Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Vinoground: Scrutinizing LMMs over Dense Temporal Reasoning with Short Videos

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.02763 v1 pith:N3FN3RB6 submitted 2024-10-03 cs.CV cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.CLcs.LG
keywords shortlmmstemporalvideosmodelsreasoningvinogroundchallenges
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

There has been growing sentiment recently that modern large multimodal models (LMMs) have addressed most of the key challenges related to short video comprehension. As a result, both academia and industry are gradually shifting their attention towards the more complex challenges posed by understanding long-form videos. However, is this really the case? Our studies indicate that LMMs still lack many fundamental reasoning capabilities even when dealing with short videos. We introduce Vinoground, a temporal counterfactual LMM evaluation benchmark encompassing 1000 short and natural video-caption pairs. We demonstrate that existing LMMs severely struggle to distinguish temporal differences between different actions and object transformations. For example, the best model GPT-4o only obtains ~50% on our text and video scores, showing a large gap compared to the human baseline of ~90%. All open-source multimodal models and CLIP-based models perform much worse, producing mostly random chance performance. Through this work, we shed light onto the fact that temporal reasoning in short videos is a problem yet to be fully solved. The dataset and evaluation code are available at https://vinoground.github.io.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. PerceptionLM: Open-Access Data and Models for Detailed Visual Understanding

    cs.CV 2025-04 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    PerceptionLM releases 2.8M human-labeled fine-grained video QA pairs and spatio-temporal captions, plus models and a new benchmark, arguing that human data, not just synthetic data, is needed for detailed video understanding.

  2. TimeChat-Online: 80% Visual Tokens are Naturally Redundant in Streaming Videos

    cs.CV 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A streaming video assistant drops temporally redundant tokens (over 80%) with minimal accuracy loss and uses the drop-ratio curve to trigger proactive responses at scene changes.

  3. Video-MMLU: A Massive Multi-Discipline Lecture Understanding Benchmark

    cs.CV 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Video-MMLU: a 1,065-video lecture benchmark where most AI video models score 10-50%, but text-only models answer 40% of quiz questions without video.

Pith tools