Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Adversarial Examples that Fool both Computer Vision and Time-Limited Humans

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1802.08195 v3 pith:KG3MQBG7 submitted 2018-02-22 cs.LG cs.CVq-bio.NCstat.ML

Adversarial Examples that Fool both Computer Vision and Time-Limited Humans

classification cs.LG cs.CVq-bio.NCstat.ML
keywords modelsadversarialcomputerexamplesvisionarchitecturehumanhumans
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Machine learning models are vulnerable to adversarial examples: small changes to images can cause computer vision models to make mistakes such as identifying a school bus as an ostrich. However, it is still an open question whether humans are prone to similar mistakes. Here, we address this question by leveraging recent techniques that transfer adversarial examples from computer vision models with known parameters and architecture to other models with unknown parameters and architecture, and by matching the initial processing of the human visual system. We find that adversarial examples that strongly transfer across computer vision models influence the classifications made by time-limited human observers.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.