Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Screen2AX: Vision-Based Approach for Automatic macOS Accessibility Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2507.16704 v1 pith:NES4JT3W submitted 2025-07-22 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CVcs.HC

Screen2AX: Vision-Based Approach for Automatic macOS Accessibility Generation

classification cs.LG cs.AIcs.CVcs.HC
keywords accessibilitymacosdesktopapplicationsmetadatascreen2axbenchmarkdetection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Desktop accessibility metadata enables AI agents to interpret screens and supports users who depend on tools like screen readers. Yet, many applications remain largely inaccessible due to incomplete or missing metadata provided by developers - our investigation shows that only 33% of applications on macOS offer full accessibility support. While recent work on structured screen representation has primarily addressed specific challenges, such as UI element detection or captioning, none has attempted to capture the full complexity of desktop interfaces by replicating their entire hierarchical structure. To bridge this gap, we introduce Screen2AX, the first framework to automatically create real-time, tree-structured accessibility metadata from a single screenshot. Our method uses vision-language and object detection models to detect, describe, and organize UI elements hierarchically, mirroring macOS's system-level accessibility structure. To tackle the limited availability of data for macOS desktop applications, we compiled and publicly released three datasets encompassing 112 macOS applications, each annotated for UI element detection, grouping, and hierarchical accessibility metadata alongside corresponding screenshots. Screen2AX accurately infers hierarchy trees, achieving a 77% F1 score in reconstructing a complete accessibility tree. Crucially, these hierarchy trees improve the ability of autonomous agents to interpret and interact with complex desktop interfaces. We introduce Screen2AX-Task, a benchmark specifically designed for evaluating autonomous agent task execution in macOS desktop environments. Using this benchmark, we demonstrate that Screen2AX delivers a 2.2x performance improvement over native accessibility representations and surpasses the state-of-the-art OmniParser V2 system on the ScreenSpot benchmark.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Do GUI Agents Believe Their Eyes? Diagnosing State-Belief Reliance on Pixels versus Structure

    cs.AI 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0

    Across five models, textual GUI state beliefs defer to conflicting structure despite near-ceiling image-only perception, yielding a positive Perception-Fusion Gap that propagates into wrong actions.

  2. Do GUI Agents Believe Their Eyes? Diagnosing State-Belief Reliance on Pixels versus Structure

    cs.AI 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0

    Across four open-weight models and three OpenAI models, textual state beliefs of GUI agents follow a conflicting structured value on 30–75% of probes where the same model reads the pixels correctly, so agent state bel...

  3. Grounding Computer Use Agents on Human Demonstrations

    cs.LG 2025-11 conditional novelty 7.0

    GroundCUA, a 3.56M-element human-annotated desktop grounding dataset, and GroundNext models achieve strong UI grounding with less than one-tenth the SFT data of prior work.

  4. Tactile: Giving Computer-Using Agents Hands and Feet

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    Adding Tactile, an MCP tool layer that grounds agent actions in macOS accessibility semantics, OCR, and visual fallback, raised Codex Success@100 from 41.1% to 50.0% on macOSWorld-style tasks.