Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

Spin alignment of Quarkonia: A Possible Probe of Deconfined QCD matter in Pb+Pb Collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper predicts that vorticity in the quark-gluon plasma measurably raises quarkonium spin alignment: $J/\psi$ always has $\rho_{00}>1/3$, and $\Upsilon(1S)$ flips from below to above $1/3$ as circulation grows, offering a possible…

desk verdict Plausible idea, unsupported central derivation—send to review only with demand to fix the vorticity substitution and the dropped spin operator. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.09405 v2 pith:KUSOPTPO submitted 2025-06-11 hep-ph hep-exhep-thnucl-exnucl-th

Bhagyarathi Sahoo , Captain R. Singh , Raghunath Sahoo This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phhep-exhep-thnucl-exnucl-th
keywords quarkoniumspinalignmentheavy-ioncollisionsquark-gluonplasmavorticitydensitymatrixmagneticfieldmomentumanisotropy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper predicts that the vorticity of the deconfined quark-gluon plasma created in Pb+Pb collisions measurably aligns the spins of quarkonium vector mesons, and that this alignment encodes the medium's rotation and thermalization. The authors solve the Schr\"odinger equation for $J/\psi$, $\psi(2S)$, $\Upsilon(1S)$, and $\Upsilon(2S)$ in a thermal rotating medium, with spin-vorticity and spin-magnetic couplings, and obtain the spin density matrix element $\rho_{00}$ as a function of transverse momentum, temperature, circulation, magnetic field, and momentum anisotropy. Their central result is that vorticity increases spin alignment, $J/\psi$ always has $\rho_{00}>1/3$, and $\Upsilon(1S)$ flips from $\rho_{00}<1/3$ to $>1/3$ as circulation grows, a flip they propose as a probe of QGP thermalization. The calculation also yields non-zero off-diagonal density-matrix elements that signal spin coherence in the medium.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a thermal rotating-medium Schr\"odinger equation for the quark-antiquark bound state. The two-body Hamiltonian in a rotating frame with a magnetic field is reduced to a radial equation in which rotation appears as a conserved circulation $C$ entering through the vorticity $\omega = C/(2\pi r^2)$, producing a $1/r^2$ potential term that splits the energy eigenvalues by spin projection $m_j$. The potential is a medium-modified color-singlet potential (string, screened Coulomb, and imaginary parts) whose Debye mass is separately modified by a strong magnetic field and by momentum-space anisotropy. The eigenvalues are then inserted into a Boltzmann spin density matrix and rotated into a laboratory frame with Wigner $D$-matrices, yielding the predicted $\rho_{00}$ and off-diagonal elements.

What would settle it

Measure $\rho_{00}$ for $J/\psi$ in Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02$ TeV as a function of $p_T$; the paper predicts $\rho_{00}>1/3$ for all $p_T$, so any measured value below $1/3$ at low $p_T$ would contradict the central claim. Alternatively, checking whether $\Upsilon(1S)$ shows the predicted sign flip in $\rho_{00}-1/3$ across collision centrality would test the vorticity-driven mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that quarkonium spin alignment, measured by $\rho_{00}$, responds systematically to the vorticity, magnetic field, and momentum-space anisotropy of the deconfined QCD medium. Starting from a rotating-frame Hamiltonian with spin-vorticity ($-\boldsymbol{\omega}\cdot\mathbf{S}$) and spin-magnetic ($\boldsymbol{\mu}\cdot\mathbf{B}$) couplings, the authors reduce the heavy-quark pair to an effective one-body radial Schr\"odinger equation and solve it numerically with a medium-modified color-singlet potential. The resulting energy eigenvalues, split by magnetic quantum number, feed a thermal spin density matrix $\hat{\rho}=e^{-\beta \hat{H}}$ that is rotated with Wigner $D$-matrices to obtain $\rho_{00}$ and off-diagonal elements. The findings state that vorticity increases spin alignment, that $\rho_{00}^{J/\psi}$ is always greater than $1/3$ for all considered circulation values and $p_T$ ranges, and that the bottomonium states, especially $\Upsilon(1S)$, show a sign flip in $\rho_{00}-1/3$ whose location depends on temperature and equilibration time, making bottomonium spin alignment a proposed probe of system thermalization.

Load-bearing premise

The central prediction assumes quarkonium spin states are thermally populated according to $e^{-\beta H}$ and that the medium's rotation can be encoded as a conserved circulation producing a $1/r^2$ potential; if either assumption fails, the predicted $\rho_{00}$ values change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02$ TeV, $J/\psi$ mesons should exhibit $\rho_{00}>1/3$ at all accessible $p_T$, with the deviation from $1/3$ growing as the medium's circulation increases.
  • Measuring $\Upsilon(1S)$ spin alignment as a function of collision centrality, where vorticity varies, should reveal a sign flip in $\rho_{00}-1/3$; locating that flip could estimate the quark-gluon plasma's equilibration time.
  • The predicted non-zero off-diagonal elements ($\rho_{1,-1}$, $\rho_{-1,0}$, $\rho_{1,0}$) provide an experimental route to distinguish local from global spin alignment and to see medium-induced spin coherence.
  • Magnetic field and momentum anisotropy shift $\rho_{00}$ mainly for charmonium, leaving $\Upsilon$ states nearly unchanged, so bottomonium alignment serves as a cleaner probe of vorticity alone.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The model's vorticity treatment (a $1/r^2$ term from conserved circulation) differs from rigid rotation with constant $\omega$, where the Coriolis term would be a constant energy shift; redoing the calculation with constant vorticity is a direct test of whether the $\rho_{00}>1/3$ prediction is robust.
  • The thermal-equilibrium assumption for spin states is acknowledged by the authors as requiring a relaxation-time study; if spin alignment equilibrates slowly, the observable $\rho_{00}$ would be diluted, so estimating that relaxation time sets the practical window for this probe.
  • The same formalism could be applied to other heavy-flavor vector mesons like $D^{*+}$, whose measured spin alignment already shows a $p_T$ pattern similar to the $J/\psi$ prediction, potentially confirming a common heavy-flavor alignment mechanism.
  • Because the $\Upsilon(1S)$ flip point is sensitive to temperature, comparing centrality-binned measurements with the predicted flip position could in principle constrain the initial temperature profile of the QGP.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the spin alignment of quarkonium states (J/psi, psi(2S), Upsilon(1S), Upsilon(2S)) in a thermal rotating, magnetized, and momentum-anisotropic QCD medium. The authors solve a Schrödinger equation with a medium-modified color-singlet potential, including spin-vorticity and spin-magnetic couplings, to obtain energy eigenvalues; from these they construct a thermal spin density matrix and rotate it to compute diagonal and off-diagonal spin-alignment observables as functions of pT, temperature, circulation C, magnetic field eB, and anisotropy xi. The central claims are that vorticity increases spin alignment, magnetic fields and anisotropy have state-dependent effects, and that bottomonium spin alignment may serve as a probe of the thermalization of the deconfined medium.

Significance. If the framework were sound, this would be a useful phenomenological contribution to the growing program of spin-alignment studies in heavy-ion collisions. The paper covers four quarkonium states, includes off-diagonal spin-density-matrix elements, and explores a wide parameter space of medium conditions. It also explicitly connects the observables to experimental measurements and to issues such as quantum coherence and spin hydrodynamics. However, the central derivation contains two load-bearing errors: the promotion of a constant vorticity to a singular 1/r^2 potential through a conservation-law argument, and the loss of the spin operator in the spin-magnetic coupling. These errors control the quantitative predictions, so the stated conclusions are not supported by the calculation as presented.

major comments (3)
  1. [II, Eqs. (10)-(11)] The substitution of the conserved circulation C into the radial Schrödinger equation, writing omega = C/(2*pi*r^2), is not justified by the Hamiltonian in Eqs. (1)-(8), where omega is a constant angular velocity of the rotating medium. For rigid rotation, the circulation around a loop depends on the loop radius, and the relative coordinate r of the quark-antiquark pair is not the radius of a circulation loop in the fluid velocity field. Promoting C to a constant inserts a singular 1/r^2 potential into the radial equation that was not present in the original Hamiltonian, and this term controls the C-dependence of the energy eigenvalues and hence of rho_00 in Figs. 1-4 and 6. With constant omega, the spin-vorticity coupling would produce only a constant m_j-dependent energy shift, a qualitatively different and much weaker effect; the paper's central conclusion that vorticity increases spin alignment is therefore not established by this calculation.
  2. [II, Eq. (11)] The spin-magnetic coupling is misimplemented: in Eqs. (6)-(8) the magnetic term is proportional to the operator (S1z - S2z), but in Eq. (11) it is replaced by the spin-independent term -qB/m_mu. This drops the spin operator, so the direct spin-magnetic coupling cannot alter the relative populations of the spin states. The eB dependence of rho_00 reported in Fig. 5 must then arise solely from the magnetic-field modification of the Debye mass in Eq. (16), not from the spin-magnetic coupling stated in the Hamiltonian. The calculation as written does not implement the model it claims to solve.
  3. [II.C, Eq. (22); Sec. III.A] The thermal density matrix rho = exp(-beta H) assumes that quarkonium spin states are thermally populated, an assumption the authors themselves flag as requiring a relaxation-time study (Sec. III.A, discussion after Fig. 5). The relaxation time for spin alignment of heavy quarkonia in the QGP is not estimated, and with T approximately 0.175 GeV and binding energies of order 0.5-1 GeV the Boltzmann factors e^{-beta E_m} strongly suppress excited spin states, so the physical interpretation of the resulting rho_00 values is not fully controlled. The claim that bottomonium spin alignment may serve as a probe of system thermalization should be tempered until the equilibration of the spin degrees of freedom is justified.
minor comments (5)
  1. [II, Eq. (6)] The Landé g-factor appearing in the magnetic moment definition in Eq. (1) is dropped in Eqs. (6)-(8) and (11), so the quoted spin-magnetic coupling is not quantitatively consistent with the stated mu = g q S/(2m).
  2. [III, Fig. 3] The text refers to 'psi(1S)' in the discussion of Fig. 3, but the context and the figure legend indicate Upsilon(1S); please correct this typo.
  3. [II, Eq. (15)] The notation Lambda^2_MS is ambiguous; since Lambda_MS = 0.176 GeV is defined, the logarithm should be written as ln(Lambda^2 / Lambda_MS^2) with a single symbol for the MS scale.
  4. [II.C, Eqs. (33)-(39)] The normalization factor Z is kept in the off-diagonal formulas, but from Eq. (31) the density matrix is already normalized with Tr rho = 1, so Z = 1; this should be stated explicitly to avoid confusion about the prefactors.
  5. [II, Introduction and Eq. (12)] The paper mentions a 'color octet potential model' in the introduction, but the potential in Eq. (12) is the color-singlet potential; please clarify the nomenclature.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: quarkonium spin alignment is computed from a Hamiltonian and thermal density matrix, not fitted to the target observable; only minor, non-load-bearing self-citations appear.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained in the relevant sense. The authors solve the radial Schrödinger equation, Eq. (11), with the color-singlet potential, Eq. (12), to obtain energy eigenvalues; these are inserted into the thermal density operator, Eq. (22), and the rotated-frame matrix element, Eq. (30), to obtain ρ00 and the off-diagonal elements. The C, eB, ξ, and pT dependences follow explicitly from the Hamiltonian terms in Eqs. (6)-(8) and from the Debye-mass modifications in Eqs. (16)-(18); no parameter is tuned to reproduce ρ00. The C=0 baseline gives ρ00=1/3 analytically, and the sign and magnitude of the deviation are dictated by the computed energy splittings. The external input θr and φr from Ref. [67] is not fitted in this paper, and it cannot by itself generate spin alignment because degenerate energies yield ρ00=1/3 for any θr. The self-citations, notably Ref. [77] for the expectation that magnetic fields and anisotropy affect vector-meson spin alignment and Refs. [80,81] for the effective-temperature scheme, are motivational or methodological rather than load-bearing: the magnetic-field and anisotropy effects are implemented explicitly through the spin-magnetic term in Eq. (6) and the Debye-mass expressions. The main caveats of the paper, such as the substitution ω=C/(2πr²) in Eqs. (9)-(11) and the thermal-equilibrium assumption in Eq. (22), are physical-modeling questions rather than circular reductions; if incorrect they would change the predictions, but they do not make the results equivalent to the inputs. The circularity burden is therefore low, with only minor non-load-bearing self-citations warranting a score of 2.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model introduces no new particles, but it relies on several chosen parameters (C, eB, xi, T, theta_r) and on prior-literature assumptions (potential, Debye mass, thermal density matrix). The circulation parameter C is the most consequential free input, and the theta_r values from Ref. [67] directly shape the off-diagonal elements.

free parameters (6)
  • Circulation parameter C = 0.01 to 3 fm (scanned)
    Encodes the vorticity of the medium; all rotation effects on rho_00 are governed by this chosen parameter.
  • Magnetic field eB = 0 to 0.3 GeV^2 (scanned)
    Field strength chosen to cover SPS-RHIC-LHC ranges; enters the Debye mass and the spin-magnetic coupling.
  • Anisotropy parameter xi = 0 to 1 (scanned)
    Degree of momentum-space anisotropy; appears in the Debye mass via Eq. (18).
  • Medium temperature T = 0.15 to 0.45 GeV (scanned)
    Medium temperature range; affects the potential, Debye mass, and Boltzmann weights.
  • Rotation angle theta_r = 1.75 rad (J/psi), 1.58 rad (Upsilon)
    Rotation angle of the spin quantization axis, imported from Ref. [67].
  • Lande g-factor = not specified (implicitly 1 or 2)
    The spin-magnetic coupling in Eq. (6) omits the explicit g factor, creating an ambiguity in the Zeeman term.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Hamiltonian of a charged spin particle in a rotating magnetized frame (Eq. 1)
    Standard non-relativistic quantum mechanics; its applicability to quarkonia inside a QGP is assumed, not demonstrated.
  • domain assumption Color-singlet potential with Doppler-shifted effective temperature (Eqs. 12-13)
    Taken from prior works (Nendzig-Wolschin and Singh et al.); the potential model is used without independent verification in a rotating medium.
  • domain assumption Thermal spin density matrix rho = exp(-beta H)/Z (Eq. 22)
    Assumes quarkonium spin states reach thermal equilibrium with the medium; the paper itself states that relaxation-time estimation is required.
  • ad hoc to paper Constant circulation C with omega = C/(2*pi*r^2) in the radial equation (Eqs. 10-11)
    This step converts the Coriolis coupling into an r-dependent potential without physical justification for a rigidly rotating fireball.
  • domain assumption Rotation angles theta_r and phi_r taken from Ref. [67]
    Values determined by a previous phenomenological model; not recomputed here.
  • domain assumption Debye mass formulas with magnetic field and anisotropy (Eqs. 16, 18)
    Standard results from the literature, used here as inputs.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spin alignment of Quarkonia: A Possible Probe of Deconfined QCD matter in Pb+Pb Collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KUSOPTPO

@misc{pith2026250609405,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spin alignment of Quarkonia: A Possible Probe of Deconfined QCD matter in Pb+Pb Collisions at $\sqrts_\rm NN = 5.02$ TeV},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KUSOPTPO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.09405}
}
abstract

In this study, we investigate the influence of deconfined QCD matter on quarkonium spin alignment in ultra-relativistic heavy-ion collisions. We estimate the spin alignment of charmonium ($J/\psi$, and $\psi$(2S)) and bottomonium ($\Upsilon$(1S), and $\Upsilon$(2S)) states for Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV as a function of transverse momentum by calculating the energy eigenvalues in a thermal rotating medium. We solve the Schr\"odinger equation with a medium-modified color-singlet potential, considering the coupling of spin with vorticity and magnetic field. Furthermore, we evaluate the effect of medium temperature, vorticity, magnetic field, and momentum-space anisotropy on the elements of the spin density matrix. Our findings reveal that vorticity increases the spin alignment, while the magnetic fields and anisotropy modify the observables in a state-dependent manner. These findings deepen our understanding of quarkonium spin alignment in an anisotropic magneto-vortical thermal medium, shedding light on spin transport phenomena in heavy-ion collisions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.09405 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (Color online) The spin alignment observable [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (Color online) The spin alignment observable [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. (Color online) The spin alignment of quarkonium [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (Color online) The spin alignment observable [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (Color online) The spin alignment observable [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (Color online) The off-diagonal elements of the spin density matrix, such as, Re[ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. (Color online) The off-diagonal elements of the spin density matrix, such as Re[ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. (Color online) The off-diagonal elements of the spin density matrix, such as Re[ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Tensor spin polarization induced by curved freeze-out hypersurface

    hep-ph 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The curvature of the freeze-out hypersurface induces a tensor spin polarization of vector mesons at leading gradient order, with predicted phi-meson spin alignment around -10^-4 to -10^-3.

  2. Rotational susceptibility of a hot and dense hadronic matter: A possible probe of QCD phase transition

    hep-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper computes rotational susceptibilities up to sixth order in ideal and van der Waals hadron resonance gas models, finds a non-monotonic bump at high baryon chemical potential, and proposes these susceptibilitie...

  3. Probing Rotational Dynamics of Quark Gluon Plasma via Global Vorticity

    hep-ph 2026-02 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper fits hadron transverse-momentum spectra with a rotating Tsallis distribution to extract 'global vorticity', but never writes down the fitted formula or parameter values.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

107 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    We explore the effect of vorticity, quantified in terms of the circulation parameterC, on the spin alignment ofJ/ψ,ψ(2S), Υ(1S), and Υ(2S) states by obtaining the vorticity and different spin pro- jections dependent energy eigenvalues. We use a medium-modified color-singlet potential model of quarkonia to estimate the medium temperature, vorticity, magnet...

  2. [2]

    In our study, ρJ/ψ 00 is found to be always greater than 1/3 for all considered values ofCandp T ranges

    The deviation ofρ J/ψ 00 from 1/3 indicate that the distribution of the producedJ/ψin relativistic heavy-ion collisions is not isotropic. In our study, ρJ/ψ 00 is found to be always greater than 1/3 for all considered values ofCandp T ranges. However, the recent experimental measurement showsρ 00 is observed to be less than 1/3 at lowp T and greater than ...

  3. [3]

    A similar feature is also seen for the Υ(2S) state as a function ofC

    We found theρ 00 observable for bottomonium states, specifically Υ(1S) state, has pronounced ef- fect (ρ00 <1/3 at lowCandρ 00 >1/3 at highC) of medium vorticity compared to the charmonium states. A similar feature is also seen for the Υ(2S) state as a function ofC. This implies that the shape of the angular distribution depends strongly on the initial an...

  4. [4]

    The magnetic field and medium anisotropies affect the quarko- nium states in a state-dependent manner

    The effect of temperature, magnetic field, and medium momentum-space anisotropy onρ 00 ob- servable is explored because the energy eigenval- ues change with these parameters. The magnetic field and medium anisotropies affect the quarko- nium states in a state-dependent manner. The possible reason for the state-dependent behavior of ρ00 in the presence of ...

  5. [5]

    This could be due to the final state interaction of the vector mesons

    The non-vanishing value of the off-diagonal ele- ments of the spin-density matrix, such asρ 1,−1, ρ−1,0, andρ 1,0, reflects the possible coherence be- tween different spin states. This could be due to the final state interaction of the vector mesons. From a theoretical standpoint, the non-zero off- diagonal elements are essential for modeling spin- hydrod...

  6. [6]

    It is important to note that apart from the studied sources, there could be various potential sources and physics mechanisms responsible for the spin-alignment of quarkonium states. Such as the correlations and fluctuations of strong force field between the quark and anti-quark pairs [69], turbulent color field [71, 72], electric field [61, 65], fragmenta...

    2021

  7. [7]

    Adamet al.[ALICE Collaboration], Nature Phys.13, 535 (2017)

    J. Adamet al.[ALICE Collaboration], Nature Phys.13, 535 (2017)

    2017

  8. [8]

    Khachatryanet al.[CMS Collaboration], Phys

    V. Khachatryanet al.[CMS Collaboration], Phys. Lett. B765, 193 (2017)

    2017

Show all 107 references
  1. [9]

    Ortiz Velasquez, P

    A. Ortiz Velasquez, P. Christiansen, E. Cuautle Flores, I. Maldonado Cervantes and G. Pai´ c, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 042001 (2013)

    2013

  2. [10]

    Zhang, A

    C. Zhang, A. Behera, S. Bhatta and J. Jia, Phys. Lett. B822, 136702 (2021)

    2021

  3. [11]

    Prasad, B

    S. Prasad, B. Sahoo, S. Tripathy, N. Mallick and R. Sa- hoo, Phys. Rev. C111, 044902 (2025)

    2025

  4. [12]

    Coquet, M

    M. Coquet, M. Winn, X. Du, J. Y. Ollitrault and S. Schlichting, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 232301 (2024)

    2024

  5. [13]

    X. Y. Wu, H. Gao, B. Forster, C. Gale, G. Jackson and S. Jeon, [arXiv:2412.15052]

    arXiv

  6. [14]

    Dey and A

    S. Dey and A. Jaiswal, [arXiv:2502.20352]

  7. [15]

    Sahoo, D

    B. Sahoo, D. Sahu, S. Deb, C. R. Singh and R. Sahoo, Phys. Rev. C109, 034910 (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    Adamczyket al.[STAR Collaboration], Nature548 62 (2017)

    L. Adamczyket al.[STAR Collaboration], Nature548 62 (2017)

    2017

  9. [17]

    Adamet al.[STAR Collaboration], Phys

    J. Adamet al.[STAR Collaboration], Phys. Rev. C98, 014910 (2018)

    2018

  10. [18]

    Acharyaet al.[ALICE Collaboration], Phys

    S. Acharyaet al.[ALICE Collaboration], Phys. Rev. C 101(2020) no.4, 044611 [erratum: Phys. Rev. C105 (2022) no.2, 029902]

    2020

  11. [19]

    Adamet al.[STAR Collaboration], Phys

    J. Adamet al.[STAR Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 162301 (2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    Adamet al.[STAR Collaboration], Phys

    J. Adamet al.[STAR Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 132301 (2019)

    2019

  13. [21]

    Acharyaet al.[ALICE Collaboration], Phys

    S. Acharyaet al.[ALICE Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 172005 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    Abdulhamidet al.[STAR Collaboration], Phys

    M. Abdulhamidet al.[STAR Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 202301 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    Y. Xie, D. Wang and L. P. Csernai, Phys. Rev. C95, 031901 (2017)

    2017

  16. [24]

    S. Ryu, V. Jupic and C. Shen, Phys. Rev. C104, 054908 (2021)

    2021

  17. [25]

    B. Fu, K. Xu, X. G. Huang and H. Song, Phys. Rev. C 103, 024903 (2021)

    2021

  18. [26]

    D. X. Wei, W. T. Deng and X. G. Huang, Phys. Rev. C99, 014905 (2019)

    2019

  19. [27]

    Becattini, M

    F. Becattini, M. Buzzegoli, G. Inghirami, I. Karpenko and A. Palermo, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 272302 (2021)

    2021

  20. [28]

    Sahoo, C

    B. Sahoo, C. R. Singh and R. Sahoo, [arXiv:2404.15138]

    arXiv

  21. [29]

    B. I. Abelevet al.[STAR Collaboration], Phys. Rev. C 77, 061902 (2008)

    2008

  22. [30]

    M. S. Abdallahet al.[STAR Collaboration], Nature 614, 244 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    Acharyaet al.[ALICE Collaboration], Phys

    S. Acharyaet al.[ALICE Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 012301 (2020)

    2020

  24. [32]

    Acharyaet al.[ALICE Collaboration], Phys

    S. Acharyaet al.[ALICE Collaboration], Phys. Lett. B 846, 137920 (2023)

    2023

  25. [33]

    Acharyaet al.[ALICE Collaboration], [arXiv:2504.00714]

    S. Acharyaet al.[ALICE Collaboration], [arXiv:2504.00714]

  26. [34]

    Adamczyket al.[STAR Collaboration], Phys

    L. Adamczyket al.[STAR Collaboration], Phys. Lett. B739, 180 (2014)

    2014

  27. [35]

    Adamet al.[STAR Collaboration], Phys

    J. Adamet al.[STAR Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D102, 092009 (2020). 15

    2020

  28. [36]

    Chatrchyanet al.[CMS Collaboration], Phys

    S. Chatrchyanet al.[CMS Collaboration], Phys. Lett. B727, 381 (2013)

    2013

  29. [37]

    Abelevet al., [ALICE Collaboration], Phys

    B. Abelevet al., [ALICE Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 082001 (2012)

    2012

  30. [38]

    Acharyaet al., [ALICE Collaboration], Eur

    S. Acharyaet al., [ALICE Collaboration], Eur. Phys. J. C78, 562 (2018)

    2018

  31. [39]

    Chatrchyanet al.[CMS Collaboration], Phys

    S. Chatrchyanet al.[CMS Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 081802 (2013)

    2013

  32. [40]

    Aaijet al., [LHCb Collaboration], Eur

    R. Aaijet al., [LHCb Collaboration], Eur. Phys. J. C 73, 2631 (2013)

    2013

  33. [41]

    Aaijet al.[LHCb Collaboration], Eur

    R. Aaijet al.[LHCb Collaboration], Eur. Phys. J. C74, 2872 (2014)

    2014

  34. [42]

    Acharyaet al.[ALICE Collaboration], Phys

    S. Acharyaet al.[ALICE Collaboration], Phys. Lett. B 815, 136146 (2021)

    2021

  35. [43]

    Acharyaet al.[ALICE Collaboration], Phys

    S. Acharyaet al.[ALICE Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 042303 (2023)

    2023

  36. [44]

    B. Betz, M. Gyulassy and G. Torrieri, Phys. Rev. C76, 044901 (2007)

    2007

  37. [45]

    X. L. Xia, H. Li, Z. B. Tang and Q. Wang, Phys. Rev. C98, 024905 (2018)

    2018

  38. [46]

    Sahoo, C

    B. Sahoo, C. R. Singh, D. Sahu, R. Sahoo and J. e. Alam, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 873 (2023)

    2023

  39. [47]

    Einstein and W

    A. Einstein and W. J. de Haas, Verh. Dtsch. Phys. Ges. 17, 152 (1915)

    1915

  40. [48]

    Becattini, I

    F. Becattini, I. Karpenko, M. Lisa, I. Upsal and S. Voloshin, Phys. Rev. C95, 054902 (2017)

    2017

  41. [49]

    Z. F. Jiang, X. Y. Wu, S. Cao and B. W. Zhang, Phys. Rev. C108, 064904 (2023)

    2023

  42. [50]

    Skokov, A

    V. Skokov, A. Y. Illarionov and V. Toneev, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A24, 5925 (2009)

    2009

  43. [51]

    K. K. Pradhan, B. Sahoo, D. Sahu and R. Sahoo, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 936 (2024)

    2024

  44. [52]

    Sahoo, K

    B. Sahoo, K. K. Pradhan, D. Sahu and R. Sahoo, Phys. Rev. D108, 074028 (2023)

    2023

  45. [53]

    C. W. Aung, A. Dwibedi, J. Dey and S. Ghosh, Phys. Rev. C109, 2024 (2024)

    2024

  46. [54]

    Dwibedi, C

    A. Dwibedi, C. W. Aung, J. Dey and S. Ghosh, Phys. Rev. C109, 034914 (2024)

    2024

  47. [55]

    Wu and Y

    S. Wu and Y. Xie, Eur. Phys. J. A59, 108 (2023)

    2023

  48. [56]

    Z. Z. Han and J. Xu, Phys. Lett. B786, 255 (2018)

    2018

  49. [57]

    K. Xu, F. Lin, A. Huang and M. Huang, Phys. Rev. D 106, L071502 (2022)

    2022

  50. [58]

    L. Dong, Y. Guo, A. Islam and M. Strickland, Phys. Rev. D104, 096017 (2021)

    2021

  51. [59]

    Romatschke, Phys

    P. Romatschke, Phys. Rev. C75, 014901 (2007); P. Ro- matschke and M. Strickland, Phys. Rev. D71, 125008 (2005)

    2007

  52. [60]

    Schenke and M

    B. Schenke and M. Strickland, Phys. Rev. D76, 025023 (2007)

    2007

  53. [61]

    Martinez and M

    M. Martinez and M. Strickland, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 102301 (2008); Phys. Rev. C78, 034917 (2008)

    2008

  54. [62]

    Dumitru, Y

    A. Dumitru, Y. Nara, B. Schenke and M. Strickland, Phys. Rev. C78, 024909 (2008)

    2008

  55. [63]

    Baier and Y

    R. Baier and Y. Mehtar-Tani, Phys. Rev. C78,064906 (2008)

    2008

  56. [64]

    Dumitru, Y

    A. Dumitru, Y. Guo and M. Strickland, Phys. Lett. B662, 37 (2008)

    2008

  57. [65]

    M. E. Carrington, A. Rebhan, Phys. Rev. D79, 025018 (2009)

    2009

  58. [66]

    Z. T. Liang and X. N. Wang, Phys. Lett. B629, 20 (2005)

    2005

  59. [67]

    Y. G. Yang, R. H. Fang, Q. Wang and X. N. Wang, Phys. Rev. C97, 034917 (2018)

    2018

  60. [68]

    X. L. Sheng, Q. Wang and X. N. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 102, 056013 (2020)

    2020

  61. [69]

    X. L. Xia, H. Li, X. G. Huang and H. Zhong Huang, Phys. Lett. B817, 136325 (2021)

    2021

  62. [70]

    J. H. Gao, Phys. Rev. D104, 076016 (2021)

    2021

  63. [71]

    X. L. Sheng, L. Oliva and Q. Wang, Phys. Rev. D101, 096005 (2020). [erratum: Phys. Rev. D105, 099903 (2022).]

    2020

  64. [72]

    K. J. Gon¸ calves and G. Torrieri, Phys. Rev. C105, 034913 (2022)

    2022

  65. [73]

    P. H. De Moura, K. J. Goncalves and G. Torrieri, Phys. Rev. D108, 034032 (2023)

    2023

  66. [74]

    K. J. Gon¸ calves, G. Torrieri and R. Ryblewski, [arXiv:2410.16448]

    arXiv

  67. [75]

    X. L. Sheng, L. Oliva, Z. T. Liang, Q. Wang and X. N. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 042304 (2023)

    2023

  68. [76]

    J. p. Lv, Z. h. Yu, Z. t. Liang, Q. Wang and X. N. Wang, Phys. Rev. D109, 114003 (2024)

    2024

  69. [77]

    Kumar, B

    A. Kumar, B. M¨ uller and D. L. Yang, Phys. Rev. D 108, 016020 (2023)

    2023

  70. [78]

    M¨ uller and D

    B. M¨ uller and D. L. Yang, Phys. Rev. D105, L011901 (2022). [erratum: Phys. Rev. D106, 039904 (2022).]

    2022

  71. [79]

    B. Fu, F. Gao, Y. X. Liu and H. Song, Phys. Lett. B 855, 138821 (2024)

    2024

  72. [80]

    Xu and M

    K. Xu and M. Huang, Phys. Rev. D110, 094034 (2024)

    2024

  73. [81]

    Y. Q. Zhao, X. L. Sheng, S. W. Li and D. Hou, JHEP 08, 070 (2024)

    2024

  74. [82]

    X. L. Sheng, Y. Q. Zhao, S. W. Li, F. Becattini and D. Hou, Phys. Rev. D110, 056047 (2024)

    2024

  75. [83]

    Sahoo, C

    B. Sahoo, C. R. Singh and R. Sahoo, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 580 (2025)

    2025

  76. [84]

    J. H. Chen, Z. T. Liang, Y. G. Ma, X. L. Sheng and Q. Wang, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.68211001 (2025)

    2025

  77. [85]

    C. R. Singh, S. Ganesh and M. Mishra, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 147 (2019)

    2019

  78. [86]

    C. R. Singh, S. Deb, R. Sahoo and J. e. Alam, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 542 (2022)

    2022

  79. [87]

    C. R. Singh, P. Bagchi, R. Sahoo and J. e. Alam, [arXiv:2501.00753] (Phys. Rev. D: In Press)

    arXiv

  80. [88]

    C. R. Singh, P. K. Srivastava, S. Ganesh and M. Mishra, Phys. Rev. C92, 034916 (2015)

    2015

  81. [89]

    Ganesh, C

    S. Ganesh, C. R. Singh and M. Mishra, J. Phys. G45, 035003 (2018)

    2018

  82. [90]

    Hatwar, C

    N. Hatwar, C. R. Singh, S. Ganesh and M. Mishra, Phys. Rev. C104, 034905 (2021)

    2021

  83. [91]

    Anandan, J., Suzuki, J. (n.d.). Quantum Mechanics in a Rotating Frame.https://doi.org/https://arxiv. org/pdf/quant-ph/0305081.pdf

    arXiv

  84. [92]

    Gordan Baym, Lectures on Quantum Me- chanics (1969).https://archive.org/details/ lecturesonquantu0000baym/page/n611/mode/2up

    1969

  85. [93]

    Griffths, Introduction to Quantum Mechan- ics.https://www.fisica.net/mecanica-quantica/ Griffiths%20-%20Introduction%20to%20quantum% 20mechanics.pdf

    David J. Griffths, Introduction to Quantum Mechan- ics.https://www.fisica.net/mecanica-quantica/ Griffiths%20-%20Introduction%20to%20quantum% 20mechanics.pdf

  86. [94]

    Nendzig and G

    F. Nendzig and G. Wolschin, Phys. Rev. C87, 024911 (2013)

    2013

  87. [95]

    Hoelck, F

    J. Hoelck, F. Nendzig and G. Wolschin, Phys. Rev. C 95, 024905 (2017)

    2017

  88. [96]

    Nendzig and G

    F. Nendzig and G. Wolschin, J. Phys. G41, 095003 (2014)

    2014

  89. [97]

    H. X. Zhang, J. W. Kang and B. W. Zhang, Eur. Phys. J. C81, 623 (2021). 16

    2021

  90. [98]

    Karmakar, A

    B. Karmakar, A. Bandyopadhyay, N. Haque and M. G. Mustafa, Eur. Phys. J. C79, 658 (2019)

    2019

  91. [99]

    Ayala, C

    A. Ayala, C. A. Dominguez, S. Hernandez-Ortiz, L. A. Hernandez, M. Loewe, D. Manreza Paret and R. Zamora, Phys. Rev. D98, 031501 (2018)

    2018

  92. [100]

    Bandyopadhyay, B

    A. Bandyopadhyay, B. Karmakar, N. Haque and M. G. Mustafa, Phys. Rev. D100, 034031 (2019)

    2019

  93. [101]

    L. Dong, Y. Guo, A. Islam, A. Rothkopf and M. Strick- land, JHEP09, 200 (2022)

    2022

  94. [102]

    Strickland and D

    M. Strickland and D. Bazow, Nucl. Phys. A879, 25-58 (2012)

    2012

  95. [103]

    Romatschke and M

    P. Romatschke and M. Strickland, Phys. Rev. D68, 036004 (2003)

    2003

  96. [104]

    Romatschke and M

    P. Romatschke and M. Strickland, Phys. Rev. D70, 116006 (2004)

    2004

  97. [105]

    Strickland, Anisotropic hydrodynamics: Three lec- tures, Acta Phys

    M. Strickland, Anisotropic hydrodynamics: Three lec- tures, Acta Phys. Pol. B 45, 2355 (2014)

    2014

  98. [106]

    Anselmino, P

    M. Anselmino, P. Kroll and B. Pire, Z. Phys. C29, 135 (1985)

    1985

  99. [107]

    D. Shen, J. Chen, A. Tang and G. Wang, Phys. Lett. B 839, 137777 (2023)

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.