Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Theory of Microphase Separation in Elastomers

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A swollen elastomer forms microdomains when molecular demixing and mesoscopic elasticity act at incompatible length scales; predicted size scales as Y^(−1/2) and ordering temperature drops linearly with stiffness, matching PDMS data.

desk verdict A clean scaling theory for elastic microphase separation; the central scalings are conditional on a fitted h, but the mechanism holds up. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.05910 v3 pith:MK76JM4I submitted 2024-12-08 cond-mat.soft cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.stat-mech

Manu Mannattil , Haim Diamant , David Andelman This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softcond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.stat-mech
keywords microphaseseparationelastomernonlocalelasticityphase-fieldmodelpolymernetworkLandau-Brazovskiifreeenergydomain-sizescalingrubber
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that microphase separation in an elastomer swollen with a solvent can arise purely from the disparity between two length scales: polymer-solvent demixing acts at molecular distances, while the polymer network responds elastically only to deformations larger than a mesoscopic coarse-graining length $h$. The model encodes this in a nonlocal elastic energy that, coupled to the composition field, produces the effective interaction $F_q = a(T-T^*) + \kappa q^2 + M e^{-h^2 q^2}$ in Fourier space; when the dimensionless elastocapillary parameter $\gamma = Mh^2/\kappa$ exceeds 1, this interaction is minimized at a nonzero wavenumber, so the system forms stable finite-sized domains instead of fully separating. Using rubber elasticity to tie $h$ to the network strand end-to-end distance $\xi \sim Y^{-1/2}$, the paper predicts the domain size scales as $\Lambda \sim Y^{-1/2}$ and the microphase separation temperature decreases linearly with the dry Young's modulus $Y$, both in good agreement with the PDMS experiments it sets out to explain. If correct, the model makes elastic stiffness the practical knob for stable, patterned elastomers, and places the phenomenon in the same universality class as block-copolymer microphase separation.

What carries the argument

The central object is the nonlocal elastic energy density $w(\varepsilon) = \frac{\lambda}{2}(\operatorname{tr}\varepsilon)(\operatorname{tr}\bar\varepsilon) + \mu\operatorname{tr}(\varepsilon\bar\varepsilon)$, in which the stress-producing strain $\bar\varepsilon$ is the convolution of the local strain $\varepsilon$ with an isotropic, normalized coarse-graining kernel $K_h$ of width $h$ (a Gaussian in the main text); only deformations larger than $h$ stress the network. Coupled to the order parameter $\psi$ through material conservation, $\operatorname{tr}\varepsilon \approx -\phi_*^{-1}\psi$, this energy becomes the Fourier-space binary interaction $F_q = a(T-T^*) + \kappa q^2 + M e^{-h^2 q^2}$, with $M = (\lambda+2\mu)/\phi_*^2$ the rescaled longitudinal modulus of the swollen elastomer. The dimensionless ratio $\gamma = Mh^2/\kappa$ — an inverse elastocapillary number — decides whether a microphase forms: $\gamma > 1$ puts the minimum of $F_q$ at $q_m = h^{-1}\sqrt{\ln\gamma}$, giving domains of size $\Lambda \sim 2\pi/q_m$, while $\gamma = 1$ is the Lifshitz point. The stiffness scalings then come from rubber elasticity, $h = n\xi$ with $\xi \sim (3B/Y)^{1/2}$ and $M \sim \frac{1}{3}\phi_*^{-5/3}Y$, which makes $\gamma$ independent of $Y$ and yields $\Lambda \sim Y^{-1/2}$ with $T_{\rm micro}$ linear in $Y$.

What would settle it

On the same PDMS samples, measure the structure-factor peak position $q_m$ by small-angle scattering during a temperature quench and independently determine the strand length $\xi$ from swelling or rheology. The model requires the product $q_m\xi$ to be a stiffness-independent constant equal to $\sqrt{\ln\gamma}/n$ with $n = 110$, so $q_m$ must grow as $Y^{1/2}$, and requires $\Lambda$ to keep following $Y^{-1/2}$ beyond the fitted 10–800 kPa range. A drift of $q_m\xi$ with stiffness, or a saturation of $\Lambda$ at extreme stiffnesses, would falsify the $h = n\xi$ premise and the scaling laws built on it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that the length-scale gap between thermodynamics and elasticity is sufficient, by itself, to select a finite pattern size in a swollen elastomer. The constitutive relation is nonlocal: the strain field is coarse-grained with a normalized kernel of width $h$, so deformations below $h$ do not stress the network, and this elastic energy is coupled to the local polymer volume fraction through material conservation, $\operatorname{tr}\varepsilon \approx -\phi_*^{-1}\psi$. The resulting quadratic free energy in Fourier space, $F_q = a(T-T^*) + \kappa q^2 + M e^{-h^2 q^2}$, pits an interfacial term favoring long wavelengths against an elastic term favoring short wavelengths; for $\gamma = Mh^2/\kappa > 1$ the competition yields a minimum at $q_m = h^{-1}\sqrt{\ln\gamma}$, selecting domains of size $\Lambda \sim 2\pi/q_m$. Setting the coarse-graining length by rubber elasticity, $h = n\xi$ with $\xi \sim (3B/Y)^{1/2}$, gives $\Lambda \sim Y^{-1/2}$ (Eq. 12), and linear-stability analysis gives $T_{\rm micro} = T^* - a^{-1}[3b\psi_0^2 + M\gamma^{-1}(1+\ln\gamma)]$ (Eq. 10), a linear decrease of the ordering temperature with stiffness. These scalings, together with the predicted phase diagram of uniform, stripe, droplet, and inverted-droplet phases (of Landau-Brazovskii type), are the claims the paper puts against experiment.

Load-bearing premise

The entire stiffness dependence rests on one premise: the length scale below which the network feels no strain, $h$, is a fixed multiple $n \approx 110$ of the end-to-end distance between crosslinks, $\xi$, which shrinks with stiffness as $Y^{-1/2}$; if $h$ were instead a fixed material length, the predicted $\Lambda \sim Y^{-1/2}$ scaling and the linear drop of the ordering temperature with $Y$ would both disappear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Pattern size becomes tunable by stiffness alone: Λ ~ Y^(−1/2) across the 10–800 kPa range of the PDMS experiments, so more densely crosslinked networks produce proportionally finer microdomains.
  • The microphase separation temperature falls linearly with Young's modulus, so stiffer elastomers need deeper temperature quenches before ordering begins — a quantitative constraint for fabricating patterned elastomers.
  • Because γ = Mh²/κ > 1 marks the Lifshitz point, the model predicts first-order transitions from the uniform state into droplet or stripe phases, with a phase diagram of the same generic topology as block-copolymer melts.
  • Written per network strand, the predictions are Λ ~ N^(1/2) and a T_micro linear in N^(−1) — the same scalings predicted earlier for crosslinked polymer blends, which the paper reads as evidence that such blends may also respond nonlocally to stress.
  • The static structure factor S(q) ~ 1/F_q peaks at the selected wavenumber and grows smoothly as the temperature approaches T_micro, so a quench should show scattering intensity rising at a fixed wavenumber, as the experiments show.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The constant n = 110 is fitted to the same domain-size data, so the model's absolute Λ is not predicted from independent inputs; measuring the coarse-graining scale directly — say from the structure-factor peak width or the correlation length — would reveal whether n is a universal material constant or an absorbent fitting parameter.
  • Because this model predicts S(0) ≠ 0 where an earlier theory of crosslinked polymer blends predicted S(0) = 0, small-angle scattering on such blends would be a direct experimental discriminator of whether their elastic response is genuinely nonlocal.
  • The paper's mean-field phase diagram does not yield the bicontinuous structures seen at high stiffness, and the authors attribute this to neglected shear or nonlinear effects; a testable extension is to impose a controlled pre-strain on a stiff sample and look for the droplet phase converting into bicontinuous morphology.
  • The free energy reduces to Landau-Brazovskii form, so thermal fluctuations of the kind that suppress the mean-field critical point in other modulated-phase systems should act here as well; a numerical or experimental check would be whether the transition at T'_* becomes weakly first-order and whether gyroid-like bicontinuous phases appear at high stiffness.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a phase-field model for microphase separation in solvent-swollen elastomers, in which the elastic response is nonlocal: deformations occurring on scales below a coarse-graining length h do not stress the elastomer. The effective Fourier-space interaction is F_q = a(T-T*) + κ q^2 + M exp(-h^2 q^2), which acquires a minimum at finite q when γ = M h^2/κ > 1, giving stable finite-sized domains. Identifying h with nξ, where ξ is the network strand end-to-end distance and ξ ~ (3B/Y)^{1/2} from rubber elasticity, the paper predicts Λ ~ Y^{-1/2} and a linear decrease of the microphase-separation temperature Tmicro with Young's modulus Y. These predictions are compared with the experiments of Fernández-Rico et al. (Nat. Mater. 2024). The paper also constructs mean-field phase diagrams with uniform, droplet, and stripe phases, supported by numerical energy minimization.

Significance. The model provides an elegant and analytically transparent mechanism for elasticity-controlled microphase separation, with the nonlocal elastic energy giving a physical justification for the emergent long-range interaction. The scaling laws are concrete and falsifiable, and the kernel-independence proof in the Supplemental Material is a notable strength. The numerical implementation is openly available, and the connection to Landau–Brazovskii theory and block-copolymer phase diagrams places the work in a broad context. However, the quantitative agreement with experiments is heavily dependent on fitted parameters (n, T*, φ*, a, b), and the phase diagram does not reproduce the bicontinuous morphologies observed in stiff elastomers. The core scaling exponent Λ ~ Y^{-1/2} is a genuine conditional prediction, but the magnitude of Λ is set by the fitted n, and the Tmicro comparison is largely a consistency check.

major comments (3)
  1. [Comparison to experiments, Eq. (12) and Fig. 2(a)] The absolute magnitude of the predicted domain size Λ is fixed by the fitting parameter n=110 in h=nξ, and n is inferred from the same domain-size data that the theory claims to explain. Consequently, the good agreement for the absolute values of Λ in Fig. 2(a) is partly by construction. The Y^{-1/2} slope is a genuine prediction of the h∝ξ assumption, but the manuscript should state explicitly that only the slope is predicted, not the overall magnitude. Please provide an independent estimate or constraint on n (e.g., from the number of strands per domain) or report the uncertainty in n obtained from the fit.
  2. [Comparison to experiments, Eq. (10) and Fig. 2(b)] Equation (10) is evaluated using T*=70°C, φ*=0.2, a=0.025 kPa/K, and b=2 kPa, with T* and φ* estimated from the Tmicro data and a and b adjusted to match the experiments. Since the crosses in Fig. 2(b) also use the experimental φ0(Y) relation, the apparent linear decrease of Tmicro with Y is a consistency check rather than a parameter-free prediction. Please quantify the sensitivity of the crosses to the fitted parameters and, if possible, determine T*, φ*, a, and b from independent swelling or phase-equilibrium data.
  3. [Phase diagram, Fig. 3(a) and surrounding text] The model predicts uniform, droplet, and stripe phases, but the experimental system exhibits bicontinuous microstructures in the stiffest samples. The authors acknowledge this and attribute it to shear or nonlinear effects, which is a reasonable limitation. However, the abstract claims that the analytical phase diagrams "capture the richness of the microphase morphologies," which is stronger than what the model delivers. The text should either temper that claim or provide a concrete mechanism (e.g., the fluctuation-induced gyroid scenario mentioned in SM Sec. IV) with a qualitative parameter estimate for the occurrence of bicontinuous structures.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 1 caption] The phrase "we chooseh as a multiple" should read "we choose h as a multiple" (missing space).
  2. [Table I] The entry for the quartic coefficient b reads "2 kPa K^{-1}"; the correct units are kPa, since b appears in the free-energy density as (1/4)bψ^4 with ψ dimensionless.
  3. [After Eq. (10)] The statement "Tmicro decreases linearly with the modulus M" is strictly true only when ψ0 is held fixed; in the experimental comparison ψ0 varies with Y through φ0. Please rephrase as "for fixed ψ0" or clarify the dependence.
  4. [Supplemental Material, Sec. IV] The notation "B µE" contains an awkward space; it should be written as a single symbol, e.g., "BμE".
  5. [Comparison to experiments, paragraph before Eq. (12)] The sentence "With the choice h=nξ, the parameter γ is independent of Y" would benefit from a brief explanation, since γ = M h^2/κ involves both M~Y and h^2~Y^{-1}.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

Central Y^{-1/2} and linear-Tmicro scalings are genuine, but the absolute domain size and Tmicro intercept are anchored by parameters fitted to the same experimental data (n=110; T*, phi*), making the quantitative agreement partly enforced.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Eq. (12) and Fig. 2(a) caption]
    "The dashed line represents the prediction from Eq. (12) with κ = 0.013 kPa µm2 and fitting parameters n = 110, ϕ∗ = 0.2."

    Eq. (12) contains n^2 as the prefactor of the predicted domain size Λ, and n=110 is fitted to the same Λ-versus-Y data shown in Fig. 2(a). The absolute magnitude of the 'prediction' is therefore set by the fit rather than derived from independent inputs. The Y^{-1/2} scaling exponent is independent of n and remains a genuine model prediction; only the prefactor is circular.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Eq. (10) and 'Comparison to experiments' paragraph]
    "Using the Tmicro data, one can estimate the parameters (ϕ∗, T∗) appearing in Eq. (5)."

    T* enters Eq. (10) as an additive constant of Tmicro, and φ* sets ψ0=φ0-φ* and the modulus M through Eq. (S18). Estimating these parameters from the same Tmicro data anchors the comparison in Fig. 2(b). The linear decrease with Y is not fitted, but the absolute Tmicro curve is not parameter-free. The paper discloses this fitting, which mitigates but does not eliminate the circularity.

full rationale

The paper's core mechanism—nonlocal elasticity competing with interfacial energy to select a finite q_m—is derived self-consistently from the free energy in Eqs. (4)-(9), and the kernel-independence argument in SM Sec. V shows that q_m~h^{-1} and Tmicro linear in Y follow for any kernel once h~ξ~Y^{-1/2} and M~Y. These are genuine, non-circular predictions. The circularity burden lies in the quantitative comparison: the proportionality constant n in h=nξ is fitted to the same domain-size data used to test Eq. (12), and T*, φ* (plus a and b) are estimated from the Tmicro data used to test Eq. (10). Thus the absolute magnitude of Λ and the intercept of Tmicro are partly enforced by construction, although the Y^{-1/2} and linear-in-Y scalings are independent content. There is no load-bearing self-citation chain or imported uniqueness theorem; the fitting is disclosed in the captions and text. Score 5 reflects partial circularity in the fitted prefactors rather than a fully circular derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model rests on phantom-network rubber elasticity, the h=nξ scaling assumption, a Landau mixing free energy, and the neglect of shear modes; the constants n, T*, φ*, a, and b are fitted or adjusted to the experimental data, while κ is estimated from kBT/l. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (6)
  • n = 110
    Average number of crosslinks coarse-grained over; fitted to the domain-size data in Fig. 2(a) to set the magnitude of Λ; not independently measured.
  • T* = 70 C
    Critical temperature in the Landau free energy; the text says it is estimated using the Tmicro data.
  • φ* = 0.2
    Critical volume fraction; estimated using the Tmicro data together with T*.
  • a = 0.025 kPa/K
    Quadratic Landau coefficient; chosen to reproduce the Tmicro scale and phase-diagram temperatures; no independent measurement is cited.
  • b = 2 kPa
    Quartic Landau coefficient; chosen with a to reproduce the experimental temperature window.
  • κ = 0.013 kPa μm^2
    Estimated as kBT/ℓ, so it is not fitted to the target data, but it is an order-of-magnitude estimate that affects γ and ln γ.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The PDMS elastomers obey classical phantom-network rubber elasticity with negligible entanglement contributions.
    SM Sec. II A justifies this from indentation data in Fig. S1, where Y extrapolates to zero with crosslinker concentration; the derivation of M~Y and ξ~Y^{-1/2} relies on this.
  • ad hoc to paper The coarse-graining length h is proportional to the strand end-to-end distance ξ, h=nξ, with a Y-independent constant n.
    Introduced after Eq. (11) of the Letter; it is the premise that converts ξ~Y^{-1/2} into Λ~Y^{-1/2} and makes γ independent of Y. The value n=110 is fitted, so this premise is not independently verified.
  • domain assumption Compositional changes occur primarily by solvent diffusion, so shear deformations decouple and can be dropped from the elastic energy.
    Stated after Eq. (6) and in SM Eq. (S7); the neglect of shear is acknowledged as a possible cause of the missing bicontinuous phase.
  • domain assumption The polymer-solvent mixing free energy is a Landau expansion about a critical point, f(ψ)=a(T-T*)ψ^2/2 + bψ^4/4, with constant coefficients a and b.
    Eq. (5); this phenomenological input is not derived from a molecular equation of state, and a,b are adjusted to match the experimental temperature scale.
  • standard math The nonlocal kernel is an isotropic, normalized, positive-definite kernel from a scaled probability-density family with finite second moment.
    SM Sec. V; the kernel-independence proof for Λ~Y^{-1/2} and Tmicro linear in Y holds for this class of kernels, which includes the Gaussian kernel used in the main text.
  • domain assumption Weak segregation and one-mode modulations are sufficient to describe the phase diagram near the critical point.
    SM Sec. III; the one-mode approximation captures uniform, stripe, droplet, and inverted droplet phases, but not bicontinuous morphologies seen in stiff samples.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Theory of Microphase Separation in Elastomers." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MK76JM4I

@misc{pith2026241205910,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Theory of Microphase Separation in Elastomers},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MK76JM4I}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.05910}
}
read the original abstract

Inspired by recent experiments, we present a phase-field model of microphase separation in an elastomer swollen with a solvent. The imbalance between the molecular scale of demixing and the mesoscopic scale beyond which elasticity operates produces effective long-range interactions, forming stable finite-sized domains. Our predictions concerning the dependence of the domain size and transition temperature on the stiffness of the elastomer are in good agreement with the experiments. Analytical phase diagrams, aided by numerical findings, capture the richness of the microphase morphologies, paving the way to create stable, patterned elastomers for various applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.05910 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Displacements [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Domain size Λ as a function of the Young’s modulus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Phase diagram in the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Thermodynamics of microphase separation in a swollen, strain-stiffening polymer network

    cond-mat.soft 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Adding strain-stiffening elasticity to Flory-Huggins theory quantitatively predicts the phase boundaries of elastic microphase separation in swollen polymer networks from independently measured mechanical and solubility data.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

112 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    J. W. Cahn, On spinodal decomposition, Acta Metall. 9, 795 (1961)

    1961

  2. [2]

    Fratzl, O

    P. Fratzl, O. Penrose, and J. L. Lebowitz, Modeling of phase separation in alloys with coherent elastic misfit, J. Stat. Phys. 95, 1429 (1999)

    1999

  3. [3]

    Rabin and S

    Y. Rabin and S. Panyukov, Scattering profiles of charged gels: Frozen inhomogeneities, thermal fluctuations, and microphase separation, Macromolecules 30, 301 (1997)

    1997

  4. [4]

    Peleg, M

    O. Peleg, M. Kr¨ oger, I. Hecht, and Y. Rabin, Filamentous networks in phase-separating two-dimensional gels, EPL 77, 58007 (2007)

    2007

  5. [5]

    Dervaux and M

    J. Dervaux and M. B. Amar, Mechanical instabilities of gels, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 3, 311 (2012)

    2012

  6. [6]

    Loudet, P

    J.-C. Loudet, P. Barois, and P. Poulin, Colloidal ordering from phase separation in a liquid-crystalline continuous phase, Nature 407, 611 (2000)

    2000

  7. [7]

    J.-M. Choi, A. S. Holehouse, and R. V. Pappu, Physical principles underlying the complex biology of intracellular phase transitions, Annu. Rev. Biophys. 49, 107 (2020)

    2020

  8. [8]

    Tanaka, Viscoelastic phase separation in biological cells, Commun

    H. Tanaka, Viscoelastic phase separation in biological cells, Commun. Phys. 5, 167 (2022)

    2022

Show all 112 references
  1. [9]

    D. S. W. Lee, A. R. Strom, and C. P. Brangwynne, The mechanobiology of nuclear phase separation, APL Bioeng. 6, 021503 (2022)

    2022

  2. [10]

    Kumar and S

    A. Kumar and S. A. Safran, Fluctuations and shape dependence of microphase separation in systems with long-range interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 258401 (2023)

    2023

  3. [11]

    Deviri and S

    D. Deviri and S. A. Safran, Mechanosensitivity of phase separation in an elastic gel, Eur. Phys. J. E 47, 16 (2024)

    2024

  4. [12]

    R. W. Style, T. Sai, N. Fanelli, M. Ijavi, K. Smith- Mannschott, Q. Xu, L. A. Wilen, and E. R. Dufresne, Liquid-liquid phase separation in an elastic network, Phys. Rev. X 8, 011028 (2018)

    2018

  5. [13]

    K. A. Rosowski, T. Sai, E. Vidal-Henriquez, D. Zwicker, R. W. Style, and E. R. Dufresne, Elastic ripening and inhibition of liquid-liquid phase separation, Nat. Phys. 16, 422 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    K. A. Rosowski, E. Vidal-Henriquez, D. Zwicker, R. W. Style, and E. R. Dufresne, Elastic stresses reverse ostwald ripening, Soft Matter 16, 5892 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    Wilken, A

    S. Wilken, A. Chaderjian, and O. A. Saleh, Spatial organization of phase-separated DNA droplets, Phys. Rev. X 13, 031014 (2023)

    2023

  8. [16]

    J. X. Liu, M. P. Haataja, A. Koˇ smrlj, S. S. Datta, C. B. Arnold, and R. D. Priestley, Liquid-liquid phase separa- tion within fibrillar networks, Nat. Commun. 14, 6085 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    Ren and L

    X. Ren and L. Truskinovsky, Finite scale microstructures in nonlocal elasticity, J. Elast. 59, 319 (2000)

    2000

  10. [18]

    Kothari and T

    M. Kothari and T. Cohen, Effect of elasticity on phase separation in heterogeneous systems, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 145, 104153 (2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    X. Wei, J. Zhou, Y. Wang, and F. Meng, Modeling elastically mediated liquid-liquid phase separation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 268001 (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    Ronceray, S

    P. Ronceray, S. Mao, A. Koˇ smrlj, and M. P. Haataja, Liquid demixing in elastic networks: Cavitation, perme- ation, or size selection?, EPL 137, 67001 (2022)

    2022

  13. [21]

    Biswas, B

    S. Biswas, B. Mukherjee, and B. Chakrabarti, Thermody- namics predicts a stable microdroplet phase in polymer- gel mixtures undergoing elastic phase separation, Soft Matter 18, 8117 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    Little, A

    J. Little, A. J. Levine, A. R. Singh, and R. Bruinsma, Finite-strain elasticity theory and liquid-liquid phase sep- aration in compressible gels, Phys. Rev. E 107, 024418 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    Grabovsky and L

    Y. Grabovsky and L. Truskinovsky, A class of nonlin- ear elasticity problems with no local but many global minimizers, J. Elast. 154, 147 (2023)

    2023

  16. [24]

    Fern´ andez-Rico, S

    C. Fern´ andez-Rico, S. Schreiber, H. Oudich, C. Lorenz, A. Sicher, T. Sai, V. Bauernfeind, S. Heyden, P. Carrara, L. D. Lorenzis, R. W. Style, and E. R. Dufresne, Elas- tic microphase separation produces robust bicontinuous materials, Nat. Mater. 23, 124 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Tanaka, S

    T. Tanaka, S. Ishiwata, and C. Ishimoto, Critical behav- ior of density fluctuations in gels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 771 (1977)

    1977

  18. [26]

    Tanaka, Dynamics of critical concentration fluctua- tions in gels, Phys

    T. Tanaka, Dynamics of critical concentration fluctua- tions in gels, Phys. Rev. A 17, 763 (1978). 5

    1978

  19. [27]

    Li and T

    Y. Li and T. Tanaka, Study of the universality class of the gel network system, J. Chem. Phys. 90, 5161 (1989)

    1989

  20. [28]

    Onuki, Theory of phase transition in polymer gels, in Responsive Gels: Volume Transitions I , edited by K

    A. Onuki, Theory of phase transition in polymer gels, in Responsive Gels: Volume Transitions I , edited by K. Duˇ sek (Springer, Berlin, 1993) pp. 63–121

    1993

  21. [29]

    Nishimori and A

    H. Nishimori and A. Onuki, Pattern formation in phase- separating alloys with cubic symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 42, 980 (1990)

    1990

  22. [30]

    Vidal-Henriquez and D

    E. Vidal-Henriquez and D. Zwicker, Cavitation controls droplet sizes in elastic media, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, e2102014118 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    Qiang, C

    Y. Qiang, C. Luo, and D. Zwicker, Nonlocal elasticity yields equilibrium patterns in phase separating systems, Phys. Rev. X 14, 021009 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    Eringen, C

    A. Eringen, C. Speziale, and B. Kim, Crack-tip problem in non-local elasticity, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 25, 339 (1977)

    1977

  25. [33]

    A. C. Eringen, Theory of nonlocal elasticity and some applications, Res Mech. 21, 313 (1987)

    1987

  26. [34]

    Polizzotto, P

    C. Polizzotto, P. Fuschi, and A. Pisano, A strain- difference-based nonlocal elasticity model, Int. J. Solids Struct. 41, 2383 (2004)

    2004

  27. [35]

    N. J. Derr, D. C. Fronk, C. A. Weber, A. Mahadevan, C. H. Rycroft, and L. Mahadevan, Flow-driven branching in a frangible porous medium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 158002 (2020)

    2020

  28. [36]

    Skoruppa, A

    E. Skoruppa, A. Voorspoels, J. Vreede, and E. Carlon, Length-scale-dependent elasticity in DNA from coarse- grained and all-atom models, Phys. Rev. E 103, 042408 (2021)

    2021

  29. [37]

    Rubinstein and R

    M. Rubinstein and R. H. Colby,Polymer Physics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003)

    2003

  30. [38]

    Tanaka, Polymer Physics: Applications to Molecular Association and Thermoreversible Gelation (Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 2011)

    F. Tanaka, Polymer Physics: Applications to Molecular Association and Thermoreversible Gelation (Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 2011)

    2011

  31. [39]

    T. P. Lodge and P. C. Hiemenz, Polymer Chemistry , 3rd ed. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2020)

    2020

  32. [40]

    M. S. Dimitriyev, Y.-W. Chang, P. M. Goldbart, and A. Fern´ andez-Nieves, Swelling thermodynamics and phase transitions of polymer gels, Nano Futures3, 042001 (2019)

    2019

  33. [41]

    Doi, Gel dynamics, J

    M. Doi, Gel dynamics, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 78, 052001 (2009)

    2009

  34. [42]

    [43– 68], for further details on (i) the material conservation relation [Eq

    See the Supplemental Material, which includes Refs. [43– 68], for further details on (i) the material conservation relation [Eq. (6)] and the free energy [Eq. (7)], (ii) com- parison with experiments and derivations of Eqs. (11) and (12), (iii) general phase diagrams, (iv) flu...

  35. [43]

    Gonzalez and A

    O. Gonzalez and A. M. Stuart, A First Course in Con- tinuum Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 2008)

    2008

  36. [44]

    W. H. Han, F. Horkay, and G. B. McKenna, Mechanical and swelling behaviors of rubber: A comparison of some molecular models with experiment, Math. Mech. Solids 4, 139 (1999)

    1999

  37. [45]

    J. F. Douglas and G. B. McKenna, The effect of swelling on the elasticity of rubber: localization model descrip- tion, Macromolecules 26, 3282 (1993)

    1993

  38. [46]

    G. B. McKenna, J. F. Douglas, K. M. Flynn, and Y. Chen, The ‘localization model’ of rubber elasticity: comparison with torsional data for natural rubber net- works in the dry state, Polymer 32, 2128 (1991)

    1991

  39. [47]

    P. J. Flory, Statistical thermodynamics of random net- works, Proc. R. Soc. A 351, 351 (1976)

    1976

  40. [48]

    H. M. James and E. Guth, Theory of the elasticity of rubber, J. Appl. Phys. 15, 294 (1944)

    1944

  41. [49]

    S. D. Reinitz, E. M. Carlson, R. A. Levine, K. J. Franklin, and D. W. Van Citters, Dynamical mechanical analysis as an assay of cross-link density of orthopaedic ultra high molecular weight polyethylene, Polym. Test. 45, 174 (2015)

    2015

  42. [50]

    Onuki, Theory of pattern formation in gels: Surface folding in highly compressible elastic bodies, Phys

    A. Onuki, Theory of pattern formation in gels: Surface folding in highly compressible elastic bodies, Phys. Rev. A 39, 5932 (1989)

    1989

  43. [51]

    Jia and M

    D. Jia and M. Muthukumar, Theory of charged gels: Swelling, elasticity, and dynamics, Gels 7, 49 (2021)

    2021

  44. [52]

    J. E. Mark, Some interesting things about polysiloxanes, Acc. Chem. Res. 37, 946 (2004)

    2004

  45. [53]

    Villain-Guillot and D

    S. Villain-Guillot and D. Andelman, The lamellar- disorder interface: one-dimensional modulated profiles, Eur. Phys. J. B 4, 95 (1998)

    1998

  46. [54]

    Thiele, T

    U. Thiele, T. Frohoff-H¨ ulsmann, S. Engelnkemper, E. Knobloch, and A. J. Archer, First order phase tran- sitions and the thermodynamic limit, New J. Phys. 21, 123021 (2019)

    2019

  47. [55]

    Komura and D

    S. Komura and D. Andelman, Adhesion-induced lateral phase separation in membranes, Eur. Phys. J. E 3, 259 (2000)

    2000

  48. [56]

    P. M. Chaikin and T. C. Lubensky, Principles of Con- densed Matter Physics (Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 1995)

    1995

  49. [57]

    Yamada and S

    K. Yamada and S. Komura, The dynamics of order-order phase separation, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 20, 155107 (2008)

    2008

  50. [58]

    Onuki, Paradox in phase transitions with volume change, Phys

    A. Onuki, Paradox in phase transitions with volume change, Phys. Rev. A 38, 2192 (1988)

    1988

  51. [59]

    Hirotsu, Softening of bulk modulus and negative Pois- son’s ratio near the volume phase transition of polymer gels, J

    S. Hirotsu, Softening of bulk modulus and negative Pois- son’s ratio near the volume phase transition of polymer gels, J. Chem. Phys. 94, 3949 (1991)

    1991

  52. [60]

    T. Koga, T. Koga, K. Kimishima, and T. Hashimoto, Long-range density fluctuations in a symmetric diblock copolymer, Phys. Rev. E 60, R3501 (1999)

    1999

  53. [61]

    Komura and N

    S. Komura and N. Shimokawa, Dynamical Brazovskii effect, Soft Mater. 6, 85 (2008)

    2008

  54. [62]

    I. W. Hamley and V. E. Podneks, On the Landau– Brazovskii theory for block copolymer melts, Macro- molecules 30, 3701 (1997)

    1997

  55. [63]

    J. M. Aguirregabiria, A. Hern´ andez, and M. Rivas,δ- function converging sequences, Am. J. Phys. 70, 180 (2002)

    2002

  56. [64]

    Bray, Theory of phase-ordering kinetics, Adv

    A. Bray, Theory of phase-ordering kinetics, Adv. Phys. 43, 357 (1994)

    1994

  57. [65]

    D. J. Eyre, An Unconditionally Stable One-Step Scheme for Gradient Systems , Tech. Rep. (University of Utah, 1998)

    1998

  58. [66]

    B. P. Vollmayr-Lee and A. D. Rutenberg, Fast and ac- curate coarsening simulation with an unconditionally stable time step, Phys. Rev. E 68, 066703 (2003)

    2003

  59. [67]

    S. Yoon, D. Jeong, C. Lee, H. Kim, S. Kim, H. G. Lee, and J. Kim, Fourier-spectral method for the phase-field equations, Mathematics 8, 1385 (2020)

    2020

  60. [68]

    https://github.com/manu-mannattil/elastomers

  61. [69]

    Horkay and J

    F. Horkay and J. F. Douglas, Influence of solvent quality on the swelling and deswelling and the shear modulus of semi-dilute solution cross-linked poly(vinyl acetate) gels, J. Chem. Phys. 158, 244901 (2023). 6

    2023

  62. [70]

    Onuki and S

    A. Onuki and S. Puri, Spinodal decomposition in gels, Phys. Rev. E 59, R1331 (1999)

    1999

  63. [71]

    Onuki, Phase Transition Dynamics (Cambridge Uni- versity Press, Cambridge, 2002)

    A. Onuki, Phase Transition Dynamics (Cambridge Uni- versity Press, Cambridge, 2002)

    2002

  64. [72]

    Yamaue, T

    T. Yamaue, T. Taniguchi, and M. Doi, Shrinking dy- namics and patterns of gels, AIP Conf. Proc. 519, 584 (2000)

    2000

  65. [73]

    Yamaue, T

    T. Yamaue, T. Taniguchi, and M. Doi, The simulation of the swelling and deswelling dynamics of gels, Mol. Phys. 102, 167 (2004)

    2004

  66. [74]

    Rabin and A

    Y. Rabin and A. Onuki, Osmotic and longitudinal moduli of polymer gels, Macromolecules 27, 870 (1994)

    1994

  67. [75]

    J. F. Doyle, Wave Propagation in Structures , 3rd ed. (Springer, New York, NY, 2021)

    2021

  68. [76]

    Q. Liu, T. Ouchi, L. Jin, R. Hayward, and Z. Suo, Elastocapillary crease, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 098003 (2019)

    2019

  69. [77]

    R. M. Hornreich, M. Luban, and S. Shtrikman, Critical behavior at the onset of ⃗k-space instability on the λ line, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 1678 (1975)

    1975

  70. [78]

    Onuki, Phase transition in deformed gels, J

    A. Onuki, Phase transition in deformed gels, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 57, 699 (1988)

    1988

  71. [79]

    R. J. Gaylord and J. F. Douglas, Rubber elasticity: a scaling approach, Polym. Bull. 18, 347 (1987)

    1987

  72. [80]

    R. J. Gaylord and J. F. Douglas, The localisation model of rubber elasticity. II, Polym. Bull. 23, 529 (1990)

    1990

  73. [81]

    J. F. Douglas, The localization model of rubber elasticity, Macromol. Symp. 291, 230 (2010)

    2010

  74. [82]

    J. F. Douglas and F. Horkay, Influence of swelling on the elasticity of polymer networks cross-linked in the melt state: Test of the localization model of rubber elasticity, J. Chem. Phys. 160, 224903 (2024)

    2024

  75. [83]

    Canal and N

    T. Canal and N. A. Peppas, Correlation between mesh size and equilibrium degree of swelling of polymeric networks, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 23, 1183 (1989)

    1989

  76. [84]

    S. H. Yoo, C. Cohen, and C.-Y. Hui, Mechanical and swelling properties of PDMS interpenetrating polymer networks, Polymer 47, 6226 (2006)

    2006

  77. [85]

    Parrish, M

    E. Parrish, M. A. Caporizzo, and R. J. Composto, Net- work confinement and heterogeneity slows nanoparticle diffusion in polymer gels, J. Chem. Phys. 146, 203318 (2017)

    2017

  78. [86]

    N. R. Richbourg and N. A. Peppas, The swollen polymer network hypothesis: Quantitative models of hydrogel swelling, stiffness, and solute transport, Prog. Polym. Sci. 105, 101243 (2020)

    2020

  79. [87]

    Leibler and D

    S. Leibler and D. Andelman, Ordered and curved meso- structures in membranes and amphiphilic films, J. Phys. France 48, 2013 (1987)

    1987

  80. [88]

    M. A. Wisniewska, J. G. Seland, and W. Wang, De- termining the scaling of gel mesh size with changing crosslinker concentration using dynamic swelling, rheom- etry, and PGSE NMR spectroscopy, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 135, 46695 (2018)

    2018

  81. [89]

    Tsuji, X

    Y. Tsuji, X. Li, and M. Shibayama, Evaluation of mesh size in model polymer networks consisting of tetra-arm and linear poly(ethylene glycol)s, Gels 4, 50 (2018)

    2018

  82. [90]

    Seul and D

    M. Seul and D. Andelman, Domain shapes and patterns: The phenomenology of modulated phases, Science 267, 476 (1995)

    1995

  83. [91]

    Andelman and R

    D. Andelman and R. E. Rosensweig, Modulated phases: Review and recent results, J. Phys. Chem. B 113, 3785 (2009)

    2009

  84. [92]

    Leibler, Theory of microphase separation in block copolymers, Macromolecules 13, 1602 (1980)

    L. Leibler, Theory of microphase separation in block copolymers, Macromolecules 13, 1602 (1980)

    1980

  85. [93]

    G. H. Fredrickson and E. Helfand, Fluctuation effects in the theory of microphase separation in block copolymers, J. Chem. Phys. 87, 697 (1987)

    1987

  86. [94]

    Garel and S

    T. Garel and S. Doniach, Phase transitions with sponta- neous modulation-the dipolar Ising ferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 26, 325 (1982)

    1982

  87. [95]

    Andelman, F

    D. Andelman, F. Bro¸ chard, and J.-F. Joanny, Phase transitions in Langmuir monolayers of polar molecules, J. Chem. Phys. 86, 3673 (1987)

    1987

  88. [96]

    K. R. Elder and M. Grant, Modeling elastic and plastic deformations in nonequilibrium processing using phase field crystals, Phys. Rev. E 70, 051605 (2004)

    2004

  89. [97]

    Provatas and K

    N. Provatas and K. Elder, Phase-Field Methods in Ma- terials Science and Engineering (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2011)

    2011

  90. [98]

    R. M. Briber and B. J. Bauer, Effect of crosslinks on the phase separation behavior of a miscible polymer blend, Macromolecules 21, 3296 (1988)

    1988

  91. [99]

    D. J. Read, M. G. Brereton, and T. C. McLeish, Theory of the order-disorder phase transition in cross-linked polymer blends, J. Phys. II France 5, 1679 (1995)

    1995

  92. [100]

    P. G. de Gennes, Effect of cross-links on a mixture of polymers, J. Phys. Lett. 40, 69 (1979)

    1979

  93. [101]

    S. A. Brazovskii, Phase transition of an isotropic system to a nonuniform state, Sov. Phys. JETP 41, 85 (1975)

    1975

  94. [102]

    F. S. Bates, W. Maurer, T. P. Lodge, M. F. Schulz, M. W. Matsen, K. Almdal, and K. Mortensen, Isotropic Lifshitz behavior in block copolymer-homopolymer blends, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4429 (1995)

    1995

  95. [103]

    F. S. Bates, W. W. Maurer, P. M. Lipic, M. A. Hillmyer, K. Almdal, K. Mortensen, G. H. Fredrickson, and T. P. Lodge, Polymeric bicontinuous microemulsions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 849 (1997)

    1997

  96. [104]

    Teubner and R

    M. Teubner and R. Strey, Origin of the scattering peak in microemulsions, J. Chem. Phys. 87, 3195 (1987)

    1987

  97. [105]

    Komura, Mesoscale structures in microemulsions, J

    S. Komura, Mesoscale structures in microemulsions, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19, 463101 (2007)

    2007

  98. [106]

    Y. Li, G. Wang, and Z. Hu, Turbidity study of spinodal decomposition of an n-isopropylacrylamide gel, Macro- molecules 28, 4194 (1995)

    1995

  99. [107]

    Y. Zhao, T. Hashimoto, and J. F. Douglas, Frustrating the lamellar ordering transition of polystyrene-block- polyisoprene with a C60 additive, J. Chem. Phys. 130, 124901 (2009)

    2009

  100. [108]

    Ghosh, A

    S. Ghosh, A. Mukherjee, R. Arroyave, and J. F. Douglas, Impact of particle arrays on phase separation composi- tion patterns, J. Chem. Phys. 152, 224902 (2020)

    2020

  101. [109]

    Ghosh and J

    S. Ghosh and J. F. Douglas, Phase separation in the pres- ence of fractal aggregates, J. Chem. Phys. 160, 104903 (2024)

    2024

  102. [110]

    Duˇ sek and M

    K. Duˇ sek and M. Duˇ skov´ a-Smrˇ ckov´ a, Volume phase transition in gels: Its discovery and development, Gels 6, 22 (2020)

    2020

  103. [111]

    Mussel, P

    M. Mussel, P. J. Basser, and F. Horkay, Ion-induced volume transition in gels and its role in biology, Gels 7, 20 (2021). 7 Supplemental Material: Theory of Microphase Separation in Elastomers Manu Mannattil,1,2,3 Haim Diamant,1,3 and David Andelman2,3 1School of Chemistry, Te...

    2021

  104. [112]

    inverted

    (S25) S5 (b) (d) (c) (e) −0.6 −0.4 −0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 φ0 −2.7 −2.6 −2.5 −2.4 −2.3 −2.2 −2.1 −2.0 T (b) (c) (d) (e) S + D D D + UID + SIDU + ID S UU T ′∗ (a) FIG. S2. (a) General phase diagram in the ( ϕ0,T ) plane obtained by choosing general, unitless parameters T∗ = ϕ∗ = 0...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.