Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The number of fundamental constants from a spacetime-based perspective

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.09249 v5 pith:LNKIJFBS submitted 2023-11-14 gr-qc hep-thquant-ph

The number of fundamental constants from a spacetime-based perspective

classification gr-qc hep-thquant-ph
keywords numberconstantsfundamentalspacetimeassumedduffequalsexpress
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We revisit Duff, Okun, and Veneziano's divergent views on the number of fundamental constants and argue that the issue can be set to rest by having spacetime as the starting point. This procedure disentangles the resolution in what depends on the assumed spacetime (whether relativistic or not) from the theories built over it. By defining that the number of fundamental constants equals the minimal number of independent standards necessary to express all observables, as assumed by Duff, Okun, and Veneziano, it is shown that the same units fixed by the apparatuses used to construct the spacetimes are enough to express all observables of the physical laws defined over them. As a result, the number of fundamental constants equals two in Galilei spacetime and one in relativistic spacetimes.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Certified Private Relational Time from Entanglement

    quant-ph 2025-12 conditional novelty 4.0

    Quantum coincidence-tick rates for a singlet state exceed Peres' linear classical model by ~13.6% at θ≈140.5°, a comparison used to propose device-independent certified private time.