Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 6 cited by

Chirality-selective magnon-phonon coupling in d-wave altermagnets imprints a d-wave phonon angular momentum texture, enabling a phonon angular momentum splitter effect.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 22:50 UTC pith:L7JCM4VV

load-bearing objection Worth a serious look: a clean model calculation that extends chirality-selective magnon-phonon hybridization to d-wave altermagnets, but the collinear ground state it assumes is not stable in the model as written, and the supplemental material is missing. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2511.08357 v3 pith:L7JCM4VV submitted 2025-11-11 cond-mat.mes-hall

D-Wave Phonon Angular Momentum Texture in Altermagnets by Magnon-Phonon Hybridization

Hannah Bendin , Alexander Mook , Ingrid Mertig , Robin R. Neumann This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords altermagnetismchiral phononsmagnon polaronsDzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactionphonon angular momentummagnon-phonon hybridizationspin-splitter effect
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out to show that altermagnets—magnets whose magnon bands are spin-split without relativistic interactions—can generate chiral phonons whose angular momentum pattern copies the altermagnet's d-wave symmetry. The proposed mechanism is a chirality-selective spin-lattice coupling from interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction: a magnon with a given spin precession direction couples only to phonons rotating in the same sense. Working on a minimal two-dimensional square-lattice d-wave altermagnet, the authors find that this selectivity turns avoided crossings into sources of finite phonon angular momentum, producing hybrid magnon polarons. The resulting phonon angular momentum texture alternates sign in the four lobes of the Brillouin zone and vanishes along the nodal lines, mirroring the magnon spin texture. This opens a route to phononic analogues of altermagnetic responses, notably a phonon angular momentum splitter effect.

Core claim

The central claim is that interfacial DMI gives rise to a magnon-phonon coupling (Eq. 5) that is chirality-selective: each magnon branch couples exclusively to one circular polarization of the phonons, with the sign set by the magnon spin. In the d-wave altermagnet this means the upper magnon band couples to left-handed phonons along ΓY and to right-handed phonons along ΓX, switching at the nodal lines. Near the avoided crossings the hybrid bands acquire a finite, sublattice-resolved phonon angular momentum that reaches ℏ/2, and the net phonon angular momentum across the Brillouin zone exhibits the d-wave pattern of the underlying magnon spin texture. The authors further argue that this even

What carries the argument

The central object is the interfacial DMI-derived coupling Hamiltonian Ĥ_mpc (Eq. 5), which couples differences of next-nearest-neighbor atomic displacements to differences of spin fluctuations. Its selectivity arises because co-rotating magnons and phonons maintain a finite time-averaged coupling while counter-rotating ones average to zero; unequal sublattice precession amplitudes further break the symmetry between the two magnon branches. Combined with the square-lattice phonon model and linear spin-wave theory, this Hamiltonian produces the avoided crossings and the d-wave phonon angular momentum texture presented in Figures 4 and 5.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes a collinear Néel ground state while neglecting the easy-axis anisotropy needed to stabilize it against the interfacial DMI—as the authors note after Eq. (5)—with D=0.25 comparable to the exchange couplings.

What would settle it

A concrete test is to add an easy-axis anisotropy to the model and re-evaluate the avoided crossings: if the phonon angular momentum lobes wash out or lose their sign alternation, the d-wave texture is an artifact of the assumed collinear state. In a real d-wave altermagnet, a momentum-resolved measurement of phonon circular polarization that shows the sign-alternating pattern along ΓX and ΓY would confirm the mechanism; its absence would falsify it.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Altermagnets become a platform for chiral phonons with a texture tunable by an external magnetic field, since the magnon band splitting is field-dependent.
  • The predicted phonon angular momentum splitter effect provides a bosonic analogue of the spin-splitter effect, with transverse angular momentum currents generated by a temperature gradient.
  • The mechanism should extend to g- and i-wave altermagnets, producing higher-wave phonon angular momentum textures.
  • In ionic altermagnets the phonon angular momentum carries an orbital magnetic moment, implying phonon piezomagnetism—strain-induced phonon magnetization or magnetic-field-induced lattice distortion.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the d-wave texture survives in real materials, momentum-resolved probes of phonon circular polarization (e.g., Raman or inelastic X-ray scattering) could map the four alternating lobes directly in the magnetic Brillouin zone.
  • Reversing the DMI sign or the sublattice labeling should flip the chirality assignment and hence the sign of the texture; a systematic dependence on D would provide a sharp experimental fingerprint of the mechanism.
  • Including the omitted easy-axis anisotropy explicitly would allow a test of whether the texture persists when the collinear Néel state is truly stabilized, rather than assumed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript studies magnons and phonons in a two-dimensional square-lattice d-wave altermagnet with collinear Néel order. The magnon Hamiltonian (Eq. 1) contains antiferromagnetic nearest-neighbor and anisotropic ferromagnetic next-nearest-neighbor exchange, producing spin-split magnon bands with a d-wave splitting (Eq. 2). A phonon spring model (Eq. 3) and an interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction (DMI) expanded to linear order in lattice displacements (Eq. 5) couple the two subsystems. The authors show that the DMI coupling is chirality-selective: each magnon spin channel couples exclusively to one phonon circular polarization (Fig. 3). Diagonalizing the coupled Hamiltonian (Eq. 6) yields avoided crossings (magnon polarons) and finite phonon angular momentum near these crossings (Fig. 4). The total phonon angular momentum across the Brillouin zone (Fig. 5) exhibits a d-wave pattern that follows the magnon spin texture, and the authors propose a phonon angular momentum splitter effect analogous to the spin-splitter effect in altermagnets.

Significance. If the calculation is valid, the paper provides a concrete and conceptually appealing mechanism for transcribing the spin symmetry of an altermagnet onto the phonon sector. The model is transparent, all parameters are explicitly stated, and the central selection rule follows from angular momentum conservation. The proposed projection scheme for characterizing chiral selectivity of magnetoelastic couplings is a useful methodological contribution. However, the numerical results and the central d-wave texture prediction rest on the stability of a collinear Néel state that is not a ground state of the analyzed model, so the evidence as presented is not yet conclusive.

major comments (3)
  1. [Results, paragraph after Eq. (5)] The collinear Néel reference state is not a ground state of the model actually solved. The text admits that an easy-axis anisotropy would be needed to stabilize the collinear state, but no such anisotropy is implemented. At the figure parameters (D=0.25, J_AFM=-1, J_FM1=0.383, J_FM2=0.5, S=1), the DMI scale is comparable to the exchange couplings that generate the altermagnetic splitting. The Holstein-Primakoff expansion and the Bogoliubov diagonalization used in Figs. 2–5 are therefore performed around a state that is not a local minimum of the Hamiltonian. Because the avoided crossings, chiral selectivity, and L_z texture are all downstream of this expansion, the authors must either include an easy-axis anisotropy and verify that the qualitative results survive for a physically reasonable anisotropy strength, or explicitly demonstrate that the linear spin-wave results are unaffected by
  2. [Results, statement before Eq. (5)] The assertion that the interfacial DMI 'does not modify the noninteracting magnon dispersion relation' is not justified in the text. For a collinear spin configuration with D perpendicular to the ordering direction, the DMI term D_ij · (S_i × S_j) generically produces a term linear in the transverse spin components, which would shift or destabilize the magnon spectrum unless the DMI vectors cancel by symmetry. No such cancellation is demonstrated for the next-nearest-neighbor geometry used in Eq. (5). The authors should provide the linear spin-wave Hamiltonian including the static DMI, or cite a specific derivation showing that the linear terms vanish for their model.
  3. [Discussion and Conclusion] The phonon angular momentum splitter effect is predicted solely from symmetry and analogy to the electronic spin-splitter effect; no transport calculation is presented. Even if the d-wave L_z texture is correct, the existence, sign, and magnitude of a transverse phonon angular momentum current under a temperature gradient require a microscopic transport treatment (e.g., Boltzmann or Kubo formalism) that accounts for phonon band structure, lifetimes, and off-diagonal responses. I recommend either adding such a calculation or explicitly labeling this part as a conjectured consequence of symmetry rather than a derived result of this paper.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Format] The placeholder 'Supplemental Material [INSERT URL]' should be replaced with the actual reference. Also, Ref. [42] lists a Zenodo DOI; please ensure this is available and accurate.
  2. [Eq. (3)] The notation in Eq. (3) uses p_i and u_i without boldface, which may be confusing since they are vectors. Please clarify the vector notation and the dot product convention consistently.
  3. [Fig. 3] The color coding of the coupling strength and the line colors for phonon angular momentum may be difficult to distinguish in grayscale or for color-blind readers. Consider adding line styles or symbols.
  4. [Downfolding argument, text near Eq. (7)] The phase argument that yields u_↓ = ±e^{-iΦ} u_↑ depends on a specific gauge choice for the Bloch wavefunctions. A brief explanation of the gauge would improve reproducibility.
  5. [Title] The title contains an extra hyphen: 'Magnon-Phonon-Hybridization' should be 'Magnon-Phonon Hybridization'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the d-wave phonon angular momentum texture is a consequence of the stated model, not an input restatement.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained: Eq. (1) defines the d-wave altermagnetic spin model with fixed parameters (J_AFM=-1, J_FM1=0.383, J_FM2=0.5, S=1), Eq. (3) defines the phonon model, and Eq. (5) defines the interfacial-DMI magnon-phonon coupling. Figures 2-5 are obtained by diagonalizing the total Hamiltonian Eq. (6) and by projecting H_mpc onto magnon-spin and phonon-angular-momentum channels. No parameter is fitted to the predicted phonon angular momentum texture, and the d-wave magnon spin splitting is an input via the anisotropic J_FM1/J_FM2 couplings. The claim that the phonon angular momentum 'follows the d-wave character of the magnon spin texture' is an explicitly derived consequence of the chirality-selective coupling, not a definitional equivalence: the phonon angular momentum L_z^ph is computed from lattice displacement operators (Eq. (4)), and the d-wave pattern is not inserted into the phonon sector by hand. The chirality selectivity itself is a computed projection result (Fig. 3), not an assumed ansatz. The cited prior works for the coupling form (Refs. [16,18,31,36]) are external, and no load-bearing uniqueness theorem or central premise rests on a self-citation; the only self-citations are a data-availability record (Ref. [42]) and a methods thesis (Ref. [46]). The authors do state a caveat: 'Although the true ground state in the presence of DMI would be a noncollinear state [32], an easy-axis anisotropy would stabilize the collinear ground state for sufficiently small D. We do not implement the anisotropy for simplicity.' This is a genuine physical-stability limitation of the model at the chosen D=0.25, but it is not a circularity: the calculation does not assume the target result, and the linear spin-wave expansion is a well-defined (if possibly unstable) reference. Overall, no circular step meeting the evidentiary standard is present.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

7 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper is a self-contained parameter study: all coupling constants are chosen by hand (no material fitting), the output phonon angular momentum texture inherits the input d-wave symmetry, and no new entities are introduced. The two assumptions most worth auditing are the collinear ground state with unmodeled anisotropy and the truncation of the DMI expansion to its leading term; both are acknowledged by the authors, with the second delegated to an unavailable Supplemental Material.

free parameters (7)
  • J_AFM = −1 (energy unit, chosen)
    Antiferromagnetic nearest-neighbor exchange; sets the energy scale of the model, not fitted to any material.
  • J_FM1, J_FM2 = 0.383, 0.5 (chosen, arbitrary units)
    Anisotropic ferromagnetic next-nearest-neighbor exchanges; their difference (Eq. 2) generates the d-wave magnon spin splitting. Chosen by hand; no material basis.
  • S = 1 (chosen)
    Spin length in the spin-wave calculation; demonstration value.
  • M = 10 (chosen, arbitrary units)
    Nuclear mass in the phonon Hamiltonian (Eq. 3); sets the phonon frequency scale.
  • K_L^(1), K_T, K_L^(2) = 160, 40, 40 (chosen, arbitrary units)
    Phonon spring constants chosen so that phonon branches cross the magnon bands in the plotted energy window, enabling the studied avoided crossings.
  • D = 0.25 (chosen, arbitrary units)
    Interfacial DMI strength in the magnon-phonon coupling (Eq. 5); comparable to the exchange couplings, which raises the collinear-ground-state stability question.
  • a = 1 (chosen)
    Lattice constant; fixes the Brillouin-zone geometry.
axioms (5)
  • standard math Linear spin-wave theory (Holstein-Primakoff to leading order) accurately describes the magnon bands of the collinear Néel altermagnet.
    Invoked for H_m (Eq. 1); the splitting ΔE (Eq. 2) and the two opposite-chirality magnon branches rest on this.
  • domain assumption The collinear Néel ground state is the physical ground state even though the static DMI would favor a noncollinear state; an easy-axis anisotropy of sufficient strength is assumed but not included in the Hamiltonian.
    Stated in the paragraph after Eq. (5): 'an easy-axis anisotropy would stabilize the collinear ground state for sufficiently small D. We do not implement the anisotropy for simplicity.' All spin-wave and hybridization results depend on this premise.
  • domain assumption The magnon-phonon coupling is dominated by the leading (first-order-in-u, D(R)-independent) term of the interfacial DMI; ∂D/∂R contributions are negligible for the central texture.
    After Eq. (5): 'we have neglected contributions that originate from the distance dependence of D(R), which we explicitly analyze in the Supplemental Material.' The authors concede these terms partially lift the perfect chiral selectivity.
  • domain assumption Rotating-wave-type selection: only co-rotating magnon and phonon modes have a non-vanishing time-averaged coupling; counter-rotating modes decouple.
    In the 'physical origin of this selectivity' paragraph of Results; the quantitative version is the projection shown in Fig. 3.
  • domain assumption In-plane displacements of a single-atom structural cell, folded into the magnetic Brillouin zone, capture the relevant vibrational physics.
    Eq. (3) and the downfolding discussion; restricts the study to xy-polarized phonons and produces the four magnetic-BZ phonon branches whose crossings are studied.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 8712 in / 20452 out tokens · 201972 ms · 2026-08-03T22:50:40.172078+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

In altermagnets, the magnon bands are anisotropically spin-split in reciprocal space without relativistic or dipolar spin-spin interactions. In this work, we theoretically study magnons and phonons coupled by spin-lattice interaction in a two-dimensional square-lattice d-wave altermagnet. We show that phonon-chirality-selective magnon-phonon hybridization can be caused by interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction leading to the emergence of hybrid quasiparticles that possess finite phonon angular momentum. These hybrid quasiparticles are called magnon polarons and consist of spin-polarized magnons and chiral phonons. Their phonon angular momentum texture follows the d-wave character of the magnon spin texture opening up the possibility of phononic counterparts to the electronic response effects in altermagnets, such as a phonon angular momentum splitter effect, i.e., the generation of a transverse phonon angular momentum current induced by a temperature gradient -- the bosonic analog of the spin-splitter effect.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.08357 by Alexander Mook, Hannah Bendin, Ingrid Mertig, Robin R. Neumann.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Visualization of the generation of phonon angular momentum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Coupling strength between the (a) upper, (b) lower magnon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Coupled magnon-phonon hybrid system. (a) Band structure of the magnon polarons along a high-symmetry path in the magnetic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Phonon angular momentum for all bands across the entire [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Complete Hierarchy of Nonrelativistic Odd-Parity Spin Splitting in Collinear Magnets

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    In collinear magnets without spin-orbit coupling, odd-parity nonrelativistic spin splitting can only be p-, f-, h-, k-, or m-wave, and the hierarchy stops at ℓ=9.

  2. Symmetry-Enforced Chiral Phonons in Altermagnets via Magnon-Phonon Coupling

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0

    Zero-field chiral phonons with g-wave phonon angular momentum emerge in altermagnetic CrSb from relativistic magnon-phonon hybridization, enabling anomalous spin and PAM Nernst effects.

  3. Structural Alter-Phononics: Sublattice-Momentum Locking in Spinless Lattice Dynamics

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Structural alter-phononics establishes sublattice-momentum locking in phonon dynamics of nonmagnetic crystals through symmetry rules involving alter-generators and absence of equipartition constraints.

  4. Observation of anomalous thermal Hall effect in altermagnets

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Anomalous phonon thermal Hall effect is observed in altermagnets MnTe and CrSb, establishing it as an intrinsic feature that couples the Néel vector to phonons without an electrical counterpart.

  5. Angular momentum splitter effect of $d$-wave axial phonons in orbital altermagnets

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0

    d-wave axial phonons with an angular-momentum texture arise in orbital altermagnets via molecular Berry curvature, without spin-orbit coupling, enabling angular-momentum Seebeck and splitter effects.

  6. Tunable Phonon-Driven Magnon Spin Currents in Altermagnets

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Phonon excitations in 2D altermagnets produce magnon spin currents with d-wave symmetry that reverse direction when phonon frequency is tuned.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith · cited by 6 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Zhang and Q

    L. Zhang and Q. Niu, Chiral Phonons at High-Symmetry Points in Monolayer Hexagonal Lattices, Physical Review Letters115, 115502 (2015)

    2015

  2. [2]

    H. Zhu, J. Yi, M.-Y . Li, J. Xiao, L. Zhang, C.-W. Yang, R. A. Kaindl, L.-J. Li, Y . Wang, and X. Zhang, Observation of chiral phonons, Science359, 579 (2018)

    2018

  3. [3]

    T. Wang, H. Sun, X. Li, and L. Zhang, Chiral Phonons: Pre- diction, Verification, and Application, Nano Letters24, 4311 (2024)

    2024

  4. [4]

    D. A. Garanin and E. M. Chudnovsky, Angular momentum in spin-phonon processes, Physical Review B92, 024421 (2015)

    2015

  5. [5]

    J. J. Nakane and H. Kohno, Angular momentum of phonons and its application to single-spin relaxation, Physical Review B97, 174403 (2018)

    2018

  6. [6]

    S. R. Tauchert, M. V olkov, D. Ehberger, D. Kazenwadel, M. Evers, H. Lange, A. Donges, A. Book, W. Kreuzpaintner, U. Nowak, and P. Baum, Polarized phonons carry angular mo- mentum in ultrafast demagnetization, Nature602, 73 (2022)

    2022

  7. [7]

    M. S. Mrudul, M. Weißenhofer, and P. M. Oppeneer, Gener- ation of Phonons with Angular Momentum During Ultrafast Demagnetization (2025), arXiv:2504.16547 [cond-mat]

    arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Dornes, Y

    C. Dornes, Y . Acremann, M. Savoini, M. Kubli, M. J. Neuge- bauer, E. Abreu, L. Huber, G. Lantz, C. A. F. Vaz, H. Lemke, E. M. Bothschafter, M. Porer, V . Esposito, L. Rettig, M. Buzzi, A. Alberca, Y . W. Windsor, P. Beaud, U. Staub, D. Zhu, S. Song, J. M. Glownia, and S. L. Johnson, The ultrafast Einstein–de Haas effect, Nature565, 209 (2019)

    2019

  9. [9]

    Zhang and Q

    L. Zhang and Q. Niu, Angular Momentum of Phonons and the Einstein–de Haas Effect, Physical Review Letters112, 085503 (2014)

    2014

  10. [10]

    Park and B.-J

    S. Park and B.-J. Yang, Phonon Angular Momentum Hall Effect, Nano Letters20, 7694 (2020)

    2020

  11. [11]

    K. An, A. N. Litvinenko, R. Kohno, A. A. Fuad, V . V . Naletov, L. Vila, U. Ebels, G. De Loubens, H. Hurdequint, N. Beaulieu, J. Ben Youssef, N. Vukadinovic, G. E. W. Bauer, A. N. Slavin, V . S. Tiberkevich, and O. Klein, Coherent long-range transfer of angular momentum between magnon Kittel modes by phonons, Physical Review B101, 060407 (2020)

    2020

  12. [12]

    D. M. Juraschek, R. M. Geilhufe, H. Zhu, M. Basini, P. Baum, A. Baydin, S. Chaudhary, M. Fechner, B. Flebus, G. Grisson- nanche, A. I. Kirilyuk, M. Lemeshko, S. F. Maehrlein, M. Migno- let, S. Murakami, Q. Niu, U. Nowak, C. P. Romao, H. Rostami, T. Satoh, N. A. Spaldin, H. Ueda, and L. Zhang, Chiral phonons, Nature Physics , 1 (2025)

    2025

  13. [13]

    H. Chen, W. Wu, S. A. Yang, X. Li, and L. Zhang, Chiral phonons in kagome lattices, Physical Review B100, 094303 (2019)

    2019

  14. [14]

    Coh, Classification of materials with phonon angular momen- tum and microscopic origin of angular momentum, Physical Review B108, 134307 (2023)

    S. Coh, Classification of materials with phonon angular momen- tum and microscopic origin of angular momentum, Physical Review B108, 134307 (2023)

    2023

  15. [15]

    Ishito, H

    K. Ishito, H. Mao, Y . Kousaka, Y . Togawa, S. Iwasaki, T. Zhang, S. Murakami, J.-i. Kishine, and T. Satoh, Truly chiral phonons inα-HgS, Nature Physics19, 35 (2023)

    2023

  16. [16]

    Ma and G

    B. Ma and G. A. Fiete, Antiferromagnetic insulators with tunable magnon-polaron Chern numbers induced by in-plane optical phonons, Physical Review B105, L100402 (2022)

    2022

  17. [17]

    J. Cui, E. V . Bostr¨om, M. Ozerov, F. Wu, Q. Jiang, J.-H. Chu, C. Li, F. Liu, X. Xu, A. Rubio, and Q. Zhang, Chirality selec- tive magnon-phonon hybridization and magnon-induced chiral phonons in a layered zigzag antiferromagnet, Nature Communi- cations14, 3396 (2023)

    2023

  18. [18]

    Q. Wang, S. Liu, M.-Q. Long, and Y .-P. Wang, Regulation of magnon-phonon coupling by phonon angular momentum in two- dimensional systems, Physical Review B108, 174426 (2023)

    2023

  19. [19]

    J. D. Mella, L. E. F. F. Torres, and R. E. Troncoso, Chiral magnon-polaron edge states in Heisenberg-Kitaev magnets, Physical Review B110, 104433 (2024)

    2024

  20. [20]

    H. Ning, T. Luo, B. Ilyas, E. V . Bostr¨om, J. Park, J. Kim, J.-G. Park, D. M. Juraschek, A. Rubio, and N. Gedik, Spontaneous emergence of phonon angular momentum through hybridization with magnons (2024), arXiv:2410.10693 [cond-mat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Wang, M.-Q

    Q. Wang, M.-Q. Long, and Y .-P. Wang, Magnetic moments of chiral phonons induced by coupling with magnons, Physical Review B110, 024423 (2024)

    2024

  22. [22]

    Weißenhofer and A

    M. Weißenhofer and A. Marmodoro, Atomistic spin dynamics simulations of magnonic spin Seebeck and spin Nernst effects in altermagnets, Physical Review B110, 094427 (2024)

    2024

  23. [23]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond Conventional Ferromagnetism and Antiferromagnetism: A Phase with Nonrel- ativistic Spin and Crystal Rotation Symmetry, Physical Review X12, 031042 (2022)

    2022

  24. [24]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging Research Landscape of Altermagnetism, Physical Review X12, 040501 (2022)

    2022

  25. [25]

    Jungwirth, R

    T. Jungwirth, R. M. Fernandes, E. Fradkin, A. H. MacDonald, J. Sinova, and L. ˇSmejkal, Altermagnetism: An unconventional spin-ordered phase of matter, Newton1, 100162 (2025)

    2025

  26. [26]

    The Supplemental Material cites Refs

    See Supplemental Material [INSERT URL] for a description of the mathematical framework, the derivation of the magnon- phonon coupling from interfacial DMI, and additional results for alternative magnon-phonon couplings. The Supplemental Material cites Refs. [43–48]

  27. [27]

    ˇSmejkal, A

    L. ˇSmejkal, A. Marmodoro, K.-H. Ahn, R. Gonz´alez-Hern´andez, I. Turek, S. Mankovsky, H. Ebert, S. W. D’Souza, O. ˇSipr, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Chiral Magnons in Altermagnetic RuO2, Physical Review Letters131, 256703 (2023)

    2023

  28. [28]

    D. Jost, R. B. Regmi, S. Sahel-Schackis, M. Scheufele, M. Neuhaus, R. Nickel, F. Yakhou, K. Kummer, N. Brookes, L. Shen, G. L. Dakovski, N. J. Ghimire, S. Gepr¨ags, and M. F. Kling, Chiral Altermagnon in MnTe (2025), arXiv:2501.17380 6 [cond-mat]

    arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Dzyaloshinsky, A thermodynamic theory of “weak” ferromag- netism of antiferromagnetics, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids4, 241 (1958)

    I. Dzyaloshinsky, A thermodynamic theory of “weak” ferromag- netism of antiferromagnetics, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids4, 241 (1958)

    1958

  30. [30]

    Moriya, Anisotropic Superexchange Interaction and Weak Ferromagnetism, Physical Review120, 91 (1960)

    T. Moriya, Anisotropic Superexchange Interaction and Weak Ferromagnetism, Physical Review120, 91 (1960)

    1960

  31. [31]

    Zhang, Y

    X. Zhang, Y . Zhang, S. Okamoto, and D. Xiao, Thermal Hall Ef- fect Induced by Magnon-Phonon Interactions, Physical Review Letters123, 167202 (2019)

    2019

  32. [32]

    F. J. dos Santos, M. dos Santos Dias, and S. Lounis, Modeling spin waves in noncollinear antiferromagnets: Spin-flop states, spin spirals, skyrmions, and antiskyrmions, Physical Review B 102, 104436 (2020)

    2020

  33. [33]

    S. M. Rezende, A. Azevedo, and R. L. Rodr ´ıguez-Su´arez, In- troduction to antiferromagnetic magnons, Journal of Applied Physics126, 151101 (2019)

    2019

  34. [34]

    Okuma, Magnon Spin-Momentum Locking: Various Spin V ortices and Dirac magnons in Noncollinear Antiferromagnets, Physical Review Letters119, 107205 (2017)

    N. Okuma, Magnon Spin-Momentum Locking: Various Spin V ortices and Dirac magnons in Noncollinear Antiferromagnets, Physical Review Letters119, 107205 (2017)

    2017

  35. [35]

    Y . Li, C. Zhao, W. Zhang, A. Hoffmann, and V . Novosad, Ad- vances in coherent coupling between magnons and acoustic phonons, APL Materials9, 060902 (2021)

    2021

  36. [36]

    Weißenhofer, P

    M. Weißenhofer, P. Rieger, M. S. Mrudul, L. Mikadze, U. Nowak, and P. M. Oppeneer, Truly Chiral Phonons Aris- ing From Chirality-Selective Magnon-Phonon Coupling (2024), arXiv:2411.03879 [cond-mat]

    arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    Gonz´alez-Hern´andez, L

    R. Gonz´alez-Hern´andez, L. ˇSmejkal, K. V ´yborn´y, Y . Yahagi, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, and J. ˇZelezn´y, Efficient Electrical Spin Splitter Based on Nonrelativistic Collinear Antiferromagnetism, Physical Review Letters126, 127701 (2021)

    2021

  38. [38]

    D. M. Juraschek and N. A. Spaldin, Orbital magnetic moments of phonons, Physical Review Materials3, 064405 (2019)

    2019

  39. [39]

    Shabala, F

    N. Shabala, F. Tietjen, and R. M. Geilhufe, Axial phono- magnetic effects (2025)

    2025

  40. [40]

    C. R. W. Steward, R. M. Fernandes, and J. Schmalian, Dynamic paramagnon-polarons in altermagnets, Physical Review B108, 144418 (2023)

    2023

  41. [41]

    P. A. McClarty and J. G. Rau, Landau Theory of Altermagnetism, Physical Review Letters132, 176702 (2024)

    2024

  42. [42]

    Bendin, A

    H. Bendin, A. Mook, I. Mertig, and R. R. Neumann, D-Wave An- gular Momentum Texture in Altermagnets by Magnon-Phonon Hybridization, Zenodo (2025), https://doi.org/10.5281/ zenodo.17550609

    2025

  43. [43]

    Holstein and H

    T. Holstein and H. Primakoff, Field Dependence of the Intrinsic Domain Magnetization of a Ferromagnet, Physical Review58, 1098 (1940)

    1940

  44. [44]

    J. H. P. Colpa, Diagonalization of the quadratic boson hamilto- nian, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications93, 327 (1978)

    1978

  45. [45]

    Shindou, R

    R. Shindou, R. Matsumoto, S. Murakami, and J.-i. Ohe, Topolog- ical chiral magnonic edge mode in a magnonic crystal, Physical Review B87, 174427 (2013)

    2013

  46. [46]

    R. R. Neumann,Theoretical Prediction for Probing Magnon Topology, Ph.D. thesis, Martin-Luther-Universit ¨at Halle- Wittenberg, Halle (Saale) (2024)

    2024

  47. [47]

    Bissbort, W

    U. Bissbort, W. Hofstetter, and D. Poletti, Operator-based deriva- tion of phonon modes and characterization of correlations for trapped ions at zero and finite temperature, Physical Review B 94, 214305 (2016)

    2016

  48. [48]

    C. P. Romao, R. Catena, N. A. Spaldin, and M. Matas, Chiral phonons as dark matter detectors, Physical Review Research5, 043262 (2023)

    2023