Zero-temperature phase-flip rate in a biased parametric oscillator

Daniel K. J. Bone{\ss}; Mark I. Dykman; Wolfgang Belzig

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Zero-temperature phase-flip rate in a biased parametric oscillator

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A zero-temperature parametric oscillator can be localized in its shallower phase state, with phase-flip rates given explicitly by an activation exponent built from complex-time periods of classical trajectories.

desk verdict Solid analytic extension to arbitrary bias, but the shallow-well localization headline is a conjecture that rests on an unproved matrix-element zero and an uncomputed prefactor. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.07562 v2 pith:KUYKR2PD submitted 2025-01-13 quant-ph cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.stat-mech

Daniel K. J. Bone{ss} , Wolfgang Belzig , Mark I. Dykman This is my paper · ORCID

classification quant-phcond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.stat-mech

keywords parametricoscillatorphaseflipquantumactivationzerotemperaturedynamicalbiasFloquetstatessemiclassicalinstantonIsingmachines

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

A parametrically driven nonlinear oscillator has two stable vibration states with opposite phases and equal amplitudes, and an extra drive at half the modulation frequency breaks that symmetry. This paper claims that at zero temperature the phase-flip rate between the two states can be written explicitly for arbitrarily strong bias, as a Boltzmann-like exponential with a computable quantum activation energy. The main new result is that when the bias amplitude equals the scaled detuning, the switching rate out of the shallower state becomes anomalously small, effectively localizing the oscillator in that state. The mechanism is a topology change of classical trajectories in complex phase space: at a critical quasienergy the two wells disconnect, and the ground state of the shallow well has vanishing upward transition amplitude. If correct, this offers a controllable way to trap or release phase states and a building block for dissipative quantum Ising systems made of coupled parametric oscillators.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Floquet Hamiltonian in the rotating frame, $g(Q,P)=\tfrac14(Q^2+P^2-\mu)^2+\tfrac12(P^2-Q^2)-\mu^2/4-\alpha_d Q$, whose two minima correspond to the two phase states. Its classical trajectories are double-periodic Jacobi elliptic functions with real period $\tau_p^{(1)}$ and complex period $\tau_p^{(2)}$; the poles of $Q$ and $P$ in complex time sit at $\tau_*$ and $\tau_{**}$, and the transition matrix elements between Floquet states are written in terms of these pole positions. The function that carries the argument is $R'(g)=2\,\mathrm{Im}(\tau_p^{(2)}-\tau_*-\tau_{**})$, which, integrated from the bottom of a well to the saddle point, gives the quantum activation energy. The topology change occurs at $g_c=-\tfrac14[(1-\mu)^2-\alpha_d^2]$, where the two branch points $Q_\pm$ merge and the imaginary part of $\tau_p^{(2)}$ diverges logarithmically; the paper argues this is the structural reason for the localization.

What would settle it

Numerically diagonalize the rotating-frame Hamiltonian in Eq. (1) for $\alpha_d=\mu$ with $0<\mu<2$ and compute $\langle 1|\hat a|0\rangle$ for the ground state of the shallow well; the paper's localization claim requires this matrix element to be exactly zero, so a nonzero value of order $\lambda^0$ would falsify it. Alternatively, a low-temperature measurement of the shallow-well escape rate as a function of $\alpha_d$ at fixed $\mu$ should show a sharp exponential dip exactly at $\alpha_d=\mu$ and recover when $\alpha_d$ moves away.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that, at zero temperature and for weak linear coupling to a bath, the phase-flip rate of a dynamically biased parametric oscillator is $W_{\rm sw}(\sigma)=C_{\rm sw}(\sigma)\exp[-R_A(\sigma)/\lambda]$, with activation energy $R_A(\sigma)=\int_{g_{\min}(\sigma)}^{g_s} R'(g)\,dg$ and $R'(g)=2\,\mathrm{Im}(\tau_p^{(2)}-\tau_*-\tau_{**})$. All ingredients are simple integrals over the classical Hamiltonian trajectories in the rotating frame, which are Jacobi elliptic functions with a real and a complex period. The paper further claims that when $\alpha_d=\pm\mu$, the critical quasienergy $g_c$ coincides with the bottom of a well; in the shallow well the ground-state transition matrix element $\langle 1|\hat a|0\rangle$ vanishes exactly, so the oscillator prepared there stays there. This efficient localization is a direct consequence of the change in topology of the phase trajectories at $g_c$, where the complex-time portrait forms an hourglass and the interwell trajectory becomes disconnected.

Load-bearing premise

The localization claim stands on two premises: that at $\alpha_d=\mu$ the amplitude for the shallow well's ground state to absorb one quantum is exactly zero, and that quantum activation, not tunneling, dominates escape; if the amplitude is only small, or if tunneling is not exponentially suppressed, the trapping effect is just a quantitative change in rates.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Phase-flip rates from the two wells differ by an exponential factor set by $\Delta R_A$, so a weak bias produces an exponentially large population imbalance; the oscillator acts like a spin with a tunable effective magnetic field.
At bias values $\alpha_d=m\lambda$, all quasienergy levels in the two wells come into resonance simultaneously, because intrawell vibration frequencies coincide for equal quasienergy; this explains the resonant tunneling condition observed in experiments and marks where tunneling corrections peak.
For $0<\mu<2$ and $\alpha_d=\mu$, the shallow well's ground state has zero coupling to its first excited state, so an oscillator prepared in that well remains there even though the well is shallower; weak dissipation does not destroy the trap.
Near the bifurcation where the shallow well disappears, the activation energy vanishes as $|\alpha_d-\alpha_B|^{3/2}$, so the phase-flip rate rises rapidly as the bias is tuned away from the well's disappearance.
In a coupled array, each oscillator's bias from its neighbors depends on their phases, so the exponential asymmetry of rates turns the network into a dissipative Ising system; if the oscillators are non-equivalent, the couplings become nonreciprocal.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The exact vanishing of the ground-state matrix element at $\alpha_d=\mu$ can be read as a dark-state condition of the complex-time topology; if so, dephasing or finite temperature will restore escape with a rate proportional to $|\mu+\sigma\alpha_d|^2$, which the paper notes for small $|\mu+\sigma\alpha_d|$ and could be tested by controlled noise injection.
The logarithmic divergence of $\mathrm{Im}\,\tau_p^{(2)}$ at a merging of turning points may occur in other multi-stable driven systems, suggesting a general mechanism for suppressing escape from a selected state whenever a critical point in complex phase space aligns with a well bottom.
For Ising machines, the exponential population asymmetry implies that a single biased oscillator can act as a probabilistic bit with a strongly nonlinear, tunable switching rate; a two-oscillator experiment measuring phase-flip rates as a function of coupling bias would directly test the predicted nonreciprocity.
The prefactor $C_{\rm sw}(\sigma)$ is left of order $\kappa$; a natural next step is to compute it beyond the exponential approximation, since the localization claim is exponential and the prefactor could matter at finite small $\lambda$.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Short version: the paper gives the first explicit zero-temperature phase-flip activation energies for a biased parametric oscillator at arbitrary bias, and the derivation is mostly honest semiclassics. The headline localization effect at alpha_d = +/- mu, however, is not actually derived. Treat the rate formula as solid and the localization claim as a conjecture.

What is new and good: Eqs. (29) and (31) express R_A as an integral over simple functions of complex-time trajectory periods and poles, with no fitted constants. The paper correctly recovers the symmetric limit, the weak-bias logarithmic susceptibility, and the resonance condition alpha_d = m lambda used in the recent experiment. The hourglass topology at g_c and the coalescence g_c = g_min are interesting, and the complex-time phase portraits support the topological picture. Appendix B proves R'(g) > 0, which is a useful check. The citation pattern is fine; the reliance on Marthaler-Dykman for the symmetric case is legitimate.

The soft spot is the localization claim in Sec. V.A. At alpha_d = +/- mu, g_c sits at the shallow-well minimum. The paper's own Eq. (31) gives a finite R_A for that well, because the logarithmic divergence of R'(g) is integrable; that formula alone predicts a finite, relatively large escape rate, not an anomalously small one. The suppression is supposed to come from the exact vanishing of <1|a|0> at g_c = g_min. That vanishing is asserted, not derived. Even if it is exact, it zeros only the first rung of the quantum walk; transitions from the ground state to m >= 2 exist at higher order in lambda, and the paper does not compare their rates with exp(-R_A/lambda), nor does it compute the prefactor C_sw that would carry the suppression. The paper does acknowledge that such transitions have exponentially small amplitudes and that dephasing can destroy the effect, but that is a caveat, not a calculation. The reader's conditional verdict is right, and the stress-test note lands.

Who benefits: people working on parametric oscillators, cat qubits, and coupled oscillator Ising machines will want this paper for the explicit R_A and the resonance condition. It deserves a serious referee. I would send it out, but ask the authors to prove the vanishing matrix element or at least estimate the m >= 2 transition rates, and to soften the abstract's localization language until they have a numerical benchmark for the biased case.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper develops a semiclassical theory for zero-temperature phase-flip (interwell switching) rates in a parametrically driven Kerr oscillator subject to an additional bias drive at half the modulation frequency. The model Hamiltonian is given in Sec. II, and the analysis is based on the double-periodic Jacobi elliptic trajectories of the classical motion in the rotating frame. The authors derive explicit expressions for the transition rates between Floquet states in terms of the poles and complex period of these trajectories, and obtain the quantum-activation exponent R'(g) = 2 Im(τ_p^(2) − τ_* − τ_**), Eq. (29), through a detailed-balance condition. The central rate formula is Eq. (31), W_sw(σ) = C_sw(σ) exp(−R_A(σ)/λ), with R_A(σ) given by an integral of R'(g). The paper further claims that when α_d = ±μ the shallow-well rate becomes anomalously small, leading to efficient localization, and it derives a weak-bias logarithmic susceptibility and a prebifurcation scaling law.

Significance. If correct, the explicit, parameter-free formulas for the zero-temperature phase-flip rates are valuable and go beyond earlier symmetric-case results. The paper is largely self-contained: the rates follow from trajectory data with no fitted constants, the positivity R'(g) > 0 is proved in Appendix B, and the logarithmic susceptibility and prebifurcation scaling are concrete falsifiable predictions. The topological 'hourglass' picture underlying the singularity at g_c is insightful. However, the headline localization claim rests on an unproved matrix-element statement and on an incompletely demonstrated comparison with tunneling; these points need to be fixed before the central claim is fully established.

major comments (3)

[Sec. V.A, Eq. (31)] The central claim of 'efficient localization' at α_d = ±μ is not established by the derivation. Equation (31) gives W_sw(σ) = C_sw(σ) exp(−R_A(σ)/λ), and since the logarithmic divergence of R′(g) at g_c is integrable, R_A for the shallow well is finite; the anomalously small rate has to come from the prefactor or from a separate suppression mechanism. The paper asserts without derivation that ⟨1|a|0⟩ = 0 at g_c = g_min, and then argues that the oscillator is trapped in the ground state. Even if that matrix element vanishes exactly, only the first rung of the quantum walk is removed: transitions |0⟩ → |m⟩ with m ≥ 2 are generically nonzero at order λ^{m/2} from anharmonic corrections to the local oscillator, and the paper does not show that their rates are small compared with exp(−R_A(σ)/λ). A modified-instanton calculation that incorporates the vanishing rung, or a direct numerical solution of the master equation for the biased case, is needed to support the localization claim; neither is supplied.
[Sec. V] The statement that quantum activation dominates tunneling in the biased case is not demonstrated. The paper says this 'can be shown by extending the arguments given in [27]' and notes that Im τ_p^(2) > R′(g), but for α_d = ±μ, where g_c = g_min and R′(g) diverges at the lower limit of the integral in Eq. (31), the comparison is made at a point where the eikonal approximation itself breaks down. Since the localization scenario requires the activation channel to dominate, the paper should either provide the extension explicitly or state the parameter conditions under which tunneling can be neglected; the introductory assumption that level broadening exceeds tunnel splitting does not by itself quantify the comparison.
[Sec. V.A and Appendix D] The argument that the singularity at g_c is harmless relies on a check for α_d = 0 (Ref. [27]), but the localization case has g_c at the lower endpoint of the integration range in Eq. (31), where the eikonal approximation used to derive Eq. (25) breaks down. The integrable divergence makes the leading contribution to R_A finite, but the correction to the eikonal exponent from the vicinity of g_c is not estimated for the biased case; this correction could be non-negligible relative to the claimed exponential suppression. A quantitative estimate, or a numerical evaluation of the prefactor C_sw(σ), is required to confirm that the shallow-well rate is anomalously small rather than merely modified by an O(1) factor.

minor comments (3)

[Introduction, first paragraph] The word 'counteraphase' should be 'counterphase'.
[Sec. IV.B, after Eq. (29)] The phrase 'describes the tale of the distribution' should be 'describes the tail of the distribution'.
[Sec. V.C] The term 'preburcation regime' is a typo for 'prebifurcation regime'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the phase-flip rates are computed from explicit semiclassical trajectory data with no fitted parameters, and self-citations are used only as benchmarks or limiting checks.

full rationale

The central claim, Eq. (31), evaluates the activation energy R_A(σ) by integrating R'(g)=2 Im(τ_p^(2)-τ_*-τ_**) from Eq. (29), which is derived in Sec. IV from the balance equation, the explicit pole representation Eq. (22) of the transition matrix elements, and the detailed-balance condition Eq. (27). The only inputs are the model Hamiltonian Eq. (3), the semiclassical WKB quantization Eq. (5), and classical trajectory data; no constant is fitted to the switching rates being predicted. The resonance condition α_d=mλ is derived from the computed action difference δI=|α_d|, not fitted to the experiment of Ref. [43], which is cited only to note agreement. The dominance of quantum activation over tunneling is re-derived for the biased case directly from Eqs. (10), (13), and (29) ('This condition is seen from Eqs. (10), (13), and (29) to hold also in the asymmetric case'), so the invocation of the symmetric-limit Ref. [27] is not the load-bearing argument. Refs. [27] and [39] serve as limiting-case benchmarks or as the finite-temperature weak-bias result, outside the T=0 derivation. The localization claim at α_d=±μ rests on the asserted vanishing of ⟨1|a|0⟩ at g_c=g_min without a fully displayed derivation, and the observation that the logarithmic divergence of R' is integrable leaves R_A finite; these are correctness or rigor concerns about an unproved matrix-element statement, not instances where an output is equivalent to an input by construction. Therefore the derivation chain is self-contained and no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No constant is fitted to data; μ, α_d, λ, and κ enter as physical inputs. The calculation is a derivation under RWA, Markovian zero-temperature dissipation, WKB quantization, and activation-over-tunneling assumptions. The switching prefactor C_sw is left at order κ, and no new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (8)

domain assumption Rotating-wave approximation and truncated quartic nonlinearity (Eqs. (1) and (3))
The Hamiltonian (3) is derived in RWA keeping only the (a†a)^2 nonlinearity and assuming small detuning and drive amplitudes; this produces the double-well surface on which the whole calculation is built.
domain assumption Markovian weak linear coupling to a zero-temperature bath (Sec. IV.A)
Transition rates W_nn'=2κ|⟨n'|a|n⟩|^2 assume a fast bath, linear coupling, and thermal occupation n̄=0; these rates feed the detailed balance relation and the instanton equation.
domain assumption Semiclassical regime with λ<<1, many intrawell Floquet states, and level broadening small compared to spacing but large compared to tunnel splitting (Secs. II.A and IV)
Used to justify WKB quantization and to assert that quantum activation, not coherent tunneling, is the dominant switching channel.
standard math Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization I(g_n)=λ(n+1/2) and semiclassical matrix elements as Fourier components (Eqs. (5) and (20))
Standard WKB bookkeeping that converts classical trajectories into Floquet transition rates.
standard math Jacobi elliptic function representation of complex-time trajectories with two periods (Appendix A)
Underlies the pole positions and the formulas for τ_p^(2), τ_*, and τ_** used in Eq. (29).
domain assumption Detailed balance among transition rates at zero temperature, Eq. (27)
The paper derives it from the pole representation, but in a driven dissipative system detailed balance is not generic; it is the load-bearing relation that fixes the instanton momentum p_I.
domain assumption Quantum activation dominates tunneling, Im τ_p^(2) > R'(g) (Sec. V, after Eq. (31))
Assumes tunnel splitting is small compared with dissipation broadening, extending Ref. [27]; if violated, tunneling could erase the predicted localization.
domain assumption Eikonal approximation for R(g) remains valid except at g=g_c, where the divergence is integrable (Sec. V.A)
The authors argue the singular contribution to R_A is small and cite Ref. [27] for α_d=0, but for α_d≠0 there is no independent check.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Zero-temperature phase-flip rate in a biased parametric oscillator." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KUYKR2PD

@misc{pith2026250107562,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Zero-temperature phase-flip rate in a biased parametric oscillator},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KUYKR2PD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.07562}
}

read the original abstract

A parametrically driven oscillator has two stable vibrational states at half the modulation frequency. The states have opposite phase and equal amplitudes. An extra drive at half the modulation frequency provides an effective bias that lifts the state symmetry. Quantum fluctuations lead to switching between the states, i.e., to phase-flip transitions. We develop a semiclassical approach that allows us to find the dependence of the switching rates on the amplitude of the bias and the parameters of the modulating field. We find that the rate of switching from a ''shallow'' state can become anomalously small at certain parameter values, leading to an efficient localization in this state. This is a consequence of the change of the topology of the oscillator phase trajectories. The results pave the way for implementing nonreciprocal quantum Ising systems based on parametric oscillators.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.07562 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. The classical turning points, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. Phase portrait and action of the Hamiltonian system. Panels (a) - (c) show the evolution of the phase portrait with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (6 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Position of the poles of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. The imaginary part of the complex vibration period [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. The dependence of the activation energies [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7. Logarithmic susceptibility [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8. A periodic Hamiltonian trajectory that starts at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: FIG. 9. Phase portrait of the Hamiltonian system in the single-well regime. Panels (a) - (c) show the real-time Hamiltonian [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Controlling the effect of quantum fluctuations in a driven nonlinear parametric oscillator
nlin.CD 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

A high-frequency linear drive softens the effective oscillator frequency and lowers the critical quantum fluctuation V0c, shrinking the parametric resonance zone and suppressing large-amplitude oscillations in a Gauss...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[27]

M. I. Dykman, C. M. Maloney, V. N. Smelyanskiy, and M. Silverstein, Fluctuational phase-flip transitions in parametrically driven oscillators, Phys. Rev. E 57, 5202 (1998)

work page 1998
[1]

preburcation regime

Action as a function of imaginary time An extra insight into the dynamics of the system can be gained by looking at the action for a classical trajectory evaluated as a function of the complex time τ , I(g|τ ) = 1 2π Z τ +τ (1) p τ dt P(t) ˙Q(t) . (17) The integral can be thought of as starting at a point with complex τ on the boundary of the parallelogra...

work page
[2]

Mirrahimi, Z

M. Mirrahimi, Z. Leghtas, V. V. Albert, S. Touzard, R. J. Schoelkopf, L. Jiang, and M. H. Devoret, Dynam- ically protected cat-qubits: A new paradigm for univer- sal quantum computation, New Journal of Physics 16, 045014 (2014)

work page 2014
[3]

Leghtas, G

Z. Leghtas, G. Kirchmair, B. Vlastakis, R. J. Schoelkopf, M. H. Devoret, and M. Mirrahimi, Hardware-efficient au- tonomous quantum memory protection, Physical Review Letters 111, 120501 (2013)

work page 2013
[4]

Zhang and M

Y. Zhang and M. I. Dykman, Preparing quasienergy states on demand: A parametric oscillator, Phys. Rev. A 95, 053841 (2017)

work page 2017
[5]

Goto, Bifurcation-based adiabatic quantum computa- tion with a nonlinear oscillator network, Scientific Re- ports 6, 21686 (2016)

H. Goto, Bifurcation-based adiabatic quantum computa- tion with a nonlinear oscillator network, Scientific Re- ports 6, 21686 (2016)

2016
[6]

Grimm, N

A. Grimm, N. E. Frattini, S. Puri, S. O. Mundhada, S. Touzard, M. Mirrahimi, S. M. Girvin, S. Shankar, and M. H. Devoret, Stabilization and operation of a kerr-cat qubit, Nature 584, 205 (2020)

2020
[7]

Puri and A

S. Puri and A. Blais, Engineering the quantum states of light in a kerr-nonlinear resonator by two-photon driving, npj Quantum Information 3, 18 (2017)

work page 2017

Show all 53 references

[8]

Ch´ avez-Carlos, R

J. Ch´ avez-Carlos, R. G. Corti˜ nas, M. A. P. Reynoso, I. Garc ´ ıa-Mata, V. S. Batista, F. P´ erez-Bernal, D. A. Wisniacki, and L. F. Santos, Driving superconducting qubits into chaos (2023), arXiv:2310.17698 [cond-mat, physics:quant-ph]

2023
[9]

Zilberberg and A

O. Zilberberg and A. Eichler, Classical and Quantum Parametric Phenomena (Oxford University Press, New York, 2023)

2023
[10]

R´ eglade, A

U. R´ eglade, A. Bocquet, R. Gautier, J. Cohen, A. Marquet, E. Albertinale, N. Pankratova, M. Hall´ en, F. Rautschke, L.-A. Sellem, P. Rouchon, A. Sarlette, M. Mirrahimi, P. Campagne-Ibarcq, R. Lescanne, S. Je- zouin, and Z. Leghtas, Quantum control of a cat qubit with bit-fli...

2024
[11]

Venkatraman, R

J. Venkatraman, R. G. Corti˜ nas, N. E. Frattini, X. Xiao, and M. H. Devoret, A driven kerr oscillator with two- fold degeneracies for qubit protection, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121, e2311241121 (2024)

2024
[12]

Marquet, S

A. Marquet, S. Dupouy, U. R´ eglade, A. Essig, J. Co- hen, E. Abertinale, A. Bienfait, T. Peronnin, S. Jezouin, R. Lescanne, and B. Huard, Harnessing two-photon dis- sipation for enhanced quantum measurement and control (2024), arXiv:2403.07744 [quant-ph]

2024 arXiv
[13]

J. Guo, Q. He, and M. Fadel, Quantum metrology with a squeezed kerr oscillator (2024)

2024
[14]

P. L. McMahon, A. Marandi, Y. Haribara, R. Hamerly, C. Langrock, S. Tamate, T. Inagaki, H. Takesue, S. Utsunomiya, K. Aihara, R. L. Byer, M. M. Fejer, H. Mabuchi, and Y. Yamamoto, A fully programmable 100-spin coherent ising machine with all-to-all connec- tions, Science 354, ...

2016
[15]

Z. Wang, A. Marandi, K. Wen, R. L. Byer, and Y. Ya- mamoto, Coherent ising machine based on degenerate optical parametric oscillators, Phys. Rev. A 88, 063853 (2013)

2013
[16]

H. Goto, Z. Lin, and Y. Nakamura, Boltzmann sampling from the ising model using quantum heating of coupled nonlinear oscillators, Sci. Rep. 8, 7154 (2018)

2018
[17]

Puri, Ch

S. Puri, Ch. K. Andersen, A. L. Grimsmo, and A. Blais, Quantum annealing with all-to-all connected nonlinear oscillators, Nature Communications 8, 15785 (2017)

2017
[18]

Yamamoto, T

Y. Yamamoto, T. Leleu, S. Ganguli, and H. Mabuchi, Co- herent ising machines—quantum optics and neural net- work perspectives, Applied Physics Letters 117, 160501 (2020)

2020
[19]

Bello, M

L. Bello, M. Calvanese Strinati, E. G. Dalla Torre, and A. Pe’er, Persistent coherent beating in coupled para- metric oscillators, Physical Review Letters 123, 083901 (2019)

2019
[20]

E. Ng, T. Onodera, S. Kako, P. L. McMahon, H. Mabuchi, and Y. Yamamoto, Efficient sampling of ground and low-energy ising spin configurations with a coherent ising machine, Phys. Rev. Research 4, 013009 (2022)

2022
[21]

Mohseni, P

N. Mohseni, P. L. McMahon, and T. Byrnes, Ising ma- chines as hardware solvers of combinatorial optimization problems, Nature Reviews Physics 4, 363 (2022)

2022
[22]

Rugar and P

D. Rugar and P. Gr¨ utter, Mechanical parametric amplifi- cation and thermomechanical noise squeezing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 699 (1991)

1991
[23]

´Alvarez, D

P. ´Alvarez, D. Pittilini, F. Miserocchi, S. Raamamurthy, G. Margiani, O. Ameye, J. del’Pino, O. Zilberberg, and A. Eichler, A biased ising model using two coupled kerr parametric oscillators with external force, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 207401 (2024)

2024
[24]

T. L. Eichler, A.and Heugel, A. Leuch, C. L. Degen, R. Chitra, and O. Zilberberg, A parametric symme- try breaking transducer, Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 233105 (2018)

2018
[25]

R. B. Karabalin, R. Lifshitz, M. C. Cross, M. H. Math- eny, S. C. Masmanidis, and M. L. Roukes, Signal amplifi- cation by sensitive control of bifurcation topology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 094102 (2011)

2011
[26]

L. J. Lapidus, D. Enzer, and G. Gabrielse, Stochastic phase switching of a parametrically driven electron in a penning trap, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 899 (1999)

1999
[28]

H. B. Chan and C. Stambaugh, Activation barrier scal- ing and crossover for noise-induced switching in mi- cromechanical parametric oscillators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 060601 (2007)

2007
[29]

Marthaler and M

M. Marthaler and M. I. Dykman, Switching via quantum activation: A parametrically modulated oscillator, Phys. Rev. A 73, 042108 (2006); Quantum interference in the classically forbidden region: A parametric oscillator, 76, 010102R (2007)

2006
[30]

N. E. Frattini, R. G. Corti˜ nas, J. Venkatraman, X. Xiao, Q. Su, C. U. Lei, B. J. Chapman, V. R. Joshi, S. M. Girvin, R. J. Schoelkopf, S. Puri, and M. H. Devoret, Ob- servation of pairwise level degeneracies and the quantum regime of the arrhenius law in a double-well parame...

2024
[31]

H. B. Chan, M. I. Dykman, and C. Stambaugh, Paths of fluctuation induced switching, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 130602 (2008)

2008
[32]

K. Kim, M. S. Heo, K. H. Lee, K. Jang, H. R. Noh, D. Kim, and W. Jhe, Spontaneous symmetry breaking of population in a nonadiabatically driven atomic trap: An ising-class phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 150601 (2006); M. S. Heo, Y. Kim, K. Kim, G. Moon, J. Lee, H. R. No...

2006
[33]

C. Han, M. Wang, B. Zhang, M. I. Dykman, and H. B. 17 Chan, Coupled parametric oscillators: From disorder- induced current to asymmetric ising model, Physical Re- view Research 6, 023162 (2024)

2024
[34]

T. L. Heugel, M. Oscity, A. Eichler, O. Zilberberg, and R. Chitra, Classical many-body time crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 124301 (2019)

2019
[35]

dynamical bias

for a review. A consequence of the symmetry of the vibrational states is the possibility of quantum tunneling between them, as suggested in Ref. [36]. Such tunneling is reminis- cent of tunneling between the quantum states at the min- ima of a symmetric double-well potential. ...

2025 arXiv
[36]

M. I. Dykman, C. Bruder, N. L¨ orch, and Y. Zhang, Interaction-induced time-symmetry breaking in driven quantum oscillators, Phys. Rev. B 98, 195444 (2018)

2018
[37]

Eichler and O

A. Eichler and O. Zilberberg, Classical and Quantum Parametric Phenomena (Oxford University Press, Ox- ford, 2023)

2023
[38]

Wielinga and G

B. Wielinga and G. J. Milburn, Quantum tunneling in a kerr medium with parametric pumping, Phys. Rev. A 48, 2494 (1993)

1993
[39]

Ryvkine and M

D. Ryvkine and M. I. Dykman, Resonant symmetry lift- ing in a parametrically modulated oscillator, Phys. Rev. E 74, 061118 (2006)

2006
[40]

Mahboob, C

I. Mahboob, C. Froitier, and H. Yamaguchi, A symmetry- breaking electromechanical detector, Applied Physics Letters 96, 213103 (2010)

2010
[41]

D. K. J. Boneß, W. Belzig, and M. I. Dykman, Resonant- force-induced symmetry breaking in a quantum paramet- ric oscillator, Physical Review Research6, 033240 (2024)

2024
[42]

Bartolo, F

N. Bartolo, F. Minganti, W. Casteels, and C. Ciuti, Exact steady state of a kerr resonator with one- and two-photon driving and dissipation: Controllable wigner- function multimodality and dissipative phase transitions, Physical Review A 94, 033841 (2016)

2016
[43]

Roberts and A

D. Roberts and A. Clerk, Driven-dissipative quantum kerr resonators: New exact solutions, photon blockade and quantum bistability, PRX 10, 021022 (2020)

2020
[44]

Roberts, A

D. Roberts, A. Lingenfelter, and A. Clerk, Hidden time- reversal symmetry, quantum detailed balance and exact solutions of driven-dissipative quantum systems, PRX Quantum 2, 020336 (2021)

2021
[45]

A. C. C. de Albornoz, R. G. Corti˜ nas, M. Sch¨ afer, N. E. Frattini, B. Allen, D. G. A. Cabral, P. E. Videla, P. Khazaei, E. Geva, V. S. Batista, and M. H. De- voret, Oscillatory dissipative tunneling in an asymmet- ric double-well potential (2024), arXiv:2409.13113 [cond- ma...

2024 arXiv
[46]

Kamenev, Field Theory of Non-Equilibrium Systems, 2nd ed

A. Kamenev, Field Theory of Non-Equilibrium Systems, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2023)

2023
[47]

Thompson and A

F. Thompson and A. Kamenev, Field theory of many- body lindbladian dynamics, Annals of Physics 455, 169385 (2023)

2023
[48]

L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Mechanics, 3rd ed. (El- sevier, Amsterdam, 2004)

2004
[49]

Kagan and A

Y. Kagan and A. J. Leggett, eds., Quantum Tunneling in Condensed Media (North-Holland, 1992)

1992
[50]

M. I. Dykman, Periodically modulated quantum non- linear oscillators, in Fluctuating Nonlinear Oscillators: From Nanomechanics to Quantum Superconducting Cir- cuits, edited by M. I. Dykman (OUP, Oxford, 2012) pp. 165–197

2012
[51]

F. R. Ong, M. Boissonneault, F. Mallet, A. C. Doherty, A. Blais, D. Vion, D. Esteve, and P. Bertet, Quantum heating of a nonlinear resonator probed by a supercon- ducting qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 047001 (2013)

2013
[52]

Peano and M

V. Peano and M. I. Dykman, Quantum fluctuations in modulated nonlinear oscillators, NJP 16, 015011 (2014)

2014
[53]

I. S. Gradstein and I. M. Ryzhik, Tables of Integrals, Se- ries and Products, 7th ed. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2007)

2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [27]

M. I. Dykman, C. M. Maloney, V. N. Smelyanskiy, and M. Silverstein, Fluctuational phase-flip transitions in parametrically driven oscillators, Phys. Rev. E 57, 5202 (1998)

work page 1998

[2] [1]

preburcation regime

Action as a function of imaginary time An extra insight into the dynamics of the system can be gained by looking at the action for a classical trajectory evaluated as a function of the complex time τ , I(g|τ ) = 1 2π Z τ +τ (1) p τ dt P(t) ˙Q(t) . (17) The integral can be thought of as starting at a point with complex τ on the boundary of the parallelogra...

work page

[3] [2]

Mirrahimi, Z

M. Mirrahimi, Z. Leghtas, V. V. Albert, S. Touzard, R. J. Schoelkopf, L. Jiang, and M. H. Devoret, Dynam- ically protected cat-qubits: A new paradigm for univer- sal quantum computation, New Journal of Physics 16, 045014 (2014)

work page 2014

[4] [3]

Leghtas, G

Z. Leghtas, G. Kirchmair, B. Vlastakis, R. J. Schoelkopf, M. H. Devoret, and M. Mirrahimi, Hardware-efficient au- tonomous quantum memory protection, Physical Review Letters 111, 120501 (2013)

work page 2013

[5] [4]

Zhang and M

Y. Zhang and M. I. Dykman, Preparing quasienergy states on demand: A parametric oscillator, Phys. Rev. A 95, 053841 (2017)

work page 2017

[6] [5]

Goto, Bifurcation-based adiabatic quantum computa- tion with a nonlinear oscillator network, Scientific Re- ports 6, 21686 (2016)

H. Goto, Bifurcation-based adiabatic quantum computa- tion with a nonlinear oscillator network, Scientific Re- ports 6, 21686 (2016)

2016

[7] [6]

Grimm, N

A. Grimm, N. E. Frattini, S. Puri, S. O. Mundhada, S. Touzard, M. Mirrahimi, S. M. Girvin, S. Shankar, and M. H. Devoret, Stabilization and operation of a kerr-cat qubit, Nature 584, 205 (2020)

2020

[8] [7]

Puri and A

S. Puri and A. Blais, Engineering the quantum states of light in a kerr-nonlinear resonator by two-photon driving, npj Quantum Information 3, 18 (2017)

work page 2017