Causal Reasoning for Algorithmic Fairness
read the original abstract
In this work, we argue for the importance of causal reasoning in creating fair algorithms for decision making. We give a review of existing approaches to fairness, describe work in causality necessary for the understanding of causal approaches, argue why causality is necessary for any approach that wishes to be fair, and give a detailed analysis of the many recent approaches to causality-based fairness.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Toward Individual Fairness Without Centralized Data: Selective Counterfactual Consistency for Vertical Federated Learning
SCC-VFL reduces individual decision flip rates by up to 98% in vertical federated learning while preserving accuracy through differentially private feature role discovery and selective counterfactual consistency enforcement.
-
Operationalizing Individual Fairness via Gradient Descent and Bradley-Terry Models
An algorithm learns a Mahalanobis metric from triplet queries via spectral initialization and gradient descent in the Bradley-Terry model, with convergence guarantees and transfer of individual fairness from estimated...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.