REVIEW 2 cited by
Covert Malicious Finetuning: Challenges in Safeguarding LLM Adaptation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Black-box finetuning is an emerging interface for adapting state-of-the-art language models to user needs. However, such access may also let malicious actors undermine model safety. To demonstrate the challenge of defending finetuning interfaces, we introduce covert malicious finetuning, a method to compromise model safety via finetuning while evading detection. Our method constructs a malicious dataset where every individual datapoint appears innocuous, but finetuning on the dataset teaches the model to respond to encoded harmful requests with encoded harmful responses. Applied to GPT-4, our method produces a finetuned model that acts on harmful instructions 99% of the time and avoids detection by defense mechanisms such as dataset inspection, safety evaluations, and input/output classifiers. Our findings question whether black-box finetuning access can be secured against sophisticated adversaries.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
A Survey on Model Extraction Attacks and Defenses for Large Language Models
A taxonomy of model extraction attacks and defenses for large language models, with proposed evaluation metrics and future research directions.
-
A Survey: Towards Privacy and Security in Mobile Large Language Models
A survey of privacy and security challenges for mobile large language models, summarizing known attack types and defenses without introducing new results.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.