REVIEW 9 cited by
Upcycling Large Language Models into Mixture of Experts
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Upcycling pre-trained dense language models into sparse mixture-of-experts (MoE) models is an efficient approach to increase the model capacity of already trained models. However, optimal techniques for upcycling at scale remain unclear. In this work, we conduct an extensive study of upcycling methods and hyperparameters for billion-parameter scale language models. We propose a novel "virtual group" initialization scheme and weight scaling approach to enable upcycling into fine-grained MoE architectures. Through ablations, we find that upcycling outperforms continued dense model training. In addition, we show that softmax-then-topK expert routing improves over topK-then-softmax approach and higher granularity MoEs can help improve accuracy. Finally, we upcycled Nemotron-4 15B on 1T tokens and compared it to a continuously trained version of the same model on the same 1T tokens: the continuous trained model achieved 65.3% MMLU, whereas the upcycled model achieved 67.6%. Our results offer insights and best practices to effectively leverage upcycling for building MoE language models. Code is available.
Forward citations
Cited by 9 Pith papers
-
Beyond instruction-conditioning, MoTE: Mixture of Task Experts for Multi-task Embedding Models
MoTE combines task-level mixture-of-experts routing with task-aware contrastive learning and beats instruction-conditioning on most MTEB tasks at equal active parameter count.
-
Automatic Expert Discovery in LLM Upcycling via Sparse Interpolated Mixture-of-Experts
Sparse Interpolated Mixture-of-Experts learns neuron-level masks and a per-prompt router to upcycle a dense LLM into a sparse expert model, improving instruction-tuning benchmarks with lower inference cost.
-
Scaling Laws for Upcycling Mixture-of-Experts Language Models
Upcycled MoE language-model loss follows a multiplicative power law in dense and upcycled training tokens, with a log-D1 interaction that caps the benefit of upcycling at large compute budgets.
-
MoLGE: Mixture of Language Group Experts for Efficient Scaling of Massively Multilingual Speech Recognition
Grouping 495 languages into roughly 16 clusters and routing speech to group-specific LoRA experts improves multilingual ASR error rates over dense and random baselines.
-
Scaling Fine-Grained MoE Beyond 50B Parameters: Empirical Evaluation and Practical Insights
At 56B total parameters, fine-grained MoE with smaller, more numerous experts beats standard Switch and Mixtral-style MoE on validation loss and average downstream accuracy at matched FLOPs.
-
FreqMoE: Dynamic Frequency Enhancement for Neural PDE Solvers
FreqMoE upcycles a pretrained low-frequency FNO into a sparse mixture of experts via LoRA-style adapters, achieving up to 16.6% lower error with 47.32x fewer activated parameters.
-
LLaMA-MoE v2: Exploring Sparsity of LLaMA from Perspective of Mixture-of-Experts with Post-Training
A dense instruction-tuned LLaMA-3-8B can be partitioned into Attention-MoE and MLP-MoE and re-trained with about 7B instruction tokens, recovering usable math/code skills with half the activated parameters.
-
ScatterPrism: convergence for generative simulation and inverse problems in particle and nuclear physics
Standard Conditional Flow Matching loss is a misleading early plateau; physics-informed metrics keep improving, so ScatterPrism and multi-metric diagnostics are needed for kinematic fidelity.
-
The Race to Efficiency: A New Perspective on AI Scaling Laws
A simple formula generalizes static AI scaling laws to time-varying efficiency, showing that efficiency-doubling rates around 2 per year keep loss reduction on a near-exponential path.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.