Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 4 cited by

Non-Locality induces Isometry and Factorisation in Holography

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Non-local wormhole corrections shrink the black hole Hilbert space to dimension e^{S_BH}, resolving both the non-isometric map and the factorization puzzle.

desk verdict A clean packaging of the resolvent method for time-shifted TFD microstates, but the random-phase assumption is not justified for a one-parameter family and the central dimension is an input-output match. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.09616 v1 pith:LQEVPPS2 submitted 2024-11-14 hep-th gr-qcmath-phmath.MPquant-ph

Souvik Banerjee , Johanna Erdmenger , Jonathan Karl This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qcmath-phmath.MPquant-ph
keywords blackholeinformationparadoxgeneralizedthermofielddoublestatesreplicawormholesstateaveragingGrammatrixrankBekenstein-HawkingentropyvonNeumannalgebratypeInon-isometricbulk-boundarymap
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the two faces of the black hole information paradox—the non-isometric bulk-boundary map and the factorization puzzle—are actually one problem and dissolve together once non-local, non-perturbative quantum-gravity corrections are included. It considers time-shifted thermofield double states as a family of black hole microstates and shows that these states acquire exponentially small overlaps from replica wormholes, which arise when the gravitational path integral is interpreted as an average over the shift phases. Counting only the linearly independent microstates then gives a finite black hole Hilbert space of dimension D = $e^{{S_BH}}$, matching the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy. Because the dimension is finite, the semiclassical type III_1 algebra of observables transitions to a type I algebra and the boundary Hilbert space factorizes. The key insight is that the infinite apparent degeneracy of microstates is an artifact of ignoring non-locality; the wormhole corrections cut it down to exactly the entropy count.

What carries the argument

The engine is the Gram matrix G_{ij} = ⟨ψ_i|ψ_j⟩ of Ω time-shifted microstates in a microcanonical energy window. Because the shift phases α_n = E_n t are taken to be independently random at late times, the Gram matrix behaves as a random matrix whose second moment is 1/N + Z(2β)/Z(β)^2, the connected piece being the replica wormhole partition function. The resolvent method rearranges the planar diagram expansion into a Schwinger-Dyson equation for the trace of the resolvent; solving the resulting quadratic equation yields the eigenvalue density, whose delta-function part counts zero modes. The rank-nullity theorem then gives d_Ω = min(Ω, $e^{{S_BH}}$), the rank formula that converts an apparent infinite-dimensional space into a finite one and carries all subsequent conclusions about isometry and factorization.

What would settle it

Compute, for a concrete holographic conformal field theory at large but finite N, the actual Gram matrix of time-shifted TFD states in a microcanonical window without imposing the random-phase ansatz. If the numerically extracted rank does not saturate at $e^{{S_BH}}$ as Ω grows, or if the second moment (1/N) Σ_γ |⟨ψ_α|ψ_γ⟩|^2 departs from 1/N + Z(2β)/Z(β)^2, the central claim would be refuted; a direct test would be to evaluate the connected wormhole contribution at finite N in a UV-complete boundary theory and check that it equals the random-matrix variance.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the infinite family of phase-shifted thermofield double states—states obtained by shifting the relative time between the two boundary conformal field theories of the eternal black hole—does not span an infinite-dimensional Hilbert space once non-perturbative corrections are included. Treating the overlaps of these microstates as entries of a random Gram matrix, with the path integral understood as an average over the random phases, the eigenvalue density is a Marchenko-Pastur distribution plus a delta-function peak at zero. The number of nonzero eigenvalues, hence the number of linearly independent microstates, is exactly min(Ω, $e^{{S_BH}}$) for Ω states in a microcanonical energy window. Taking Ω → ∞ sets the black hole Hilbert space dimension to D = $e^{{S_BH}}$. This restores isometry of the bulk-boundary map, and the discrete spectrum that accompanies finite dimensionality moves the operator algebra from type III_1 to type I_D, resolving the factorization puzzle directly at the level of the Hilbert space rather than through correlation functions.

Load-bearing premise

The counting rests on assuming that, at late times, the phases α_n = E_n t behave as independent uniform random variables, so that the gravitational path integral computes an average over these phases; if a real holographic conformal field theory has correlations in its energy spectrum that survive at late times, the Gram matrix is not the random matrix the calculation assumes and the rank formula need not hold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The bulk-boundary embedding map becomes isometric after non-perturbative corrections: exactly e^{S_BH} independent microstates remain, and the null states are invisible to any local observer because the corrections that generate them are of order e^{-S_BH}.
  • The type III_1 von Neumann algebra of the semiclassical bulk goes over to a type I_D algebra with D = e^{S_BH}, so pure black hole microstates exist and the Hilbert space admits a tensor product decomposition.
  • The factorization puzzle is resolved directly at the Hilbert space level, without relying on factorization of the two-point function.
  • No extra degrees of freedom such as branes or matter fields are needed; the reduction follows from the inherent non-locality of gravity, parameterized by the undetectable time-shift phases.
  • The finiteness of the Hilbert space forces the energy spectrum to be discrete, which is the mechanism that yields the type I algebra.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The rank formula suggests that any family of black hole microstates whose overlaps are controlled by the same second moment, 1/N plus a term of order e^{-S_BH}, will exhibit the same saturation, so the mechanism may generalize beyond the specific thermofield double family.
  • The argument treats the path integral as a state average; if this averaging is exact in the full quantum theory, one would expect the same Gram-matrix rank to emerge from a direct microscopic calculation in a concrete boundary theory at large but finite N, which could serve as a quantitative check.
  • The connection drawn between Lorentzian time-shift non-locality and Euclidean replica wormholes suggests that the same resolvent-based counting could be applied to other gravitational settings, such as cosmological horizons, where an analogous family of phase-shifted states may exist.
  • The discreteness of the spectrum implied by the type I transition might be testable in low-dimensional toy models, such as nearly-AdS_2 gravity, where the resolvent equation can be solved exactly and compared with the boundary energy spectrum.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies the infinite family of time-shifted thermofield-double states (1) as candidate microstates of an eternal black hole in AdS. At leading order in G_N these states are orthogonal, so they appear to span an infinite-dimensional Hilbert space, in tension with the holographic entropy bound. The paper argues that non-perturbative, wormhole-type corrections give the states exponentially small overlaps, modeled by the random matrix (11) with off-diagonal variance e^{-S_BH}. Using a resolvent/Schwinger-Dyson calculation, the authors obtain the Marchenko-Pastur eigenvalue density (18) for the Gram matrix of Ω microstates and conclude that its rank is min(Ω, e^{S_BH}) (Eq. (19)). Hence the black hole Hilbert space has dimension D = e^{S_BH}, the bulk-boundary embedding map becomes isometric after the corrections, and the algebra of observables is type I_D, resolving the factorization puzzle.

Significance. If the argument holds, the paper provides a concrete Hilbert-space mechanism connecting state-averaged replica wormholes, the ER=EPR time-shift family, and the non-isometric code proposal, with a clean random-matrix counting step. The resolvent method and the identification of the resulting density with the Marchenko-Pastur law are standard, and the final eigenvalue density is internally consistent once the quadratic resolvent equation is corrected. The paper is also explicit that no extra branes or matter fields are needed. However, the significance is tempered by two structural caveats: the random-phase assumption that turns the one-parameter time-shifted family into an independent random-matrix ensemble is not established, and the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy enters as an input before the counting, so 'D = e^{S_BH}' is a consistency check rather than an independent derivation of the holographic dimension.

major comments (4)
  1. [Supplemental material, Schwinger-Dyson equation, Eq. (41)] Equation (41) does not follow from Eq. (40). Expanding λR = Ω + e^S R/(e^S − R) gives λR^2 − (λe^S + Ω − e^S)R + Ωe^S = 0, not the printed λR^2 − (λe^{S_BH} − Ω − e^{S_BH})R − Ωe^{S_BH} = 0. The printed equation has incorrect signs in both the linear coefficient and the constant term, and solving it does not produce the eigenvalue density (18). Since Eq. (18) is the basis of the rank formula (19), this algebraic error must be corrected. The correct quadratic does yield the displayed Marchenko-Pastur density, so this is a fixable but load-bearing error.
  2. [Microstates and overlaps; Supplemental material, Eq. (31)] The derivation of the second moment (10) uses the identity (1/N)Σ_γ e^{i(γ_m−γ_n)} = δ_{mn}, treating the phases γ_n as independent uniform random variables. But Eq. (5) fixes γ_n = E_n t, so the family is labelled by a single real parameter t, not by independent phases. For that identity to hold one needs an equidistribution statement for the sampled times t_i against the spectral differences E_m − E_n; this is not proved and is not the same as 'the phases are random at large time.' Without it, the second moment is not Z(2β)/Z(β)^2, the Gram matrix is not the random matrix (11), and the Marchenko-Pastur rank formula (19) does not apply to the actual states. The manuscript should supply a precise assumption (for example, explicit averaging over t with a quantitative equidistribution bound) and test the Gram matrix against a concrete spectrum.
  3. [Supplemental material, Eqs. (38)–(39); Counting the microstates] The paper sets the microcanonical entropy equal to the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, S_M = S_BH, before performing the counting. Since the wormhole amplitude e^{−S_BH(n−1)} is the only scale in the Gram matrix, the Marchenko-Pastur law returns rank e^{S_BH} by construction. The conclusion D = e^{S_BH} is therefore an input-output consistency check rather than an independent derivation of the black hole Hilbert-space dimension. The text should state this clearly and avoid presenting the result as an ab initio count.
  4. [Algebra and Factorisation] The inference that non-orthogonality of the microstates forces discreteness of the energy spectrum is not logically valid: a family of non-orthogonal states can be built from systems with a continuous spectrum. The intended statement appears to be that finite dimensionality of the black hole Hilbert space implies a discrete spectrum on that subspace; this should be stated directly, and the sentence claiming that the assumption of a continuous spectrum 'has to break down' should be removed or rephrased.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Brief review of generalized TFD states, Eq. (4)] There is a typo: 'the identification (4) is does not hold' should read 'the identification (4) does not hold.'
  2. [Microstates and overlaps] In the sentence 'the averaging over M is a state averaging over the Hibert space', 'Hibert' should be 'Hilbert'.
  3. [Supplemental material, Fig. 5 caption] The caption contains the typo 'Euclidean bkack hole'; it should be 'Euclidean black hole'.
  4. [References, [62]] Reference [62] contains an unresolved '[ ? ]' placeholder and should be completed or removed.
  5. [Microstates and overlaps, Eq. (9)] Equation (9) uses a Kronecker delta δ_{αγ} for phase labels that are continuous in the time parameter t; a discrete set of phases should be specified, or the orthogonality statement should be phrased as a distribution in the phase difference.
  6. [Microstates and overlaps, Eq. (10)] The normalization of the sum over γ in Eq. (10) is not fully specified: N is introduced as 'the number of phases' but the family of time-shifted states is continuous in t, so the measure and the N → ∞ limit should be defined carefully.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 8.0 of 10

The central result D=e^{S_BH} is inserted as an input: S_M=S_BH in Eq. (39) fixes the wormhole amplitudes and the random-matrix variance, and Eq. (19) returns e^{S_BH} as the Gram-matrix rank.

  1. self definitional [Sec. 'Counting the microstates', Eqs. (18)-(19); Supplemental material, Eqs. (37)-(39)]
    "the appearance of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy (4) in (18) arises from the overlaps (10), since SBH is contained in the ratio of the Gibbons-Hawking partition functions. ... S_M := log(z(E)) = S_BH. In the second equality we used the fact that the microcanonical entropy is equal to the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy (4) ... dΩ = min(Ω, e^{S_BH}). This indeed shows that the black hole Hilbert space has dimension D = e^{S_BH}."

    The saturation scale in the rank formula is not obtained by counting microstates: it is substituted into the resolvent before the counting. Equation (38) sets the microcanonical wormhole amplitude Z_n/Z_1^n = e^{-S_M(n-1)}, and Eq. (39) declares S_M = S_BH. The Schwinger-Dyson equation (40)-(41) then contains e^{S_BH} as a parameter, so the eigenvalue density (18) and the rank dΩ = min(Ω,e^{S_BH}) inherit that same value. The concluding statement 'the black hole Hilbert space has dimension D = e^{S_BH}' is therefore the input entropy restated, not an independent result derived from the state family.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Sec. 'Microstates and overlaps', Eqs. (10)-(11); supplemental Eq. (31)]
    "1/N Σ_γ |⟨TFDα|TFDγ⟩|^2 = 1/N + Z(2β)/Z^2(β) ... M_{αγ} = δ_{αγ} + e^{-S_BH/2} R_{αγ}"

    The off-diagonal variance of the Gram matrix, which controls the Marchenko-Pastur density, is set to e^{-S_BH} before any counting. Equation (11) builds the random matrix with e^{-S_BH/2} as the fluctuation scale, and Eq. (10) identifies the second moment with Z(2β)/Z^2(β), which in the microcanonical ensemble (38) equals e^{-S_M}=e^{-S_BH}. The rank (19) is then the reciprocal of this pre-installed variance. Thus the 'prediction' that the Hilbert space dimension is e^{S_BH} is equivalent to the amplitude put into the random-matrix model.

full rationale

The paper's self-citations ([29]-[32]) and citations to [33] and [38] are not themselves circular: [33] supplies the random-matrix/replica-wormhole technique and [38] supplies ensemble equivalence, both with independent content. However, the central quantitative claim fails the input-output test. The dimension D=e^{S_BH} is fixed in advance by Eq. (39), which identifies the microcanonical entropy with the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy before the Gram-matrix rank is computed, and by Eq. (11), which puts e^{-S_BH/2} into the off-diagonal overlaps. The resolvent calculation then returns this same S_BH in Eq. (19). A separate, non-circularity concern is that the identity Σ_γ e^{i(γ_m-γ_n)}/N = δ_{mn} (Eq. (31)) treats phases γ_n=E_n t as independent uniforms, although every microstate's phases are locked to the energy eigenvalues by one parameter t; this is an unsupported equidistribution assumption about the CFT spectrum, not a circular reduction. Apart from the central input-output match, the random-matrix algebra itself is self-contained.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central computation depends on four inputs that the paper does not derive: the randomness of the time-shift phases, the state-averaging interpretation of the gravitational path integral, the identification of the microcanonical entropy with the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, and planar dominance in the resolvent resummation. The first two are physical assumptions about the holographic CFT and the meaning of the path integral; the third imports the target entropy; the fourth is a standard technical limit. There are no fitted parameters and no invented entities. No new particles, forces, or other entities are postulated; the wormholes are the standard replica wormholes of [33], the time-shifted TFD states come from [26-28], and the finite-dimensional Hilbert space is the claimed output, not a postulated input. There is no graviton problem here.

free parameters (1)
  • Overlap variance e^{−S_BH} of the Gram matrix off-diagonals = e^{−S_BH} = Z(2β)/Z²(β) (from Eq. 10)
    The random matrix model (11) sets the off-diagonal overlap variance to e^{−S_BH} using the wormhole amplitude (10), and the rank result (19) is the inverse of this variance. The paper takes the value from the Gibbons-Hawking partition function rather than fitting it, but the central claim depends directly on it.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The phases α_n = E_n t are effectively independent uniform random variables at late times (Poincaré recurrence time scale).
    Stated in Sec. 'Microstates and overlaps': 'these phases are random, since they are related to the random energy spectrum of the holographic CFT'. Used to derive the second moment (10) and to justify the random matrix model (11).
  • domain assumption The gravitational path integral computes an average over the phase-shifted microstates (state averaging).
    Sec. 'Microstates and overlaps': 'the gravitational path integral computes an average over the fundamental degrees of freedom... encoded in the random matrix'. This interpretation converts wormhole corrections into a reduction of the Hilbert space dimension; without it, the corrections are just small numbers.
  • domain assumption The microcanonical entropy equals the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, S_M = S_BH = A/4G_N.
    Eq. (39) and the text 'the microcanonical entropy is equal to the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy (4)... due to the equivalence of the ensembles in the GN → 0 limit [38]'. This imports the target entropy into the wormhole amplitudes (38) and hence into the output dimension (19).
  • standard math Only planar geometries contribute to the resolvent resummation in the semiclassical limit with Ω large.
    Supplemental, Schwinger-Dyson section: 'we work in the semiclassical GN → 0 limit... only the planar geometries contribute'; standard planar resummation following [33,55,56].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Non-Locality induces Isometry and Factorisation in Holography." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LQEVPPS2

@misc{pith2026241109616,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Non-Locality induces Isometry and Factorisation in Holography},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LQEVPPS2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.09616}
}
read the original abstract

In holography, two manifestations of the black hole information paradox are given by the non-isometric nature of the bulk-boundary map and by the factorisation puzzle. By considering time-shifted microstates of the eternal black hole, we demonstrate that both these puzzles may be simultaneously resolved by taking into account non-local quantum corrections that correspond to wormholes arising from state averaging. This is achieved by showing, using a resolvent technique, that the resulting Hilbert space for an eternal black hole in Anti-de Sitter space is finite-dimensional with a discrete energy spectrum. The latter gives rise to a transition to a type I von Neumann algebra.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.09616 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Visualization of the black hole microstates ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Geometric representation of the right hand side of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. ) [62]. Since we work in the microcanonical ensem￾ble (12), we can include the left boundary Hamiltonian HL into the algebra, which leads to a transition to a type II∞ algebra [52]. The extended algebra admits density matrices and renormalized von Neumann entropies, but FIG. 3. At large N, the black-hole Hilbert space HBH splits into GNS Hilbert spaces around the TFD state, labelled by HGNS, and the microstates (1),… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The left-hand side shows the boundary conditions im [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Leading geometries contributing to the second mo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Diagrammatic representation of the expansion of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Nonperturbative Toolkit for Quantum Gravity

    hep-th 2025-04 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A shell-state resolution of the identity, an infinite-overcompleteness limit, and geometric surgery are claimed to prove fine-grained factorization of the two-sided gravitational thermal partition function.

  2. It from ETH: Multi-interval Entanglement and Replica Wormholes from Large-$c$ BCFT Ensemble

    hep-th 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The RT formula for entanglement in AdS3/CFT2, including phase transitions and multi-interval vacuum entropies, is derived from an assumed large-c ensemble of (B)CFT data, under the 'It from ETH' paradigm.

  3. Spread complexity and the saturation of wormhole size

    hep-th 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For finite-N DSSYK, the chord basis is the early part of the physical Krylov basis, and spread complexity, taken as the non-perturbative ER bridge size, saturates after a universality-class-dependent peak and slope.

  4. Bulk-boundary entanglement correspondence and the Ryu-Takayanagi conjecture in an $AdS_2/CFT_1$ setup

    hep-th 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    For a free scalar plus Majorana field in AdS2, boundary thermofield-double entanglement entropy matches, up to additive constants, the bulk horizon entanglement entropy and the log of a near-boundary geodesic length.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [62]

    A similar structure of the boundary Hilbert space was studied [ ? ], where general states with a gravity dual were considered

    work page

  2. [42]

    Two types of quan- tum chaos: testing the limits of the Bohigas-Giannoni- Schmit conjecture,

    Javier M. Magan and Qingyue Wu, “Two types of quan- tum chaos: testing the limits of the Bohigas-Giannoni- Schmit conjecture,” (2024), arXiv:2411.08186 [quant- ph]

    arXiv 2024

  3. [1]

    Dimensional reduction in quan- tum gravity,

    Gerard ’t Hooft, “Dimensional reduction in quan- tum gravity,” Conf. Proc. C 930308, 284–296 (1993), arXiv:gr-qc/9310026

    arXiv 1993

  4. [2]

    The World as a hologram,

    Leonard Susskind, “The World as a hologram,” J. Math. Phys. 36, 6377–6396 (1995), arXiv:hep-th/9409089

    arXiv 1995

  5. [3]

    Holography from Conformal Field Theory,

    Idse Heemskerk, Joao Penedones, Joseph Polchinski, and James Sully, “Holography from Conformal Field Theory,” JHEP 10, 079 (2009), arXiv:0907.0151 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2009

  6. [4]

    Emer- gent Spacetime and Holographic CFTs,

    Sheer El-Showk and Kyriakos Papadodimas, “Emer- gent Spacetime and Holographic CFTs,” JHEP 10, 106 (2012), arXiv:1101.4163 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2012

  7. [5]

    Holographic CFTs are characterized by large central charges and sparse spectrum of operators with small con- formal dimensions. Furthermore, correlators of these low- lying operators in any holographic CFT factorize into products of two-point functions, in other words connected higher point correlators of these operators vanish [4]

    work page

  8. [6]

    The Large N limit of super- conformal field theories and supergravity,

    Juan Martin Maldacena, “The Large N limit of super- conformal field theories and supergravity,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231–252 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9711200

    arXiv 1998

Show all 65 references
  1. [7]

    Anti-de Sitter space and holography,

    Edward Witten, “Anti-de Sitter space and holography,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 253–291 (1998), arXiv:hep- th/9802150

    1998

  2. [8]

    Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,

    S. S. Gubser, Igor R. Klebanov, and Alexander M. Polyakov, “Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,” Phys. Lett. B 428, 105–114 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9802109

    1998 arXiv

  3. [9]

    Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories,

    Edward Witten, “Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 505–532 (1998), arXiv:hep- th/9803131

    1998

  4. [10]

    Holography, thermodynam- ics and fluctuations of charged AdS black holes,

    Andrew Chamblin, Roberto Emparan, Clifford V. John- son, and Robert C. Myers, “Holography, thermodynam- ics and fluctuations of charged AdS black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 60, 104026 (1999), arXiv:hep-th/9904197

    1999 arXiv

  5. [11]

    Charged AdS black holes and catastrophic holography,

    Andrew Chamblin, Roberto Emparan, Clifford V. John- son, and Robert C. Myers, “Charged AdS black holes and catastrophic holography,” Phys. Rev. D 60, 064018 (1999), arXiv:hep-th/9902170

    1999 arXiv

  6. [12]

    Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT,

    Shinsei Ryu and Tadashi Takayanagi, “Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 181602 (2006), arXiv:hep- th/0603001

    2006

  7. [13]

    Aspects of Holo- graphic Entanglement Entropy,

    Shinsei Ryu and Tadashi Takayanagi, “Aspects of Holo- graphic Entanglement Entropy,” JHEP 08, 045 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0605073

    2006 arXiv

  8. [14]

    A Covariant holographic entanglement en- tropy proposal,

    Veronika E. Hubeny, Mukund Rangamani, and Tadashi Takayanagi, “A Covariant holographic entanglement en- tropy proposal,” JHEP 07, 062 (2007), arXiv:0705.0016 [hep-th]

    2007 arXiv

  9. [15]

    The black hole in- terior from non-isometric codes and complexity,

    Chris Akers, Netta Engelhardt, Daniel Harlow, Geoff Penington, and Shreya Vardhan, “The black hole in- terior from non-isometric codes and complexity,” JHEP 06, 155 (2024), arXiv:2207.06536 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  10. [16]

    Asymptotically isometric codes for holography,

    Thomas Faulkner and Min Li, “Asymptotically isometric codes for holography,” (2022), arXiv:2211.12439 [hep- th]

    2022 arXiv

  11. [17]

    Non- isometric codes for the black hole interior from funda- mental and effective dynamics,

    Oliver DeWolfe and Kenneth Higginbotham, “Non- isometric codes for the black hole interior from funda- mental and effective dynamics,” JHEP 09, 068 (2023), arXiv:2304.12345 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  12. [18]

    Non- isometry, State-Dependence and Holography,

    Stefano Antonini, Vijay Balasubramanian, Ning Bao, ChunJun Cao, and Wissam Chemissany, “Non- isometry, State-Dependence and Holography,” (2024), arXiv:2411.07296 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  13. [19]

    The Factorization Problem in Jackiw-Teitelboim Gravity,

    Daniel Harlow and Daniel Jafferis, “The Factorization Problem in Jackiw-Teitelboim Gravity,” JHEP 02, 177 (2020), arXiv:1804.01081 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  14. [20]

    Entan- glement Entropy in Jackiw-Teitelboim Gravity,

    Daniel Louis Jafferis and David K. Kolchmeyer, “Entan- glement Entropy in Jackiw-Teitelboim Gravity,” (2019), arXiv:1911.10663 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  15. [21]

    Cool horizons for entangled black holes,

    Juan Maldacena and Leonard Susskind, “Cool horizons for entangled black holes,” Fortsch. Phys. 61, 781–811 (2013), arXiv:1306.0533 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  16. [22]

    Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement,

    Mark Van Raamsdonk, “Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement,” Gen. Rel. Grav. 42, 2323–2329 (2010), arXiv:1005.3035 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  17. [23]

    Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter,

    Juan Martin Maldacena, “Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter,” JHEP 04, 021 (2003), arXiv:hep-th/0106112

    2003 arXiv

  18. [24]

    Rudolf Haag, Local Quantum Physics: Fields, Particles, Algebras (Springer, 1996)

    1996

  19. [25]

    Gravity and the crossed product,

    Edward Witten, “Gravity and the crossed product,” JHEP 10, 008 (2022), arXiv:2112.12828 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  20. [26]

    Local Opera- tors in the Eternal Black Hole,

    Kyriakos Papadodimas and Suvrat Raju, “Local Opera- tors in the Eternal Black Hole,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 211601 (2015), arXiv:1502.06692 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  21. [27]

    Remarks on 11 the necessity and implications of state-dependence in the black hole interior,

    Kyriakos Papadodimas and Suvrat Raju, “Remarks on 11 the necessity and implications of state-dependence in the black hole interior,” Phys. Rev. D 93, 084049 (2016), arXiv:1503.08825 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  22. [28]

    ER = EPR revisited: On the Entropy of an Einstein-Rosen Bridge,

    Herman Verlinde, “ER = EPR revisited: On the Entropy of an Einstein-Rosen Bridge,” (2020), arXiv:2003.13117 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  23. [29]

    Geometric phases distinguish entangled states in wormhole quantum mechanics,

    Flavio S. Nogueira, Souvik Banerjee, Moritz Dorband, Ren´ e Meyer, Jeroen van den Brink, and Johanna Erd- menger, “Geometric phases distinguish entangled states in wormhole quantum mechanics,” Phys. Rev. D 105, L081903 (2022), arXiv:2109.06190 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  24. [30]

    Berry phases, wormholes and factorization in AdS/CFT,

    Souvik Banerjee, Moritz Dorband, Johanna Erdmenger, Ren´ e Meyer, and Anna-Lena Weigel, “Berry phases, wormholes and factorization in AdS/CFT,” JHEP 08, 162 (2022), arXiv:2202.11717 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  25. [31]

    Geometric Quantum Discord Sig- nals Non-Factorization,

    Souvik Banerjee, Pablo Basteiro, Rathindra Nath Das, and Moritz Dorband, “Geometric Quantum Discord Sig- nals Non-Factorization,” (2023), arXiv:2305.04952 [hep- th]

    2023 arXiv

  26. [32]

    Geometric phases characterise operator algebras and missing information,

    Souvik Banerjee, Moritz Dorband, Johanna Erdmenger, and Anna-Lena Weigel, “Geometric phases characterise operator algebras and missing information,” JHEP 10, 026 (2023), arXiv:2306.00055 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  27. [33]

    Replica wormholes and the black hole interior,

    Geoff Penington, Stephen H. Shenker, Douglas Stanford, and Zhenbin Yang, “Replica wormholes and the black hole interior,” JHEP 03, 205 (2022), arXiv:1911.11977 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  28. [34]

    The Python’s Lunch: geomet- ric obstructions to decoding Hawking radiation,

    Adam R. Brown, Hrant Gharibyan, Geoff Penington, and Leonard Susskind, “The Python’s Lunch: geomet- ric obstructions to decoding Hawking radiation,” JHEP 08, 121 (2020), arXiv:1912.00228 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  29. [35]

    Microscopic Origin of the Entropy of Single-sided Black Holes,

    Hao Geng and Yikun Jiang, “Microscopic Origin of the Entropy of Single-sided Black Holes,” (2024), arXiv:2409.12219 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [36]

    Microscopic origin of the entropy of black holes in general relativity,

    Vijay Balasubramanian, Albion Lawrence, Javier M. Ma- gan, and Martin Sasieta, “Microscopic origin of the entropy of black holes in general relativity,” (2022), arXiv:2212.02447 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  31. [37]

    Microscopic origin of the entropy of astrophysical black holes,

    Vijay Balasubramanian, Albion Lawrence, Javier M. Magan, and Martin Sasieta, “Microscopic origin of the entropy of astrophysical black holes,” (2022), arXiv:2212.08623 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  32. [38]

    Universal con- struction of black hole microstates,

    Ana Climent, Roberto Emparan, Javier M. Magan, Mar- tin Sasieta, and Alejandro Vilar L´ opez, “Universal con- struction of black hole microstates,” Phys. Rev. D 109, 086024 (2024), arXiv:2401.08775 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  33. [39]

    How the Hilbert space of two-sided black holes factorises,

    Jan Boruch, Luca V. Iliesiu, Guanda Lin, and Cynthia Yan, “How the Hilbert space of two-sided black holes factorises,” (2024), arXiv:2406.04396 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  34. [40]

    Factorization of the Hilbert space of eternal black holes in general rel- ativity,

    Vijay Balasubramanian, Ben Craps, Juan Hernandez, Mikhail Khramtsov, and Maria Knysh, “Factorization of the Hilbert space of eternal black holes in general rel- ativity,” (2024), arXiv:2410.00091 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  35. [41]

    Notes on the Factorisation of the Hilbert Space for Two-Sided Black Holes in Higher Dimensions,

    Pan Li, “Notes on the Factorisation of the Hilbert Space for Two-Sided Black Holes in Higher Dimensions,” (2024), arXiv:2410.23886 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  36. [43]

    Independence of local algebras in quantum field theory,

    H. Roos, “Independence of local algebras in quantum field theory,” Commun. Math. Phys. 16, 238–246 (1970)

    1970

  37. [44]

    PRODUCT STATES FOR LOCAL ALGEBRAS,

    Detlev Buchholz, “PRODUCT STATES FOR LOCAL ALGEBRAS,” Commun. Math. Phys. 36, 287–304 (1974)

    1974

  38. [45]

    The split property for quantum field theories in flat and curved spacetimes,

    Christopher J Fewster, “The split property for quantum field theories in flat and curved spacetimes,” in Abhand- lungen aus dem Mathematischen Seminar der Universit¨ at Hamburg, Vol. 86 (Springer, 2016) pp. 153–175

    2016

  39. [46]

    Action integrals and partition functions in quantum gravity,

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, “Action integrals and partition functions in quantum gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 15, 2752–2756 (1977)

    1977

  40. [47]

    Failure of the split property in gravity and the information paradox,

    Suvrat Raju, “Failure of the split property in gravity and the information paradox,” Class. Quant. Grav. 39, 064002 (2022), arXiv:2110.05470 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  41. [48]

    In general the microstate of a thermodynamical system is defined as a pure state |ψ⟩, which is indistinguishable from the equilibrium state represented by a thermal den- sity matrix ρ, when probed by simple operators [35, 38], in the sense that ⟨ψ| O1...On |ψ⟩ = Tr(ρ O1...On)

  42. [49]

    In the present example of an eternal black hole, the phases arising from the global time evolution can be mea- sured if two observers in a gedanken experimental set- up perform a non-local measurement by jumping into the black hole from different sides. They would detect a tim...

  43. [50]

    Wormholes in Quantum Mechanics,

    Herman Verlinde, “Wormholes in Quantum Mechanics,” (2021), arXiv:2105.02129 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  44. [51]

    The fundamental description is also sometimes termed as the boundary description

    We refer to the semiclassical description, together with perturbative corrections as the effective description, while the full quantum gravity theory is the fundamental description, including non-perturbative corrections. The fundamental description is also sometimes termed as...

  45. [52]

    Large N algebras and generalized en- tropy,

    Venkatesa Chandrasekaran, Geoff Penington, and Ed- ward Witten, “Large N algebras and generalized en- tropy,” (2022), arXiv:2209.10454 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  46. [53]

    Since we have to find dΩ in the limit Ω → ∞, this requires diagonalizing a matrix of infinite size, which is very hard

    The rank of the Gram matrix may in principle directly be determined by either performing a Gram-Schmidt or- thogonalization procedure, or equivalently by diagonaliz- ing G. Since we have to find dΩ in the limit Ω → ∞, this requires diagonalizing a matrix of infinite size, whic...

  47. [54]

    This method was also used to give a microscopic inter- pretation of Bekenstein-Hawking entropy by considering a different family of microstates [35–38]

  48. [55]

    Planar perturbation expansion,

    Predrag Cvitanovi´ c, “Planar perturbation expansion,” Physics Letters B 99, 49–52 (1981)

    1981

  49. [56]

    Free Probability Theory,

    Roland Speicher, “Free Probability Theory,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:0911.0087 (2009), arXiv:0911.0087 [math.PR]

    2009 arXiv

  50. [57]

    The Holographic principle,

    Raphael Bousso, “The Holographic principle,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 825–874 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0203101

    2002 arXiv

  51. [58]

    Information loss, mixing and emergent type III 1 factors,

    Keiichiro Furuya, Nima Lashkari, Mudassir Moosa, and Shoy Ouseph, “Information loss, mixing and emergent type III 1 factors,” (2023), arXiv:2305.16028 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  52. [59]

    Why Does Quantum Field Theory In Curved Spacetime Make Sense? And What Happens To The Algebra of Observables In The Thermodynamic Limit?

    Edward Witten, “Why Does Quantum Field Theory In Curved Spacetime Make Sense? And What Happens To The Algebra of Observables In The Thermodynamic Limit?” (2021), arXiv:2112.11614 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  53. [60]

    Causal connectabil- ity between quantum systems and the black hole interior 12 in holographic duality,

    Samuel Leutheusser and Hong Liu, “Causal connectabil- ity between quantum systems and the black hole interior 12 in holographic duality,” (2021), arXiv:2110.05497 [hep- th]

    2021 arXiv

  54. [61]

    Emergent times in holographic duality,

    Samuel Leutheusser and Hong Liu, “Emergent times in holographic duality,” (2021), arXiv:2112.12156 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Path-integral deriva- tion of black-hole radiance,

    J. B. Hartle and S. W. Hawking, “Path-integral deriva- tion of black-hole radiance,” Phys. Rev. D 13, 2188–2203 (1976)

    1976

  56. [64]

    Jerusalem Lectures on Black Holes and Quantum Information,

    Daniel Harlow, “Jerusalem Lectures on Black Holes and Quantum Information,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 015002 (2016), arXiv:1409.1231 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Random matrices,

    Bertrand Eynard, Taro Kimura, and Sylvain Ribault, “Random matrices,” (2015), arXiv:1510.04430 [math- ph]

    2015 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.