Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Adversarial Examples in Modern Machine Learning: A Review

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1911.05268 v2 pith:OAWMGA6D submitted 2019-11-13 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CRstat.ML

Adversarial Examples in Modern Machine Learning: A Review

classification cs.LG cs.AIcs.CRstat.ML
keywords adversarialexamplesattacklearningmachinemethodsdefensemodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent research has found that many families of machine learning models are vulnerable to adversarial examples: inputs that are specifically designed to cause the target model to produce erroneous outputs. In this survey, we focus on machine learning models in the visual domain, where methods for generating and detecting such examples have been most extensively studied. We explore a variety of adversarial attack methods that apply to image-space content, real world adversarial attacks, adversarial defenses, and the transferability property of adversarial examples. We also discuss strengths and weaknesses of various methods of adversarial attack and defense. Our aim is to provide an extensive coverage of the field, furnishing the reader with an intuitive understanding of the mechanics of adversarial attack and defense mechanisms and enlarging the community of researchers studying this fundamental set of problems.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Evaluation of Adversarial Robustness in Arabic Language Models

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    Arabic BERT-family sentiment models lose up to 92% accuracy under diacritics and 58% under conjunction attacks; paraphrase attacks cut accuracy by 76% on average, and adversarial training only partially helps.