Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Semantic Density: Uncertainty Quantification for Large Language Models through Confidence Measurement in Semantic Space

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.13845 v3 pith:LHPNTX3E submitted 2024-05-22 cs.CL cs.AI

Semantic Density: Uncertainty Quantification for Large Language Models through Confidence Measurement in Semantic Space

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords semanticllmsmodelsuncertaintyconfidencedensityinformationlanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

With the widespread application of Large Language Models (LLMs) to various domains, concerns regarding the trustworthiness of LLMs in safety-critical scenarios have been raised, due to their unpredictable tendency to hallucinate and generate misinformation. Existing LLMs do not have an inherent functionality to provide the users with an uncertainty/confidence metric for each response it generates, making it difficult to evaluate trustworthiness. Although several studies aim to develop uncertainty quantification methods for LLMs, they have fundamental limitations, such as being restricted to classification tasks, requiring additional training and data, considering only lexical instead of semantic information, and being prompt-wise but not response-wise. A new framework is proposed in this paper to address these issues. Semantic density extracts uncertainty/confidence information for each response from a probability distribution perspective in semantic space. It has no restriction on task types and is "off-the-shelf" for new models and tasks. Experiments on seven state-of-the-art LLMs, including the latest Llama 3 and Mixtral-8x22B models, on four free-form question-answering benchmarks demonstrate the superior performance and robustness of semantic density compared to prior approaches.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. DECK: A Consistency x Confidence Taxonomy of LLM Hallucinations

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    The DECK taxonomy partitions LLM hallucinations into four detectability regimes using consistency and confidence axes, mapping each to scorer families and identifying a universal blind spot for output-level uncertaint...

  2. Functional Entropy: Predicting Functional Correctness in LLM-Generated Code with Uncertainty Quantification

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Introduces functional equivalence methods and functional entropy to predict functional correctness of LLM-generated code via uncertainty quantification, outperforming NLI-based baselines in most tested settings.

  3. A Survey on Semantic Communication for Vision: Categories, Frameworks, Enabling Techniques, and Applications

    eess.IV 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A survey that classifies visual semantic communication into preservation, expansion, and refinement categories and reviews their machine-learning components and applications.