Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 300 references

A chain-rule decomposition predicts how complex molecular deformations—not just simple pulls along a bond—change reaction barriers, reducing mechanophore activation to structure optimization.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 10:27 UTC pith:KUTHNFOY

load-bearing objection Useful empirical observation buried under an overclaimed theoretical framework; the supplement's math has inconsistent factors of 2. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.20217 v1 pith:KUTHNFOY submitted 2026-07-22 cond-mat.soft cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.chem-ph

A Theoretical Framework for the Coupling of Macroscale-Nanoscale Mechanochemical Phenomena in Condensed Matter

Brenden W Hamilton This is my paper
classification cond-mat.soft cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.chem-ph
keywords mechanochemistryactivation barrierstrain energychain-rule decompositionreaction coordinate projectionspiropyranmolecular dynamicsstructure optimization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper develops a theoretical framework for predicting how complex, non-linear molecular deformations—the kind that occur when a macroscopic strain is applied to a material—change the activation barrier of a mechanochemical reaction. The central claim is that the barrier change can be written, via a chain-rule expansion, as the product of two more easily computed quantities: how sensitive the barrier is to progress along the reaction coordinate, and how much a given molecular strain advances that coordinate. The paper validates the decomposition on the mechanochromic molecule spiropyran using molecular-dynamics simulations with five distinct deformation modes, showing that the barrier's sensitivity to the reaction coordinate is the same for all modes. A sympathetic reader would care because, if correct, the framework turns a costly problem—simulating an entire reaction for each deformation—into a small set of static structure optimizations, making high-level quantum chemistry practical for mechanophore design.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the strain-induced shift in an effective activation barrier, ΔE‡_eff = ΔE‡_o − (∂ΔE‡_o/∂ΔU_sys) ΔU_sys, can be evaluated without simulating every imposed deformation. Through a chain-rule expansion, ∂ΔE‡_o/∂ΔU_sys equals either (∂ΔE‡_o/∂F_ξ)(∂F_ξ/∂ΔU_sys) or (∂ΔE‡_o/∂ξ)(∂ξ/∂ΔU_sys), where ξ is the implicit reaction coordinate. The second form is the practical one: the paper argues that ∂ΔE‡_o/∂ξ is independent of the deformation path—so it needs to be sampled only once—and that the coupling term ∂ξ/∂ΔU_sys can be extracted from constrained geometry optimizations. Applied to spiropyran with five torsional deformation modes, the simulations show that deformati

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the chain-rule identity ∂ΔE‡_o/∂ΔU_sys = (∂ΔE‡_o/∂ξ)(∂ξ/∂ΔU_sys), together with the projection identity ∂F_ξ/∂ΔU_sys = s·|proj_ξ(ε)|²/|ε|², which states that the component of the molecular strain along the reaction coordinate, squared relative to the total strain, determines how much of the strain energy is transduced into barrier lowering. This identity is what lets the barrier change be rewritten as a product of an intrinsic, deformation-independent quantity and a geometric coupling factor computable from a single structure optimization. The framework's practical workhorse is the claim that ∂ΔE‡_o/∂ξ is independent of the deformation path, validated by the spirop

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes the molecule responds as a linear (harmonic) spring—force proportional to deformation—so that the ratio F_ξ/ΔU_sys equals the derivative ∂F_ξ/∂ΔU_sys; for the genuinely nonlinear deformations the paper targets, this equality is not guaranteed.

What would settle it

Take a molecule whose strain energy is not quadratic in the deformation, compute the force along the reaction coordinate and the energy rise over a range of strains, and compare F_ξ/ΔU_sys with the numerically evaluated derivative dF_ξ/dΔU_sys; if they disagree, the central projection identity does not hold outside the harmonic limit.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If correct, predicting a mechanophore's response to an arbitrary local strain reduces to computing one deformation-independent barrier sensitivity and one strain-to-coordinate coupling per deformation, rather than simulating each full reaction path.
  • The five spiropyran deformation modes imply that deformation modes can be classified as activating, inhibiting, or inert purely by how much they project onto the scissile reaction coordinate.
  • The framework allows activation-barrier changes to be estimated with high-level quantum chemical methods, because the required quantities come from static structure optimizations rather than costly steered reaction trajectories.
  • Because ∂ΔE‡_o/∂ξ needs to be sampled only once, adding a new deformation mode to a material model costs only the computation of ∂ξ/∂ΔU_sys.
  • In the single-bond limit, the formula reduces to a closed-form barrier shift proportional to s·cos²θ times the strain energy, giving a simple analytic estimate for bond-stretching mechanophores.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: The same projection logic suggests a design heuristic for mechanophore-containing polymers—engineer the local strain field so that a large fraction of its squared norm lies along the fragile bond's reaction coordinate; this follows directly from the formula but is not stated as a design rule in the paper.
  • Editorial inference: The framework's reliance on a single reaction coordinate could be probed with a two-coordinate model where the transition state shifts; the chain-rule factorization may then require a sum over coordinates rather than a single product.
  • Editorial inference: A natural testable extension is to repeat the spiropyran analysis with a higher-level electronic-structure method; if ∂ΔE‡_o/∂ξ remains deformation-independent there, the method's promise for high-level quantum chemistry is much firmer.
  • Editorial inference: The decomposition suggests a way to upscale from single molecules to condensed matter—couple a continuum strain field to the molecular projection factor to predict activation maps across a stressed material without atomistic resolution everywhere.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a chain-rule decomposition of mechanochemical barrier changes: the change in activation energy per unit molecular strain energy is written as a product of either the barrier-force derivative and a force-energy derivative, or the barrier-coordinate derivative and a coordinate-energy derivative. The central projection formula ∂∆E‡/∂∆U_sys = s·|proj_ξ(ε)|²/|ε|² is claimed to be a general, non-perturbative result. The approach is demonstrated on spiropyran using ReaxFF molecular dynamics with five additional torsional deformation paths, showing that the barrier plotted against the chosen reaction coordinate collapses onto a single line.

Significance. If the central projection formula were valid for arbitrary, nonlinear molecular deformations, it would be a substantial practical contribution: it would let one predict mechanophore activation from structure optimizations rather than from explicit simulation of every deformation path, and it would enable high-level quantum chemical methods. The paper also contains a useful organizational idea — separating the barrier-coordinate response from the coordinate-strain-energy response — and the empirical collapse in Figure 3 for five deformations of one molecule is suggestive. However, the derivation as written is not general: all supplement derivations assume quadratic strain energy or a linear force–deformation relation, and the identification of a finite ratio with a partial derivative is valid only in that linear regime. A factor-of-two inconsistency appears in the harmonic derivations themselves. These issues are load-bearing for the abstract's central claim, so the manuscript cannot be accepted in its present form.

major comments (4)
  1. [Supplement, Derivations 1–5] The central projection formula is not consistently derived even in the harmonic limit. Derivations 1–4 use ∆U_sys = ½k|ε|², which implies k = 2∆U_sys/|ε|², but then substitute k = ∆U_sys/|ε|², obtaining F_ξ = ∆U_sys(ε·ξ̂)/|ε|². The correct prefactor is 2. Derivation 5 initially obtains F_ξ = −2∆U_sys(ε·ξ̂)/|ε|² and then cancels the factor of 2 to match. Thus the claimed formula has a factor-of-two error relative to the stated harmonic model.
  2. [Supplement, Derivation 2 and main text, Eqs. (2)–(4)] The replacement of ∂F_ξ/∂∆U_sys by the finite ratio F_ξ/∆U_sys is an identity only when F_ξ is proportional to ∆U_sys, i.e., under linear response. All five derivations assume either ∆U_sys = ½k|ε|² or F_sys = κ·ε with scalar κ. The abstract and introduction nevertheless claim a 'non-perturbative' framework for 'highly non-linear' deformations. No derivation is given outside the harmonic/linear regime, so the central projection formula is not established for the stated scope.
  3. [Main text, Eq. (1) and Figure 3] The factorization ∂∆E‡/∂∆U_sys = (∂∆E‡/∂ξ)(∂ξ/∂∆U_sys) presupposes that the barrier depends on the deformation only through the single coordinate ξ. The only evidence offered is the collapse of five deformation paths in the left panel of Figure 3, from one molecule and one force field, with no error bars. The left panel also plots the same barrier data as Figure 2 against C-O distance, so it tests the adequacy of the chosen coordinate for this system rather than validating the general decomposition. The statement that Figure 3 'validates the assumption' is too strong.
  4. [Main text, Bell-model substitution after Eq. (3)] The substitution ∂∆E‡/∂F_ξ = ∆ξ uses Bell's linear model and treats a finite displacement as a derivative. Combined with the ratio-derivative identification discussed above, the final expression rests on two linear approximations. This is not acknowledged in the paper; in particular, it conflicts with the claimed non-perturbative generality.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Figure 2 caption and text] The text says the x-axis 'directly represents ∂∆E‡/∂∆U_sys sampled from MD'; actually the axis is ∆U_sys and the plotted slope is the derivative. Please rephrase to avoid confusing the variable with the derivative.
  2. [Figure 3] The right panel is called an 'analytical mapping' but it is empirical MD data. Add a statement of the fitting procedure and uncertainty estimates.
  3. [Supplement, notation] There are several typographical/notation issues: 'Fxi|∗|ξ|' and the sign convention for s are unclear; the sign of F_ξ changes between Derivations 1, 4, and 5 without a consistent statement.
  4. [Throughout] The term 'non-perturbative' is never defined. Since the main result is a first-order Taylor-style expansion with linear-response ingredients, the terminology should be justified or removed.
  5. [Main text, 'Central Buckle' discussion] Minor language issues such as 'there is a start difference' and 'The stems from' should be corrected.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

Central projection formula reduces to the harmonic ansatz by construction; same-data decomposition is presented as validation.

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Supplement, 'Derivations for |∂Fξ|/∂∆Usys', Derivations 1–2; main text, unnumbered equation after Bell substitution]
    "Given: Fsys = κ∗ϵ where κ is some scalar constant. ... κ = ∆Usys/|ϵ|^2 ... Fξ = ∆Usys· projξ(ϵ)/|ϵ|^2 ... ∂|Fξ|/∂∆Usys = s∗|projξ(ϵ)|^2/|ϵ|^2|ξ|"

    The coupling term is not derived as a general, non-perturbative result; it is obtained by substituting κ = ∆Usys/|ϵ|² into the assumed Hookean relation Fsys = κϵ and then identifying the ratio Fξ/∆Usys with the partial derivative ∂Fξ/∂∆Usys. The final projected-strain fraction is exactly the derivative of the quadratic energy ∆Usys = ½k|ϵ|² that constitutes the input, so the central 'prediction' is an algebraic rearrangement of the harmonic ansatz. Moreover, using the stated k = 2∆Usys/|ϵ|² consistently gives Fξ = −2∆Usys(ϵ·ξ̂)/|ϵ|², so the published factor-1 formula is also internally inconsistent.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Figure 3 and 'Molecular dynamics simulations validate the assumptions...' paragraph]
    "Figure 3 represents an analytical approach to assessing ∂∆E‡_o/∂ξ ∂ξ/∂∆Usys, breaking the data from Figure 2 into the two partial derivatives. ... The left panel ... cleanly shows all 5 deformation paths falling onto a single line. This validates the assumption above that ∂∆E‡_o/∂ξ is independent of ϵ and U."

    The linear ∂∆E‡_o/∂ξ is obtained by fitting the same five ReaxFF trajectories whose ∂ξ/∂∆Usys is plotted in the right panel; multiplying the two factors reconstructs the barrier data of Figure 2 by the chain rule. Treating this same-data decomposition as a validation of the predictive claim ('abates the need for computationally expensive molecular dynamics simulations') is a re-plot of the fitting data rather than an independent prediction: no held-out deformation, independent force field, or separately computed ∂ξ/∂∆Usys is tested.

full rationale

The central claim—non-perturbative prediction of barrier changes from structure optimization—rests on the projection formula ∂Fξ/∂∆Usys = s|projξ(ϵ)|²/(|ϵ|²|ξ|). The supplement derives that formula from the harmonic identities ∆Usys = ½k|ϵ|² and Fsys = κϵ with κ = ∆Usys/|ϵ|², so the formula is the input stress-strain ansatz restated in projection variables. The factor-of-2 inconsistency further shows the derivation is not a robust first-principles result. The spiropyran demonstration is a same-data decomposition: Figure 3 explicitly 'break[s] the data from Figure 2 into the two partial derivatives,' so the chain-rule recovery of Figure 2 is by construction and does not independently validate the formula. The self-citations (MBsMD methods, deformation-path selection, previous shock/spallation work) are methodological and not load-bearing; no uniqueness theorem is imported. The empirical five-path collapse onto one line and the use of the standard Bell model provide some independent content, preventing a score of 9–10, but the central 'prediction' is substantially forced by the harmonic input and the same fitted data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on (i) a linear-response core contradicting its nonlinear billing, (ii) an unstated ratio=derivative identification, and (iii) empirical path-independence supported by one molecule and one force field. The spiropyran demonstration contributes data but no new constants of nature and no invented entities. The net ledger: 'non-perturbative' generality is an axiom, mode-independence is a single-molecule empirical conjecture, and the practical structure-optimization workflow is asserted, not validated.

free parameters (3)
  • Barrier–coordinate slope ∂∆E‡/∂ξ (linear fit) = Not stated numerically; slope of the collapsed line in Figure 3 (left)
    Fit to the five ReaxFF deformation runs; the paper states ∂∆E‡/∂ξ 'can be readily approximated by a simple linear function' and then uses this fitted slope to reproduce barrier changes, making the demonstration a refit rather than a prediction.
  • Harmonic stiffness k = Defined as ∆U_sys/|ε|² (Derivations 1–4) and 2∆U_sys/|ε|² (Derivation 5)
    Ad hoc constant introduced to express F_ξ in terms of ∆U_sys; the factor-of-2 disagreement between derivations is never resolved and changes the resulting expression by 2×.
  • MBsMD torsional field strengths (5 deformation paths) = Not reported (deferred to absent Supplemental Materials)
    The magnitude of each external torsional field sets the deformation energy range; the reported barrier-change curves depend on these simulation controls, and neither values nor calibration protocols are given.
axioms (7)
  • ad hoc to paper Harmonic strain energy: ∆U_sys = ½k|ε|²
    Invoked in Supplement Derivations 1, 4, 5 to derive F_ξ = ∆U·proj/|ε|²; contradicts the paper's claim of validity for 'highly non-linear' deformations.
  • ad hoc to paper Linear force–deformation response: F_sys = κ·ε for a scalar κ
    Supplement Derivation 2 — this is Hooke's law; the central projection formula is an algebraic consequence of it, so the 'framework' inherits linear-response validity only.
  • ad hoc to paper ∂F_ξ/∂∆U_sys = F_ξ/∆U_sys (ratio treated as partial derivative)
    All five derivations compute the endpoint ratio and the main text labels it a partial derivative; the identification holds only for linear response and is unstated.
  • domain assumption Path-independence of ∂∆E‡_o/∂ξ with respect to deformation mode ε
    Framing claim that the barrier slope depends only on the coordinate ξ; supported only by the empirical collapse in Figure 3 (left) for one molecule and one force field, with admitted deviations for the Central Twist at large deformation.
  • domain assumption |proj_ξ(ε)| = |ξ| when ε does not change the path of ξ
    Supplement paragraph 'From there...'; used to strip |ξ| from the projection factor; restricts the deformation to ones that leave the reaction path geometry unchanged.
  • domain assumption Bell-model linear barrier response: ∂∆E‡_o/∂F_ξ = ∆ξ
    Main text adopts the Bell model for the force-side factor; assumes the barrier decreases linearly with force along the implicit coordinate over the whole strain range.
  • domain assumption ReaxFF accuracy for spiropyran ring-opening barriers
    All demonstration numbers come from one classical reactive force field (refs 56, 57); no quantum-chemical benchmark is provided for the barrier response, despite the abstract claiming compatibility with 'high level quantum chemical methods'.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 9426 in / 24709 out tokens · 209257 ms · 2026-08-01T10:27:37.415143+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The field of covalent mechanochemistry has transitioned from fundamental science to engineering applications, yet it lacks a robust theoretical framework for predicting reaction kinetics in condensed matter. Existing analytical models fail under realistic conditions where macroscopic strains drive molecular-scale deformations that are highly non-linear. We develop a non-perturbative theoretical framework that captures activation barrier changes in highly strained molecules undergoing complex, non-linear deformations, describing the macroscale-nanoscale coupling of phenomena. The framework yields general expressions, parameterizable from atomistic simulations, enabling multiscale prediction of mechanochemical behavior. By presenting the expressions in terms of general observables, this work enables predictions of mechanochemical effects from simple structure optimization calculations, enabling the use of high level quantum chemical methods. We demonstrate this approach on the mechanochromic polymer spiropyran, showing how non-linear strain fields govern mechanophore activation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.20217 by Brenden W Hamilton.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Atoms in the spiropyran molecule involved in the torsional deformation for each [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The effective activation barrier of the ring opening reaction for each deformation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The effective activation barrier as a function of the reaction coordinate and the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Oil & Gas Science and Technology--Revue d’IFP Energies nouvelles , volume=

    A review of kinetic modeling methodologies for complex processes , author=. Oil & Gas Science and Technology--Revue d’IFP Energies nouvelles , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  2. [2]

    Chemical reviews , volume=

    Theoretical chemical kinetics in tropospheric chemistry: methodologies and applications , author=. Chemical reviews , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  3. [3]

    Energy & Fuels , volume=

    Critical review of the global chemical kinetics of cellulose thermal decomposition , author=. Energy & Fuels , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  4. [4]

    Chemical reviews , volume=

    Modeling the kinetics of bimolecular reactions , author=. Chemical reviews , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  5. [5]

    Chemical reviews , volume=

    Kinetic and catalytic mechanisms of protein kinases , author=. Chemical reviews , volume=. 2001 , publisher=

    2001

  6. [6]

    Nature Reviews Chemistry , volume=

    The many flavours of mechanochemistry and its plausible conceptual underpinnings , author=. Nature Reviews Chemistry , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  7. [7]

    Angewandte Chemie , volume=

    Switching chemoselectivity: using mechanochemistry to alter reaction kinetics , author=. Angewandte Chemie , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  8. [8]

    Heliyon , volume=

    Linking mechanochemistry with the green chemistry principles , author=. Heliyon , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  9. [9]

    Journal of Controlled Release , volume=

    Polymer mechanochemistry in drug delivery: From controlled release to precise activation , author=. Journal of Controlled Release , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  10. [10]

    Advanced drug delivery reviews , volume=

    Cell responses to the mechanochemical microenvironment—implications for regenerative medicine and drug delivery , author=. Advanced drug delivery reviews , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  11. [11]

    Chemical Society Reviews , volume=

    Application of heterogeneous catalysts prepared by mechanochemical synthesis , author=. Chemical Society Reviews , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  12. [12]

    Catalysis Today , volume=

    Mechanochemical activation as a tool of increasing catalytic activity , author=. Catalysis Today , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  13. [13]

    Nature Communications , volume=

    Mechanochemically responsive polymer enables shockwave visualization , author=. Nature Communications , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  14. [14]

    Journal of the American Chemical Society , volume=

    Structure--mechanochemical activity relationships for cyclobutane mechanophores , author=. Journal of the American Chemical Society , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  15. [15]

    Journal of the American Chemical Society , volume=

    Substituent effects and mechanism in a mechanochemical reaction , author=. Journal of the American Chemical Society , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  16. [16]

    Journal of the American Chemical Society , volume=

    Relative mechanical strengths of weak bonds in sonochemical polymer mechanochemistry , author=. Journal of the American Chemical Society , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  17. [17]

    Journal of the American Chemical Society , volume=

    Validation of the CoGEF method as a predictive tool for polymer mechanochemistry , author=. Journal of the American Chemical Society , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  18. [18]

    Journal of the American Chemical Society , volume=

    Mechanochemical Synthesis and Fluorescence Reporting of Conjugated Polymers through Flex-Activation , author=. Journal of the American Chemical Society , volume=. 2026 , publisher=

    2026

  19. [19]

    Journal of the American Chemical Society , volume=

    Mechanochemistry of spiropyran under internal stresses of a glassy polymer , author=. Journal of the American Chemical Society , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  20. [20]

    Chemical Society Reviews , volume=

    Hallmarks of mechanochemistry: from nanoparticles to technology , author=. Chemical Society Reviews , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  21. [21]

    Nguyen and Yen-Thi Nguyen and Joseph B

    Phong C.H. Nguyen and Yen-Thi Nguyen and Joseph B. Choi and Pradeep K. Seshadri and H. S. Udaykumar and Stephen S. Baek , title =. Science Advances , volume =. 2023 , doi =. https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.add6868 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.add6868 2023

  22. [22]

    Physical review letters , volume=

    Atomic force microscope , author=. Physical review letters , volume=. 1986 , publisher=

    1986

  23. [23]

    Angewandte Chemie International Edition , volume=

    Force spectroscopy of molecular systems—single molecule spectroscopy of polymers and biomolecules , author=. Angewandte Chemie International Edition , volume=. 2000 , publisher=

    2000

  24. [24]

    Chemistry--A European Journal , volume=

    Stretching single molecules along unbinding and unfolding pathways with the scanning force microscope , author=. Chemistry--A European Journal , volume=. 2000 , publisher=

    2000

  25. [25]

    Annual review of biochemistry , volume=

    Mechanical processes in biochemistry , author=. Annual review of biochemistry , volume=. 2004 , publisher=

    2004

  26. [26]

    High-resolution, single-molecule measurements of biomolecular motion , author=. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  27. [27]

    Nature , volume=

    Biasing reaction pathways with mechanical force , author=. Nature , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  28. [28]

    Angewandte Chemie International Edition , volume=

    Forcing and controlling chemical reactions with ultrasound , author=. Angewandte Chemie International Edition , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  29. [29]

    Nature nanotechnology , volume=

    A molecular force probe , author=. Nature nanotechnology , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  30. [30]

    Journal of Applied Physics , volume=

    Energy localization efficiency in 1, 3, 5-trinitro-2, 4, 6-triaminobenzene pore collapse mechanisms , author=. Journal of Applied Physics , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  31. [31]

    The Journal of Physical Chemistry C , year=

    Intergranular Hotspots: A Molecular Dynamics Study on the Influence of Compressive and Shear Work , author=. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C , year=

  32. [32]

    Using limited neural networks to assess relative mechanistic influence on shock heating in granular solids , author =. Phys. Rev. Mater. , volume =. 2023 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.7.085601 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevmaterials.7.085601 2023

  33. [33]

    and Appleton, Robert J

    Li, Chunyu and Verduzco, Juan Carlos and Lee, Brian H. and Appleton, Robert J. and Strachan, Alejandro , title=. npj Computational Materials , year=. doi:10.1038/s41524-023-01134-0 , url=

    work page doi:10.1038/s41524-023-01134-0

  34. [34]

    The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume=

    High-pressure and temperature neural network reactive force field for energetic materials , author=. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume=. 2023 , pages=

    2023

  35. [35]

    Chemistry International , volume=

    IUPAC Top Ten Emerging Technologies in Chemistry 2021 , author=. Chemistry International , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  36. [36]

    Angewandte Chemie , volume=

    Mechanocatalytic Room-Temperature Synthesis of Ammonia from Its Elements Down to Atmospheric Pressure , author=. Angewandte Chemie , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  37. [37]

    ChemSusChem , pages=

    Mechanochemical Ammonia Synthesis: Old is New Again , author=. ChemSusChem , pages=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  38. [38]

    Chemistry International , volume=

    Ten Chemical Innovations That Will Change Our World: IUPAC identifies emerging technologies in Chemistry with potential to make our planet more sustainable , author=. Chemistry International , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  39. [39]

    Angewandte Chemie International Edition , volume=

    Analyzing reaction rates with the distortion/interaction-activation strain model , author=. Angewandte Chemie International Edition , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  40. [40]

    Proceedings of the Royal Society of London

    The theory of reactions involving proton transfers , author=. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A-Mathematical and Physical Sciences , volume=. 1936 , publisher=

    1936

  41. [41]

    Transactions of the Faraday Society , volume=

    Further considerations on the thermodynamics of chemical equilibria and reaction rates , author=. Transactions of the Faraday Society , volume=. 1936 , publisher=

    1936

  42. [42]

    The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters , volume=

    Interplay of mechanochemistry and material processes in the graphite to diamond phase transformation , author=. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  43. [43]

    Nature Reviews Methods Primers , volume=

    Ball milling for mechanochemical reactions , author=. Nature Reviews Methods Primers , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  44. [44]

    Chemical Society Reviews , volume=

    On the mechanochemical activation by ultrasound , author=. Chemical Society Reviews , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  45. [45]

    Chemical reviews , volume=

    Mechanochemistry: the mechanical activation of covalent bonds , author=. Chemical reviews , volume=. 2005 , publisher=

    2005

  46. [46]

    Journal of the American Chemical Society , volume=

    A remote stereochemical lever arm effect in polymer mechanochemistry , author=. Journal of the American Chemical Society , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  47. [47]

    Nano Letters , year=

    Mechanochemically Activated Carbon for Achieving CO2 Chemisorption under Mild Conditions without Chemical Treatment , author=. Nano Letters , year=

  48. [48]

    Nano Letters , volume=

    Charge redistribution in mechanochemical reactions for solid interfaces , author=. Nano Letters , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  49. [49]

    Nano letters , volume=

    Mechanochemical delivery and dynamic tracking of fluorescent quantum dots in the cytoplasm and nucleus of living cells , author=. Nano letters , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  50. [50]

    Nano Letters , volume=

    A pH and Light Dual-Responsive Spiropyran-Peptide Self-Assembly for Controlled Mitochondria and Nucleus Targeting , author=. Nano Letters , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  51. [51]

    artificial solvent

    Polysilsesquioxane nanowire networks as an “artificial solvent” for reversible operation of photochromic molecules , author=. Nano letters , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  52. [52]

    Nano Letters , volume=

    A nonvolatile plasmonic switch employing photochromic molecules , author=. Nano Letters , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

    2008

  53. [53]

    Nano Letters , volume=

    Engineering liquid metal particles: design rules for sonication-based methods , author=. Nano Letters , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  54. [54]

    Nano Letters , volume=

    Unidirectional drug delivery and responsive release guided by nanofunnel-shaped heterojunction , author=. Nano Letters , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  55. [55]

    The Journal of Physical Chemistry C , volume=

    Influence of pore surface structure and contents on shock-induced collapse and energy localization , author=. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  56. [56]

    The Journal of chemical physics , volume=

    Liquid drops of polar molecules , author=. The Journal of chemical physics , volume=. 1986 , publisher=

    1986

  57. [57]

    The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume=

    The method of planes pressure tensor for a spherical subvolume , author=. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  58. [58]

    Proceedings of the Royal Society of London

    Statistical mechanics of inhomogeneous fluids , author=. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences , volume=. 1982 , publisher=

    1982

  59. [59]

    Journal of materials Science , volume=

    The yield behaviour of polymers , author=. Journal of materials Science , volume=. 1971 , publisher=

    1971

  60. [60]

    Tribology Letters , volume=

    On the commonality between theoretical models for fluid and solid friction, wear and tribochemistry , author=. Tribology Letters , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  61. [61]

    AIP conference proceedings , volume=

    Ignition chemistry in HMX from thermal explosion to detonation , author=. AIP conference proceedings , volume=. 2002 , organization=

    2002

  62. [62]

    Chemical Society Reviews , volume=

    Mechanochemistry: opportunities for new and cleaner synthesis , author=. Chemical Society Reviews , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  63. [63]

    Chemical Society Reviews , volume=

    Mechanochemistry , author=. Chemical Society Reviews , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  64. [64]

    Angewandte Chemie , volume=

    Mechanochemistry for synthesis , author=. Angewandte Chemie , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  65. [65]

    Physical Review Materials , volume=

    Rapid Activation of Non-Oriented Mechanophores via Shock Loading and Spallation , author=. Physical Review Materials , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  66. [66]

    Chemical reviews , volume=

    Asymmetric photochemical reactions in solution , author=. Chemical reviews , volume=. 1992 , publisher=

    1992

  67. [67]

    Transactions of the Faraday Society , volume=

    Elementary processes of photochemical reactions , author=. Transactions of the Faraday Society , volume=. 1926 , publisher=

    1926

  68. [68]

    Chemical reviews , volume=

    Photochemical reactions as key steps in organic synthesis , author=. Chemical reviews , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

    2008

  69. [69]

    2000 , publisher=

    Electrochemical reactions and mechanisms in organic chemistry , author=. 2000 , publisher=

    2000

  70. [70]

    Mechanistic aspects , author=

    Molecular catalysis of electrochemical reactions. Mechanistic aspects , author=. Chemical Reviews , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

    2008

  71. [71]

    Progress in Materials Science , volume=

    Mechanochemical synthesis of hydrogen storage materials , author=. Progress in Materials Science , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  72. [72]

    Chemical Science , volume=

    Multicomponent mechanochemical synthesis , author=. Chemical Science , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  73. [73]

    Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English , volume=

    The conservation of orbital symmetry , author=. Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English , volume=. 1969 , publisher=

    1969

  74. [74]

    Marco and Klein, Michael L

    Saitta, A. Marco and Klein, Michael L. , doi =. Journal of the American Chemical Society , number =. arXiv , arxivId =:9910219 , file =

  75. [75]

    and Landis, Steven and Sun, Yuanyuan and Li, Jinjin and Zhu, Peng and Doherty, Michael F

    Zhao, Yongsheng and Tilbury, Carl J. and Landis, Steven and Sun, Yuanyuan and Li, Jinjin and Zhu, Peng and Doherty, Michael F. , doi =. Crystal Growth and Design , number =

  76. [76]

    and Udaykumar, H

    Das, Pratik and Rai, Nirmal K. and Udaykumar, H. S. , doi =

  77. [77]

    and Germann, Timothy C

    Cherukara, Mathew J. and Germann, Timothy C. and Kober, Edward M. and Strachan, Alejandro , doi =. Journal of Physical Chemistry C , number =

  78. [78]

    Materials , keywords =

    Wang, Yuqiao and Li, Xin and Chen, Shusen and Ma, Xiao and Yu, Ziyang and Jin, Shaohua and Li, Lijie and Chen, Yu , doi =. Materials , keywords =

  79. [79]

    and An, Qi and Goddard, William A

    Guo, Dezhou and Zybin, Sergey V. and An, Qi and Goddard, William A. and Huang, Fenglei , doi =. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics , number =

  80. [80]

    and Leiding, Jeff and Tao, Hongli and Virshup, Aaron M

    Ong, Mitchell T. and Leiding, Jeff and Tao, Hongli and Virshup, Aaron M. and Mart. Journal of the American Chemical Society , number =. doi:10.1021/ja8095834 , file =

    work page doi:10.1021/ja8095834

Showing first 80 references.