonequilibrium quark-gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. C106, 034901 (2022), arXiv:2202.03414 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  35. [35]

    Pablos, Jet Suppression From a Small to Intermediate to Large Radius, Phys

    D. Pablos, Jet Suppression From a Small to Intermediate to Large Radius, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 052301 (2020), arXiv:1907.12301 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  36. [36]

    Z. Yang, T. Luo, W. Chen, L.-G. Pang, and X.-N. Wang, 3D Structure of Jet-Induced Diffusion Wake in an Ex- panding Quark-Gluon Plasma, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 052301 (2023), arXiv:2203.03683 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  37. [37]

    Z. Yang, Y. He, I. Moult, and X.-N. Wang, Probing the Short-Distance Structure of the Quark-Gluon Plasma with Energy Correlators, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 011901 (2024), arXiv:2310.01500 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    Bossi, A

    H. Bossi, A. S. Kudinoor, I. Moult, D. Pablos, A. Rai, and K. Rajagopal, Imaging the wakes of jets with energy-energy-energy correlators, JHEP12, 073, arXiv:2407.13818 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [39]

    Yang and X.-N

    Z. Yang and X.-N. Wang, Rapidity Asymmetry of Jet- Hadron Correlation as a Robust Signal of Diffusion Wake Induced by Dijets in High-Energy Heavy-Ion Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 072302 (2025), arXiv:2501.03419 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    A. M. Sirunyanet al.(CMS), Using Z Boson Events to Study Parton-Medium Interactions in Pb-Pb Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 122301 (2022), arXiv:2103.04377 9 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  41. [41]

    G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Search for the jet-induced diffu- sion wake in the quark-gluon plasma via measurements of jet-track correlations in photon-jet events in Pb+Pb col- lisions at sNN=5.02TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. C111, 044909 (2025), arXiv:2408.08599 [nucl-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    V. Chekhovskyet al.(CMS), Evidence of medium re- sponse to hard probes using correlations of Z bosons with hadronsinheavyioncollisions,Phys.Lett.B874,140120 (2026), arXiv:2507.09307 [nucl-ex]

    arXiv 2026

  43. [43]

    Hayrapetyanet al.(CMS), Observation of the jet dif- fusion wake using dijets in heavy ion collisions, (2026), arXiv:2602.19431 [nucl-ex]

    A. Hayrapetyanet al.(CMS), Observation of the jet dif- fusion wake using dijets in heavy ion collisions, (2026), arXiv:2602.19431 [nucl-ex]

    arXiv 2026

  44. [44]

    P. B. Arnold, G. D. Moore, and L. G. Yaffe, Effective kinetictheoryforhightemperaturegaugetheories,JHEP 01, 030, arXiv:hep-ph/0209353

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [45]

    R.Baier, A.H.Mueller, D.Schiff,andD.T.Son,’Bottom up’ thermalization in heavy ion collisions, Phys. Lett. B 502, 51 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0009237

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  46. [46]

    Schlichting and D

    S. Schlichting and D. Teaney, The First fm/c of Heavy- Ion Collisions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.69, 447 (2019), arXiv:1908.02113 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  47. [47]

    Berges, M

    J. Berges, M. P. Heller, A. Mazeliauskas, and R. Venu- gopalan, QCD thermalization: Ab initio approaches and interdisciplinary connections, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 035003 (2021), arXiv:2005.12299 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  48. [48]

    Schlichting and I

    S. Schlichting and I. Soudi, Medium-induced fragmenta- tion and equilibration of highly energetic partons, JHEP 07, 077, arXiv:2008.04928 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  49. [49]

    Mehtar-Tani, S

    Y. Mehtar-Tani, S. Schlichting, and I. Soudi, Jet ther- malization in QCD kinetic theory, JHEP05, 091, arXiv:2209.10569 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  50. [50]

    F.Zhou, J.Brewer,andA.Mazeliauskas,Minijetquench- ing in non-equilibrium quark-gluon plasma, JHEP06, 214, arXiv:2402.09298 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [51]

    Boguslavski, F

    K. Boguslavski, F. Lindenbauer, A. Mazeliauskas, A. Takacs, and F. Zhou, Minijet thermalization and jet transport coefficients in QCD kinetic theory, JHEP05, 093, arXiv:2510.25669 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  52. [52]

    Citronet al., Report from Working Group 5: Future physics opportunities for high-density QCD at the LHC with heavy-ion and proton beams, CERN Yellow Rep

    Z. Citronet al., Report from Working Group 5: Future physics opportunities for high-density QCD at the LHC with heavy-ion and proton beams, CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr.7, 1159 (2019), arXiv:1812.06772 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  53. [53]

    Brewer, A

    J. Brewer, A. Mazeliauskas, and W. van der Schee, Op- portunities of OO andpO collisions at the LHC, inOp- portunities of OO and pO collisions at the LHC(2021) arXiv:2103.01939 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  54. [54]

    Hayrapetyanet al.(CMS), Discovery of suppressed charged-particle production in ultrarelativistic oxygen- oxygen collisions, (2025), arXiv:2510.09864 [nucl-ex]

    A. Hayrapetyanet al.(CMS), Discovery of suppressed charged-particle production in ultrarelativistic oxygen- oxygen collisions, (2025), arXiv:2510.09864 [nucl-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    Ali Hassan Abdallahet al.(ALICE), Evidence for parton energy loss in oxygen−oxygen collisions at√sNN =5.36TeV, (2026), arXiv:2606.19967 [nucl-ex]

    D. Ali Hassan Abdallahet al.(ALICE), Evidence for parton energy loss in oxygen−oxygen collisions at√sNN =5.36TeV, (2026), arXiv:2606.19967 [nucl-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  56. [56]

    G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Observation of centrality- dependent dijet transverse momentum imbalance in O+O and Ne+Ne collisions at√sN N= 5.36 TeV with the ATLAS detector, (2026), arXiv:2606.20463 [nucl-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  57. [57]

    [58]Jet production in Oxygen-Oxygen collisions at√sNN =200GeV, Tech

    Measurement of jet quenching in O+O collisions at√sNN = 200GeV by the STAR experiment at RHIC, (2026), arXiv:2604.13935 [nucl-ex]. [58]Jet production in Oxygen-Oxygen collisions at√sNN =200GeV, Tech. Rep. (BNL, Brookhaven, 2026)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  58. [59]

    Mehtar-Tani and S

    Y. Mehtar-Tani and S. Schlichting, Universal quark to gluonratioinmedium-inducedpartoncascade,JHEP09, 144, arXiv:1807.06181 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  59. [60]

    K. Zapp, G. Ingelman, J. Rathsman, J. Stachel, and U. A. Wiedemann, A Monte Carlo Model for ’Jet Quenching’, Eur. Phys. J. C60, 617 (2009), arXiv:0804.3568 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  60. [61]

    Auvinen, K

    J. Auvinen, K. J. Eskola, and T. Renk, A Monte-Carlo model for elastic energy loss in a hydrodynamical back- ground, Phys. Rev. C82, 024906 (2010), arXiv:0912.2265 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  61. [62]

    Schenke, C

    B. Schenke, C. Gale, and S. Jeon, MARTINI: An Event generator for relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C80, 054913 (2009), arXiv:0909.2037 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  62. [63]

    Y. He, T. Luo, X.-N. Wang, and Y. Zhu, Linear Boltz- mann Transport for Jet Propagation in the Quark-Gluon Plasma: Elastic Processes and Medium Recoil, Phys. Rev. C91, 054908 (2015), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 97, 019902 (2018)], arXiv:1503.03313 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  63. [64]

    Y. He, S. Cao, W. Chen, T. Luo, L.-G. Pang, and X.-N. Wang, Interplaying mechanisms behind single inclusive jet suppression in heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C99, 054911 (2019), arXiv:1809.02525 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  64. [65]

    D’Eramo, K

    F. D’Eramo, K. Rajagopal, and Y. Yin, Molière scatter- ing in quark-gluon plasma: finding point-like scatterers in a liquid, JHEP01, 172, arXiv:1808.03250 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  65. [66]

    E. W. Kolb and M. S. Turner,The Early Universe, Vol. 69 (Taylor and Francis, 2019)

    2019

  66. [67]

    Konstandin, Quantum Transport and Electroweak Baryogenesis,Phys.Usp.56,747(2013),arXiv:1302.6713 [hep-ph]

    T. Konstandin, Quantum Transport and Electroweak Baryogenesis,Phys.Usp.56,747(2013),arXiv:1302.6713 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  67. [68]

    Mezzacappa, E

    A. Mezzacappa, E. Endeve, O. E. Bronson Messer, and S. W. Bruenn, Physical, numerical, and computational challengesofmodelingneutrinotransportincore-collapse supernovae, Liv. Rev. Comput. Astrophys.6, 4 (2020), arXiv:2010.09013 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  68. [69]

    Soudi and A

    I. Soudi and A. Takacs, Deriving a parton shower for jet thermalization in QCD plasmas, Phys. Rev. D113, 074011 (2026), arXiv:2510.25837 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  69. [70]

    Lönnblad, Fooling Around with the Sudakov Veto Algorithm, Eur

    L. Lönnblad, Fooling Around with the Sudakov Veto Algorithm, Eur. Phys. J. C73, 2350 (2013), arXiv:1211.7204 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  70. [71]

    Höche, Introduction to parton-shower event generators (2015) pp

    S. Höche, Introduction to parton-shower event generators (2015) pp. 235–295, arXiv:1411.4085 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  71. [72]

    Bierlichet al., A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3, SciPost Phys

    C. Bierlichet al., A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3, SciPost Phys. Codeb.2022, 8 (2022), arXiv:2203.11601 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  72. [73]

    Bewicket al., Herwig 7.3 release note, Eur

    G. Bewicket al., Herwig 7.3 release note, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 1053 (2024), arXiv:2312.05175 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  73. [74]

    Bothmannet al.(Sherpa), Event generation with Sherpa 3, JHEP12, 156, arXiv:2410.22148 [hep-ph]

    E. Bothmannet al.(Sherpa), Event generation with Sherpa 3, JHEP12, 156, arXiv:2410.22148 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  74. [75]

    Baier, Y

    R. Baier, Y. L. Dokshitzer, A. H. Mueller, S. Peigne, and D.Schiff,Radiativeenergylossofhigh-energyquarks and gluons in a finite volume quark - gluon plasma, Nucl. Phys. B483, 291 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9607355

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  75. [76]

    Zakharov, Fully quantum treatment of the Landau- Pomeranchuk-Migdal effect in QED and QCD, JETP Lett.63, 952 (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9607440

    B. Zakharov, Fully quantum treatment of the Landau- Pomeranchuk-Migdal effect in QED and QCD, JETP Lett.63, 952 (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9607440

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  76. [77]

    P. B. Arnold, Simple Formula for High-Energy Gluon Bremsstrahlung in a Finite, Expanding Medium, Phys. Rev. D79, 065025 (2009), arXiv:0808.2767 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  77. [78]

    P. B. Arnold and W. Xiao, High-energy jet quenching in weakly-coupled quark-gluon plasmas, Phys. Rev. D78, 125008 (2008), arXiv:0810.1026 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  78. [79]

    Blaizot, F

    J.-P. Blaizot, F. Dominguez, E. Iancu, and Y. Mehtar- 10 Tani, Probabilistic picture for medium-induced jet evo- lution, JHEP06, 075, arXiv:1311.5823 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  79. [80]

    Blaizot, Y

    J.-P. Blaizot, Y. Mehtar-Tani, and M. A. C. Torres, An- gular structure of the in-medium QCD cascade, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 222002 (2015), arXiv:1407.0326 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  80. [81]

    Blaizot and Y

    J.-P. Blaizot and Y. Mehtar-Tani, Energy flow along the medium-induced parton cascade, Annals Phys.368, 148 (2016), arXiv:1501.03443 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

Showing first 80 references.