REVIEW 7 cited by
OverleafCopilot: Empowering Academic Writing in Overleaf with Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
OverleafCopilot: Empowering Academic Writing in Overleaf with Large Language Models
read the original abstract
The rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs) has facilitated a variety of applications from different domains. In this technical report, we explore the integration of LLMs and the popular academic writing tool, Overleaf, to enhance the efficiency and quality of academic writing. To achieve the above goal, there are three challenges: i) including seamless interaction between Overleaf and LLMs, ii) establishing reliable communication with the LLM provider, and iii) ensuring user privacy. To address these challenges, we present OverleafCopilot, the first-ever tool (i.e., a browser extension) that seamlessly integrates LLMs and Overleaf, enabling researchers to leverage the power of LLMs while writing papers. Specifically, we first propose an effective framework to bridge LLMs and Overleaf. Then, we developed PromptGenius, a website for researchers to easily find and share high-quality up-to-date prompts. Thirdly, we propose an agent command system to help researchers quickly build their customizable agents. OverleafCopilot (https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/overleaf-copilot/eoadabdpninlhkkbhngoddfjianhlghb ) has been on the Chrome Extension Store, which now serves thousands of researchers. Additionally, the code of PromptGenius is released at https://github.com/wenhaomin/ChatGPT-PromptGenius. We believe our work has the potential to revolutionize academic writing practices, empowering researchers to produce higher-quality papers in less time.
Forward citations
Cited by 7 Pith papers
-
SciGA: A Comprehensive Dataset for Designing Graphical Abstracts in Academic Papers
Introduces the SciGA-145k dataset with intra-paper and cross-paper graphical abstract recommendation tasks plus the CAR evaluation metric.
-
How Researchers Navigate Accountability, Transparency, and Trust When Using AI Tools in Early-Stage Research: A Think-Aloud Study
A think-aloud study reveals that AI tools in early research misrepresent uncertainty, obscure provenance, and create fragile trust, leading researchers to develop compensatory strategies to preserve scholarly judgment.
-
InnoEval: On Research Idea Evaluation as a Knowledge-Grounded, Multi-Perspective Reasoning Problem
Idea evaluation can be automated with LLM agents that retrieve heterogeneous online evidence, simulate diverse reviewers, and score ideas on multiple dimensions, outperforming existing judges on acceptance-label predi...
-
ShinkaEvolve: Towards Open-Ended And Sample-Efficient Program Evolution
ShinkaEvolve improves sample efficiency in LLM-driven program evolution via parent sampling, code novelty rejection-sampling, and bandit LLM ensemble selection, achieving new SOTA circle packing with 150 samples and g...
-
Sakana Fugu Technical Report
Sakana Fugu trains LLM orchestrators using fine-tuning, evolutionary algorithms, and RL to build query-adaptive multi-agent scaffolds, claiming SOTA results on benchmarks including SWE-Bench Pro and GPQA-Diamond.
-
pAI/MSc: ML Theory Research with Humans on the Loop
pAI/MSc is a customizable multi-agent system that reduces human steering by orders of magnitude when turning a hypothesis into a literature-grounded, mathematically established, experimentally supported manuscript dra...
-
SciAtlas: A Large-Scale Knowledge Graph for Automated Scientific Research
SciAtlas builds a large-scale multi-disciplinary academic knowledge graph and a neuro-symbolic retrieval system to support automated scientific research tasks such as literature review and idea positioning.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.