Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 183 references

The Kerr spin exponential — the classical limit of the spinning three-point amplitude — organizes an infinite tower of frame shifts at null infinity, one per soft order, with parity alternating level by level.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 07:12 UTC pith:LH3XPFDM

load-bearing objection A careful, honest paper whose s=0,1 frame dictionary and closed aligned-spin tower are real advances, but whose central claim that Kerr organizes the whole higher-spin tower is an explicitly admitted assumption, not a proven result. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.27478 v1 pith:LH3XPFDM submitted 2026-07-29 hep-th gr-qchep-ph

Kerr Soft Dressing and the w_(1+infty) Frame Algebra at Null Infinity

Gabriel Menezes This is my paper
classification hep-th gr-qchep-ph
keywords soft theoremsKerr multipolesnull infinitygeneralized BMSsupertranslationw_{1+∞} algebragravitational memoryspinning black holes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper claims that the Veneziano–Vilkovisky supertranslation is the leading member of an infinite hierarchy of large-gauge frame shifts at null infinity, with one shift per order in the soft expansion, and that the entire hierarchy is sourced by the Kerr spin exponential. It solves an inverse problem: the field-independent part of the s-th soft charge kernel is matched to the s-th coefficient of the exponentiating soft factor, K^{(s,0)}_{AB}[t] = 2G S^{(s)}_{AB,exp}. Helicity conjugation forces a level-by-level parity alternation — electric at even s, magnetic at odd s — mirroring the alternation of Kerr mass and current multipole moments. At s=1 the equation fixes the curl of a smooth generalized-BMS vector (the frame-dragging datum), not its divergence; for aligned spin the whole tower solves in closed form via hyperbolic integrals, reducing to the VV logarithm at zero spin. The principal symbols of the homogeneous transformations close under the Poisson bracket of polynomials on T*S², giving the w_{1+∞}-type structure a concrete role: it is the composition law of the Kerr-selected frame dictionary.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the VV supertranslation is the s=0 member of an infinite hierarchy of soft frame shifts whose source is fixed by the Kerr spin exponential. Concretely, it solves the inverse problem K^{(s,0)}_{AB}[t] = 2G S^{(s)}_{AB,exp}: the parity-adapted maximally longitudinal soft kernel at level s equals the real projection of the s-th coefficient of the exponentiating soft factor S^{(0)}_η e^{ηλa·q}. Helicity conjugation forces an electric/magnetic alternation: even levels fix mass-multipole (electric) data, odd levels fix current-multipole (magnetic) data, echoing the Kerr relation M_ℓ+iS_ℓ = M(ia)^ℓ. At s=1 the equation fixes the curl of a smooth Diff(S²) vector, no

What carries the argument

The engine is the soft-charge kernel K^{(s,0)}_{AB}[t]: a symmetric trace-free sphere tensor built from the maximally longitudinal scalar χ^{(s)}_t (the trace-free Hessian at even s, its parity dual ϵ^C_(A D_B)_C at odd s), paired with the retarded-time moment u^s that projects onto the s-th derivative of the soft mode at zero frequency. The matching source is the Kerr exponent, the classical limit of the spinning three-point operator, whose coefficients obey S^{(s)}_{+,exp}=(−1)^s S^{(s)}_{−,exp} and generate the Kerr multipole tower. The third piece is a principal-symbol identity: the homogeneous parts L^{(s)}_t of the frame transformations close as σ([L_t,L_{t'}]) = {F_t,F_{t'}}_{T*S²} wi

Load-bearing premise

For every s≥2 the radiative phase space is assumed to carry a homogeneous transformation L^{(s)}_t whose leading angular part is t^{A1...As}D_{A1}...D_{As}; the paper states this existence is an assumption, not a construction, and if it fails the w_{1+∞}-type action has no referent, though the s=0,1 dictionary and the aligned-spin tower survive.

What would settle it

Match the s=1 and s=2 levels of the tower against the known linearized Kerr metric in Bondi gauge: the explicit coefficients of Eq. (7.20) predict that the subleading soft charge fixes the curl (D²Ψ) with a logarithmic profile and that the electric quadrupole level follows the hyperbolic-cosine integral. A mismatch in sign, factor, or parity — or a measurement of spin memory with a nonzero value at the aberration angle cosθ=v, where ωw=χ(GMω)γ(v−cosθ) predicts zero — would refute the hierarchy. The cleanest decisive test is the predicted aberration-angle zero in the magnetic-to-electric memory

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The VV supertranslation is the leading member of a universal hierarchy: every soft order s carries a parity-selected frame shift generated by the Kerr multipole exponential, with the s=1 datum being frame dragging fixed by a smooth Diff(S²) parameter.
  • Spin memory, not center-of-mass memory, is the universal subleading observable: the exponentiating sector fixes the curl of the Ward vector, so the magnetic potential Ψ is determined while the electric potential Φ is not.
  • The w_{1+∞}-type algebra gets a concrete gravitational job: it is the composition law of the intrinsic/canonical frame dictionary, acting on frame data without closing on the finite-dimensional Kerr locus.
  • For aligned spin every multipole level has an explicit generator in hyperbolic cosine/sine integral form, each carrying its own logarithmic long-range frame shift suppressed by (m/E)^{2s}; the magnetic-to-electric memory ratio ωw = χ(GMω)γ(v−cosθ) vanishes at the aberration angle cosθ=v.
  • Observable imprints follow the parity alternation: displacement memory at s=0, spin memory at s=1, and regulated higher electric and magnetic memory moments beyond.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the exponentiating sector is the universal charge organizer, then opposite-parity completions (the electric partner of spin memory, for instance) are not small corrections but structurally different data, plausibly tied to tail and loop effects beyond the three-point amplitude — a separation the paper leaves implicit.
  • The paper's own standing assumption suggests a testable fork: constructing the s=2 ordered operator explicitly (its rank-two form is sketched) would convert the existence assumption on L^{(s)}_t into a construction, deciding level by level where the w_{1+∞} action has a referent.
  • The closed-form aligned tower invites direct comparison with waveforms of spinning binaries: the predicted vanishing of the magnetic memory ratio at the aberration angle is a sharp observable signature that would confirm or rule out the hierarchy in real gravitational-wave data.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a charge-generated frame dictionary at null infinity for the Kerr-selected exponentiating soft sector. The central equation (3.15) identifies the field-independent soft-charge kernel K^{(s,0)}_{AB}[t] with 2G S^{(s)}_{AB,exp}, the real parity projection of the exponentiating soft factor. For s=0 this reproduces the Veneziano–Vilkovisky supertranslation; for s=1 it fixes the curl (not divergence) of a smooth generalized-BMS vector; for s≥2 the kernel is parity-alternating (electric at even s, magnetic at odd s). The paper solves the aligned-spin tower in closed form (7.13), derives the principal-symbol Poisson algebra on T*S2 with w_{1+∞}-type local reductions, identifies hard charges and Ward identities, and interprets memory moments. The advertised conclusion is that the Kerr spin exponential organizes the asymptotic multipole soft dressing and that the w_{1+∞}-like algebra acts on the intrinsic/canonical frame shifts.

Significance. If the central identification (3.15) were established for all s, the paper would provide a compelling unification: the Kerr multipole relation (3.26), the universal soft expansion, the intrinsic/canonical Bondi frame dictionary, and celestial w_{1+∞}-type algebras would all be facets of one object. The s=0 and s=1 checks are concrete and the aligned-spin tower is an explicit, nontrivial closed-form result. The principal-symbol commutator proof (Section 6.3) is clean and correctly identifies why the parameter bracket is the polynomial Poisson bracket on T*S2. The paper is also commendably candid about its limitations, including Remark 6.2 and the un-solved generic non-aligned case. However, the load-bearing assertion (3.15) is not derived or independently verified for s≥2, and the algebra section is conditional on an assumed homogeneous higher-spin action. These gaps prevent the paper from fully supporting its headline claim in its present form.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.3, Eq. (3.15)] For s≥2, Eq. (3.15) is a matching prescription, not a derivation. The text calls it the 'universal identification', but no independent computation from the linearized Kerr metric or from the Bondi shear of a Kerr source establishes equality beyond s=1. Appendix B.11.2 states that Eq. (B.101) 'should be tested' after trace-descendant and gauge-restoring terms. Since the aligned-spin tower (7.13) solves this postulated equation by construction, it does not test it. The paper needs at least an explicit s=2 check—e.g., Bondi extraction of the linearized Kerr quadrupole shear compared with 2G S^{(2)}_{AB,exp}—or a derivation from the GOV three-point operator, before the claim that the Kerr exponent organizes the full multipole tower is supportable.
  2. [§6.9, Remark 6.2] The algebra section relies on the existence of homogeneous higher-spin transformations L_t^{(s)} on the radiative phase space with principal symbol t^{A1...As} p_{A1}...p_{As}. Remark 6.2 explicitly states that this is 'an assumption, not a construction' for s≥2. The principal-symbol proof is conditional on that existence; if such operators do not exist, the w_{1+∞}-type action on frame generators has no referent beyond s=1. The paper should either construct these operators for s=2 (and ideally all s) or clearly restrict the algebra claims to s=0,1 and present the higher-rank brackets as formal. This is load-bearing because the advertised physical role of w_{1+∞} depends on the higher-spin action.
  3. [§7.3 and §B.2.1] The generic non-aligned spin problem is not solved. The text states that for generic spin orientation the source retains an opposite-parity remainder and that the partial differential equation in the two invariants (x,y) 'is not solved in closed form here' (Appendix B.2.1). The paper's physical claim, however, is about Kerr black holes in general, not only aligned spin. The aligned closed-form tower (7.13) is a special case and does not establish the generic dictionary. At minimum, the paper should provide a perturbative solution around the aligned case, an explicit statement of what remains unfixed for generic spin, or a reduction showing that the generic case is fully controlled by the same matching principle. Without this, the universal Kerr organizer claim is overreaching.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3.2, §7.3] The bookkeeper λ is set to the physical frequency ω after the level expansion, but the generating functions Φλ and Ψλ are not dimensionally homogeneous when powers of λ are suppressed. This is discussed, but the notation remains confusing. A clearer convention, e.g., writing the expansion with explicit ω^s in (7.12)–(7.13), would help the reader track dimensions.
  2. [§3.2, Eq. (3.13)] The homogeneous operator L_t^{(s)} is used in Eq. (3.13) before it is defined. The paper would benefit from a forward reference or a preliminary definition, especially because Remark 6.2 later explains that this operator is assumed rather than constructed.
  3. [§4, Eq. (4.15)] The solvable special case (4.15) is presented with a factor 'ic/2' and a relative sign 'appropriate to a divergence-free vector'. The reader must cross-check the sign conventions with (B.25). A short statement of the Helmholtz decomposition conventions (already partly given in §4.2) would make the example easier to verify.
  4. [§6.10, Eq. (6.72)] The classical w_{1+∞} bracket is derived with a sign convention that may differ from the celestial literature by an overall sign. This is acknowledged, but a concrete comparison with the convention in Refs. [122, 123, 127, 128, 131] would be useful for readers trying to match the celestial algebra.
  5. [General] The phrase 'higher-spin frame' is carefully defined, but it can be mistaken for bulk higher-spin fields. A brief footnote re-emphasizing that only angular-derivative rank is meant, not propagating higher-spin degrees of freedom, would preempt confusion.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Master matching equation (3.15) is definitional for s≥2: the generator is defined as the solution of K=2G S_exp, so the Kerr-selected parity tower is partly an input; the s=0,1 checks and GOV/Kerr anchors provide independent content, but the higher-spin dictionary is an assumed identification, not a tested derivation.

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Sec. 3.2, Eq. (3.14)/(3.15); see also App. B.11.2 and Eq. (7.13)]
    "The universal identification is K^{(s,0)}_{AB}[t] = 2G S^{(s)}_{AB,exp}, where S^{(s)}_{AB,exp} denotes the real projection (3.8) of the exponentiating part of the sth soft factor. ... It is the equation that determines the generator."

    The generator t^{(s)} is defined as the solution of this equation, and the right-hand side is built from the Kerr spin exponential by (3.6)-(3.8). Therefore any parity alternation or multipole content of the resulting t^{(s)} is inherited from the input S^{(s)}_{AB,exp} by construction. For s≥2 the paper does not independently derive this equality from a Kerr Bondi-frame computation; instead App. B.11.2 states that the higher-order relation is an 'analogous expectation' that 'should be tested' after trace-descendant and gauge-restoring terms. The aligned-spin solution (7.13) solves the same defining ODEs, so it demonstrates consistency with the matched source rather than verifying that the Kerr shear equals 2G S_exp at every level.

full rationale

The paper is not a data-fitting exercise and has substantial independent anchors: the s=0 case reduces to the Veneziano–Vilkovisky supertranslation, the s=1 case reproduces the magnetic/generalized-BMS sector, and the Kerr multipole relation is independently supported by the complex-shift potential (B.102)-(B.105) and by the Guevara–Ochirov–Vines three-point operator. No load-bearing self-citation chain is invoked; Ref. [141] is used for context and contrast, not to justify the central equation. The main circularity concern is concentrated in Eq. (3.15): for s≥2 the equality K^{(s,0)}[t]=2G S_exp is presented as the 'universal identification' and then used to determine the generator, so the resulting frame dictionary is a solution of its own defining equation. This is a partial, explicitly acknowledged circularity rather than a fatal tautology, because the paper is transparent that it is setting up an inverse problem and because the low-spin anchors and the external Kerr-multipole/generator structure give the construction independent physical content. The algebra section is further explicitly conditional (Remark 6.2 labels the existence of L_t for s≥2 'an assumption, not a construction'), which is an admitted gap rather than circularity. Overall, the central higher-spin claim reduces by construction to the matched input, though the claim is not wholly empty.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The construction rests on standard BMS/soft-theorem input plus one explicit unproved existence assumption for s≥2 homogeneous actions. No new particles, forces or conserved charges are introduced; the one free-parameter entry is a set of convention-dependent ordering coefficients, not a physical fit. The Kerr selection is an input to the frame equation rather than an output of a parameter fit.

free parameters (1)
  • Ordering/completion coefficients (α1, α2 in (6.66); βs, βs,r in (6.69)) = unspecified
    Chosen by hand in the ordered realization of L_t^(s); the paper says they are fixed by convention and do not change the leading principal-symbol algebra, but they are needed for exact global closure.
axioms (6)
  • standard math Principal-symbol commutator identity σ([P,Q]) = {σ(P), σ(Q)} on T*S^2, and Jacobi identity for the canonical Poisson bracket.
    Used in Section 6.3 to prove the parameter bracket; standard pseudodifferential-operator mathematics.
  • domain assumption The radiative phase space is the shifted-news Ashtekar–Streubel phase space with the generalized-BMS action (4.5).
    Background conventions in Sections 2 and 6; typical of the modern BMS/asymptotic-charge literature and not proven anew.
  • domain assumption The universal soft contribution has the exponentiating form (3.21) in the selected sector.
    Equation (3.16)/(3.21) is imported from the soft/celestial literature; the paper does not prove the soft theorem, it builds charges on it.
  • domain assumption Kerr multipole relation M_l + iS_l = M(ia)^l and the Guevara–Ochirov–Vines three-point exponential are the correct classical spinning limit.
    Invoked around (3.23)–(3.26) and Section 7.5; a standard amplitude/black-hole result used as input.
  • ad hoc to paper Existence of a homogeneous higher-spin action L_t^(s) on the radiative phase space with principal symbol t^{A1...As}p_{A1}...p_{As} for s≥2.
    Remark 6.2 states this is 'an assumption, not a construction'; the s≥2 charge-algebra results depend on it.
  • domain assumption Covariant spin supplementary condition a·p=0 and aligned kinematics imply y = α + β x with (7.11).
    Used for the closed-form aligned tower in Section 7.3; the paper notes the coefficients depend on this choice and that the naive rest-frame spin vector is inadmissible.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-daily-deepseek · 55692 in / 19618 out tokens · 198226 ms · 2026-08-01T07:12:28.695515+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We construct the charge-generated intrinsic/canonical frame dictionary associated with the Kerr-selected soft dressing. Starting from the VV supertranslation, we formulate the higher-spin problem as an inverse problem at null infinity: the soft kernel ${\mathcal K}^{(s,0)}_{AB}[t]$, built from the parity-adapted maximally longitudinal scalar $\chi^{(s)}_t$, is matched to the Kerr-selected exponentiating projection of the universal soft contribution, thereby determining one parity component of the generator $t^{A_1\cdots A_s}$. Helicity conjugation fixes which one: the exponentiating source obeys $\overline{S^{(s)}_{+,{\rm exp}}}=(-1)^sS^{(s)}_{-,{\rm exp}}$, so the tower fixes the electric projection of the source at even levels and the magnetic projection at odd ones, matching the alternation of the Kerr mass and current moments; for aligned spin the projection is exhaustive and we solve the tower in closed form. The prescription reproduces the VV supertranslation at leading order and fixes the curl, not the divergence, of a smooth generalized-BMS vector at subleading order. The reason for the matching is physical: the same exponentiating soft factor is the classical limit of the Guevara--Ochirov--Vines spinning three-point operator and generates the Kerr multipole tower. We explain the corresponding hard flux charges and show how their external-state action gives the Ward representation of the soft theorem. The polynomial Poisson algebra on $T^\ast S^2$, with local $w_{1+\infty}$-type reductions, then acts on these frame-changing generators; it does not close on the Kerr-selected data alone. This gives the physical role of the $w_{1+\infty}$-like structure in Kerr black-hole scattering: it moves the intrinsic/canonical dictionary. Its observable imprint begins with displacement memory at $s=0$ and spin memory at $s=1$, followed by higher electric and magnetic memory moments.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

183 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Veneziano and G

    G. Veneziano and G. A. Vilkovisky,Angular momentum loss in gravitational scattering, radiation reaction, and the Bondi gauge ambiguity, Phys. Lett. B834, 137419 (2022), 2201.11607[gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  2. [2]

    Damour,Radiative contribution to classical gravitational scattering at the third order in G, Phys

    T. Damour,Radiative contribution to classical gravitational scattering at the third order in G, Phys. Rev. D102, 124008 (2020),2010.01641[gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  3. [3]

    P. P. Kulish and L. D. Faddeev,Asymptotic conditions and infrared divergences in quantum electrodynamics, Theor. Math. Phys.4, 745 (1970)

    1970

  4. [4]

    J. Ware, R. Saotome, and R. Akhoury,Construction of an asymptotic S matrix for perturbative quantum gravity, JHEP10, 159 (2013),1308.6285[hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  5. [5]

    Choi and R

    S. Choi and R. Akhoury,Subleading soft dressings of asymptotic states in QED and perturbative quantum gravity, JHEP09, 031 (2019),1907.05438[hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    Elkhidir, D

    A. Elkhidir, D. O’Connell, and R. Roiban,Supertranslations from Scattering Amplitudes, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 151601 (2025),2408.15961[hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Cheung, I

    C. Cheung, I. Z. Rothstein, and M. P. Solon,From Scattering Amplitudes to Classical Potentials in the Post-Minkowskian Expansion, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 251101 (2018), 1808.02489[hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    D. A. Kosower, B. Maybee, and D. O’Connell,Amplitudes, Observables, and Classical Scattering, JHEP02, 137 (2019),1811.10950[hep-th]. – 81 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  9. [9]

    Z. Bern, C. Cheung, R. Roiban, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon, and M. Zeng,Scattering Amplitudes and the Conservative Hamiltonian for Binary Systems at Third Post-Minkowskian Order, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 201603 (2019),1901.04424[hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  10. [10]

    Z. Bern, C. Cheung, R. Roiban, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon, and M. Zeng,Black Hole Binary Dynamics from the Double Copy and Effective Theory, JHEP10, 206 (2019),1908.01493 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  11. [11]

    Cristofoli, R

    A. Cristofoli, R. Gonzo, D. A. Kosower, and D. O’Connell,Waveforms from Amplitudes, Phys. Rev. D106, 056007 (2022),2107.10193[hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  12. [12]

    Herrmann, J

    E. Herrmann, J. Parra-Martinez, M. S. Ruf, and M. Zeng,Radiative classical gravitational observables atO(G 3)from scattering amplitudes, JHEP10, 148 (2021),2104.03957 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    Buonanno, M

    A. Buonanno, M. Khalil, D. O’Connell, R. Roiban, M. P. Solon, and M. Zeng,Snowmass White Paper: Gravitational Waves and Scattering Amplitudes,2204.05194[hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [14]

    J. F. Donoghue,General relativity as an effective field theory: The leading quantum corrections,Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 3874 [gr-qc/9405057]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  15. [15]

    W. D. Goldberger and I. Z. Rothstein,An Effective field theory of gravity for extended objects,Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 104029 [hep-th/0409156]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  16. [16]

    R. A. Porto,The effective field theorist’s approach to gravitational dynamics,Phys. Rept. 633(2016) 1 [1601.04914]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  17. [17]

    Levi,Effective Field Theories of Post-Newtonian Gravity: A comprehensive review, Rept

    M. Levi,Effective Field Theories of Post-Newtonian Gravity: A comprehensive review, Rept. Prog. Phys.83(2020) 075901 [1807.01699]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  18. [18]

    Barack and A

    L. Barack and A. Pound,Self-force and radiation reaction in general relativity,Rept. Prog. Phys.82(2019) 016904 [1805.10385]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  19. [19]

    Buonanno and T

    A. Buonanno and T. Damour,Effective one-body approach to general relativistic two-body dynamics,Phys. Rev. D59(1999) 084006 [gr-qc/9811091]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  20. [20]

    Buonanno and T

    A. Buonanno and T. Damour,Transition from inspiral to plunge in binary black hole coalescences,Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 064015 [gr-qc/0001013]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  21. [21]

    Pretorius,Evolution of binary black hole spacetimes,Phys

    F. Pretorius,Evolution of binary black hole spacetimes,Phys. Rev. Lett.95(2005) 121101 [gr-qc/0507014]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  22. [22]

    Campanelli, C

    M. Campanelli, C. O. Lousto, P. Marronetti and Y. Zlochower,Accurate evolutions of orbiting black-hole binaries without excision,Phys. Rev. Lett.96(2006) 111101 [gr-qc/0511048]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  23. [23]

    J. G. Baker, J. Centrella, D.-I. Choi, M. Koppitz and J. van Meter,Gravitational wave extraction from an inspiraling configuration of merging black holes,Phys. Rev. Lett.96 (2006) 111102 [gr-qc/0511103]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  24. [24]

    Blanchet,Gravitational Radiation from Post-Newtonian Sources and Inspiralling Compact Binaries,Living Rev

    L. Blanchet,Gravitational Radiation from Post-Newtonian Sources and Inspiralling Compact Binaries,Living Rev. Rel.17(2014) 2 [1310.1528]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  25. [25]

    Georgoudis, C

    A. Georgoudis, C. Heissenberg and R. Russo,An eikonal-inspired approach to the gravitational scattering waveform,JHEP03(2024) 089,2312.07452

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Alessio and P

    F. Alessio and P. Di Vecchia,2PM waveform from loop corrected soft theorems,J. Phys. A 57(2024) 475402,2402.06533. – 82 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    D. Bini, T. Damour and A. Geralico,Gravitational Bremsstrahlung Waveform at the fourth Post-Minkowskian order and the second Post-Newtonian level,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 064035,2407.02076

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    Sen,Gravitational Wave Tails from Soft Theorem: A Short Review,Class

    A. Sen,Gravitational Wave Tails from Soft Theorem: A Short Review,Class. Quant. Grav. 42(2025) 143002,2408.08851

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Georgoudis, V

    A. Georgoudis, V. Goncalves, C. Heissenberg and J. Parra-Martinez,Nonlinear Gravitational Memory in the Post-Minkowskian Expansion,Phys. Rev. Lett.136(2026) 121401,2506.20733

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  30. [30]

    Fucito, J.F

    F. Fucito, J.F. Morales and R. Russo,Gravitational wave forms for extreme mass ratio collisions from supersymmetric gauge theories,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 044054, 2408.07329

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    S. J. Parke and T. R. Taylor,An Amplitude fornGluon Scattering,Phys. Rev. Lett.56 (1986) 2459

    1986

  32. [32]

    Witten,Perturbative gauge theory as a string theory in twistor space,Commun

    E. Witten,Perturbative gauge theory as a string theory in twistor space,Commun. Math. Phys.252(2004) 189 [hep-th/0312171]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  33. [33]

    Roiban, M

    R. Roiban, M. Spradlin and A. Volovich,On the tree level S matrix of Yang-Mills theory, Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 026009 [hep-th/0403190]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  34. [34]

    Gukov, L

    S. Gukov, L. Motl and A. Neitzke,Equivalence of twistor prescriptions for superYang-Mills, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.11(2007) 199 [hep-th/0404085]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  35. [35]

    Cachazo, P

    F. Cachazo, P. Svrcek and E. Witten,MHV vertices and tree amplitudes in gauge theory, JHEP09(2004) 006 [hep-th/0403047]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  36. [36]

    Britto, F

    R. Britto, F. Cachazo, B. Feng and E. Witten,Direct proof of tree-level recursion relation in Yang-Mills theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.94(2005) 181602 [hep-th/0501052]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  37. [37]

    Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, D. C. Dunbar and D. A. Kosower,One loop n point gauge theory amplitudes, unitarity and collinear limits,Nucl. Phys. B425(1994) 217 [hep-ph/9403226]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  38. [38]

    Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, D. C. Dunbar and D. A. Kosower,Fusing gauge theory tree amplitudes into loop amplitudes,Nucl. Phys.B435(1995) 59 [hep-ph/9409265]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  39. [39]

    Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon and D. A. Kosower,One-loop amplitudes fore+e− to four partons, Nucl. Phys.B513(1998) 3 [hep-ph/9708239]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  40. [40]

    Britto, F

    R. Britto, F. Cachazo and B. Feng,Generalized unitarity and one-loop amplitudes inN= 4 super-Yang-Mills,Nucl. Phys.B725(2005) 275 [hep-th/0412103]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  41. [41]

    Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon and D. A. Kosower,Progress in one loop QCD computations,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.46(1996) 109 [hep-ph/9602280]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  42. [42]

    Elvang and Y.-t

    H. Elvang and Y.-t. Huang,Scattering Amplitudes in Gauge Theory and Gravity. Cambridge University Press, 4, 2015,1308.1697

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  43. [43]

    J. J. M. Carrasco and H. Johansson,Generic multiloop methods and application toN= 4 super-Yang-Mills,J. Phys.A44(2011) 454004 [1103.3298]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  44. [44]

    Bern and Y.-t

    Z. Bern and Y.-t. Huang,Basics of generalized unitarity,J. Phys.A44(2011) 454003 [1103.1869]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  45. [45]

    Kawai, D

    H. Kawai, D. C. Lewellen and S. H. H. Tye,A relation between tree amplitudes of closed and open strings,Nucl. Phys.B269(1986) 1. – 83 –

    1986

  46. [46]

    Z. Bern, J. J. M. Carrasco and H. Johansson,New relations for gauge-theory amplitudes, Phys. Rev.D78(2008) 085011 [0805.3993]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  47. [47]

    Z. Bern, J. J. M. Carrasco and H. Johansson,Perturbative quantum gravity as a double copy of gauge theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.105(2010) 061602 [1004.0476]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  48. [48]

    Monteiro, D

    R. Monteiro, D. O’Connell and C. D. White,Black holes and the double copy,JHEP12 (2014) 056 [1410.0239]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  49. [49]

    Z. Bern, J. J. Carrasco, M. Chiodaroli, H. Johansson and R. Roiban,The Duality Between Color and Kinematics and its Applications,J. Phys. A57(2024) 333002,1909.01358

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  50. [50]

    Adamo, J

    T. Adamo, J. J. M. Carrasco, M. Carrillo-González, M. Chiodaroli, H. Elvang, H. Johansson, D. O’Connell, R. Roiban and O. Schlotterer,Snowmass White Paper: the Double Copy and its Applications,2204.06547

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [51]

    B. R. Holstein and J. F. Donoghue,Classical physics and quantum loops,Phys. Rev. Lett. 93(2004) 201602 [hep-th/0405239]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  52. [52]

    Einstein, L

    A. Einstein, L. Infeld and B. Hoffmann,The Gravitational equations and the problem of motion,Annals Math.39(1938) 65

    1938

  53. [53]

    Einstein and L

    A. Einstein and L. Infeld,The Gravitational equations and the problem of motion. 2., Annals Math.41(1940) 455

    1940

  54. [54]

    T. Ohta, H. Okamura, T. Kimura and K. Hiida,Physically acceptable solution of einstein’s equation for many-body system,Prog. Theor. Phys.50(1973) 492

    1973

  55. [55]

    Jaranowski and G

    P. Jaranowski and G. Schaefer,Third postNewtonian higher order ADM Hamilton dynamics for two-body point mass systems,Phys. Rev. D57(1998) 7274 [gr-qc/9712075]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  56. [56]

    Damour, P

    T. Damour, P. Jaranowski and G. Schaefer,Dynamical invariants for general relativistic two-body systems at the third postNewtonian approximation,Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 044024 [gr-qc/9912092]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  57. [57]

    Blanchet and G

    L. Blanchet and G. Faye,Equations of motion of point particle binaries at the third postNewtonian order,Phys. Lett. A271(2000) 58 [gr-qc/0004009]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  58. [58]

    Damour, P

    T. Damour, P. Jaranowski and G. Schaefer,Dimensional regularization of the gravitational interaction of point masses,Phys. Lett. B513(2001) 147 [gr-qc/0105038]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  59. [59]

    Damour, P

    T. Damour, P. Jaranowski and G. Schäfer,Nonlocal-in-time action for the fourth post-Newtonian conservative dynamics of two-body systems,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 064058 [1401.4548]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  60. [60]

    Jaranowski and G

    P. Jaranowski and G. Schäfer,Derivation of local-in-time fourth post-Newtonian ADM Hamiltonian for spinless compact binaries,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 124043 [1508.01016]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  61. [61]

    Y. Mino, M. Sasaki and T. Tanaka,Gravitational radiation reaction to a particle motion, Phys. Rev. D55(1997) 3457 [gr-qc/9606018]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  62. [62]

    T. C. Quinn and R. M. Wald,An Axiomatic approach to electromagnetic and gravitational radiation reaction of particles in curved space-time,Phys. Rev. D56(1997) 3381 [gr-qc/9610053]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  63. [63]

    Bertotti,On gravitational motion,Nuovo Cim.4(1956) 898

    B. Bertotti,On gravitational motion,Nuovo Cim.4(1956) 898

    1956

  64. [64]

    R. P. Kerr,The Lorentz-covariant approximation method in general relativity I,Nuovo Cim. 13(1959) 469. – 84 –

    1959

  65. [65]

    Bertotti and J

    B. Bertotti and J. Plebanski,Theory of gravitational perturbations in the fast motion approximation,Annals Phys.11(1960) 169

    1960

  66. [66]

    Portilla,MOMENTUM AND ANGULAR MOMENTUM OF TWO GRAVITATING PARTICLES,J

    M. Portilla,MOMENTUM AND ANGULAR MOMENTUM OF TWO GRAVITATING PARTICLES,J. Phys. A12(1979) 1075

    1979

  67. [67]

    Westpfahl and M

    K. Westpfahl and M. Goller,GRAVITATIONAL SCATTERING OF TWO RELATIVISTIC PARTICLES IN POSTLINEAR APPROXIMATION,Lett. Nuovo Cim. 26(1979) 573

    1979

  68. [68]

    Portilla,SCATTERING OF TWO GRAVITATING PARTICLES: CLASSICAL APPROACH,J

    M. Portilla,SCATTERING OF TWO GRAVITATING PARTICLES: CLASSICAL APPROACH,J. Phys. A13(1980) 3677

    1980

  69. [69]

    L. Bel, T. Damour, N. Deruelle, J. Ibanez and J. Martin,Poincaré-invariant gravitational field and equations of motion of two pointlike objects: The postlinear approximation of general relativity,Gen. Rel. Grav.13(1981) 963

    1981

  70. [70]

    Westpfahl,High-Speed Scattering of Charged and Uncharged Particles in General Relativity,Fortsch

    K. Westpfahl,High-Speed Scattering of Charged and Uncharged Particles in General Relativity,Fortsch. Phys.33(1985) 417

    1985

  71. [71]

    Damour,Gravitational scattering, post-Minkowskian approximation and Effective One-Body theory,Phys

    T. Damour,Gravitational scattering, post-Minkowskian approximation and Effective One-Body theory,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 104015 [1609.00354]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  72. [72]

    Damour,High-energy gravitational scattering and the general relativistic two-body problem,Phys

    T. Damour,High-energy gravitational scattering and the general relativistic two-body problem,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 044038 [1710.10599]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  73. [73]

    Damour,Classical and quantum scattering in post-Minkowskian gravity,Phys

    T. Damour,Classical and quantum scattering in post-Minkowskian gravity,Phys. Rev. D 102(2020) 024060 [1912.02139]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  74. [74]

    P. H. Damgaard and P. Vanhove,Remodeling the effective one-body formalism in post-Minkowskian gravity,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 104029 [2108.11248]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  75. [75]

    Amati, M

    D. Amati, M. Ciafaloni and G. Veneziano,Superstring Collisions at Planckian Energies, Phys. Lett. B197(1987) 81

    1987

  76. [76]

    ’t Hooft,Graviton Dominance in Ultrahigh-Energy Scattering,Phys

    G. ’t Hooft,Graviton Dominance in Ultrahigh-Energy Scattering,Phys. Lett. B198(1987) 61

    1987

  77. [77]

    I. J. Muzinich and M. Soldate,High-Energy Unitarity of Gravitation and Strings,Phys. Rev. D37(1988) 359

    1988

  78. [78]

    Amati, M

    D. Amati, M. Ciafaloni and G. Veneziano,Classical and Quantum Gravity Effects from Planckian Energy Superstring Collisions,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A3(1988) 1615

    1988

  79. [79]

    Classical gravitational observables from the Eikonal operator,

    P. Di Vecchia, C. Heissenberg, R. Russo and G. Veneziano, “Classical gravitational observables from the Eikonal operator,” Phys. Lett. B843, 138049 (2023) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138049 [2210.12118[hep-th]]

    arXiv 2023

  80. [80]

    Cristofoli, R

    A. Cristofoli, R. Gonzo, N. Moynihan, D. O’Connell, A. Ross, M. Sergola et al.,The Uncertainty Principle and Classical Amplitudes,JHEP06(2024) 181,2112.07556

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

Showing first 80 references.