Pith

open record

sign in
Browse

arxiv: 2205.02892 · v2 · pith:LWCG2JKS · submitted 2022-05-05 · cs.SE · cs.AI· cs.CL

Ontology Reuse: the Real Test of Ontological Design

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved pith:LWCG2JKSrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.SE cs.AIcs.CL
keywords ontologyontologiesqualityassurancereusediverseimprovingissues
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Reusing ontologies in practice is still very challenging, especially when multiple ontologies are (jointly) involved. Moreover, despite recent advances, the realization of systematic ontology quality assurance remains a difficult problem. In this work, the quality of thirty biomedical ontologies, and the Computer Science Ontology are investigated, from the perspective of a practical use case. Special scrutiny is given to cross-ontology references, which are vital for combining ontologies. Diverse methods to detect potential issues are proposed, including natural language processing and network analysis. Moreover, several suggestions for improving ontologies and their quality assurance processes are presented. It is argued that while the advancing automatic tools for ontology quality assurance are crucial for ontology improvement, they will not solve the problem entirely. It is ontology reuse that is the ultimate method for continuously verifying and improving ontology quality, as well as for guiding its future development. Specifically, multiple issues can be found and fixed primarily through practical and diverse ontology reuse scenarios.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.