pith. sign in

arxiv: 2402.13446 · v3 · pith:O2OKSZJQnew · submitted 2024-02-21 · 💻 cs.CL

Large Language Models for Data Annotation and Synthesis: A Survey

classification 💻 cs.CL
keywords dataannotationllmsmodelssurveysynthesisannotationsllm-generated
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Data annotation and synthesis generally refers to the labeling or generating of raw data with relevant information, which could be used for improving the efficacy of machine learning models. The process, however, is labor-intensive and costly. The emergence of advanced Large Language Models (LLMs), exemplified by GPT-4, presents an unprecedented opportunity to automate the complicated process of data annotation and synthesis. While existing surveys have extensively covered LLM architecture, training, and general applications, we uniquely focus on their specific utility for data annotation. This survey contributes to three core aspects: LLM-Based Annotation Generation, LLM-Generated Annotations Assessment, and LLM-Generated Annotations Utilization. Furthermore, this survey includes an in-depth taxonomy of data types that LLMs can annotate, a comprehensive review of learning strategies for models utilizing LLM-generated annotations, and a detailed discussion of the primary challenges and limitations associated with using LLMs for data annotation and synthesis. Serving as a key guide, this survey aims to assist researchers and practitioners in exploring the potential of the latest LLMs for data annotation, thereby fostering future advancements in this critical field.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 13 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. CAPC-CG: A Large-Scale, Expert-Directed LLM-Annotated Corpus of Adaptive Policy Communication in China

    cs.CL 2025-10 accept novelty 8.0

    The first open annotated corpus of Chinese central government policy directives with expert-directed five-color labels for adaptive policy communication.

  2. AI in the Wild: A Large Scale Analysis of Authentic Interactions of College Students with Generative AI

    cs.CY 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Large-scale empirical analysis of authentic student-GenAI interactions reveals concentrated recurring patterns that vary by course and form of academic work.

  3. Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models for Evidence-Informed Guidance on Cannabidiol Use in Older Adults

    cs.IR 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Retrieval-augmented LLMs produce more cautious and guideline-aligned recommendations on cannabidiol for older adults than standalone models, demonstrated via automated evaluation on 64 diverse scenarios.

  4. CAPC-CG: A Large-Scale, Expert-Directed LLM-Annotated Corpus of Adaptive Policy Communication in China

    cs.CL 2025-10 accept novelty 7.0

    Releases the first large-scale expert-annotated corpus of Chinese central government policy directives (1949-2023) labeled with a five-color clear/ambiguous taxonomy and high inter-annotator reliability.

  5. Context-Aware Spear Phishing: Generative AI-Enabled Attacks Against Individuals via Public Social Media Data

    cs.CR 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    Generative AI enables scalable, context-aware spear phishing by extracting profiles from public social media, producing emails that outperform real-world phishing samples in personalization and lower recipient suspicion.

  6. Profiling for Pennies: Unveiling the Privacy Iceberg of LLM Agents

    cs.CR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LLM agents can reconstruct high-fidelity personal profiles from minimal PII seeds with over 90% accuracy in under 10 minutes at less than $3 cost, exposing three escalating tiers of privacy risks.

  7. Can We Trust a Black-box LLM? LLM Untrustworthy Boundary Detection via Bias-Diffusion and Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    GMRL-BD detects untrustworthy topic boundaries for black-box LLMs by combining bias-diffusion on a Wikipedia KG with multi-agent RL, supported by a released dataset labeling biases in models like Llama2 and Qwen2.

  8. A Leaf-Level Dataset for Soybean-Cotton Detection and Segmentation

    cs.CV 2025-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A new leaf-instance dataset for soybean-cotton detection and segmentation collected across growth stages and conditions from commercial farms is presented and validated with YOLOv11.

  9. Linguistic Productivity in Large Language Models: Models Coerce, but do not Preempt

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Larger LLMs reproduce constructional productivity via entrenchment in coercion cases with nonce words but fail to use statistical preemption to avoid overgeneralizing semantically plausible but unobserved patterns.

  10. Cognitive-Uncertainty Guided Knowledge Distillation for Accurate Classification of Student Misconceptions

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A cognitive-uncertainty guided two-stage KD framework filters to 10.3% of samples to reach 0.9585 MAP@3 and 84.38% accuracy with a 4B model, beating larger LLMs on misconception classification.

  11. Rethinking Math Reasoning Evaluation: A Robust LLM-as-a-Judge Framework Beyond Symbolic Rigidity

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    An LLM-as-a-judge evaluation framework for math reasoning outperforms symbolic methods by accurately assessing diverse answer representations and formats.

  12. A Survey of Scaling in Large Language Model Reasoning

    cs.AI 2025-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    A survey categorizing scaling in LLM reasoning across input size, steps, rounds, training, and future directions, noting that scaling can negatively affect performance.

  13. Towards Large Reasoning Models: A Survey of Reinforced Reasoning with Large Language Models

    cs.AI 2025-01 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    The paper surveys reinforced reasoning techniques for LLMs, covering automated data construction, learning-to-reason methods, and test-time scaling as steps toward Large Reasoning Models.