pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.11346 · v1 · pith:KBW4LYBGnew · submitted 2019-06-26 · 🌌 astro-ph.EP · astro-ph.IM

Maximizing LSST Solar System Science: Approaches, Software Tools, and Infrastructure Needs

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 14:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.IM
keywords LSSTsolar systemsmall bodiessoftware toolsinfrastructuredata processingorbit determinationplanetary science
0
0 comments X

The pith

LSST will increase known small solar system objects by an order of magnitude or more, but specific software tools and infrastructure must be developed beforehand to realize the science.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that the LSST survey will multiply the known populations of small solar system bodies by ten times or greater within a decade. This expansion would support a wide range of new investigations into orbital dynamics, compositions, and formation histories if the data can be processed effectively. The authors identify the software tools for detection, tracking, and analysis plus the supporting infrastructure that the community must build in advance. They outline implementation approaches and issue a call for coordinated development before operations begin in late 2022. A sympathetic reader would see this as a practical roadmap to avoid missing the scientific opportunity created by the survey's data volume.

Core claim

The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope is expected to increase known small solar system object populations by an order of magnitude or more over the next decade, enabling a broad array of transformative solar system science investigations to be performed, provided the community develops and deploys the necessary software tools and infrastructure in time.

What carries the argument

The set of anticipated software tools for object detection, orbit determination, light-curve analysis, and infrastructure for data handling and community coordination that carry the argument for readiness.

If this is right

  • Statistical studies of previously inaccessible subpopulations of asteroids and comets become feasible with the larger sample sizes.
  • Real-time follow-up observations of newly discovered objects require integrated alert and scheduling systems.
  • Long-term archiving and reprocessing capabilities must support repeated analyses as the survey accumulates data.
  • Community-wide standards for data formats and algorithms will be needed to combine LSST results with other surveys.
  • Targeted science cases such as near-Earth object characterization and trans-Neptunian object dynamics depend on the outlined tools being available.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Prioritizing open-source development of orbit-fitting codes could accelerate readiness across multiple institutions.
  • Integration with existing planetary science databases would reduce duplication of effort once LSST data arrives.
  • Testing the proposed infrastructure on precursor surveys like ZTF could reveal bottlenecks before full operations.
  • Failure to coordinate across subfields risks uneven science return favoring only well-resourced groups.

Load-bearing premise

The solar system science community will successfully develop and deploy the specific software tools and infrastructure in time for the start of LSST operations in late 2022.

What would settle it

Absence of operational software pipelines for real-time LSST solar system object processing and orbit solutions by the start of survey operations in late 2022 would demonstrate the claim does not hold.

read the original abstract

The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) is expected to increase known small solar system object populations by an order of magnitude or more over the next decade, enabling a broad array of transformative solar system science investigations to be performed. In this white paper, we discuss software tools and infrastructure that we anticipate will be needed to conduct these investigations and outline possible approaches for implementing them. Feedback from the community or contributions to future updates of this work are welcome. Our aim is for this white paper to encourage further consideration of the software development needs of the LSST solar system science community, and also to be a call to action for working to meet those needs in advance of the expected start of the survey in late 2022.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. This white paper claims that the LSST survey will increase the known populations of small solar system objects by an order of magnitude or more, enabling transformative science. It identifies necessary software tools and infrastructure for handling the data, suggests implementation approaches, and urges the community to develop these resources ahead of LSST operations starting in late 2022.

Significance. If the recommendations are followed, the paper could play a key role in preparing the solar system science community for LSST by highlighting infrastructure needs and fostering collaboration on tool development. It gives credit to prior LSST projections for the data volume estimates and focuses on actionable steps rather than unsubstantiated claims.

minor comments (1)
  1. The manuscript would benefit from an explicit list or table summarizing the key software tools and infrastructure needs discussed throughout the text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the white paper, including the recognition of its potential role in preparing the community and the recommendation to accept.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: white paper with no derivations or fitted claims

full rationale

This 2019 community white paper enumerates software and infrastructure needs for LSST solar-system science and issues a call to action. It contains no equations, derivations, fitted parameters, quantitative predictions, or technical claims whose correctness is defended within the paper. The sole forward-looking statement (order-of-magnitude increase in known objects) is presented as background expectation from LSST survey capabilities rather than a result derived or fitted here. No load-bearing steps exist that could reduce by construction to inputs, self-citations, or ansatzes. The document is self-contained as planning guidance without any circular reasoning possible.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced because the document is a planning white paper rather than a derivation or model.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5717 in / 940 out tokens · 22053 ms · 2026-05-25T14:46:40.105584+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

155 extracted references · 155 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    2017, Nature, 549, 357

    Agarwal, J., Jewitt, D., Mutchler, M., Weaver, H., & Larson, S. 2017, Nature, 549, 357

  2. [2]

    2016, Astron

    Agarwal, J., Jewitt, D., Weaver, H., Mutchler, M., & Larson, S. 2016, Astron. J., 151, 12 A ’Hearn, M. F., Schleicher, D. G., Millis, R. L., Feldman, P . D., & Thompson, D. T. 1984, Astron. J., 89, 579 A ’Hearn, M. F., Belton, M. J. S., Delamere, W. A., et al. 2005, Science, 310, 258

  3. [3]

    2015, Astrophys

    Akhlaghi, M., & Ichikawa, T. 2015, Astrophys. J. Suppl., 220 , 1

  4. [4]

    Ashton, E. e. a. 2019, Icarusin review Assafin, M., Camargo, J. I. B., Vieira Martins, R., et al. 2010 , Astron. Astrophys., 515, A32

  5. [5]

    Bannister, M. T. 2014, PhD thesis, RSAA, the Australian Nati onal University., Canberra

  6. [6]

    T., Kavelaars, J

    Bannister, M. T., Kavelaars, J. J., Petit, J.-M., et al. 2016 , Astron. J., 152, 70

  7. [7]

    M., Fern´ andez, Y

    Bauer, J. M., Fern´ andez, Y . R., & Meech, K. J. 2003, PASP , 115, 981

  8. [8]

    N., Ortiz, J

    Belskaya, I. N., Ortiz, J. L., Rousselot, P ., et al. 2006, Ica rus, 184, 277

  9. [9]

    Belton, M. J. S., Meech, K. J., Chesley, S., et al. 2011, Icaru s, 213, 345 B´ erard, D., Sicardy, B., Camargo, J. I. B., et al. 2017, Astron. J., 154, 144

  10. [10]

    2000, Astron

    Bernstein, G., & Khushalani, B. 2000, Astron. J., 120, 3323

  11. [11]

    S., & Betzler, L

    Betzler, A. S., & Betzler, L. B. S. 2017, Earth Moon and Planet s, 120, 1

  12. [12]

    P ., Morbidelli, A., Merouane, S., et al

    Binzel, R. P ., Morbidelli, A., Merouane, S., et al. 2010, Nat ure, 463, 331

  13. [13]

    L., Kelley, M

    Bodewits, D., Farnham, T. L., Kelley, M. S. P ., & Knight, M. M. 2018, Nature, 553, 186

  14. [14]

    S., Li, J.-Y ., et al

    Bodewits, D., Kelley, M. S., Li, J.-Y ., et al. 2011, Astrophy s. J., 733, L3

  15. [15]

    Bodewits, D., Vincent, J.-B., & Kelley, M. S. P . 2014, Icarus, 229, 190

  16. [16]

    2016, Mon

    Boehnhardt, H., Riffeser, A., Kluge, M., et al. 2016, Mon. No t. R. Astron. Soc., 462, S376

  17. [17]

    2014, Icarus, 241 , 280

    Bolin, B., Jedicke, R., Granvik, M., et al. 2014, Icarus, 241 , 280

  18. [18]

    T., Delbo’, M., Morbidelli, A., & Walsh, K

    Bolin, B. T., Delbo’, M., Morbidelli, A., & Walsh, K. J. 2017, Icarus, 282, 290

  19. [19]

    1989, in Asteroid s II, 524–556

    Bowell, E., Hapke, B., Domingue, D., et al. 1989, in Asteroid s II, 524–556

  20. [20]

    L., et al

    Braga-Ribas, F., Sicardy, B., Ortiz, J. L., et al. 2013, Astr ophys. J., 773, 26 74 —. 2014, Nature, 508, 72

  21. [21]

    Brasser, R., & Lehto, H. J. 2002, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 33 4, 241

  22. [22]

    E., Barkume, K

    Brown, M. E., Barkume, K. M., Ragozzine, D., & Schaller, E. L. 2007, Nature, 446, 294

  23. [23]

    E., Bannister, M

    Brown, M. E., Bannister, M. T., Schmidt, B. P ., et al. 2015, As tron. J., 149, 69

  24. [24]

    W., & Keller, J

    Buie, M. W., & Keller, J. M. 2016, Astron. J., 151, 73

  25. [25]

    J., & Binzel, R

    Bus, S. J., & Binzel, R. P . 2002, Icarus, 158, 146

  26. [26]

    J., Bowell, E., & French, L

    Bus, S. J., Bowell, E., & French, L. M. 1988, IAU Circ., 4684

  27. [27]

    M., & Davalos, J

    Carvano, J. M., & Davalos, J. A. G. 2015, Astron. Astrophys., 580, A98

  28. [28]

    M., Hasselmann, P

    Carvano, J. M., Hasselmann, P . H., Lazzaro, D., & Moth´ e-Diniz, T. 2010, Astron. Astrophys., 510, A43

  29. [29]

    O., Curtis, A

    Chandler, C. O., Curtis, A. M., Mommert, M., Sheppard, S. S., & Trujillo, C. A. 2018, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 130, 114502

  30. [30]

    M., Tamarov, V

    Chernitsov, A. M., Tamarov, V . A., & Barannikov, Y . A. 2017, Solar System Research, 51, 400 Cibulkov´ a, H., Nortunen, H.,ˇDurech, J., et al. 2018, Astron. Astrophys., 611, A86

  31. [31]

    L., Cikota, A., Morales, N., & Tancredi , G

    Cikota, S., Ortiz, J. L., Cikota, A., Morales, N., & Tancredi , G. 2014, Astron. Astrophys., 562, A94

  32. [32]

    E., Binzel, R

    DeMeo, F. E., Binzel, R. P ., & Lockhart, M. 2014, Icarus, 227, 112

  33. [33]

    E., Binzel, R

    DeMeo, F. E., Binzel, R. P ., Slivan, S. M., & Bus, S. J. 2009, Ic arus, 202, 160

  34. [34]

    2013, Publication s of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 125, 357

    Denneau, L., Jedicke, R., Grav, T., et al. 2013, Publication s of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 125, 357

  35. [35]

    2015, Icar us, 245, 1

    Denneau, L., Jedicke, R., Fitzsimmons, A., et al. 2015, Icar us, 245, 1

  36. [36]

    Desmars, J., Camargo, J. I. B., Braga-Ribas, F., et al. 2015, Astron. Astrophys., 584, A96

  37. [37]

    2019, Astron

    Desmars, J., Meza, E., Sicardy, B., et al. 2019, Astron. Astr ophys., 625, A43

  38. [38]

    D., et al

    Durech, J., Kaasalainen, M., Warner, B. D., et al. 2009, Astr on. Astrophys., 493, 291 Dybczy´ nski, P . A., & Kr´ olikowska, M. 2016, Planet. Space Sci., 123, 77

  39. [39]

    M., & Schleicher, D

    Eisner, N., Knight, M. M., & Schleicher, D. G. 2017, Astron. J ., 154, 196

  40. [40]

    R., & Micheli, M

    Farnocchia, D., Chesley, S. R., & Micheli, M. 2015, Icarus, 2 58, 18

  41. [41]

    L., Juri´ c, M., & Jedicke, R

    Fedorets, G., Granvik, M., Jones, R. L., Juri´ c, M., & Jedicke, R. 2019, Icarus, submitted

  42. [42]

    A., Lebofsky, L

    Feierberg, M. A., Lebofsky, L. A., & Tholen, D. J. 1985, Icaru s, 63, 183 75

  43. [43]

    J., & Probstein, R

    Finson, M. J., & Probstein, R. F. 1968, Astrophys. J., 154, 32 7

  44. [44]

    C., Gwyn, S., Trujillo, C., et al

    Fraser, W. C., Gwyn, S., Trujillo, C., et al. 2013, PASP , 125, 1000

  45. [45]

    2006, Icarus, 183, 93

    Gil-Hutton, R. 2006, Icarus, 183, 93

  46. [46]

    M., & Wiegert, P

    Gilbert, A. M., & Wiegert, P . A. 2009, Icarus, 201, 714 —. 2010, Icarus, 210, 998

  47. [47]

    Gladman, B., & Kavelaars, J. J. 1997, Astron. Astrophys., 31 7, L35

  48. [48]

    J., Nicholson, P

    Gladman, B., Kavelaars, J. J., Nicholson, P . D., Loredo, T. J., & Burns, J. A. 1998, Astron. J., 116, 2042

  49. [49]

    G., & V anlaerhoven, C

    Gladman, B., Marsden, B. G., & V anlaerhoven, C. 2008, Nomenclature in the Outer Solar System, ed. M. A. Barucci, H. Boehnhardt, D. P . Cruikshank, A. Morbid elli, & R. Dotson, 43

  50. [50]

    M., Petit, J.-M., et al

    Gladman, B., Lawler, S. M., Petit, J.-M., et al. 2012, Astron . J., 144, 23

  51. [51]

    2005, Icarus, 179, 109 —

    Granvik, M., & Muinonen, K. 2005, Icarus, 179, 109 —. 2008, Icarus, 198, 130

  52. [52]

    2011, PASP , 123, 423 Hanuˇ s, J., &ˇDurech, J

    Grav, T., Jedicke, R., Denneau, L., et al. 2011, PASP , 123, 423 Hanuˇ s, J., &ˇDurech, J. 2012, Planetary and Space Science, 73, 75

  53. [53]

    Hapke, B. 1981, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 3039 —. 1984, Icarus, 59, 41 —. 1986, Icarus, 67, 264 —. 2002, Icarus, 157, 523

  54. [54]

    Hapke, B., & Wells, E. 1981, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 3055

  55. [55]

    K., Tholen, D

    Hartmann, W. K., Tholen, D. J., Meech, K. J., & Cruikshank, D. P . 1990, Icarus, 83, 1

  56. [56]

    N., Metchev, S., & Trollo, J

    Heinze, A. N., Metchev, S., & Trollo, J. 2015, Astron. J., 150 , 125

  57. [57]

    P ., & Scheeres, D

    Hirabayashi, M., S´ anchez, D. P ., & Scheeres, D. J. 2015, Astrophys. J., 808, 63

  58. [58]

    1918, Astron

    Hirayama, K. 1918, Astron. J., 31, 185

  59. [59]

    2017, Mon

    Hofmann, M., Sierks, H., & Blum, J. 2017, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 469, S73

  60. [60]

    J., Payne, M

    Holman, M. J., Payne, M. J., Blankley, P ., Janssen, R., & Kuin dersma, S. 2018, Astron. J., 156, 135 76

  61. [61]

    J., Payne, M

    Holman, M. J., Payne, M. J., Fraser, W., et al. 2018, The Astro physical Journal Letters, 855, 0

  62. [62]

    Hsieh, H. H. 2009, Astron. Astrophys., 505, 1297

  63. [63]

    H., & Jewitt, D

    Hsieh, H. H., & Jewitt, D. 2006, Science, 312, 561

  64. [64]

    H., Schwamb, M

    Hsieh, H. H., Schwamb, M. E., Zhang, Z.-W., et al. 2016, in AAS /Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts, V ol. 48, 406.03

  65. [65]

    H., & Sheppard, S

    Hsieh, H. H., & Sheppard, S. S. 2015, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. , 454, L81

  66. [66]

    H., Y ang, B., Haghighipour, N., et al

    Hsieh, H. H., Y ang, B., Haghighipour, N., et al. 2012, Astrop hys. J., 748, L15

  67. [67]

    H., Denneau, L., Wainscoat, R

    Hsieh, H. H., Denneau, L., Wainscoat, R. J., et al. 2015, Icar us, 248, 289

  68. [68]

    2017, Astron

    Hui, M.-T., & Jewitt, D. 2017, Astron. J., 153, 80

  69. [69]

    2011, Astro phys

    Ishiguro, M., Hanayama, H., Hasegawa, S., et al. 2011, Astro phys. J., 741, L24

  70. [70]

    LSST: from Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products

    Ishiguro, M., Kuroda, D., Hanayama, H., et al. 2016, Astron. J., 152, 169 Ivezi´ c,ˇZ., Kahn, S. M., Tyson, J. A., et al. 2008, ArXiv e-prints, arX iv:0805.2366

  71. [71]

    2016, Icar us, 266, 173

    Jedicke, R., Bolin, B., Granvik, M., & Beshore, E. 2016, Icar us, 266, 173

  72. [72]

    T., Bottke, W

    Jedicke, R., Bolin, B. T., Bottke, W. F., et al. 2018, Frontie rs in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 5, 13

  73. [73]

    2009, Astron

    Jewitt, D. 2009, Astron. J., 137, 4296

  74. [74]

    2015, Asteroids IV (Tucs on, University of Arizona Press), 221–241

    Jewitt, D., Hsieh, H., & Agarwal, J. 2015, Asteroids IV (Tucs on, University of Arizona Press), 221–241

  75. [75]

    2010, Nature, 467, 817

    Jewitt, D., Weaver, H., Agarwal, J., Mutchler, M., & Drahus, M. 2010, Nature, 467, 817

  76. [76]

    2011, Astrophys

    Jewitt, D., Weaver, H., Mutchler, M., Larson, S., & Agarwal, J. 2011, Astrophys. J., 733, L4

  77. [77]

    L., Slater, C

    Jones, R. L., Slater, C. T., Moeyens, J., et al. 2018, Icarus, 303, 181

  78. [78]

    Enabling Deep All-Sky Searches of Outer Solar System Objects

    Jones, T. D., Lebofsky, L. A., Lewis, J. S., & Marley, M. S. 199 0, Icarus, 88, 172 Juri´ c, M., Jones, R. L., Bryce Kalmbach, J., et al. 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1901.08549

  79. [79]

    2004, Astron

    Kaasalainen, M. 2004, Astron. Astrophys., 422, L39

  80. [80]

    2001, Icarus, 153, 24

    Kaasalainen, M., & Torppa, J. 2001, Icarus, 153, 24

Showing first 80 references.