REVIEW 8 cited by
AutoRule: Reasoning Chain-of-thought Extracted Rule-based Rewards Improve Preference Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
AutoRule: Reasoning Chain-of-thought Extracted Rule-based Rewards Improve Preference Learning
read the original abstract
Rule-based rewards offer a promising strategy for improving reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), but current approaches often rely on manual rule engineering. We present AutoRule, a fully automated method for extracting rules from preference feedback and formulating them into rule-based rewards. AutoRule extraction operates in three stages: it leverages a reasoning model to interpret user preferences, identifies candidate rules from the reasoning chain of these interpretations, and synthesizes them into a unified rule set. Leveraging the finalized rule set, we employ language-model verifiers to compute the fraction of rules satisfied by each output, using this metric as an auxiliary reward alongside the learned reward model during policy optimization. Training a Llama-3-8B model with AutoRule results in a 28.6\% relative improvement in length-controlled win rate on AlpacaEval2.0, and a 6.1\% relative gain in second-turn performance on a held-out MT-Bench subset, compared to a GRPO baseline trained with the same learned reward model but without the rule-based auxiliary reward. Our analysis confirms that the extracted rules exhibit good agreement with dataset preference. We find that AutoRule demonstrates reduced reward hacking compared to a learned reward model when run over two episodes. Finally, our case study suggests that the extracted rules capture unique qualities valued in different datasets. The extracted rules are provided in the appendix, and the code is open-sourced at https://github.com/cxcscmu/AutoRule.
Forward citations
Cited by 8 Pith papers
-
AutoRubric-T2I: Robust Rule-Based Reward Model for Text-to-Image Alignment
AutoRubric-T2I learns and selects explicit rubrics from preference pairs to guide VLM judges, producing high-quality interpretable rewards for T2I alignment with far less data than traditional Bradley-Terry models.
-
AutoRubric-T2I: Robust Rule-Based Reward Model for Text-to-Image Alignment
AutoRubric-T2I learns a small set of interpretable rubrics for VLM judges that outperform scalar reward models on T2I benchmarks while using far less preference data.
-
Generating and Refining Dynamic Evaluation Rubrics for LLM-as-a-Judge
Training-free dynamic rubric generation and meta-judge fine-tuning for LLM evaluation that matches or exceeds baselines on four benchmarks, with a 14B model outperforming larger proprietary systems.
-
Evaluation-driven Scaling for Scientific Discovery
SimpleTES scales test-time evaluation in LLMs to discover state-of-the-art solutions on 21 scientific problems across six domains, outperforming frontier models and optimization pipelines with examples like 2x faster ...
-
Training LLM Agents for Spontaneous, Reward-Free Self-Evolution via World Knowledge Exploration
LLM agents trained with a task-success reward on self-generated knowledge can spontaneously explore and adapt to new environments without any rewards or instructions at inference, yielding 20% gains on web tasks and a...
-
Modularized Reinforcement Learning on LLMs: From MDP Creation to Exploration and Learning
Survey mapping RL techniques onto LLM training and highlighting gaps in value-based, off-policy, and bootstrapping methods.
-
A Survey of Self-Evolving Agents: What, When, How, and Where to Evolve on the Path to Artificial Super Intelligence
The paper delivers the first systematic review of self-evolving agents, structured around what components evolve, when adaptation occurs, and how it is implemented.
-
Reinforcement Learning Meets Large Language Models: A Survey of Advancements and Applications Across the LLM Lifecycle
A survey that maps reinforcement learning methods, datasets, benchmarks, and open-source tools across the full training lifecycle of large language models, focusing on verifiable-reward reasoning.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.