Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 9 cited by

On classification of (self-dual) higher-spin gravities in flat space

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that the quartic holomorphic light-cone constraint admits infinitely many consistent chiral higher-spin theories in 4d flat space, with finite or infinite spectra, and classifies all one- and two-derivative cases.

desk verdict A genuinely new existence result for finite- and infinite-spectrum chiral higher-spin theories in 4d flat space, with the 'classification' part resting on an unproved combinatorial assumption. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.12839 v2 pith:NVX7EWUH submitted 2025-05-19 hep-th

Mattia Serrani This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords higher-spingravitylight-conegaugechiraltheoryself-dualYang-Millsquarticconsistencyconditioncrystalclassificationflatspace
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that 4d flat spacetime contains infinitely many higher-spin theories with nontrivial local interactions, and that their field spectra—the helicities, or spin values, of the massless fields present—can be finite as well as infinite. This overturns the belief that higher-dimensional higher-spin gravities must have infinitely many unbounded spins. Working in the light-cone gauge, a physical gauge that keeps only propagating degrees of freedom, the author solves the quartic holomorphic consistency condition and classifies all one- and two-derivative theories, showing each one is a consistent chiral subsector of the higher-spin extensions of self-dual Yang-Mills and self-dual gravity. The classification is organised by minimal sets of cubic couplings called crystals, each generated from a seed spectrum; in these low-derivative cases the interacting spectrum completely determines the couplings. If correct, the result supplies new finite-spectrum higher-spin gravities, a coloured graviton in the self-dual sector, and examples where a low-spin cubic coupling forces higher-spin amplitudes.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the small crystal: a minimal set of six cubic couplings forced by the exchange diagrams generated by one pair of two-derivative couplings (or six one-derivative couplings in the gauge-group case), together with the crystal obtained by iterating this closure until no new couplings appear. The quartic holomorphic constraint reduces to a polynomial identity in three variables $A,B,C$; its solution fixes each product of couplings as a factorial expression $C_{1234\omega}\sim(\Lambda-2)!/[2^{\Lambda-3}(\lambda_{12}+\omega-1)!(\lambda_{34}-\omega-1)!]$, identically for the three orderings of external legs. The classification is then the list of inequivalent crystals under permutations of external helicities and affine transformations of the free helicity parameters. The paper also relies on the observed fact that in one- and two-derivative cases the couplings are fully determined by the interacting spectrum.

What would settle it

An exhaustive computer search over integer-helicity seeds with bounded spin (for example $|\lambda_i|\le 10$) for one- and two-derivative solutions of the quartic holomorphic constraint that are not equivalent under permutations and affine transformations to any listed crystal would directly test completeness; finding one consistent solution whose interacting spectrum omits a possible cubic coupling would refute the spectrum-determines-couplings assertion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that solving the quartic holomorphic constraint in the light-cone gauge yields a rich landscape of consistent chiral higher-spin theories, not just the previously known infinite-spectrum ones. For one- and two-derivative interactions the solutions are classified completely: a theory is specified by its interacting spectrum, and every consistent spectrum arises as a crystal generated from a seed of four helicities whose sum is 2 (one derivative) or 4 (two derivatives). The solution fixes products of couplings through factorial formulas, while the products $C_{\lambda_1,\lambda_1,0}C_{0,\lambda_2,\lambda_2}$ remain free; this freedom is what allows nonvanishing four-point amplitudes in otherwise amplitude-free chiral theories. The list of inequivalent crystals includes finite theories such as self-dual gravity with a scalar ($\pm\{0,2\}$), self-dual gravity with a photon and a scalar ($\pm\{0,1,2\}$), infinite truncations to even or odd helicities, and a coloured graviton coupling $C_{-2,1,2}$ in the one-derivative sector. The paper also proves that any higher-derivative self-coupling of the form $C_{-\lambda,\lambda,\lambda}$ with $|\lambda|>2$ forces the full factorial (standard) solution, so the complete chiral theory is selected by higher-derivative vertices rather than by higher spin alone.

Load-bearing premise

The completeness of the classification depends on the paper's own 'experimental fact' that every consistent one- or two-derivative theory contains all cubic interactions its spectrum allows and is reached by building up from a starting configuration with at most three extra conditions; if that assertion fails, valid theories are left out of the list.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every consistent one- or two-derivative chiral higher-spin theory in 4d flat space is a subsector of either the higher-spin extension of self-dual Yang-Mills or of self-dual gravity, so low-derivative chiral theories cannot lie outside these two master theories.
  • Finite-spectrum higher-spin gravities exist in 4d, for example self-dual gravity with a scalar ($\pm\{0,2\}$) and with a photon and scalar ($\pm\{0,1,2\}$), giving concrete models with a finite number of fields.
  • The unconstrained products $C_{\lambda_1,\lambda_1,0}C_{0,\lambda_2,\lambda_2}$ allow nonvanishing four-point amplitudes such as $A(2222)$ from $R^3$ and $R^2\phi$ couplings without violating the low-energy theorem for massless particles, because the vertices are abelian.
  • A one-derivative low-spin coupling $C_{-1,0,2}$ forces higher-spin couplings by consistency, and the self-dual sector admits a coloured graviton $C_{-2,1,2}$ even though ordinary multi-graviton theories are inconsistent.
  • Any cubic coupling of the form $C_{-\lambda,\lambda,\lambda}$ with $|\lambda|>2$ forces the entire spectrum and the standard factorial couplings, making full chiral higher-spin gravity the unique completion of any such higher-derivative self-interaction.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same crystal logic should extend to higher-derivative chiral theories, but the paper shows the spectrum no longer determines the couplings there; an algebraic reformulation in terms of higher-spin algebras may be the natural way to complete that classification.
  • The finite crystals resemble the finite-dimensional higher-spin algebras behind 3d Chern-Simons gravities, so the 4d results strengthen the analogy between the two cases and suggest a finite-dimensional algebraic structure for each finite crystal.
  • Because the classification is chiral, unitary completions that add the anti-holomorphic parity-conjugate sector may be obstructed for several of the new solutions, especially the coloured graviton; the consistency statements here should be read as statements about self-dual subsectors.
  • A concrete next test is to compute five-point or higher tree amplitudes for a generic finite crystal; if the vanishing-amplitude pattern persists, these theories would be integrable-like even though their spectra are finite.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper studies the quartic light-cone consistency condition for chiral (holomorphic) massless higher-spin theories in four-dimensional flat space. Building on Metsaev's constraint, the author solves the holomorphic quartic constraint for integer helicities, with and without U(N), SO(N), and USp(N) gauge groups, and obtains an algebraic form for products of cubic couplings together with relations that force couplings to appear in 'small crystals.' The bulk of the paper is a systematic enumeration of one- and two-derivative chiral higher-spin theories, presented as a list of inequivalent 'crystals' (spectra and implied cubic couplings), including finite-spectrum examples, infinite spectra, a coloured graviton in the self-dual sector, and low-spin couplings that generate higher-spin fields. The paper also computes on-shell four-point amplitudes, showing that they vanish generically with exceptions tied to an unconstrained product C_{λ,λ,0}C_{0,μ,μ}, and proves that the inclusion of a higher-derivative self-interaction C_{-λ,λ,λ} with |λ|>2 forces the Metsaev (full chiral) solution.

Significance. If the completeness claims held, the paper would represent a substantial advance: it would overturn the common expectation that consistent higher-spin theories in d≥4 require an infinite, unbounded spectrum, and it would organize a rich landscape of self-dual higher-spin theories interpolating between SDYM/SDGR and the full chiral theory. The algebraic solution of the quartic constraint is worked out in detail, and the low-spin checks against Einstein-Maxwell-scalar, R^3, and F R^2 actions give independent anchors for the existence part. The amplitude theorem is also useful. The main significance is limited by an unproved combinatorial closure assertion on which the word 'classify' rests; as it stands, the paper is best read as an extensive construction of examples and families, with the completeness of the enumeration remaining conditional.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.1, 'Spectrum⇒ couplings' and 'All two-derivative solutions'] The completeness of the two-derivative classification is asserted on the basis of an 'experimental fact' that every consistent theory contains all possible cubic couplings built from its interacting spectrum and that every solution is reached by iterating the small-crystal closure from a seed with at most three relations. No proof of either statement is given, and the paper itself notes in Section 4.3 that the analogous statement fails for higher-derivative theories. Since the enumeration algorithm is stopped after three iterations, the list of seeds is not demonstrated exhaustive; the central claim that all one- and two-derivative theories are classified therefore holds only conditional on this unverified combinatorial closure.
  2. [§4.2, one-derivative small crystal] The one-derivative classification begins with the simplifying assumption that C_{λ1,λ2,ω}≠0 implies C_{λ2,λ1,ω}≠0, after which all colour-ordered constraints are imposed. This assumption is not derived from the quartic constraint and is not harmless: a consistent coupling with support only in one orientation would be missed by the crystal construction. To claim a complete one-derivative classification, the author needs either to prove that such asymmetric solutions cannot satisfy the full set of colour-ordered constraints, or to state the result as a classification of crystals satisfying this extra condition.
  3. [§3.1, Eqs. (3.13), (3.19), (3.30), (3.37)] The claim that (3.50)-(3.51) is the general solution of the quartic constraint is obtained by first postulating the displayed polynomial forms for the functions f and then imposing residual equations; the text asserts, but does not prove, that no other monomials can occur, and the degenerate cases Λ=4 are passed over with a comment that the conditions 'still' hold. Because the small-crystal closure rules of Section 4 are read off from these solutions, a gap here would propagate directly into the classification. Please provide a proof that the polynomial-form ansatz is exhaustive, or state the ansatz as an assumption and derive its consequences.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§4.2, Eqs. (4.60)-(4.61)] In the displayed small crystal the pair C_{1,1,-1}C_{1,λ,-λ} is written, but Eq. (4.61) then uses C_{1,1,-1}C_{2,λ,-λ}; the subscript 2 appears to be a typo.
  2. [§4.1, one-parameter finite crystals] The statement 'we only report the physical solutions' leaves non-integer helicity solutions undocumented; since the text later calls them mathematically interesting, a brief catalogue or a precise exclusion criterion would make the classification claim clearer.
  3. [§4.3, Eq. (4.97)] The bracket notation [−,−] used to denote ranges of exchanged helicities is explained only after the display; define it before first use.
  4. [§4.1, Eq. (4.5)] The affine equivalence λ'_i = A λ_i + b is not fully specified; state the allowed entries of A and b, for example integer matrices preserving the derivative-order condition, to make the equivalence unambiguous.
  5. [§4.1] The terms 'sub-crystal' and 'subalgebra' are used before being formally defined; a short definition in Section 4.1 would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the quartic light-cone constraint is solved directly, the Metsaev solution appears as a special case, and the unproved classification-completeness assertion is an explicit assumption rather than a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation starts from the quartic holomorphic constraint (3.5), which is obtained from the Poincaré algebra consistency condition, and solves it for the coupling products C1234ω without assuming the final spectrum or coupling relations. The Metsaev solution is recovered as a special case of the general solution, not used as an input. The product Cλ1,λ1,0C0,λ2,λ2 is explicitly left free and is not fitted to force amplitude statements. The classification in Section 4 is built on the small-crystal rules that the paper derives from the constraint solution; the statement that the interacting spectrum determines all cubic couplings is explicitly labeled an "experimental fact" and is a completeness assumption, not a prediction claimed to follow from the equations. Therefore, even if that assumption were false, the issue would be an unproved completeness lemma, not circularity. The citations to [26] and [49] provide external context and prior technical results; they are not used to define the present paper's new solutions, and the present author is not an author of those cited works, so no load-bearing self-citation chain is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The ledger contains no fitted data points and no invented physical entities. The central input from outside the paper is the quartic light-cone holomorphic constraint of Metsaev and the deformation framework of the light-front higher-spin program. The main added structure is the crystal combinatorics, and the most fragile ingredient is the unproved experimental fact that spectrum determines couplings, which is needed for the completeness part of the classification.

free parameters (3)
  • Global coupling normalization k1234+
    In the even-derivative solution (3.51), the common k1234+ sets the overall strength of the cubic couplings and cancels from the constraint. It is a free overall constant per theory.
  • Unconstrained product C_{lambda1,lambda1,0} C_{0,lambda2,lambda2}
    Explicitly labeled generic in (3.50), (3.51), (3.74), and (D.16). It is not fixed by the quartic constraint, and it controls whether certain amplitudes and coupling relations, such as (3.57) and (5.4), are nonzero.
  • Helicity parameter lambda in one-parameter families
    Families such as the seeds (0, 6-4lambda, lambda, 3lambda-2) in (4.18) are labeled by a free integer or rational parameter. This is a choice of spectrum rather than a fitted number, but the classification depends on enumerating these choices.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Binomial and momentum identities in Appendix B are correct and sufficient to reduce the quartic constraint to a polynomial system.
    Equations (B.2) through (B.10) are used throughout Section 3 to convert the light-cone constraint into linear systems for the couplings.
  • domain assumption A purely holomorphic cubic theory that satisfies the quartic holomorphic constraint is consistent at all orders and contains only cubic interactions.
    Stated in Section 2: if the theory is purely holomorphic and satisfies the holomorphic quartic constraints, it is well-defined at any order. This is inherited from the light-cone deformation program, mainly from Ponomarev and Skvortsov [49].
  • domain assumption The classification is restricted to integer helicities and bosonic fields; fermions and half-integer or fractional helicities are excluded.
    Section 4 omits fractional helicities such as 2/3 and 4/3, and Section 6 explicitly states that fermions and supersymmetric theories are not studied.
  • ad hoc to paper Every consistent one- and two-derivative chiral theory is determined by its interacting spectrum, which contains all possible cubic couplings built from that spectrum.
    Section 4.1 calls this an experimental fact and uses it as the basis for the classification. It is not proven, and the claim classify all depends on it.
  • domain assumption Internal symmetry is implemented with fields in the fundamental or adjoint of U(N), SO(N), or USp(N), with trace contractions as specified.
    Sections 2.2, 3.2, and Appendices D and E restrict the gauge-group analysis to these representations; mixed coloured and singlet fields are not studied.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On classification of (self-dual) higher-spin gravities in flat space." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NVX7EWUH

@misc{pith2026250512839,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On classification of (self-dual) higher-spin gravities in flat space},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NVX7EWUH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.12839}
}
abstract

There is a great number of higher-spin gravities in $3d$ that can have both finite and infinite spectra of fields and can be formulated as Chern-Simons theories. It was believed that this is impossible in higher dimensions, where higher-spin fields do have propagating degrees of freedom. We show that there are infinitely many higher-spin theories in the $4d$ flat space featuring nontrivial local interactions that can have either a finite or infinite number of fields. We classify all one- and two-derivative (i.e. with gauge and gravitational interactions) higher-spin theories by solving the holomorphic constraint in the light-cone gauge obtained by Metsaev. Therefore, these theories are consistent subsectors of the higher-spin extensions of self-dual Yang-Mills/gravity, which in turn are truncations of the chiral higher-spin gravity.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 9 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Light-Front approach to $4d$ massless Higher-Spin interactions

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.5 of 10

    Solving Poincaré-algebra closure at quartic order yields infinitely many local 4d massless higher-spin theories (finite or infinite spectra), classifies chiral one-/two-derivative models, and determines all local unit...

  2. Massless spinning fields on the Light-Front: quartic vertices and amplitudes

    hep-th 2026-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A light-front quartic-constraint analysis classifies local massless higher-spin vertices and amplitudes, yielding no-go results for unitary theories and new quasi-chiral higher-spin sectors.

  3. BRST-BV approach to fields in Poincare patch of AdS

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    A universal BRST-BV Lagrangian for free AdS fields is obtained by solving algebraic defining equations for spin operators, with explicit solutions for totally symmetric integer-spin and continuous-spin fields.

  4. Three-dimensional non-relativistic chiral massive higher-spin gravity

    hep-th 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A non-relativistic massive higher-spin gravity in deformed AdS₃ is constructed by Lifshitz-deforming and null-reducing chiral massless higher-spin gravity; under an assumed mass-spin relation its cubic couplings vanis...

  5. On symmetry breaking in the self-dual higher-spin theory

    hep-th 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In the self-dual higher-spin theory, a scalar vacuum that breaks AdS symmetry to 3D Poincaré makes all higher-spin gauge fields decouple except spin one, and makes higher-spin currents non-conserved except the spin-on...

  6. Higher-spins on Taub-NUT and higher-spin Taub-NUT

    hep-th 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Higher-spin fields are solved exactly on the Taub-NUT instanton in the self-dual Yang-Mills truncation, and an order-by-order convergent higher-spin Taub-NUT solution is constructed in self-dual gravity, organized by ...

  7. Associativity of celestial OPE, higher spins and self-duality

    hep-th 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Celestial OPE associativity, the Jacobi identity of a vertex-derived gauge algebra, vanishing four-point amplitudes, and the light-cone holomorphic constraint are shown to be the same consistency condition, solved for...

  8. A proposal for the role of higher spin fields in Conformal Cyclic Cosmology

    gr-qc 2025-07 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A qualitative proposal that non-unitary higher spin physics inside black holes removes degrees of freedom from phase space, resetting entropy between aeons of Conformal Cyclic Cosmology.

  9. Inconsistency of point-particle dynamics on higher-spin backgrounds: massive particles

    hep-th 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Massive scalar particles cannot have local interactions with chiral higher-spin backgrounds, so no higher-spin extension of Riemannian geometry of this type exists.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

103 extracted references · 77 linked inside Pith · cited by 9 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Massless fields with integer spin,

    C. Fronsdal, “Massless fields with integer spin,” Phys. Rev. D18 (1978) 3624

    1978

  2. [2]

    One Massless Particle Equals Two Dirac Singletons: Elementary Particles in a Curved Space. 6.,

    M. Flato and C. Fronsdal, “One Massless Particle Equals Two Dirac Singletons: Elementary Particles in a Curved Space. 6.,” Lett.Math.Phys. 2 (1978) 421–426

    1978

  3. [3]

    On DIS and Racs,

    M. Flato and C. Fronsdal, “On DIS and Racs,” Phys. Lett. B 97 (1980) 236–240

    1980

  4. [4]

    Massless higher spins and holography,

    E. Sezgin and P. Sundell, “Massless higher spins and holography,” Nucl.Phys. B644 (2002) 303–370, arXiv:hep-th/0205131 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2002

  5. [5]

    AdS dual of the critical O(N) vector model,

    I. R. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov, “AdS dual of the critical O(N) vector model,” Phys. Lett. B550 (2002) 213–219, arXiv:hep-th/0210114

    arXiv 2002

  6. [6]

    Holography in 4D (super) higher spin theories and a test via cubic scalar couplings,

    E. Sezgin and P. Sundell, “Holography in 4D (super) higher spin theories and a test via cubic scalar couplings,” JHEP 0507 (2005) 044, arXiv:hep-th/0305040 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2005

  7. [7]

    Holography of the N=1 higher spin theory on AdS(4),

    R. G. Leigh and A. C. Petkou, “Holography of the N=1 higher spin theory on AdS(4),” JHEP 0306 (2003) 011, arXiv:hep-th/0304217 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2003

  8. [8]

    Chern-Simons Theory with Vector Fermion Matter,

    S. Giombi, S. Minwalla, S. Prakash, S. P. Trivedi, S. R. Wadia, and X. Yin, “Chern-Simons Theory with Vector Fermion Matter,” Eur. Phys. J. C72 (2012) 2112, arXiv:1110.4386 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2012

Show all 103 references
  1. [9]

    Cubic interaction terms for arbitrarily extended Supermultiplets,

    A. K. H. Bengtsson, I. Bengtsson, and L. Brink, “Cubic interaction terms for arbitrarily extended Supermultiplets,” Nucl. Phys. B227 (1983) 41

    1983

  2. [10]

    Cubic interaction terms for arbitrary spin,

    A. K. H. Bengtsson, I. Bengtsson, and L. Brink, “Cubic interaction terms for arbitrary spin,” Nucl. Phys. B227 (1983) 31

    1983

  3. [11]

    Interacting Higher Spin Gauge Fields on the Light Front,

    A. K. H. Bengtsson, I. Bengtsson, and N. Linden, “Interacting Higher Spin Gauge Fields on the Light Front,” Class. Quant. Grav. 4 (1987) 1333

    1987

  4. [12]

    On spin three selfinteractions,

    F. A. Berends, G. J. H. Burgers, and H. Van Dam, “On spin three selfinteractions,” Z. Phys. C24 (1984) 247–254

    1984

  5. [13]

    On the theoretical problems in constructing interactions involving higher spin massless particles,

    F. A. Berends, G. J. H. Burgers, and H. van Dam, “On the theoretical problems in constructing interactions involving higher spin massless particles,” Nucl. Phys. B260 (1985) 295

    1985

  6. [14]

    Photons and Gravitons in S Matrix Theory: Derivation of Charge Conservation and Equality of Gravitational and Inertial Mass,

    S. Weinberg, “Photons and Gravitons in S Matrix Theory: Derivation of Charge Conservation and Equality of Gravitational and Inertial Mass,” Phys. Rev. 135 (1964) B1049–B1056

    1964

  7. [15]

    All Possible Symmetries of the S Matrix,

    S. R. Coleman and J. Mandula, “All Possible Symmetries of the S Matrix,” Phys. Rev. 159 (1967) 1251–1256

    1967

  8. [16]

    Constraining Conformal Field Theories with A Higher Spin Symmetry,

    J. Maldacena and A. Zhiboedov, “Constraining Conformal Field Theories with A Higher Spin Symmetry,” arXiv:1112.1016 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  9. [17]

    AdS Field Theory from Conformal Field Theory,

    A. L. Fitzpatrick and J. Kaplan, “AdS Field Theory from Conformal Field Theory,” JHEP 02 (2013) 054, arXiv:1208.0337 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  10. [18]

    On the uniqueness of higher-spin symmetries in AdS and CFT,

    N. Boulanger, D. Ponomarev, E. D. Skvortsov, and M. Taronna, “On the uniqueness of higher-spin symmetries in AdS and CFT,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A28 (2013) 1350162, arXiv:1305.5180 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Constraining conformal field theories with a higher spin symmetry in d=4,

    V. Alba and K. Diab, “Constraining conformal field theories with a higher spin symmetry in d=4,” arXiv:1307.8092 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  12. [20]

    Constraining conformal field theories with a higher spin symmetry in d> 3 dimensions,

    V. Alba and K. Diab, “Constraining conformal field theories with a higher spin symmetry in d> 3 dimensions,” arXiv:1510.02535 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  13. [21]

    On the consistency of (partially-)massless matter couplings in de Sitter space,

    C. Sleight and M. Taronna, “On the consistency of (partially-)massless matter couplings in de Sitter space,” JHEP 10 (2021) 156, arXiv:2106.00366 [hep-th] . 74

    2021 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Cubic Interaction in Extended Theories of Massless Higher Spin Fields,

    E. S. Fradkin and M. A. Vasiliev, “Cubic Interaction in Extended Theories of Massless Higher Spin Fields,” Nucl. Phys. B291 (1987) 141

    1987

  15. [23]

    Consistency Problems of Hypergravity,

    C. Aragone and S. Deser, “Consistency Problems of Hypergravity,” Phys. Lett. B86 (1979) 161

    1979

  16. [24]

    Actions for Self-dual Higher Spin Gravities,

    K. Krasnov, E. Skvortsov, and T. Tran, “Actions for Self-dual Higher Spin Gravities,” arXiv:2105.12782 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  17. [25]

    Strong obstruction of the Berends-Burgers-van Dam spin-3 vertex,

    X. Bekaert, N. Boulanger, and S. Leclercq, “Strong obstruction of the Berends-Burgers-van Dam spin-3 vertex,” J.Phys. A43 (2010) 185401, arXiv:1002.0289 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Chiral Higher Spin Theories and Self-Duality,

    D. Ponomarev, “Chiral Higher Spin Theories and Self-Duality,” JHEP 12 (2017) 141, arXiv:1710.00270 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  19. [27]

    On four-point interactions in massless higher spin theory in flat space,

    R. Roiban and A. A. Tseytlin, “On four-point interactions in massless higher spin theory in flat space,” JHEP 04 (2017) 139, arXiv:1701.05773 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Quartic AdS Interactions in Higher-Spin Gravity from Conformal Field Theory,

    X. Bekaert, J. Erdmenger, D. Ponomarev, and C. Sleight, “Quartic AdS Interactions in Higher-Spin Gravity from Conformal Field Theory,” JHEP 11 (2015) 149, arXiv:1508.04292 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Looking for a bulk point,

    J. Maldacena, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Zhiboedov, “Looking for a bulk point,” JHEP 01 (2017) 013, arXiv:1509.03612 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Higher-Spin Gauge Theories and Bulk Locality,

    C. Sleight and M. Taronna, “Higher-Spin Gauge Theories and Bulk Locality,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 no. 17, (2018) 171604, arXiv:1704.07859 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  23. [31]

    A Note on (Non)-Locality in Holographic Higher Spin Theories,

    D. Ponomarev, “A Note on (Non)-Locality in Holographic Higher Spin Theories,” Universe 4 no. 1, (2018) 2, arXiv:1710.00403 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Quartic locality of higher-spin gravity in de Sitter and Euclidean anti-de Sitter space,

    Y. Neiman, “Quartic locality of higher-spin gravity in de Sitter and Euclidean anti-de Sitter space,” Phys. Lett. B 843 (2023) 138048, arXiv:2302.00852 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  25. [33]

    A Consistent Interacting Massless Higher Spin Field Theory in D = (2+1),

    M. Blencowe, “A Consistent Interacting Massless Higher Spin Field Theory in D = (2+1),” Class.Quant.Grav. 6 (1989) 443

    1989

  26. [34]

    Area Preserving Diffeomorphisms and Higher Spin Algebra,

    E. Bergshoeff, M. P. Blencowe, and K. S. Stelle, “Area Preserving Diffeomorphisms and Higher Spin Algebra,” Commun. Math. Phys. 128 (1990) 213

    1990

  27. [35]

    Asymptotic symmetries of three-dimensional gravity coupled to higher-spin fields,

    A. Campoleoni, S. Fredenhagen, S. Pfenninger, and S. Theisen, “Asymptotic symmetries of three-dimensional gravity coupled to higher-spin fields,” JHEP 1011 (2010) 007, arXiv:1008.4744 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Nonlinear W∞ as Asymptotic Symmetry of Three-Dimensional Higher Spin Anti-de Sitter Gravity,

    M. Henneaux and S.-J. Rey, “Nonlinear W∞ as Asymptotic Symmetry of Three-Dimensional Higher Spin Anti-de Sitter Gravity,” JHEP 1012 (2010) 007, arXiv:1008.4579 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Matter-free higher spin gravities in 3D: Partially-massless fields and general structure,

    M. Grigoriev, K. Mkrtchyan, and E. Skvortsov, “Matter-free higher spin gravities in 3D: Partially-massless fields and general structure,” Phys. Rev. D 102 no. 6, (2020) 066003, arXiv:2005.05931 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Conformal Higher Spin in (2+1)-dimensions,

    C. N. Pope and P. K. Townsend, “Conformal Higher Spin in (2+1)-dimensions,” Phys. Lett. B225 (1989) 245–250

    1989

  31. [39]

    A Superconformal Theory of Massless Higher Spin Fields in D = (2+1),

    E. S. Fradkin and V. Ya. Linetsky, “A Superconformal Theory of Massless Higher Spin Fields in D = (2+1),” Mod. Phys. Lett. A4 (1989) 731. [Annals Phys.198,293(1990)]

    1989

  32. [40]

    New Conformal Higher Spin Gravities in 3 d,

    M. Grigoriev, I. Lovrekovic, and E. Skvortsov, “New Conformal Higher Spin Gravities in 3 d,” JHEP 01 (2020) 059, arXiv:1909.13305 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Matter-coupled higher spin gravities in 3d: no- and yes-go results,

    A. Sharapov, E. Skvortsov, and A. Sukhanov, “Matter-coupled higher spin gravities in 3d: no- and yes-go results,” JHEP 04 (2025) 155, arXiv:2409.12830 [hep-th] . 75

    2025 arXiv

  34. [42]

    On BF-type higher-spin actions in two dimensions,

    K. Alkalaev and X. Bekaert, “On BF-type higher-spin actions in two dimensions,” JHEP 05 (2020) 158, arXiv:2002.02387 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Conformal higher spin theory,

    A. Y. Segal, “Conformal higher spin theory,” Nucl. Phys. B664 (2003) 59–130, arXiv:hep-th/0207212 [hep-th]

    2003 arXiv

  36. [44]

    On limits of superstring in AdS5×S5,

    A. A. Tseytlin, “On limits of superstring in AdS5×S5,” Theor. Math. Phys. 133 (2002) 1376–1389, arXiv:hep-th/0201112 [hep-th] . [Teor. Mat. Fiz.133,69(2002)]

    2002 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Effective action in a higher-spin background,

    X. Bekaert, E. Joung, and J. Mourad, “Effective action in a higher-spin background,” JHEP 02 (2011) 048, arXiv:1012.2103 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Covariant action for conformal higher spin gravity,

    T. Basile, M. Grigoriev, and E. Skvortsov, “Covariant action for conformal higher spin gravity,” J. Phys. A 56 no. 38, (2023) 385402, arXiv:2212.10336 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Poincare invariant dynamics of massless higher spins: Fourth order analysis on mass shell,

    R. R. Metsaev, “Poincare invariant dynamics of massless higher spins: Fourth order analysis on mass shell,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A6 (1991) 359–367

    1991

  40. [48]

    S matrix approach to massless higher spins theory. 2: The Case of internal symmetry,

    R. R. Metsaev, “ S matrix approach to massless higher spins theory. 2: The Case of internal symmetry,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A6 (1991) 2411–2421

    1991

  41. [49]

    Light-Front Higher-Spin Theories in Flat Space,

    D. Ponomarev and E. D. Skvortsov, “Light-Front Higher-Spin Theories in Flat Space,” J. Phys. A50 no. 9, (2017) 095401, arXiv:1609.04655 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Chiral higher-spin double copy,

    D. Ponomarev, “Chiral higher-spin double copy,” JHEP 01 (2025) 143, arXiv:2409.19449 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Higher-spin Yang–Mills, amplitudes and self-duality,

    T. Adamo and T. Tran, “Higher-spin Yang–Mills, amplitudes and self-duality,” Lett. Math. Phys. 113 no. 3, (2023) 50, arXiv:2210.07130 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Covariant 4-dimensional fuzzy spheres, matrix models and higher spin,

    M. Sperling and H. C. Steinacker, “Covariant 4-dimensional fuzzy spheres, matrix models and higher spin,” J. Phys. A50 no. 37, (2017) 375202, arXiv:1704.02863 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  45. [53]

    AdS Maps and Diagrams of Bi-local Holography,

    R. de Mello Koch, A. Jevicki, K. Suzuki, and J. Yoon, “AdS Maps and Diagrams of Bi-local Holography,” JHEP 03 (2019) 133, arXiv:1810.02332 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Generating function for cubic interaction vertices of higher spin fields in any dimension,

    R. R. Metsaev, “Generating function for cubic interaction vertices of higher spin fields in any dimension,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A8 (1993) 2413–2426

    1993

  47. [55]

    Cubic interaction vertices for massive and massless higher spin fields,

    R. R. Metsaev, “Cubic interaction vertices for massive and massless higher spin fields,” Nucl. Phys. B759 (2006) 147–201, arXiv:hep-th/0512342

    2006 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Cubic interaction vertices for fermionic and bosonic arbitrary spin fields,

    R. R. Metsaev, “Cubic interaction vertices for fermionic and bosonic arbitrary spin fields,” arXiv:0712.3526 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  49. [57]

    Light-cone gauge cubic interaction vertices for massless fields in AdS(4),

    R. R. Metsaev, “Light-cone gauge cubic interaction vertices for massless fields in AdS(4),” Nucl. Phys. B936 (2018) 320–351, arXiv:1807.07542 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  50. [58]

    On The Uniqueness of Minimal Coupling in Higher-Spin Gauge Theory,

    N. Boulanger, S. Leclercq, and P. Sundell, “On The Uniqueness of Minimal Coupling in Higher-Spin Gauge Theory,” JHEP 08 (2008) 056, arXiv:0805.2764 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  51. [59]

    A Generating function for the cubic interactions of higher spin fields,

    R. Manvelyan, K. Mkrtchyan, and W. Ruehl, “A Generating function for the cubic interactions of higher spin fields,” Phys.Lett. B696 (2011) 410–415, arXiv:1009.1054 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Non-abelian cubic vertices for higher-spin fields in anti-de Sitter space,

    N. Boulanger, D. Ponomarev, and E. Skvortsov, “Non-abelian cubic vertices for higher-spin fields in anti-de Sitter space,” JHEP 1305 (2013) 008, arXiv:1211.6979 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Cubic interactions of Maxwell-like higher spins,

    D. Francia, G. L. Monaco, and K. Mkrtchyan, “Cubic interactions of Maxwell-like higher spins,” JHEP 04 (2017) 068, arXiv:1611.00292 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Snowmass White Paper: Higher Spin Gravity and Higher Spin symmetry,

    X. Bekaert, N. Boulanger, A. Campoleoni, M. Chiodaroli, D. Francia, M. Grigoriev, E. Sezgin, and 76 E. Skvortsov, “Snowmass White Paper: Higher Spin Gravity and Higher Spin symmetry,” arXiv:2205.01567 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  55. [63]

    Consistent deformations of dual formulations of linearized gravity: A no-go result,

    X. Bekaert, N. Boulanger, and M. Henneaux, “Consistent deformations of dual formulations of linearized gravity: A no-go result,” Phys. Rev. D67 (2003) 044010, hep-th/0210278

    2003 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Minimal model of Chiral Higher Spin Gravity,

    A. Sharapov, E. Skvortsov, A. Sukhanov, and R. Van Dongen, “Minimal model of Chiral Higher Spin Gravity,” arXiv:2205.07794 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  57. [65]

    Chiral higher spin gravity and convex geometry,

    A. Sharapov, E. Skvortsov, and R. Van Dongen, “Chiral higher spin gravity and convex geometry,” SciPost Phys. 14 no. 6, (2023) 162, arXiv:2209.01796 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Chiral Higher Spin Gravity in (A)dS 4 and secrets of Chern–Simons Matter Theories,

    A. Sharapov and E. Skvortsov, “Chiral Higher Spin Gravity in (A)dS 4 and secrets of Chern–Simons Matter Theories,” arXiv:2205.15293 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  59. [67]

    More on Chiral Higher Spin Gravity and convex geometry,

    A. Sharapov, E. Skvortsov, A. Sukhanov, and R. Van Dongen, “More on Chiral Higher Spin Gravity and convex geometry,” Nucl. Phys. B 990 (2023) 116152, arXiv:2209.15441 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Strong Homotopy Algebras for Higher Spin Gravity via Stokes Theorem,

    A. Sharapov, E. Skvortsov, and R. Van Dongen, “Strong Homotopy Algebras for Higher Spin Gravity via Stokes Theorem,” arXiv:2312.16573 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  61. [69]

    Low spin solutions of higher spin gravity: BPST instanton,

    E. Skvortsov and Y. Yin, “Low spin solutions of higher spin gravity: BPST instanton,” JHEP 07 (2024) 032, arXiv:2403.17148 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Self-dual pp-wave solutions in chiral higher-spin gravity,

    T. Tran, “Self-dual pp-wave solutions in chiral higher-spin gravity,” JHEP 03 (2025) 041, arXiv:2501.06445 [hep-th]

    2025

  63. [71]

    Quantum Chiral Higher Spin Gravity,

    E. D. Skvortsov, T. Tran, and M. Tsulaia, “Quantum Chiral Higher Spin Gravity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 no. 3, (2018) 031601, arXiv:1805.00048 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  64. [72]

    More on Quantum Chiral Higher Spin Gravity,

    E. Skvortsov, T. Tran, and M. Tsulaia, “More on Quantum Chiral Higher Spin Gravity,” Phys. Rev. D101 no. 10, (2020) 106001, arXiv:2002.08487 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  65. [73]

    One-loop Finiteness of Chiral Higher Spin Gravity,

    E. Skvortsov and T. Tran, “One-loop Finiteness of Chiral Higher Spin Gravity,” arXiv:2004.10797 [hep-th]

    2004 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Supersymmetric quantum chiral higher spin gravity,

    M. Tsulaia and D. Weissman, “Supersymmetric quantum chiral higher spin gravity,” JHEP 12 (2022) 002, arXiv:2209.13907 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Higher-spin self-dual General Relativity: 6d and 4d pictures, covariant vs. lightcone,

    Y. Neiman, “Higher-spin self-dual General Relativity: 6d and 4d pictures, covariant vs. lightcone,” JHEP 07 (2024) 178, arXiv:2404.18589 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Light-Front Bootstrap for Chern-Simons Matter Theories,

    E. Skvortsov, “Light-Front Bootstrap for Chern-Simons Matter Theories,” JHEP 06 (2019) 058, arXiv:1811.12333 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Hidden sectors of Chern-Simons Matter theories and Exact Holography,

    S. Jain, D. K. S, and E. Skvortsov, “Hidden sectors of Chern-Simons Matter theories and Exact Holography,” arXiv:2405.00773 [hep-th]

  70. [78]

    A chiral limit for Chern-Simons-matter theories,

    O. Aharony, R. R. Kalloor, and T. Kukolj, “A chiral limit for Chern-Simons-matter theories,” JHEP 10 (2024) 051, arXiv:2405.01647 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Off-Shell Spinor-Helicity Amplitudes from Light-Cone Deformation Procedure,

    D. Ponomarev, “Off-Shell Spinor-Helicity Amplitudes from Light-Cone Deformation Procedure,” JHEP 12 (2016) 117, arXiv:1611.00361 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  72. [80]

    From Moyal deformations to chiral higher-spin theories and to celestial algebras,

    R. Monteiro, “From Moyal deformations to chiral higher-spin theories and to celestial algebras,” JHEP 03 (2023) 062, arXiv:2212.11266 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Inconsistency of interacting, multigraviton theories,

    N. Boulanger, T. Damour, L. Gualtieri, and M. Henneaux, “Inconsistency of interacting, multigraviton theories,” Nucl. Phys. B597 (2001) 127–171, arXiv:hep-th/0007220. 77

    2001 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Candidate to the role of higher spin symmetry,

    E. S. Fradkin and M. A. Vasiliev, “Candidate to the role of higher spin symmetry,” Ann. Phys. 177 (1987) 63

    1987

  75. [83]

    Scattering amplitudes for all masses and spins,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, T.-C. Huang, and Y.-t. Huang, “Scattering amplitudes for all masses and spins,” JHEP 11 (2021) 070, arXiv:1709.04891 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Celestial chiral algebras, colour-kinematics duality and integrability,

    R. Monteiro, “Celestial chiral algebras, colour-kinematics duality and integrability,” JHEP 01 (2023) 092, arXiv:2208.11179 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Feynman Rules for Any Spin. 2. Massless Particles,

    S. Weinberg, “Feynman Rules for Any Spin. 2. Massless Particles,” Phys. Rev. 134 (1964) B882–B896

    1964

  78. [86]

    Twistor constructions for higher-spin extensions of (self-dual) Yang-Mills,

    T. Tran, “Twistor constructions for higher-spin extensions of (self-dual) Yang-Mills,” JHEP 11 (2021) 117, arXiv:2107.04500 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Higher-spin self-dual Yang-Mills and gravity from the twistor space,

    Y. Herfray, K. Krasnov, and E. Skvortsov, “Higher-spin self-dual Yang-Mills and gravity from the twistor space,” JHEP 01 (2023) 158, arXiv:2210.06209 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Toward a twistor action for chiral higher-spin gravity,

    T. Tran, “Toward a twistor action for chiral higher-spin gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 4, (2023) 046015, arXiv:2209.00925 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Conformal higher spin scattering amplitudes from twistor space,

    T. Adamo, P. H¨ ahnel, and T. McLoughlin, “Conformal higher spin scattering amplitudes from twistor space,” JHEP 04 (2017) 021, arXiv:1611.06200 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Chiral higher-spin theories from twistor space,

    L. Mason and A. Sharma, “Chiral higher-spin theories from twistor space,” arXiv:2505.09419 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  83. [91]

    Self-dual gravity in de Sitter space: Light-cone ansatz and static-patch scattering,

    Y. Neiman, “Self-dual gravity in de Sitter space: Light-cone ansatz and static-patch scattering,” Phys. Rev. D 109 no. 2, (2024) 024039, arXiv:2303.17866 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Self-Dual Gravity and Color-Kinematics Duality in AdS4,

    A. Lipstein and S. Nagy, “Self-Dual Gravity and Color-Kinematics Duality in AdS4,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 no. 8, (2023) 081501, arXiv:2304.07141 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Light-cone actions and correlators of self-dual theories in AdS 4,

    C. Chowdhury, G. Doran, A. Lipstein, R. Monteiro, S. Nagy, and K. Singh, “Light-cone actions and correlators of self-dual theories in AdS 4,” JHEP 01 (2025) 172, arXiv:2411.04172 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Constraining higher-spin S-matrices,

    T. Tran, “Constraining higher-spin S-matrices,” JHEP 02 (2023) 001, arXiv:2212.02540 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  87. [95]

    On effective field theories with celestial duals,

    L. Ren, M. Spradlin, A. Yelleshpur Srikant, and A. Volovich, “On effective field theories with celestial duals,” JHEP 08 (2022) 251, arXiv:2206.08322 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Invariant traces of the flat space chiral higher-spin algebra as scattering amplitudes,

    D. Ponomarev, “Invariant traces of the flat space chiral higher-spin algebra as scattering amplitudes,” JHEP 09 (2022) 086, arXiv:2205.09654 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Towards higher-spin holography in flat space,

    D. Ponomarev, “Towards higher-spin holography in flat space,” JHEP 01 (2023) 084, arXiv:2210.04035 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Chiral higher-spin holography in flat space: the Flato-Fronsdal theorem and lower-point functions,

    D. Ponomarev, “Chiral higher-spin holography in flat space: the Flato-Fronsdal theorem and lower-point functions,” JHEP 01 (2023) 048, arXiv:2210.04036 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  91. [99]

    A Riccati type PDE for light-front higher helicity vertices,

    A. K. H. Bengtsson, “A Riccati type PDE for light-front higher helicity vertices,” JHEP 09 (2014) 105, arXiv:1403.7345 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Massless chiral fields in six dimensions,

    T. Basile, “Massless chiral fields in six dimensions,” arXiv:2409.12800 [hep-th]

  93. [101]

    Quantum field theory off null planes,

    R. A. Neville and F. Rohrlich, “Quantum field theory off null planes,” Nuovo Cim. A 1 (1971) 625–644

    1971

  94. [102]

    Light cone quantization: Foundations and applications,

    T. Heinzl, “Light cone quantization: Foundations and applications,” Lect. Notes Phys. 572 (2001) 55–142, arXiv:hep-th/0008096

    2001 arXiv

  95. [103]

    Tree Level Constraints on Gauge Groups for Type I Superstrings,

    N. Marcus and A. Sagnotti, “Tree Level Constraints on Gauge Groups for Type I Superstrings,” Phys. Lett. B 119 (1982) 97–99. 78

    1982

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.