REVIEW 3 cited by
A Primer on Private Statistics
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Differentially private statistical estimation has seen a flurry of developments over the last several years. Study has been divided into two schools of thought, focusing on empirical statistics versus population statistics. We suggest that these two lines of work are more similar than different by giving examples of methods that were initially framed for empirical statistics, but can be applied just as well to population statistics. We also provide a thorough coverage of recent work in this area.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Sequential Auditing for f-Differential Privacy
A new sequential auditor for f-differential privacy adaptively chooses its sample size, detects violations across the whole privacy tradeoff curve, and holds a user-set false-rejection rate.
-
Privacy in Metalearning and Multitask Learning: Modeling and Separations
The paper proves a formal separation between joint differential privacy and billboard or metalearning privacy, showing that the public billboard model can require far more data.
-
How Private is Your Attention? Bridging Privacy with In-Context Learning
Differentially private pretraining of linear attention heads for in-context linear regression has excess risk that decays like 1/(N L^3) in low dimensions and D^2/(N^2 L^2) in high dimensions, up to log factors and pr...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.