Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 51 references

Twisted monolayer–rhombohedral graphene can host a hybrid network of flat, localized states and propagating one-dimensional modes within the same energy window.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 14:36 UTC pith:KMOQNQTD

load-bearing objection The microscopic derivation for twisted monolayer–rhombohedral graphene is the real contribution, but the headline coexistence rests on a perturbation expansion that is not controlled at the quoted parameters. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.29049 v1 pith:KMOQNQTD submitted 2026-07-31 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.str-el

Emerging network model in a twisted monolayer-rhombohedral graphene

Juyoung Song , Jeyong Park , Jinhong Park This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.str-el
keywords moiré heterostructurerhombohedral graphenetwisted monolayer-rhombohedral graphenehybrid electronic networknearly flat bandsquasi-1D modesdomain-wall modesstaggered potential
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper seeks to show that a realistic stacked graphene system—monolayer graphene twisted on top of gapped rhombohedral multilayer graphene—can contain, at the same energy, electrons that are trapped at points and electrons that move only along one-dimensional lines, all linked into a network. The authors first use a minimal model to demonstrate that a smooth scalar potential localizes states at its minima, while sign changes of a staggered potential generate chiral one-dimensional modes along the separating domain walls; these two kinds of states can coexist in one finite energy window. They then derive an effective moiré Hamiltonian for the multilayer system by integrating out the gapped rhombohedral layers, reducing it to the same scalar-plus-staggered potential form. In an explicit N=3 calculation, the band structure, constant-energy contours, and Bloch wave functions show a nearly flat band concentrated near the AB regions and quasi-one-dimensional dispersive bands, confirming the coexistence. If correct, this establishes a tunable material platform for studying how localized moments interact through propagating one-dimensional channels.

Core claim

The central claim is that twisted monolayer–rhombohedral N-layer graphene is a microscopic realization of a hybrid electronic network: within a single finite energy window, the moiré band structure contains both localized nearly flat bands and propagating quasi-1D bands. The argument proceeds by integrating out the gapped rhombohedral stack: second-order interlayer tunneling generates an effective local potential acting on the monolayer whose staggered component changes sign along a network of domain walls, producing valley-polarized one-dimensional chiral modes, while the scalar component develops minima at the junctions, localizing additional states. In the N=3 case computed with realistic

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the effective moiré Hamiltonian obtained by a second-order perturbative elimination of the gapped rhombohedral stack. The elimination reduces the full heterostructure to a local Hamiltonian for the monolayer of the form (low-energy velocity)(-i∇ - eA)·σ + V0(r)1 + Vs(r)σ_z, where the nonlocal self-energy becomes local because the induced decay length is much shorter than the moiré period. The staggered component Vs sets up lines of zero mass; the sign-change contours are the domain walls that host the propagating one-dimensional modes. The scalar component V0 has minima at the junctions where those domain walls meet, and those minima trap the localized states. A fi

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on the second-order perturbative expression for the effective monolayer potential being quantitatively accurate at the chosen parameters, where the tunnel coupling (110 meV) is not much smaller than the rhombohedral gap (about 133 meV) and the potential is evaluated at a single mid-gap energy.

What would settle it

Run the full continuum model of the monolayer plus the rhombohedral stack, without integrating out the rhombohedral layers, at the same N=3 parameters and displacement field; if the nearly flat band and the quasi-1D dispersions disappear or move out of the same energy window, the coexistence is an artifact of the second-order approximation rather than a property of the real system.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • At the parameters treated (N=3, U=-200 meV, w_AB=110 meV, θ=0.181°), the single-particle spectrum explicitly contains both a nearly flat band localized near AB regions and quasi-1D dispersive bands, so any local probe of the density of states should see dots and wires in the same energy window.
  • The derivation maps a realistic multilayer stack to a minimal scalar-plus-staggered model, so the coexistence is not put in by hand; it follows from the gapped rhombohedral layers, moiré tunneling, and lattice relaxation.
  • Because the one-dimensional modes come in counter-propagating valley pairs, the network is valley-helical; intervalley scattering is suppressed by the smooth moiré scale, keeping the two channels approximately decoupled.
  • The local approximation for the effective potential improves with layer number N (the decay length shrinks), so thicker rhombohedral stacks are expected to show the network more cleanly.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • [Editorial inference] The same scalar-plus-staggered mechanism might be engineered in other gapped multilayer moiré stacks, not just rhombohedral N-layer graphene, because the derivation only requires a gapped substrate with inequivalent surface sublattices and anisotropic tunneling.
  • [Editorial inference] A direct experimental test would be a scanning tunneling spectroscopy map at the energy of the flat band: localized states should appear as bright spots at AB junctions, while the one-dimensional modes should appear as extended line features; the number of modes per link and their crossing structure could then be read off.
  • [Editorial inference] If the coexistence survives beyond second-order perturbation theory, the same stack provides a tunable Kondo-lattice-like setting: localized moments at junctions exchange-coupled through Luttinger-liquid one-dimensional channels, with the displacement field acting as the coupling knob.
  • [Editorial inference] The uniform staggered potential generated by relaxation is likely sensitive to strain and twist angle; tuning these could shift the domain walls and gate the connectivity of the network without changing the displacement field.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that twisted monolayer–rhombohedral N-layer graphene realizes a hybrid electronic network in which nearly flat localized states coexist with quasi-1D domain-wall modes. It first presents a toy model of monolayer graphene on a triangular substrate with smooth scalar and staggered moiré potentials; the scalar potential localizes states near junctions, and sign changes of the staggered potential produce 1D chiral modes, as shown in band structures and wave functions. It then derives an effective local moiré Hamiltonian for the monolayer by a Schrieffer–Wolff elimination of the gapped rhombohedral multilayer, yielding scalar and staggered potentials (Eqs. 17–19). For N=3 with U=-200 meV, γ=361 meV, w_AA=55 meV, w_AB=110 meV, θ=0.181°, band-structure, constant-energy-contour, and Bloch-wave-function calculations exhibit the claimed coexistence. The central claim is that this realistic system is a microscopic realization of the toy-model mechanism.

Significance. If the perturbative mapping is justified, this is a useful step: it connects a generic toy mechanism to a concrete experimentally accessible heterostructure, with explicit expressions for the effective potentials and a numerically checked vanishing effective magnetic field. The distinction between localized flat bands and propagating quasi-1D modes is convincingly visualized in Figs. 1 and 3. However, the microscopic realization rests entirely on a second-order truncation whose small parameter is not small for the headline parameters, and on a fixed-energy self-energy. These are correctness risks, not merely presentation issues, so the significance is conditional on addressing them.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. III, Eqs. (13)–(19)] The Schrieffer–Wolff truncation is used under the stated condition w_AA, w_AB ≪ |U_2 − U_{N+1}|. For the headline N=3 parameters, |U_2 − U_4| = |−33.3 − 100| = 133 meV, giving w_AB/Δ = 110/133 ≈ 0.83 and w_AA/Δ ≈ 0.41. These are not small; a two-level estimate gives fourth-order corrections of order w^4/Δ^3 ≈ 60 meV against second-order w^2/Δ ≈ 90 meV, so the expansion is uncontrolled. All of Fig. 3 uses Eq. (19) derived from this truncation. Please either choose parameters with a smaller coupling/gap ratio, or benchmark Eq. (19) against a direct diagonalization of the full continuum Hamiltonian (6) at the same parameters. Without such a check, the coexistence of flat and 1D bands in the microscopic model is not established.
  2. [Sec. III, after Eq. (19)] The self-energy is evaluated at the fixed energy E=(U_2+U_4)/2, while the bands in Fig. 3(c) span a finite energy window. The correct condition for a pole is det[E−H_MLG−Σ(E)] = 0, not the eigenvalue problem of a fixed H_eff. If dΣ/dE is appreciable over the bandwidth, the effective potentials—and thus the existence of the red flat band and green 1D bands—can change. Please quantify the energy dependence of Σ over the window of Fig. 3(c), or solve the nonlinear pole equation, before concluding that the hybrid network is a property of the full Hamiltonian.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Eq. (18b)] The position argument in the second line is written as r_{Bβ}, which appears to be a typo. The sum is over α, so the argument should be r_{Bα} (or a consistent index).
  2. [Sec. II / Fig. 1] The parameter values used for the toy model (e.g., u_0, the moiré wavelength, and the Fermi velocity) are not specified. Including them would improve reproducibility.
  3. [Sec. III, after Eq. (10)] The statement that neglected remote hopping processes and the onsite asymmetry Δ do not qualitatively change the physics is asserted but not supported. A brief quantitative comparison or a reference to an appendix would strengthen the claim.
  4. [Sec. III, vector potential check] The claim that B=∇×A vanishes at every point r is numerical, but the grid resolution and tolerance are not reported. Please provide these details or state that the check is analytic.
  5. [References] Refs. [23] and [51] are the same article (Rademaker, Protopopov, and Abanin, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 033150 (2020)); the duplicate should be removed.
  6. [Fig. 3] The text discusses bands 39–41 and 43, but band 42 is not mentioned. If band 42 is outside the energy window or not relevant, say so for clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: effective potential is derived from the microscopic Hamiltonian, and coexistence is an output, not an input; Ref. [46] is interpretive self-citation only.

full rationale

The derivation chain is: (i) the toy model Hamiltonian (1) with arbitrary scalar/staggered potentials is diagonalized, exhibiting coexistence; (ii) for twisted monolayer-rhombohedral N-layer graphene, the microscopic Hamiltonian (6) is reduced by a Schrieffer-Wolff / second-order self-energy calculation to the effective monolayer potentials V_0(r), V_s(r) in Eqs. (13)-(19); (iii) the bands (Fig. 3(c)-(e)) are then computed and interpreted. The coexistence is not an input: the parameters U=-200 meV, gamma=361 meV, w_AA=55 meV, w_AB=110 meV, theta=0.181 deg are taken from independent modeling/relaxation literature, and the sign changes of V_s and extrema of V_0 are outputs of Eq. (19). The reference to the authors' prior work [46] appears only as interpretive framing ('The emergence of such a network model was discussed in Ref. [46]') and is not used as a uniqueness theorem, as a fitted constraint, or as a substitute for the band-structure calculation. The skeptical concern that w_AB/gap ~ 0.83 invalidates the second-order truncation is a question of approximation validity and energy-dependence of the self-energy, not a circular-input issue; under the instructions such concerns do not raise the circularity score.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 8 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central result rests on standard moiré continuum models and perturbation theory. No new particles or entities are introduced. The main load-bearing assumptions are the validity of second-order perturbation theory at marginal parameters, the local approximation, and the unverified claim that neglected hoppings do not affect the physics.

free parameters (5)
  • U (displacement-field potential difference) = -200 meV
    Chosen as a realistic displacement field; not fitted to the coexistence result.
  • w_AA (AA tunneling strength) = 55 meV
    Taken from moiré tunneling models; ratio w_AA/w_AB = 0.5 motivated by relaxation in small-angle graphene interfaces.
  • w_AB (AB/BA tunneling strength) = 110 meV
    Taken from moiré tunneling models; enters the effective potential amplitudes in Eq. (19).
  • θ (twist angle) = 0.181°
    Chosen as a small-angle example; experimentally accessible but not scanned.
  • u_0 (toy-model moiré potential amplitude) = not stated in text
    Used for Fig. 1 but its value is not given; the toy model is illustrative.
axioms (8)
  • domain assumption Bistritzer–MacDonald continuum model for moiré tunneling with three dominant momentum transfers
    Standard continuum model used for twisted graphene interfaces; invoked in Sec. III, Eq. (11).
  • domain assumption Jackiw–Rebbi mechanism: a sign change of the staggered potential hosts a 1D chiral mode per valley
    Used in Sec. II to interpret domain-wall modes.
  • domain assumption Smooth moiré potential suppresses intervalley scattering, keeping the two valley modes decoupled
    Assumed in Sec. II for large moiré period.
  • domain assumption Local approximation: the rhombohedral Green function decays with ξ ≪ L, allowing a local effective potential
    Argued from ξ scaling (Eq. 16) and checked for the chosen parameters; stated in Sec. III.
  • domain assumption Second-order perturbation theory (Schrieffer–Wolff) is sufficient: w_AA, w_AB ≪ |U2 − U_{N+1}|
    Stated as a validity condition, but at the chosen parameters w_AB = 110 meV vs gap ≈ 133 meV, so the condition is marginal (Sec. III).
  • ad hoc to paper Neglected remote hopping processes and onsite-energy asymmetry Δ do not qualitatively change the physics
    Asserted in Sec. III after Eq. (10) without supporting data; load-bearing for realism of the effective model.
  • domain assumption The effective vector potential has vanishing curl (B = 0) and can be gauged away
    Checked numerically in Sec. III; without this the effective model would differ.
  • domain assumption The perpendicular electric field creates a linear potential drop U_i = U[1/2 − (i−1)/N] across layers
    Simplified electrostatic model used in Sec. III, Eq. (5).

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-daily-deepseek · 12438 in / 16405 out tokens · 160975 ms · 2026-08-03T14:36:30.089297+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate the coexistence of localized states and propagating one-dimensional (1D) modes in graphene moir\'e systems. We first show within a minimal model that a spatially varying scalar potential can confine localized states, while sign changes of a staggered potential generate 1D modes along the resulting domain walls. These two types of states can coexist within the same finite energy window and form a hybrid network. We then demonstrate a microscopic realization of this mechanism in twisted monolayer-rhombohedral N-layer graphene. Band structures, energy contours, and Bloch wave functions obtained in a realistic parameter regime reveal the coexistence of localized nearly flat-band states and propagating quasi-1D modes. Our results establish twisted monolayer-rhombohedral graphene as a promising platform for realizing hybrid electronic networks with coexisting states of distinct effective dimensionalities.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.29049 by Jeyong Park, Jinhong Park, Juyoung Song.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Potential model. (a) Moir´e pattern from a graphene stacked on a triangular-lattice substrate with the same lattice constant as the graphene. A relative twist between graphene and the substrate produces a spatially varying displacement between the layers, generating local stacking patterns, BA, AC, AA. (b) Spatial profiles of the staggered potential Vs(r) and scalar potential V0(r). The green lines in the … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Network model emerging from the potential model presented in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Twisted rhombohedral–monolayer graphene. (a) Schematic atomic structure of monolayer graphene twisted relative to an N-layer rhombohedral graphene. Red and blue circles denote the two sublattices, respectively. The enlarged side-views show the representative local AA, AB, and BA stacking configurations. (b–e) Results for N = 3. (b) Contour plots of the effective staggered potential Vs(r) and scalar potenti… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A. K. Geim and I. V. Grigorieva, Van der Waals het- erostructures, Nature 2013 499:7459499, 419 (2013), arXiv:1307.6718

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  2. [2]

    E. Y. Andrei, D. K. Efetov, P. Jarillo-Herrero, A. H. MacDonald, K. F. Mak, T. Senthil, E. Tutuc, A. Yazdani, and A. F. Young, The marvels of moir´ e materials, Nature Reviews Materials 2021 6:36, 201 (2021)

    2021

  3. [3]

    Bistritzer and A

    R. Bistritzer and A. H. MacDonald, Moir´ e bands in twisted double-layer graphene, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences of the United States of Amer- ica108, 12233 (2011), arXiv:1009.4203

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  4. [4]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, A. Demir, S. Fang, S. L. Tomarken, J. Y. Luo, J. D. Sanchez-Yamagishi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, R. C. Ashoori, and P. Jarillo- Herrero, Correlated insulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Nature 2018 556:7699556, 80 (2018), arXiv:1802.00553

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  5. [5]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Unconventional super- conductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Na- ture 2018 556:7699556, 43 (2018)

    2018

  6. [6]

    Yankowitz, S

    M. Yankowitz, S. Chen, H. Polshyn, Y. Zhang, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, D. Graf, A. F. Young, and C. R. Dean, Tuning superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene, Science363, 1059 (2019), arXiv:1808.07865

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  7. [7]

    Y. Choi, J. Kemmer, Y. Peng, A. Thomson, H. Arora, R. Polski, Y. Zhang, H. Ren, J. Alicea, G. Refael, F. von Oppen, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and S. Nadj-Perge, Electronic correlations in twisted bilayer graphene near the magic angle, Nature Physics 2019 15:1115, 1174 (2019), arXiv:1901.02997

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    Bultinck, E

    N. Bultinck, E. Khalaf, S. Liu, S. Chatterjee, A. Vish- wanath, and M. P. Zaletel, Ground state and hidden symmetry of magic-angle graphene at even integer fill- ing, Phys. Rev. X10, 031034 (2020)

    2020

  9. [9]

    Y. Xie, A. T. Pierce, J. M. Park, D. E. Parker, E. Kha- laf, P. Ledwith, Y. Cao, S. H. Lee, S. Chen, P. R. Forrester, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Vishwanath, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and A. Yacoby, Fractional Chern in- sulators in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene, Nature 2021 600:7889600, 439 (2021), arXiv:2107.10854

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  10. [10]

    Song and B

    Z.-D. Song and B. A. Bernevig, Magic-angle twisted bi- layer graphene as a topological heavy fermion problem, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 047601 (2022)

    2022

  11. [11]

    C. Wang, X. Shen, R. Guo, W. Duan, C. Wang, and Y. Xu, Fractional chern insulators in moir´ e flat bands with high chern numbers, Physical Review B112, L201109 (2025)

    2025

  12. [12]

    Z. Chen, N. Liu, J. Hua, H. Xiang, W. Zhou, J. Ding, X. Fang, L. Wu, L. Zhang, Q. Chen, X. Chen, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, N. Xin, W. Zhu, and S. Xu, Layer-engineered quantum anomalous hall effect in twisted rhombohedral graphene family, arXiv:2601.14014 10.48550/arXiv.2601.14014 (2026), arXiv:2601.14014

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.14014 2026

  13. [13]

    R. Su, D. Waters, B. Zhou, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, Y.-H. Zhang, M. Yankowitz, and J. Folk, Moir´ e-driven topological electronic crystals in twisted graphene, Na- ture637, 1084 (2025)

    2025

  14. [14]

    C. Shen, Y. Chu, Q. Wu, N. Li, S. Wang, Y. Zhao, J. Tang, J. Liu, J. Tian, K. Watanabe,et al., Corre- lated states in twisted double bilayer graphene, Nature Physics16, 520 (2020)

    2020

  15. [15]

    Polshyn, J

    H. Polshyn, J. Zhu, M. A. Kumar, Y. Zhang, F. Yang, C. L. Tschirhart, M. Serlin, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. H. MacDonald,et al., Electrical switching of mag- netic order in an orbital chern insulator, Nature588, 66 (2020)

    2020

  16. [16]

    Polshyn, Y

    H. Polshyn, Y. Zhang, M. A. Kumar, T. Soejima, P. Led- with, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Vishwanath, M. P. Zaletel, and A. F. Young, Topological charge density waves at half-integer filling of a moir´ e superlattice, Na- ture Physics18, 42 (2022)

    2022

  17. [17]

    S. Chen, M. He, Y.-H. Zhang, V. Hsieh, Z. Fei, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, D. H. Cobden, X. Xu, C. R. Dean, et al., Electrically tunable correlated and topological states in twisted monolayer–bilayer graphene, Nature Physics17, 374 (2021)

    2021

  18. [18]

    M. He, Y. Li, J. Cai, Y. Liu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, X. Xu, and M. Yankowitz, Symmetry breaking in twisted double bilayer graphene, Nature Physics17, 26 (2021)

    2021

  19. [19]

    X. Liu, Z. Hao, E. Khalaf, J. Y. Lee, Y. Ronen, H. Yoo, D. Haei Najafabadi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Vish- wanath,et al., Tunable spin-polarized correlated states in 9 twisted double bilayer graphene, Nature583, 221 (2020)

    2020

  20. [20]

    G. W. Burg, J. Zhu, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, A. H. MacDonald, and E. Tutuc, Correlated insulating states in twisted double bilayer graphene, Physical review letters 123, 197702 (2019)

    2019

  21. [21]

    S. Xu, M. M. Al Ezzi, N. Balakrishnan, A. Garcia-Ruiz, B. Tsim, C. Mullan, J. Barrier, N. Xin, B. A. Piot, T. Taniguchi,et al., Tunable van hove singularities and correlated states in twisted monolayer–bilayer graphene, Nature Physics17, 619 (2021)

    2021

  22. [22]

    J. Y. Lee, E. Khalaf, S. Liu, X. Liu, Z. Hao, P. Kim, and A. Vishwanath, Theory of correlated insulating be- haviour and spin-triplet superconductivity in twisted double bilayer graphene, Nature communications10, 5333 (2019)

    2019

  23. [23]

    Rademaker, I

    L. Rademaker, I. V. Protopopov, and D. A. Abanin, Topological flat bands and correlated states in twisted monolayer-bilayer graphene, Physical Review Research 2, 033150 (2020)

    2020

  24. [24]

    Wilhelm, T

    P. Wilhelm, T. Lang, M. S. Scheurer, and A. L¨ auchli, Non-coplanar magnetism, topological density wave order and emergent symmetry at half-integer filling of moir´ e chern bands, SciPost Physics14, 040 (2023)

    2023

  25. [25]

    Z. Lu, T. Han, Y. Yao, A. P. Reddy, J. Yang, J. Seo, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Fu, and L. Ju, Fractional quantum anomalous hall effect in multilayer graphene, Nature626, 759 (2024)

    2024

  26. [26]

    Song and K

    M. Song and K. Chang, Fractional chern insulators tran- sition in non-ideal flat bands of twisted mono-bilayer graphene, arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.12231 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Waters, A

    D. Waters, A. Okounkova, R. Su, B. Zhou, J. Yao, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, X. Xu, Y.-H. Zhang, J. Folk, and M. Yankowitz, Chern insulators at integer and frac- tional filling in moir´ e pentalayer graphene, Physical Re- view X15, 011045 (2025)

    2025

  28. [28]

    J. Xie, Z. Huo, X. Lu, Z. Feng, Z. Zhang, W. Wang, Q. Yang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. Liu, Z. Song, X. C. Xie, J. Liu, and X. Lu, Tunable fractional chern in- sulators in rhombohedral graphene superlattices, Nature Materials24, 1042 (2025)

    2025

  29. [29]

    V. T. Phong and C. Lewandowski, Coulomb interaction- stabilized isolated narrow bands with chern numbers c >1 in twisted rhombohedral trilayer-bilayer graphene, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.07981 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Z. Wang, Y. H. Kwan, G. Wagner, S. H. Simon, N. Bult- inck, and S. Parameswaran, Chern-textured exciton insu- lators with valley spiral order in moir´ e materials, Physical Review B112, 035130 (2025)

    2025

  31. [31]

    Y. H. Kwan, Z. Wang, G. Wagner, S. H. Simon, S. Parameswaran, and N. Bultinck, Textured exciton in- sulators, Physical Review B112, 035129 (2025)

    2025

  32. [32]

    J. Park, M. Luo, L. Rademaker, J. Smet, M. S. Scheurer, and L. Classen, Tuning correlated states of twisted mono- bilayer graphene with proximity-induced spin-orbit cou- pling, arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.10914 (2026)

    arXiv 2026

  33. [33]

    Zhang, J

    H. Zhang, J. Lu, K. Liu, Y. Wang, F. Wang, S. Wu, W. Chen, X. Cai, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Avila, P. Dudin, M. D. Watson, A. Louat, T. Sato, P. Yu, W. Duan, Z. Song, G. Chen, and S. Zhou, Moir´ e en- hanced flat band in rhombohedral graphene, Nature Ma- terials25, 566 (2026)

    2026

  34. [34]

    Z. Li, W. Wang, F. Wang, Z. Zhang, Q. Yang, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, X. C. Xie, J. Wang, K. Liu, Z. Song, and X. Lu, Fractional high-Chern insulator in twisted rhombohedral graphene, Nature655, 892 (2026)

    2026

  35. [35]

    N. Liu, Z. Chen, J. Ding, W. Zhou, H. Xiang, X. Fang, L. Wu, X. Zhan, L. Zhang, Q. Chen, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, N. Xin, and S. Xu, Diverse high-Chern-number quantum anomalous hall insulators in twisted rhombohedral graphene, arXiv:2507.11347 10.48550/arXiv.2507.11347 (2025), arXiv:2507.11347

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.11347 2025

  36. [36]

    X. Wang, L. A. Ben ´ ıtez, S. Rao, V. T. Phong, W. I. Chu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, C. Lewandowski, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, High-Chern-number orbital mag- netism in twisted rhombohedral graphene, Nature Mate- rials 10.1038/s41563-026-02659-7 (2026)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41563-026-02659-7 2026

  37. [37]

    San-Jose and E

    P. San-Jose and E. Prada, Helical networks in twisted bilayer graphene under interlayer bias, Phys. Rev. B88, 121408 (2013)

    2013

  38. [38]

    D. K. Efimkin and A. H. MacDonald, Helical network model for twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B98, 35404 (2018)

    2018

  39. [39]

    J. Li, K. Wang, K. J. McFaul, Z. Zern, Y. Ren, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, Z. Qiao, and J. Zhu, Gate-controlled topological conducting channels in bilayer graphene, Nature Nanotechnology 2016 11:1211, 1060 (2016), arXiv:1509.03912

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  40. [40]

    Huang, K

    S. Huang, K. Kim, D. K. Efimkin, T. Lovorn, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, A. H. MacDonald, E. Tutuc, and B. J. LeRoy, Topologically Protected Helical States in Minimally Twisted Bilayer Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 37702 (2018)

    2018

  41. [41]

    De Beule, F

    C. De Beule, F. Dominguez, and P. Recher, Network model and four-terminal transport in minimally twisted bilayer graphene, Physical Review B104, 195410 (2021), arXiv:2107.04812

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  42. [42]

    C.-H. Hsu, D. Loss, and J. Klinovaja, General scattering and electronic states in a quantum-wire network of moir´ e systems, Phys. Rev. B108, L121409 (2023)

    2023

  43. [43]

    Wang and C.-H

    H.-C. Wang and C.-H. Hsu, Electrically tunable corre- lated domain wall network in twisted bilayer graphene, 2D Mater.11, 035007 (2024)

    2024

  44. [44]

    N. C. Georgoulea, N. M. Caffrey, and S. R. Power, One- dimensional topological channels in heterostrained bi- layer graphene, Phys. Rev. B109, 035403 (2024)

    2024

  45. [45]

    Z. Hou, K. Yuan, and H. Jiang, Arrays of one- dimensional conducting channels in minimally twisted bi- layer graphene, Phys. Rev. B110, L161406 (2024)

    2024

  46. [46]

    J. Park, L. Gresista, S. Trebst, A. Rosch, and J. Park, Network of chiral one-dimensional channels and local- ized states emerging in a moir´ e system, 2D Materials10, 035033 (2023)

    2023

  47. [47]

    Jackiw and C

    R. Jackiw and C. Rebbi, Solitons with fermion number ½, Phys. Rev. D13, 3398 (1976)

    1976

  48. [48]

    Jung and A

    J. Jung and A. H. MacDonald, Accurate tight-binding models for theπbands of bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B89, 035405 (2014)

    2014

  49. [49]

    S. Carr, S. Fang, Z. Zhu, and E. Kaxiras, Exact con- tinuum model for low-energy electronic states of twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Research1, 013001 (2019)

    2019

  50. [50]

    N. R. Walet and F. Guinea, The emergence of one- dimensional channels in marginal-angle twisted bilayer graphene, 2D Mater.7, 015023 (2020)

    2020

  51. [51]

    Rademaker, I

    L. Rademaker, I. V. Protopopov, and D. A. Abanin, Topological flat bands and correlated states in twisted monolayer-bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033150 (2020)

    2020