Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

SAIF: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating the Risks of Generative AI in the Public Sector

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.08814 v2 pith:OERX7TF5 submitted 2025-01-15 cs.AI cs.CLcs.CY

SAIF: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating the Risks of Generative AI in the Public Sector

classification cs.AI cs.CLcs.CY
keywords riskspublicgenerativesectorsaifpromptwhilecomprehensive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The rapid adoption of generative AI in the public sector, encompassing diverse applications ranging from automated public assistance to welfare services and immigration processes, highlights its transformative potential while underscoring the pressing need for thorough risk assessments. Despite its growing presence, evaluations of risks associated with AI-driven systems in the public sector remain insufficiently explored. Building upon an established taxonomy of AI risks derived from diverse government policies and corporate guidelines, we investigate the critical risks posed by generative AI in the public sector while extending the scope to account for its multimodal capabilities. In addition, we propose a Systematic dAta generatIon Framework for evaluating the risks of generative AI (SAIF). SAIF involves four key stages: breaking down risks, designing scenarios, applying jailbreak methods, and exploring prompt types. It ensures the systematic and consistent generation of prompt data, facilitating a comprehensive evaluation while providing a solid foundation for mitigating the risks. Furthermore, SAIF is designed to accommodate emerging jailbreak methods and evolving prompt types, thereby enabling effective responses to unforeseen risk scenarios. We believe that this study can play a crucial role in fostering the safe and responsible integration of generative AI into the public sector.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. AI Deployment and Cyber Governance Failures in Public-Sector Organizations: A Typological Analysis

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    A seven-domain typology of ten AI-driven public-sector cyber-governance failures, with a five-framework coverage matrix showing Shadow AI, speed asymmetry, and governance vacuum are not addressed at operational specificity.