REVIEW 15 cited by
REFINER: Reasoning Feedback on Intermediate Representations
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
REFINER: Reasoning Feedback on Intermediate Representations
read the original abstract
Language models (LMs) have recently shown remarkable performance on reasoning tasks by explicitly generating intermediate inferences, e.g., chain-of-thought prompting. However, these intermediate inference steps may be inappropriate deductions from the initial context and lead to incorrect final predictions. Here we introduce REFINER, a framework for finetuning LMs to explicitly generate intermediate reasoning steps while interacting with a critic model that provides automated feedback on the reasoning. Specifically, the critic provides structured feedback that the reasoning LM uses to iteratively improve its intermediate arguments. Empirical evaluations of REFINER on three diverse reasoning tasks show significant improvements over baseline LMs of comparable scale. Furthermore, when using GPT-3.5 or ChatGPT as the reasoner, the trained critic significantly improves reasoning without finetuning the reasoner. Finally, our critic model is trained without expensive human-in-the-loop data but can be substituted with humans at inference time.
Forward citations
Cited by 15 Pith papers
-
DICE: Entropy-Regularized Equilibrium Selection for Stable Multi-Agent LLM Coordination
DICE formalizes multi-agent LLM coordination as discounted incomplete-information Markov games and introduces Heterogeneous Quantal Response Equilibrium (HQRE) to achieve unique stable equilibria with bounded regret, ...
-
User-Assistant Bias in LLMs
LLMs show strong user bias in role-tagged contexts that is amplified by preference alignment and can be reduced or controlled through targeted fine-tuning and DPO.
-
Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning
Reflexion lets LLM agents improve via stored verbal reflections on task feedback, reaching 91% pass@1 on HumanEval and outperforming prior GPT-4 results.
-
DICE: Entropy-Regularized Equilibrium Selection for Stable Multi-Agent LLM Coordination
HQRE entropy regularization makes multi-agent LLM coordination well-posed, yielding unique equilibria, linear mirror convergence, bounded Bayesian regret, and DICE gains of 4.3–8.5 pp on reasoning/planning tasks.
-
VTOS: Learning to Orchestrate Vision Tools by Co-Searching Solutions and Observers
VTOS jointly searches solution and observer programs to adaptively orchestrate vision tools, outperforming static pipelines on dense object counting and zero-shot plant disease segmentation.
-
OPD-Evolver: Cultivating Holistic Agent Evolver via On-Policy Distillation
OPD-Evolver uses on-policy self-distillation in fast interaction and slow attribution loops to build agents with holistic memory competence, outperforming prior systems by up to 11.5% and allowing a 9B model to compet...
-
Context Learning for Multi-Agent Discussion
M2CL trains per-agent context generators with a self-adaptive mechanism to maintain coherence and reduce output discrepancies in multi-LLM discussions, yielding 20-50% gains on reasoning, embodied, and mobile control tasks.
-
Training Language Models to Self-Correct via Reinforcement Learning
SCoRe uses multi-turn online RL with regularization on self-generated traces to improve LLM self-correction, achieving 15.6% and 9.1% gains on MATH and HumanEval for Gemini models.
-
Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflection
Self-RAG trains LLMs to adaptively retrieve passages on demand and self-critique using reflection tokens, outperforming ChatGPT and retrieval-augmented Llama2 on QA, reasoning, and fact verification.
-
Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yet
LLMs cannot reliably self-correct reasoning mistakes using only their internal capabilities and often degrade in performance without external feedback.
-
Reasoning with Language Model is Planning with World Model
RAP turns LLMs into dual world-model and planning agents via MCTS to generate better reasoning paths, outperforming CoT baselines and achieving 33% relative gains over GPT-4 CoT using LLaMA-33B on plan generation.
-
Measure Twice, Click Once: Co-evolving Proposer and Visual Critic via Reinforcement Learning for GUI Grounding
A co-evolving proposer-critic RL framework improves GUI grounding accuracy by letting the model critique its own proposals rendered on screenshots.
-
TRACES: Tagging Reasoning Steps for Adaptive Cost-Efficient Early-Stopping
TRACES tags reasoning steps to enable adaptive early stopping, cutting token use by 20-50% on MATH500, GSM8K, AIME, MMLU and GPQA with comparable accuracy.
-
From Hallucination to Structure Snowballing: The Alignment Tax of Constrained Decoding in LLM Reflection
Enforcing structured reflection via Outlines-based constrained decoding on an 8B LLM triggers structure snowballing instead of better self-correction, producing near-perfect syntax but persistent semantic errors and r...
-
LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methods
A survey that organizes LLMs-as-judges research into functionality, methodology, applications, meta-evaluation, and limitations.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.