REVIEW 2 cited by
Evaluating the Goal-Directedness of Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Evaluating the Goal-Directedness of Large Language Models
read the original abstract
To what extent do LLMs use their capabilities towards their given goal? We take this as a measure of their goal-directedness. We evaluate goal-directedness on tasks that require information gathering, cognitive effort, and plan execution, where we use subtasks to infer each model's relevant capabilities. Our evaluations of LLMs from Google DeepMind, OpenAI, and Anthropic show that goal-directedness is relatively consistent across tasks, differs from task performance, and is only moderately sensitive to motivational prompts. Notably, most models are not fully goal-directed. We hope our goal-directedness evaluations will enable better monitoring of LLM progress, and enable more deliberate design choices of agentic properties in LLMs.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Causal Foundations of Collective Agency
Collective agency arises when a group's joint actions are faithfully captured by a simpler causal model of unified rational behavior.
-
A Behavioural and Representational Evaluation of Goal-Directedness in Language Model Agents
An LLM navigation agent encodes a coarse spatial map and multi-step plans in its activations, and reasoning shifts these representations from broad environment information to immediate action selection.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.