Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

On Lower Bounds for Standard and Robust Gaussian Process Bandit Optimization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2008.08757 v2 pith:LOTIHLVF submitted 2020-08-20 stat.ML cs.ITcs.LGmath.ITmath.OC

On Lower Bounds for Standard and Robust Gaussian Process Bandit Optimization

classification stat.ML cs.ITcs.LGmath.ITmath.OC
keywords lowerboundsrobustsettingadversarybanditbounddependence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

In this paper, we consider algorithm-independent lower bounds for the problem of black-box optimization of functions having a bounded norm is some Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space (RKHS), which can be viewed as a non-Bayesian Gaussian process bandit problem. In the standard noisy setting, we provide a novel proof technique for deriving lower bounds on the regret, with benefits including simplicity, versatility, and an improved dependence on the error probability. In a robust setting in which every sampled point may be perturbed by a suitably-constrained adversary, we provide a novel lower bound for deterministic strategies, demonstrating an inevitable joint dependence of the cumulative regret on the corruption level and the time horizon, in contrast with existing lower bounds that only characterize the individual dependencies. Furthermore, in a distinct robust setting in which the final point is perturbed by an adversary, we strengthen an existing lower bound that only holds for target success probabilities very close to one, by allowing for arbitrary success probabilities above $\frac{2}{3}$.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Efficient and Principled Scientific Discovery through Bayesian Optimization: A Tutorial

    cs.LG 2026-04 accept novelty 2.0

    Bayesian optimization automates the scientific discovery cycle by modeling observations with surrogate models and using acquisition functions to select experiments that balance known information with new exploration.