REVIEW 5 cited by
LLMs with Personalities in Multi-issue Negotiation Games
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Powered by large language models (LLMs), AI agents have become capable of many human tasks. Using the most canonical definitions of the Big Five personality, we measure the ability of LLMs to negotiate within a game-theoretical framework, as well as methodological challenges to measuring notions of fairness and risk. Simulations (n=1,500) for both single-issue and multi-issue negotiation reveal increase in domain complexity with asymmetric issue valuations improve agreement rates but decrease surplus from aggressive negotiation. Through gradient-boosted regression and Shapley explainers, we find high openness, conscientiousness, and neuroticism are associated with fair tendencies; low agreeableness and low openness are associated with rational tendencies. Low conscientiousness is associated with high toxicity. These results indicate that LLMs may have built-in guardrails that default to fair behavior, but can be "jail broken" to exploit agreeable opponents. We also offer pragmatic insight in how negotiation bots can be designed, and a framework of assessing negotiation behavior based on game theory and computational social science.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Assessing Social Alignment: Do Personality-Prompted Large Language Models Behave Like Humans?
Personality-prompted LLMs do not reliably behave in line with the ascribed Big Five traits in Ultimatum Game and Milgram-style tests, with trends sometimes reversing human patterns.
-
Measuring Social Influence with Networked Synthetic Control
Under a linear model, social value is exactly degree centrality times the social coefficient, and with interaction terms it becomes a weighted sum of neighbors' attributes.
-
Humanizing LLMs: A Survey of Psychological Measurements with Tools, Datasets, and Human-Agent Applications
A survey of six dimensions of LLM psychological assessment concludes that results are strongly affected by test design and remain inconsistent across models and settings.
-
From Individual to Society: A Survey on Social Simulation Driven by Large Language Model-based Agents
A structured survey that categorizes LLM-based social simulation into individual, scenario, and society simulation, with associated methods, benchmarks, and observed trends.
-
A Survey on Large Language Model-Based Social Agents in Game-Theoretic Scenarios
LLM-based game-playing agents are surveyed across choice-focused and communication-focused games, with a comparative performance table and future directions.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.