REVIEW 3 cited by
MentaLLaMA: Interpretable Mental Health Analysis on Social Media with Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
With the development of web technology, social media texts are becoming a rich source for automatic mental health analysis. As traditional discriminative methods bear the problem of low interpretability, the recent large language models have been explored for interpretable mental health analysis on social media, which aims to provide detailed explanations along with predictions. The results show that ChatGPT can generate approaching-human explanations for its correct classifications. However, LLMs still achieve unsatisfactory classification performance in a zero-shot/few-shot manner. Domain-specific finetuning is an effective solution, but faces 2 challenges: 1) lack of high-quality training data. 2) no open-source LLMs for interpretable mental health analysis were released to lower the finetuning cost. To alleviate these problems, we build the first multi-task and multi-source interpretable mental health instruction (IMHI) dataset on social media, with 105K data samples. The raw social media data are collected from 10 existing sources covering 8 mental health analysis tasks. We use expert-written few-shot prompts and collected labels to prompt ChatGPT and obtain explanations from its responses. To ensure the reliability of the explanations, we perform strict automatic and human evaluations on the correctness, consistency, and quality of generated data. Based on the IMHI dataset and LLaMA2 foundation models, we train MentalLLaMA, the first open-source LLM series for interpretable mental health analysis with instruction-following capability. We also evaluate the performance of MentalLLaMA on the IMHI evaluation benchmark with 10 test sets, where their correctness for making predictions and the quality of explanations are examined. The results show that MentalLLaMA approaches state-of-the-art discriminative methods in correctness and generates high-quality explanations.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Systematic Evaluation of Machine-Generated Reasoning and PHQ-9 Labeling for Depression Detection Using Large Language Models
A subtask decomposition of depression detection shows LLMs are biased by explicit depression keywords, and DPO fine-tuning on quality-filtered machine-generated rationales improves joint PHQ-9 labeling on the hardest samples.
-
Spiritual-LLM : Gita Inspired Mental Health Therapy In the Era of LLMs
A Gita-based mental-health dialogue dataset helps small LLMs score higher on spirituality-oriented metrics, but the evaluation loop is largely self-referential.
-
Analysing Self-Harm Representations in Language Models: a Cross-Architecture Study
Self-harm information in four LLMs is most linearly separable at the last layers, but Gemma-3-4B spreads the signal across many directions rather than a single one.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.