Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Whose View of Safety? A Deep DIVE Dataset for Pluralistic Alignment of Text-to-Image Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2507.13383 v1 pith:KKN63JWD submitted 2025-07-15 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CV

Whose View of Safety? A Deep DIVE Dataset for Pluralistic Alignment of Text-to-Image Models

classification cs.LG cs.AIcs.CV
keywords diversealignmentmodelsdatasethumanpluralisticsafetyaligned
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Current text-to-image (T2I) models often fail to account for diverse human experiences, leading to misaligned systems. We advocate for pluralistic alignment, where an AI understands and is steerable towards diverse, and often conflicting, human values. Our work provides three core contributions to achieve this in T2I models. First, we introduce a novel dataset for Diverse Intersectional Visual Evaluation (DIVE) -- the first multimodal dataset for pluralistic alignment. It enable deep alignment to diverse safety perspectives through a large pool of demographically intersectional human raters who provided extensive feedback across 1000 prompts, with high replication, capturing nuanced safety perceptions. Second, we empirically confirm demographics as a crucial proxy for diverse viewpoints in this domain, revealing significant, context-dependent differences in harm perception that diverge from conventional evaluations. Finally, we discuss implications for building aligned T2I models, including efficient data collection strategies, LLM judgment capabilities, and model steerability towards diverse perspectives. This research offers foundational tools for more equitable and aligned T2I systems. Content Warning: The paper includes sensitive content that may be harmful.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Going PLACES: Participatory Localized Red Teaming for Text-to-Image Safety in the Global South

    cs.CY 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A participatory red-teaming project in the Global South created the PLACES dataset of 26k T2I failure examples that reveal unique cultural and linguistic harms missed by existing safety frameworks.

  2. Computational Hermeneutics: Evaluating generative AI as a cultural technology

    cs.AI 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Generative AI should be evaluated through computational hermeneutics using iterative, human-inclusive benchmarks that measure cultural context rather than isolated model outputs.