Pith. sign in

REVIEW 8 cited by

Watch Every Step! LLM Agent Learning via Iterative Step-Level Process Refinement

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.11176 v2 pith:LASXUZBY submitted 2024-06-17 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords agentstep-levelactionsexpertprocessrewardsactioncomplex
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language model agents have exhibited exceptional performance across a range of complex interactive tasks. Recent approaches have utilized tuning with expert trajectories to enhance agent performance, yet they primarily concentrate on outcome rewards, which may lead to errors or suboptimal actions due to the absence of process supervision signals. In this paper, we introduce the Iterative step-level Process Refinement (IPR) framework, which provides detailed step-by-step guidance to enhance agent training. Specifically, we adopt the Monte Carlo method to estimate step-level rewards. During each iteration, the agent explores along the expert trajectory and generates new actions. These actions are then evaluated against the corresponding step of expert trajectory using step-level rewards. Such comparison helps identify discrepancies, yielding contrastive action pairs that serve as training data for the agent. Our experiments on three complex agent tasks demonstrate that our framework outperforms a variety of strong baselines. Moreover, our analytical findings highlight the effectiveness of IPR in augmenting action efficiency and its applicability to diverse models.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 8 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Leveraging Trajectory Graphs for Pre-Execution Error Diagnosis in Agentic LLM Systems

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Modeling agent trajectories as action-centric probabilistic graphs lets a GNN warn LLM agents of likely step-level errors before execution, improving pass ratio ~14.7% across four benchmarks.

  2. Fishing Out Free Riders: Shapley-Based Reward Attribution for Parallel Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Rewarding each parallel reasoning path by Monte-Carlo-Shapley marginal contribution, scored by a generative reward model, lifts Pass@16 on AIME24/AIME25/AMC23 by 4-90% relative over Parallel-R1 with a fifth of the tra...

  3. MENTOR: Reinforcement Learning via Flexible Teacher-Optimized Rewards for Tool-Use Distillation

    cs.CL 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A teacher-guided dense reward for GRPO distillation improves small-model tool-use accuracy and out-of-domain generalization on executable-tool benchmarks.

  4. ARIA: Training Language Agents with Intention-Driven Reward Aggregation

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Clustering language-agent actions into shared intentions and averaging their rewards reduces reward variance and improves policy performance in open-ended dialogue tasks.

  5. Source Component Shift Adaptation via Offline Decomposition and Online Mixing Approach

    cs.LG 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    The claimed result is that source-component-shift adaptation splits cleanly into offline component learning via EM and online mixing-weight updates, cutting cumulative test loss by up to 67.4%.

  6. LLaPipe: LLM-Guided Reinforcement Learning for Automated Data Preparation Pipeline Construction

    cs.DB 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A framework that uses LLM suggestions, retrieved past experience, and adaptive triggering to speed up RL search for data preprocessing pipelines, showing improved accuracy on 18 tabular datasets.

  7. RRO: LLM Agent Optimization Through Rising Reward Trajectories

    cs.AI 2025-05 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    RRO samples LLM agent actions until a step shows a rising process reward, converts those steps into DPO preference pairs, and reports modest gains on WebShop and InterCode-SQL with fewer samples.

  8. Leveraging OS-Level Primitives for Robotic Action Management

    cs.OS 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Applying OS-style exception handling, context caching, and replay to robotic action slices raises success rates 7x to 24x and cuts execution steps up to 74% for repetitive manipulation tasks, without retraining the VLA model.

Pith tools