REVIEW 2 cited by
Regularizing Action Policies for Smooth Control with Reinforcement Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Regularizing Action Policies for Smooth Control with Reinforcement Learning
read the original abstract
A critical problem with the practical utility of controllers trained with deep Reinforcement Learning (RL) is the notable lack of smoothness in the actions learned by the RL policies. This trend often presents itself in the form of control signal oscillation and can result in poor control, high power consumption, and undue system wear. We introduce Conditioning for Action Policy Smoothness (CAPS), an effective yet intuitive regularization on action policies, which offers consistent improvement in the smoothness of the learned state-to-action mappings of neural network controllers, reflected in the elimination of high-frequency components in the control signal. Tested on a real system, improvements in controller smoothness on a quadrotor drone resulted in an almost 80% reduction in power consumption while consistently training flight-worthy controllers. Project website: http://ai.bu.edu/caps
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Input-Side Variance Suppression under Non-Normal Transient Amplification in Continuous-Control Reinforcement Learning
Non-normal transient amplification is an important contributor to closed-loop variance in RL, and input-side suppression can reduce downstream covariance without altering peak gain.
-
Implicit Action Chunking for Smooth Continuous Control
Dual-Window Smoothing uses an execution window for deterministic smoothness and a value window to correct critic bias, plus a first-order temporal regularizer, to achieve smoother RL control than explicit chunking or ...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.