Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Emerging Safety Attack and Defense in Federated Instruction Tuning of Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.10630 v1 pith:MRYFWNTX submitted 2024-06-15 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CRcs.MA

Emerging Safety Attack and Defense in Federated Instruction Tuning of Large Language Models

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.CRcs.MA
keywords safetyattackdefensedataalignmentmethodfederatedfedit
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Federated learning (FL) enables multiple parties to collaboratively fine-tune an large language model (LLM) without the need of direct data sharing. Ideally, by training on decentralized data that is aligned with human preferences and safety principles, federated instruction tuning can result in an LLM that could behave in a helpful and safe manner. In this paper, we for the first time reveal the vulnerability of safety alignment in FedIT by proposing a simple, stealthy, yet effective safety attack method. Specifically, the malicious clients could automatically generate attack data without involving manual efforts and attack the FedIT system by training their local LLMs on such attack data. Unfortunately, this proposed safety attack not only can compromise the safety alignment of LLM trained via FedIT, but also can not be effectively defended against by many existing FL defense methods. Targeting this, we further propose a post-hoc defense method, which could rely on a fully automated pipeline: generation of defense data and further fine-tuning of the LLM. Extensive experiments show that our safety attack method can significantly compromise the LLM's safety alignment (e.g., reduce safety rate by 70\%), which can not be effectively defended by existing defense methods (at most 4\% absolute improvement), while our safety defense method can significantly enhance the attacked LLM's safety alignment (at most 69\% absolute improvement).

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Palette: A Modular, Controllable, and Efficient Framework for On-demand Authorized Safety Alignment Relaxation in LLMs

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Palette identifies refusal directions via multi-objective search, internalizes them through lightweight adaptation, and supports on-demand multi-domain authorization via independent learning and parameter merging.

  2. Graph Representation Learning Augmented Model Manipulation on Federated Fine-Tuning of LLMs

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Graph representation learning plus iterative augmented Lagrangian optimization creates stronger, harder-to-detect model manipulation attacks on federated LLM fine-tuning, cutting global accuracy by up to 26%.

  3. Graph Representation Learning Augmented Model Manipulation on Federated Fine-Tuning of LLMs

    cs.LG 2026-05 conditional novelty 5.0

    Graph-learned, Lagrangian-constrained malicious LoRA updates can degrade federated LLM accuracy by up to 26% while matching benign distance and cosine statistics.

  4. FedDetox: Robust Federated SLM Alignment via On-Device Data Sanitization

    cs.CR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    FedDetox uses on-device knowledge-distilled classifiers to sanitize toxic data in federated SLM training, preserving safety alignment comparable to centralized baselines.