Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Back2Future: Leveraging Backfill Dynamics for Improving Real-time Predictions in Future

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.04420 v8 pith:N5M52EMX submitted 2021-06-08 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CY

Back2Future: Leveraging Backfill Dynamics for Improving Real-time Predictions in Future

classification cs.LG cs.AIcs.CY
keywords backfillmodelreal-timeforecastingperformanceback2futurebaselinescovid-19
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In real-time forecasting in public health, data collection is a non-trivial and demanding task. Often after initially released, it undergoes several revisions later (maybe due to human or technical constraints) - as a result, it may take weeks until the data reaches to a stable value. This so-called 'backfill' phenomenon and its effect on model performance has been barely studied in the prior literature. In this paper, we introduce the multi-variate backfill problem using COVID-19 as the motivating example. We construct a detailed dataset composed of relevant signals over the past year of the pandemic. We then systematically characterize several patterns in backfill dynamics and leverage our observations for formulating a novel problem and neural framework Back2Future that aims to refines a given model's predictions in real-time. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that our method refines the performance of top models for COVID-19 forecasting, in contrast to non-trivial baselines, yielding 18% improvement over baselines, enabling us obtain a new SOTA performance. In addition, we show that our model improves model evaluation too; hence policy-makers can better understand the true accuracy of forecasting models in real-time.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Are LLMs Ready for Neural-integrated Mechanistic Modeling? A Benchmark and Agentic Framework

    cs.LG 2026-02 reject novelty 6.0

    A benchmark (NIMM) and agentic framework (NIMMGen) for LLM-generated neural-integrated mechanistic models, reporting strong but possibly inflated RMSE gains.