REVIEW 2 cited by
Multi-Platform Budget Management in Ad Markets with Non-IC Auctions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Multi-Platform Budget Management in Ad Markets with Non-IC Auctions
abstract
In online advertising markets, budget-constrained advertisers acquire ad placements through repeated bidding in auctions on various platforms. We present a strategy for bidding optimally in a set of auctions that may or may not be incentive-compatible under the presence of budget constraints. Our strategy maximizes the expected total utility across auctions while satisfying the advertiser's budget constraints in expectation. Additionally, we investigate the online setting where the advertiser must submit bids across platforms while learning about other bidders' bids over time. Our algorithm has $O(T^{3/4})$ regret under the full-information setting. Finally, we demonstrate that our algorithms have superior cumulative regret on both synthetic and real-world datasets of ad placement auctions, compared to existing adaptive pacing algorithms.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Beyond the PPAD hardness of Auto-bidding Auctions
Under non-atomic value distributions, auto-bidding equilibria become separately monotone generalized Nash equilibria and PRIME solves them with last-iterate linear convergence.
-
HOB: A Holistically Optimized Bidding Strategy under Heterogeneous Bidding Environments
HOB equalizes marginal cost across heterogeneous auction channels and uses a zero-inflated exponential win-price model for first-price auctions with organic traffic, reporting a 3.0% GMV lift in online A/B tests.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.