REVIEW 3 cited by
A Random Matrix Theory Perspective on the Consistency of Diffusion Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
A Random Matrix Theory Perspective on the Consistency of Diffusion Models
read the original abstract
Diffusion models trained on different, non-overlapping subsets of a dataset often produce strikingly similar outputs when given the same noise seed. We trace this consistency to a simple linear effect: the shared Gaussian statistics across splits already predict much of the generated images. To formalize this, we develop a random matrix theory (RMT) framework that quantifies how finite datasets shape the expectation and variance of the learned denoiser and sampling map in the linear setting. For expectations, sampling variability acts as a renormalization of the noise level through a self-consistent relation $\sigma^2 \mapsto \kappa(\sigma^2)$, explaining why limited data overshrink low-variance directions and pull samples toward the dataset mean. For fluctuations, our variance formulas reveal three key factors behind cross-split disagreement: \textit{anisotropy} across eigenmodes, \textit{inhomogeneity} across inputs, and overall scaling with dataset size. Extending deterministic-equivalence tools to fractional matrix powers further allows us to analyze entire sampling trajectories. The theory sharply predicts the behavior of linear diffusion models, and we validate its predictions on UNet and DiT architectures in their non-memorization regime, identifying where and how samples deviates across training data split. This provides a principled baseline for reproducibility in diffusion training, linking spectral properties of data to the stability of generative outputs.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
An exact information theory of generalization phase transitions in Bayesian diffusion models
Bayesian diffusion models memorize training data when mutual information between restricted observations and training data exceeds log dataset size, and generalize otherwise.
-
Memorisation, convergence and generalisation in generative models
Linear generative models memorize at small data loads but converge continuously once samples scale linearly with dimension; this convergence is insensitive to sharp recovery of principal latent factors.
-
The two clocks and the innovation window: When and how generative models learn rules
Generative models learn rules before memorizing data, creating an innovation window whose width depends on dataset size and rule complexity, observed in both diffusion and autoregressive architectures.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.