Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Doing Right by Not Doing Wrong in Human-Robot Collaboration

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2202.02654 v1 pith:MBQCKZHP submitted 2022-02-05 cs.RO cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.ROcs.AIcs.LG
keywords behaviorroboticconsiderdoingfairhuman-robothumansmanipulation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As robotic systems become more and more capable of assisting humans in their everyday lives, we must consider the opportunities for these artificial agents to make their human collaborators feel unsafe or to treat them unfairly. Robots can exhibit antisocial behavior causing physical harm to people or reproduce unfair behavior replicating and even amplifying historical and societal biases which are detrimental to humans they interact with. In this paper, we discuss these issues considering sociable robotic manipulation and fair robotic decision making. We propose a novel approach to learning fair and sociable behavior, not by reproducing positive behavior, but rather by avoiding negative behavior. In this study, we highlight the importance of incorporating sociability in robot manipulation, as well as the need to consider fairness in human-robot interactions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Designing for Difference: How Human Characteristics Shape Perceptions of Collaborative Robots

    cs.RO 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    In an online video study, people rated antisocial robot behavior as least acceptable, preferred handover over table placement, and judged collaborations with older adults more sensitively.

  2. Human-Centered Reflections on Care Robots: A Comparative Study of Caregiver Perspectives

    cs.RO 2026-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Caregivers across the US, Mexico, and Chile accept care robots mostly for logistics and physical assistance, while preferring human oversight for relational tasks.

Pith tools